On 6 Dec 2002 at 16:54, Feroze Kistan wrote:
> Hi Rob,
> So what is the generally accepted opinion?
> In a studio setup, for my situtation, 90%
> pack shots, and I'm just learning to shoot slides,
> will a hand held meter be more accurate than
> using the cameras meter?
It really depends how you
On 7 Dec 2002 at 22:46, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> I still like mine. The Sekonic L308-B is a rather basic
> flash/incident/reflected meter that is small, light, and simple to use. It
> is reletively inexpensive. Several others on the list have posted favorable
> comments on it in the past. I have had
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 09:42 PM, David A. Mann wrote:
You mean the 100/2.8 Macro? I have one of those and its probably the
best photographic item I ever bought. The front garden is now a feast
of
photographic opportunity.
Cheers,
- Dave
The very same. :-)
Dan Scott
I still like mine. The Sekonic L308-B is a rather basic
flash/incident/reflected meter that is small, light, and simple to use. It
is reletively inexpensive. Several others on the list have posted favorable
comments on it in the past. I have had other Sekonics in the past, they all
did what they we
Dan Scott wrote:
> I find that the equipment feeds my appreciation of my environment. I
> thought I was pretty observant and continually got feedback from others
> indicating the same, but I found I had missed out on a veritable feast of
> visual delight before I acquired my FA 100/2.8 and started
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 07:38 AM, Marcel Laufer wrote:
I'm new to the group. I try to have one 'bells and whistles' 35mm slr
which I derive some (but limited) pleasure from. Then I have my
medium format 645 pentax, and a variety of 'classic' 35's. I have
been thinking of selling
Guess you would do anything to get out of Illinois this time of year.
;-)
Ken
Missouri native
On Sunday 08 December 2002 03:24 am, William Kane wrote:
>I'll come and help you pull the plug, but you have to promise to
> let me use some of your lenses.
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
San An
Hi all,
I think I have my scanner up & running again.
So, better late than never, here's my "Juxtaposition".
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/juxt.html
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Ken,
I'll come and help you pull the plug, but you have to promise to let
me use some of your lenses.
IL Bill
Ken Archer wrote:
It's too cold down here to sleep out in the dog house so I may be
looking for a place to hang out for awhile when my wife finds out how
much stuff I bought off eb
Glad to see you on the list again, buddy.
At 5:01 PM -050012/6/02, T Rittenhouse wrote, or at least typed:
>Anyway, I am glad to be back.
>
>Ciao,
>Graywolf
>http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I only use slide film when shooting for my own purposes. I used to
bracket a fair bit but now seldom bracket. Sometimes when the scene is
greater then film latitude I bracket in one direction by up to one stop
from what I think would produce the
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Yup. That's what I want. I am not there yet, since I am still learning, I
am still naturally thinking about the camera a bit more than I would like.<
that is something that comes with practice and trying to understand the
reasons for your failure
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Always? Wow. Any other nature folks out there always bracket?
Herb, is this +- a half, a third, or a whole stop?
<
because of the subjects i shoot and the lighting i like to shoot in, the
bracketing for me usually is metered, metered -1/2, and
Speaking of flash meters, I just purchased a set of studio lights and I'm
searching for a flash meter. Has anyone used anything from the Sekonic line?
They seem to be reasonably priced, but I don't want to trade price for
decent quality if I can help it.
> You don't need to spend a whack of money
In the MZ-S manual, two cable switches are listed, the CS-105 and the
CS-130, the difference is length, the CS-105 is 0.5m and the CS-130 is 3m,
there is no mention of a CS-205, so I don't know if it is the same as the
MZ-S or not.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PR
None taken at all Mike.
I apologize for inadvertently starting this little s*%t storm. I forget
that people can be a little irrational about this stuff sometimes
We're not quite as tied up in it as other places seem to be, and many of
us just copped it on the chin, got on with our lives, an
I'm new to the group. I try to have one 'bells and whistles' 35mm
slr which I derive some (but limited) pleasure from. Then I have my
medium format 645 pentax, and a variety of 'classic' 35's. I have
been thinking of selling my minolata and it's four lenses and buying
a pentax. I'm attracte
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 09:23:38 +0800, Simon King wrote:
> I don't own an MZ-S, but according to other PDMLs,
Thanks for the update. All those x05 numbers have me confused. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
In a message dated 12/6/2002 10:46:03 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> for me, the process is secondary so long as i get the results i want when i
> want them and the equipment doesn't get in the way. the
> equipment job is
> to stay out of my way.
>
> Herb...
Yup. That's
Hi Doug,
I don't own an MZ-S, but according to other PDMLs,
On 23/08/02, Alan Chan said;
Pentax specifically mentioned 205 is for MZ-L/6 while 105 & 305 are for
MZ-S. I don't think they are interchangeable.
And...
On 23/08/02, Bill Owens said;
Nope [not compatible], it's a female socket with three
http://www.livejournal.com/users/true_nexus
but.. be warned.. it's not all about photography :)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 4:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LiveJournal
This came up briefly i
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:12:20 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> I don't know if the MZS has a PC socket.
It does.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 07:52:48 +0800, Simon King wrote:
> I asked this question some time ago. The remote cable release for the
> MZ-6/ZX-L is "Cable Switch CS-205" which has a different plug to the cable
> switch F, indeed it's a brand new plug that's not compatible with any other
> cable release. B
Sticking to what I know, the MZ-S has a PC socket, but I've never used it :)
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
>
> - Original Messa
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:02:27 +, Cotty wrote:
> >With an eclectic mixer,
Dammit, WalMart ran out of eclectic mixers! They've got a load of
electric ones, though. ;-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
> Hi William,
> So the modelling lights are on all the time and
> the lights only flashes when I release the shutter?
> Is that what the little plug on the MZS is for?
> Does it work well when yo
Hi John,
I asked this question some time ago. The remote cable release for the
MZ-6/ZX-L is "Cable Switch CS-205" which has a different plug to the cable
switch F, indeed it's a brand new plug that's not compatible with any other
cable release. B&H sell them.
I couldn't bring myself to spend that
?Andre wrote
<>
Are you quite sure? Compared to a lens for Auto 110, yes it is big.
But any other way.aw come on.
Kind regards
Peter
No Peter, I'm not quite sure! As I answered to Dave...
I wouldn't call it big, nor really slow. But I guess its a matter of
interpretation. I am used to
I will second the comments Andre made concerning the K
35/3.5. It is one hell of a sharp lens with
practically no flare at all. I have comtemplated
replacing it with one of Pentax's f2 versions, but I
can't really justify two 35's and I'm NOT getting rid
of my K 35/3.5. It is the lightest of their
Some of this is a little stale, and some is off-topic ... my
intent here is not to restart the thread, but to do a little
summing up. Not in the sense of trying to get the last word,
but in the sense of answering questions and implied questions
that I hadn't gotten around to answering, and filling
Andre wrote
(B<>
(B
(BAre you quite sure? Compared to a lens for Auto 110, yes it is big. But any other
(Bway.aw come on.
(B
(BKind regards
(B
(BPeter
Sorry Bruce
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Feroze Kistan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 08, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Re[10]: electra studio flash/ring flash
> I think we are mixing emails. Brad did ask about playing with studio
> lighting.
This thread is getting SNUG! ;-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 11:30 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Way OT: GNUS, GNUS, AND MORE GNUS
> Hi,
>
>
http://www.wooster.edu/ipo/Webpage%20Images/st
I think we are mixing emails. Brad did ask about playing with studio
lighting. Knowing that he already had 1 AF360, that is why I said
what I did.
In your case, I have already recommended the Alien Bees for real
studio flashes. Otherwise, use any flashes that you have with
Lumiquest softboxes o
Hi,
http://www.wooster.edu/ipo/Webpage%20Images/studentphotos/FALL%202000/herd2.jpeg
Saturday, December 7, 2002, 3:41:41 PM, you wrote:
> Not OT: a picture of a large bun:
> http://www.beyondthepath.com/news/news.html
---
Bob
"Our heads are round so that our thoughts can fly in any directi
Hi Brad,
check out this site www.photographytips.com,
it gives quite a bit of info on setups and even
a posing guide for males & females. Quite a bit
of pages of info on just about every aspect of photography
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
Hi William,
So the modelling lights are on all the time and
the lights only flashes when I release the shutter?
Is that what the little plug on the MZS is for?
Does it work well when you have 3 lights?
Thanks
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
In a message dated 12/7/2002 10:32:50 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> for reasons I don't understand, I was unsubscribed this
> morning. now, I
> hope I'm re-subscribed.
Probably my unscription which didn't work.
Doe aka Marnie I guess I can stop bitting my lips now. Go
Abscholu'ly Cotthy.
Hope you don't mind...:-)
I still giggle when visualising the last part with "heating the pan
and pouring the whole mess into the dishwasher". :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, Dece
Bob, if you would like to test the various colonoscopy setups from other
optical manufacturers and report back on the efficacy of the various
coatings, I'm sure the rest of us would find it very enlightening -- not to
mention earning the respect and admiration of your peers for your dedication
to r
- Original Message -
From: Dan Scott
Subject: Wm & Brad
> I applaud both of you for your demonstration of civil
behavior.
We ARE Canadian.
William Robb
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 05:55 AM, Ken Archer wrote:
They'll have to pry it out of my cold, dead fingers. ;-)
--
Ken Archer Canine Photography
Ok.
Can I at least look at it when you get it? I'll let you hold my 77 for
security.
Dan Scott
I applaud both of you for your demonstration of civil behavior.
Dan Scott
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 12:23 AM, Lon Williamson wrote:
Simon King makes sense with his twelve points UNTIL:
My name is Simon, and it's been 3 weeks since my last Pentax
purchase...
The 12 Steps
(1 thru 10, yes, we've all been through that, but goldangit:)
11. Seek through photog
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 07:51 AM, Heiko Hamann wrote:
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
Welcome and congratulations to your choice of Pentax!
That's one of the biggest advanteges of the Pentax system: you can use
every Pentax lens on all Pentax bodies (afair there are only three
bodies with restrict
They'll have to pry it out of my cold, dead fingers. ;-)
On Saturday 07 December 2002 05:34 pm, Dan Scott wrote:
> Cripes! That never occurred to me! I guess Ken could claim he's just
> "holding" for a friend whose wife wouldn't understand (me,
> preferably--especially for the 200/2.5).
--
Ken
Oh, don't get me started!! ;-) I hope you have better luck that I with the
cables.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "John Gill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 12:19 PM
Subject: ZX-L cable release
> I have a difficult time getting informatio
On Friday, December 6, 2002, at 05:03 PM, Cotty wrote:
Cheers Bruce.
I dare say the kid's mother wouldn't necessarily be pleased!
;-)
Cot
Just give'r a wink and a smile, and ask if she wouldn't like a copy of
the one you shot of her.
(and run like hell)
You should see her. Gotta run fa
On Saturday, December 7, 2002, at 06:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan,
Now you know there are dangers in this approach. I recently sold a
Sears
135/3.5 and a Kiron 28/2 on ebay. They were leftovers that came with
Pentax
gear and I was pleased with the sales, but...
The danger is that t
I happen to be one of those gun owners (since pre-teens) and shot
competition in HS. Expert in military small arms. Was an NRA member
for a dozen or so years until I quit them in disgust after Reagan was
shot and folks like G Gordon Liddy prodded his radio listeners to start
whacking forest r
Joseph wrote:
> I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
> of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
> Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
> which are specifically not available in Pentax mount.
Well, p
I have a difficult time getting information on the Pentax ZX-L camera. Even though
it's been out awhile
all I can find is the ZX-5n. Which cable release works with the ZX-L,the 205,F or both
? Also if anyone is using the ZX-L, how does it stack up against the 5n ? Thanks.
Best,
John
--
_
Lon Williamson wrote:
>
> Always? Wow. Any other nature folks out there always bracket?
> Herb, is this +- a half, a third, or a whole stop?
>
> Herb Chong wrote, in part:
>
> > I always bracket my film
> > at least 3 frames and so
I only use slide film when shooting for my own purposes.
William wrote:
> May I gently and politely remind you that you are doing exactly
> what you chastised Kieth for.
Actually it was sarcasm. I only reminded the person in question that he should abide
by his own rules. It is clearly contradictory to insist that one are free to post
whatever one
I know where that reshipe came frum. *hic* !!!
>-Reminds me... Recently got a recipe for an English christmas cake
>that looks pretty good. Haven't tried it yet, as I'm a little short on
>one of the main ingredients...
>Jostein
>
>English Christmas cake
>--
>
>1 cup butter
Frank,
You're able to post again.
Hope you get two copies of this mail...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 5:36 PM
Subject: another test
> Seems I got subscribed to the digest (just got on
nice recipe Jostein.
I hope to try it sometime. But without the eggs
(as some here at home wouldnt have it otherwise)
-Sridhar
>
> Looks nice.
>
> -Reminds me... Recently got a recipe for an English christmas cake
> that looks pretty good. Haven't tried it yet, as I'm a little short on
> o
Seems I got subscribed to the digest (just got one, and saw my previous
test).
I wanna be on the list.
Just re-subscribed again. Let's see what happens.
Is this a plot by the pro-gun lobby?
-frank
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is tru
I was away all of November, so I am just now reading the December issue
of Shutterbug, including the report on Photokina. It appears that both
Tamron and Sigma are introducing several new and interesting lenses,
which are specifically not available in Pentax mount.
Joe
- Original Message -
From: Brad Dobo
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
> Hey,
>
> I'd love to try a studio setup. How much does *cheap*
equipment cost? Or
> rentals? It would be fun to do some work with friends and
family and a bit
> of still life, providing the cost
Yer translater program is broke down at the end, Jostein.
HAR!
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: Way OT: BUNS, BUNS, AND MORE PUNS
>
> - Original Message -
>
- Original Message -
From: Albert Fekson
Subject: Re: flatbed scanners
> >>I have a 2450. Is that close?<<
>
> William,
>
> I would love to hear your opinion. Most flatbeds have problems
scanning
> negatives, Epson seems to have solved the problem. The reason
I am
> interested in Canon m
Brad,
Well, there's cheap as in inexpensive and cheap as in low quality. The
cheapest way to do it is buy another AF360FGZ (I've done this) and two
Lumiquest softboxes. Then start practicing with a 2 light setup.
You can always use hotlights. You'll need a couple of reflectors
(Home Depot) and
Alexander,
I've tried to wait patiently for your email address to pop back up so that
I can contact you off-list... but I guess I'm just too anxious. If you'd
be so kind, could you contact me off-list @ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... It
pertains to your 200mm SCMA* lens. Thanks in advance.
- jerome
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This loks good, and very easy to make:
> http://www.recipesource.com/main-dishes/sandwiches/03/rec0334.html
Looks nice.
-Reminds me... Recently got a recipe for an English christmas cake
that looks pretty good. Haven't
THIS IS NOT A BUN LIST! TAKE THIS CRAP OFF THE LIST IMMEDIATELY OR I AM
GOING TO UNSUBSRIBE! (grin)
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 10:59 AM
Subje
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
> Well this is the problem, I need to buy
> studio lights. I like the idea of continuous
> lights. It takes me ages to set up a shot
> and if I could have the lights on most of the time
> the com
Wow! That was _big_.
Nice newsletter too!
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Amita Guha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: RE: Way OT: BUNS, BUNS, AND MORE PUNS
> Not OT: a picture of a large bun:
>
> http://www.beyondthepa
- Original Message -
From: Jostein
Subject: Way OT: BUNS, BUNS, AND MORE PUNS
>
> Care for a more friendly OT thread, anyone?
This loks good, and very easy to make:
http://www.recipesource.com/main-dishes/sandwiches/03/rec0334.ht
ml
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: David Brooks
Subject: Sorry
>
> I apologize for the reply to Frank,sorry the thread went
cookoo and
> i will be more vigilant in my replies from now on.
Vigilant, Vigilante. What a difference one letter can make.
William Robb
T Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> As of today, I have internet access at the apartment in Boone.
Great Tom. Welcome back. We missed you.
Paul Stenquist
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: NO GUN TALK
> Right! The rabid anti-OT foilks should use their consitutional
right to remain silent whereas the rabid OT folks should use
their constitutional right to say whatever they want in whatever
forum they want wihout any conside
Not OT: a picture of a large bun:
http://www.beyondthepath.com/news/news.html
This is a camera/photography discussion list. Undisciplined, self absorbed,
inconsiderate people who insist on introducing unrelated, inflammatory
topics are no different than hoodlums that ransack a place. On any
semi-normal, moderated list they are the ones who would be tossed off the
list.
Do y
for reasons I don't understand, I was unsubscribed this morning. now, I
hope I'm re-subscribed.
--
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert
Oppenheimer
Care for a more friendly OT thread, anyone?
Something not worth going ginger nuts about, I mean...
Jostein
Bob wrote:
> F*ck. The 12 or so actual OT posts were entirely without animosity. Now the
> rabid anti OT folks, pushing the topic to beyond 40 posts so and climbing,
> are flaming each other!
>
> I love it!
Right! The rabid anti-OT foilks should use their consitutional right to remain silent
F*ck. The 12 or so actual OT posts were entirely without animosity. Now the
rabid anti OT folks, pushing the topic to beyond 40 posts so and climbing,
are flaming each other!
I love it!
My next post will detail my colonoscopy and the Pentax "probe" used by my
doctor. A lively discussion (or dead
The battery arrangement on the screwmount ESII seems odd.
It looks like it takes 4 batteries and closes in an odd way.
Can anyone enlighten me?
I purchased a ESII without the battery door. Anybody have a spare or a
source?
How about a set of instructions?
It was Sid's post form last month whic
Plönck!
keith
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Keith wrote:
>
> > Let's drop it ~ AND the irrational responses to any unpleasant subject
> > that raises it's ugly head...
>
> Why don't you start living by your own words instead of posting ten mails with the
>same nonsensical contents?
> If you want thi
Keith wrote:
> Let's drop it ~ AND the irrational responses to any unpleasant subject
> that raises it's ugly head...
Why don't you start living by your own words instead of posting ten mails with the
same nonsensical contents?
If you want this to go on forever your recipy so far has been fault
Frank-
The word is 'bear' arms. How can you properly hold a Pentax with bear arms?
Of course, it wouldn't make any difference if you were using a Leica.
Regards,
Ed
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bare Arms-was: Way OT: GUN
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
on 07 Dec 02 you wrote in pentax.list:
>Back to photography i'd like to get a Pentax camera before Christmas.
Welcome and congratulations to your choice of Pentax!
>e.g. RTS-III + 1,4/35 Zeiss = 2 kilos !). At first sight I didn't
>really care about the brand but i really lik
Hello,
Back to photography i'd like to get a Pentax camera before Christmas.
So far i've used(and still own) a Nikon F (1,4/50 2,8/135) and for 2
years a Contax RTS-III (Zeiss 1,4/35 1,4/50) but it has been stolen...
I'd like to have an AF camera so that i could use a zoom painlessly
(AF is f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> You can always tell your wife you cleverly bought them for resale,
> recognizing that they were temporarily undervalued due to seasonal
> conditions. Sort of a wheeler dealer thing rather than a camera junkie
> feeding a habit.
Dan,
Now you know there are danger
Because, with food in your stomach, you can drink more beer. You know, the
bread acts like a sponge... (at least that's what we told ourselves as
teenagers - didn't stop us from getting drunk, though )
regards,
frank
Lon Williamson wrote:
> Why on Earth would I dilute my beer with bread?
>
--
Gary,
Please, no one wants you to do anything with your arms. If you prefer them "bare",
it's your prerogative, however here in Canada right now, you'd get pretty cold, being
currently -2 degrees celsius (hmmm... metric, another liberal plot? ). But, do
keep them. Better to hold a camera tha
That's a good idea. Although my lack of knowledge will become rapidly
apparent :)
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Feroze Kistan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 6:54 AM
Subject: Re: Re[6]: electra studio flash/ring flash
> Hi Brad
> If you
Hi all.
Just getting back on the computer this am and notice a bunch of gun
threads which started by my reply to a thread by Knarf.
The reply was meant as a tongue in cheek reply and I was by no means
trying to be flippent or offensive to anyone.I have only read a few
replies of the gun thread a
Thanks Lon, I'll take that as a compliment!
>Cotty does tend to wade in, Wellingtons and all, where
>angles and prissy boys fear to tread. grin.
>
>Cotty wrote:
>>
>> Proof that you can shoot a portrait with a 14mm lens (22mm effective):
>>
>> http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/portraits/images/pic2
Welcome back Tom.Good to see things are turning around for you.
Dave Brooks
Pentax User
Stouffville Ontario Canada
http://home.ca.inter.net/brooksdj/
http://brooks1952.tripod.com/myhorses
Sign up today for your Free E-mail at: http://www.canoe.ca/CanoeMail
Hi Brad
If you just gonna try it once or twice, rather
rent some studio time. Lots of studios will
even provide a bit of assistance in use of equipment
as well.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 1:14
You're still a voice of reason, Tom. Thanks for stepping in and being counted.
We need some grownups around here, and peace-keepers.
I'll support any and all such calming influences...
Best, keith
T Rittenhouse wrote:
>
> I'm not sure just what the framers' of the Bill of Rights meant by a "
Thanks for your enlightening views, Pal.
This list is polarizing quite nicely.
Shame. Rationality is rapidly leaving the building...
keith
Pål Jensen wrote:
>
> Please take your idiocy elsewhere. This is a Pentax discuss forum and you are
>insulting people world-wide with this garbage. My stan
>Powell's has it
Thanks Mark, I'm onto it. (correct URL noted)
Actually, chatting about books reminded me to place an order with Amazon
for a couple last night:
"Slightly Out of Focus (Modern Library)"
Robert Capa;
and
"Paris, Mon Amour (Evergreen Series)"
I bet the Capa is rivetting?
and
What's your point, please?
No, don't bother answering. That might possibly constitute rational
discussion, and heaven's sake, we can't have THAT on this list, can we?
Sorry 'bout that.
keith
Bob Rapp wrote:
>
> NRA this is NOT
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
>
> Guns and gun control are way, way, out of line on PDML. If I see another I'm
> off.
>
> Don
Okay, they are not a subject for discussion, but you're being irrational.
Let's stay calm until this blows over, okay?
Why should you suffer by absenting yourself from a lis
Welcome back, Tom!
Kathy
- Original Message -
From: "T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discussion Malling List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 5:01 PM
Subject: Graywolf's Back
> As of today, I have internet access at the apartment in Boone. Of course
one
Your choice, Doe or Marnie.
Be well,
keith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Me too. I'll check back later.
>
> Doe aka Marnie
Let's stay calm, Vic. No need for vituperousness.
As others have said or implied, there are apparently a number of list
members with hot buttons. We're slowly learning who they are.
I'll try to keep track, mentally, and avoid pushing any of them. I'm
sorry I know about them, in fact...
So, let's t
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
