I've been sent three copies of the same message over the 24 past hours
supposedly from someone talking about a Rollei SL66 and a close-up lens. The
message has an attachment (Earthlink Support.url.exe) ... I-Worm/Bugbear.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.willi
I've been sent three copies of the same message over the 24 past hours
supposedly from someone talking about a Rollei SL66 and a close-up lens. The
message has an attachment (Earthlink Support.url.exe) ... I-Worm/Bugbear.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.willi
Clean-Lubricate-Adjust. Some might call it overhaul.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Just a little question.
In many of your mails I read the term CLA. Could you explain to me what CLA
is short for? I know it's a kind of servicing, but what is exactly done
when
a camera is CLA'd?
_
Just a little question.
In many of your mails I read the term CLA. Could you explain to me what CLA
is short for? I know it's a kind of servicing, but what is exactly done when
a camera is CLA'd?
Greetings,
Hans B.
mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Remember the Spotmatic II? It appeared AFTER the Spotmatic F.
Are you sure about that? I can't get to Peter Jonkman's Spotmatic page
to check, but that clashes with my recollection. My first SLR (which I
purchased with my very first paycheck from my first full-time job) was
a Spotmatic II (w
>
> Remember the Spotmatic II? It appeared AFTER the Spotmatic F.
Are you sure about that? I can't get to Peter Jonkman's Spotmatic page
to check, but that clashes with my recollection. My first SLR (which I
purchased with my very first paycheck from my first full-time job) was
a Spotmatic II
Thx Peter! If what you are saying about the MX is correct, my solution
should work. I simply need to adjust the mirror to sit higher, and then have
the screen adjusted. The LX should install without problem. Now I have to
figure out where to go... Anyone tried Brighouse Camera Repairs
(http://w
John Dallman:
So, with either SMC Takumars or K-mount manual focus lenses, what could I
do, metering-wise, on a *istD?
Christian:
With Ks and Ms you get nothing. No metering at all...
Not exactly. To get metering on the *ist D with K lenses, you would
have to make a simple modification on the le
if you want photos of any of my stuff
just email me
in good condition some brassing- glass is excellent no dust or fungus. comes
with original carry bag. Its a big lens 112mm filter size and weighs around
4lbs
$750
your choice of nikon, canon or pentax adaptall mounts
$750US
vivitar series 1 28mm 1.9 $75US ex
vivitar series 1 35mm 1.9 $55US good condition
m42 to k mount adaptor $20US
wayne
still some stuff left
pentax lx with fa-1 finder mint recently claed $450US
fd-2 fb-1 viewfinder for lx good condition $90us
pentax fa 20mm 2.8 mint with box $380US
pentax fa 50mm 1.4 mint with box $130US
pentax f 17-28mm fisheye zoom excellent $280US
i take paypal
wayne
That seems like a reasonable price, a bit lower than ebay but the same as
the store down the street.
/Paul
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: F50/1.7 in pawn shop for US$40
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 19:17:51 -0700
Just saw a F50/1.7 in a pawn shop for
Hello from a lurker-
I will be making an impromptu visit to Toronto in about a week's time. I
thought I would appeal to the generosity of the TOPDMLers for advice on any
mid-September events and late summer climate. My last trip was a summer trip 5
years ago. I have a vague recollection of visitin
According to Kerrisdale cameras, their first shipment is to arrive Sept
11-12th, at the aforementioned $2699.00 with the 18-35.
I'm on the list (and can hardly wait!).
C.
Is the shutter on the MX smoother than the shutter on the ME.regards dxl
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: The MX
> It's small and reliable. With the 40/2.8 attached, one can s
Harry,
Thanks for sharing this. Interesting though, if you are not from a European
country, you can get it for ?1478.45. This might even be of interest for our
American friends. Even shipping is less then to the European countries,
strange.
Did anyone ever dealt with them? Any experiences?
Frits
Hello all,
I'm in the market for a 70-210 range zoom lens. I know that the FA
80-200/2.8 is the last word in quality as far as Pentax glass is concerned,
but to see me through until the happy day when I can scrape together the
money to buy it I have my eye on an A 70-210/4 (SMC version).
How doe
Welcome back John, we missed you!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> (You might want to be sure of *your* ground before being
> quite so snarky, too)
See below...
Cotty wrote:
>
> >> >n the US we refer to that color as "No Sale Green."
> >> >
> >> >John Francis wrote:
> >> >
> >> >Actually I think BRG might be out of place on a mini.
> >>
> >> For the record, John quoted my original post, and the line above came
> >> from my sad digits.
> >>
>I thought along the same line when I saw these posts.
>Since I create the PUG very much automatically now my scripts will need
>some adjustments, but I think I can do this.
>
>So wie have 12 themes to work out now
>As I said the seasons where a sort of test when they will be noticed.
>But I
>> >n the US we refer to that color as "No Sale Green."
>> >
>> >John Francis wrote:
>> >
>> >Actually I think BRG might be out of place on a mini.
>>
>> For the record, John quoted my original post, and the line above came
>> from my sad digits.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Cotty
>
>Oh no, Sir Cot... BRG
Frits wrote:-
> Could you share with us who this supplier is? I assume he also ships to the
> Netherlands.
Hi Frits, he appears to ship all over Europe and elsewhere.
It is "New York Camera", full details as regards ordering and shipping
is on their website:-
http://www.ny-camera.net/language/e
The line I think Graywolf was stirred into action by was this:
>The Land Rover Defender was voted second coolest. First built in 1950, it
>has outlasted the VW Beetle to become the world's oldest production car.
In fact it has stirred me as well - the Land Rover went into production
earlier than
The RR account was published in Reader's Digest many, many years ago and is
assumed to be the original source. I paraphrased from the RD "Life in These
United States" snippet. I'm sorry for forgetting to attribute the article to
my source.
RR's are (comparatively) all over the place out here in So
Hi Adelheid;
I, for one, like the alternating theme/open format. The theme months often
make me shoot something I normally wouldn't shoot, which would stretch, and
hopefully improve, my photography. Some theme ideas: animals, motion,
environment, opposites, humor or funny, urban or rural, children
"T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Of course a 28 makes a nice normal lens on the istD.
But a 31mm Limited is even better :-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
>
>A 6MP sensor isn't bad - it gives you
> 300ppi on an 8x10 print, which is good enough for many purposes. But
> there's no way this comes close to the resolution
obtainable from film.
> I've only got a 2700ppi scanner (the Nikon Coolscan III),
but even that
> gives me
Harry,
Could you share with us who this supplier is? I assume he also ships to the
Netherlands.
Regards,
Frits
-Original Message-
From: Harold Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 September 2003 16:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *istD German Dealers price 1699 euros
I have just n
I use P series square filter with 24mm. Here are some
results.
1) "square filter holder + square filter + circular
polarizer" resulted in vignetting.
2) "square filter holder + square filter" did not have
vignetting.
3) "square filter + circular polarizer" did not have
vignetting. In this metho
My only complaint with the A70-210 F4 is the large focus ring.I keep moving the focus
when
i palm hold the lens.If my hand moves just a bit so does the focus.I tend to shoot it
fast
and wide in my
horse stuff,so DOF/focus is farly critical.Its also a bit loose ,going by my other M
type
lenses.O
28mm!
Of course a 28 makes a nice normal lens on the istD. It will have about the
same angle of view as the 43 Limited does on 35mm or a 150mm on 4x5.
Ciao,
Graywolf
--
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> W
Bob Walkden posted the link, but here it is again. See the last paragraph.
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=439425
Ciao,
Graywolf
--
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pentax li
Clive evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "complained"
Not just British cars that are leaky.
I had a porsche 911 carrera cabriolet in the mid 80s [one of the last witt
the useful picnic table rear wing]
Fabulous car, but after two years the carpets were always wet after rain,
had new seals fitted on
That RR story was an urban legend long before the internet ever existed.
I remember getting into a argument with a guy back in the 1960's. He claimed
that Rolls Royce would fly a mechanic out and fix your car anyplace in the
world for free even if it had been built in 1923. We were both very
knowl
I would think that every month having a "theme" as
well as an "open" category would be an improvement
over the current setup. That way good shots would
not have to wait months for submission.
JCO
J.C. O'Connell
"Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I thought along the same line when I saw these posts.
>Since I create the PUG very much automatically now my scripts will need
>some adjustments, but I think I can do this.
>
>So wie have 12 themes to work out now
>As I said the seasons where a so
I thought along the same line when I saw these posts.
Since I create the PUG very much automatically now my scripts will need
some adjustments, but I think I can do this.
So wie have 12 themes to work out now
As I said the seasons where a sort of test when they will be noticed.
But I think I
Hi,
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 10:17:19 AM, you wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:28:45PM +0100, Bob Walkden wrote:
>> Am I an imagist? Not sure about that one.
> From merriam-webster
> imagism: a 20th century movement in poetry advocating free verse and the
> expression
You may want to use the A lens with a program or AF camera eventually. I have the A
70-210 and the Tak version of the 80-200/4.5 and have taken very good photos with the
80-200. It has no zoom creep. The A is probably optically superior but it does creep.
I see two versions of the M80-200 on
>
> >A 6MP sensor isn't bad - it gives you
> > 300ppi on an 8x10 print, which is good enough for many purposes. But
> > there's no way this comes close to the resolution obtainable from film.
> > I've only got a 2700ppi scanner (the Nikon Coolscan III), but even that
> > gives
They're definitely what *I* expect; I've got them hanging on the wall in front
of me as I type.
The purely-optical photographic print is the sharpest.
A 300ppi print (from a top-of-the line digital printer) isn't quite as good.
Similarly, 200ppi prints aren't quite as sharp as 300ppi prints (mad
There are actually two different versions of the M80-200 f/4.5 fhe first is an
M version of the earlier K version. The second is a "new" M
design. strangely
enough the earlier version is smaller and lighter than the newer version.
See Boz's page for details.
http://www.BDimitrov.de/kmp/
Of co
Hi,
Wednesday, September 3, 2003, 4:44:05 PM, you wrote:
> Not just British cars that are leaky.
> I had a porsche 911 carrera cabriolet in the mid 80s [one of the last witt
> the useful picnic table rear wing]
> Fabulous car, but after two years the carpets were always wet after rain,
>
Nope - the last VW Beetles were produced in Mexico - and the production ended only a
couple of weeks ago.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: T Rittenhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROT
The math is simple enough Andre wins the prize.
At 02:11 PM 9/3/03 -0400, you wrote:
A 6MP sensor isn't bad - it gives you
300ppi on an 8x10 print, which is good enough for many purposes. But
there's no way this comes close to the resolution obtainable from film.
I've only got a 27
28mm of course, (42mm equivalent on 35mm however).
At 07:46 PM 9/3/03 +0200, you wrote:
Frank wrote:
> There's no possible reply to that one...
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> > I get stranger things than you
> > free with my breakfast cereal.
> >
"Well just who do you think you are, honey?"
[...]
"
A 6MP sensor isn't bad - it gives you
300ppi on an 8x10 print, which is good enough for many purposes. But
there's no way this comes close to the resolution obtainable from film.
I've only got a 2700ppi scanner (the Nikon Coolscan III), but even that
gives me 20 megapixels from
Hi, Stephen.
The area of the filter is not the limiting factor for Cokin. The diameter of
the opening in the holder is. It is 75mm across. That said, I have used
Cokin P filters on Sigma 70-200/2.8, FA*400/5.6 and 645A*300/4 without
any vignetting. So with tele lenses, 77mm lens diameter is not
Thanks to some of your earlier opinions, I have narrowed down my choice for
a zoom to either a SMC-A 70-210/f4 or a M80-200/f4.5.
I can get the first lens for $120US and the M80-200 for slightly less.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks again for any and all comments!
Pat Wunsch
Many years ago, a selle
You have an early model. The later ones swiveled 180°.
At 10:55 AM 9/3/03 +0100, you wrote:
Hi,
Bob W. wrote:
> I'd keep my 600mm behind my sporran...
Only 600? Poor man - of course it will be in perfect condition, as
nothing is worn under the kilt
Some of the best fun I ever had was at a
Frank wrote:
> There's no possible reply to that one...
>
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> > I get stranger things than you
> > free with my breakfast cereal.
> >
"Well just who do you think you are, honey?"
[...]
"Zaphod Beeblebrox or something?"
:-)
Which reminds me; what exactly will be the focal
You would be well advised to personally run this science fair experiment before
instructing others to do so, because the results will not be what you expect if the
prints are viewed with the naked eye.
BR
"John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This suggests that a good optical full-fra
The Optio S4 is the update for the Optio S. 4 mega pixels instead of
3.2 (not enough difference to tell about) and a champagne color rather
than silver. I also understand that the control button on the back has
been enlarged.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Petter Jarbo [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
I've seen mixed results from using it.
On a 16x20 print from a 6Mp camera of a single individual,
it was apparently applied lightly.
The print looks like it was taken with a 35mm chrome.
Very nice. Good edge definition & hair detail.
The 8x10 family shot I look at was horrible.
It looked like the
From: Cotty
Sent: 02 September 2003 21:58
To: pentax list
Subject: RE: Stop Press: *ist D UK pricing
>I know Ziggy has confirmed UK pricing on the *ist D but for the record,
>Pricing in the UK will be as follows:
>
>For your info, official prices are:
>
>Pentax *ist D camera body £1400 includ
At two different Swedish online stores I've found a Pentax "Optio 555" and a Pentax
"Optio S4". Are these new models? I can't find anything at Pentax Scandinavia's site
nor at Pentax USA. DPReview have nothing on them.
What do you think?
According to "Inwarehouse" (one of the stores) Optio S4 i
Dave,
I handhold my 67ii all the time. Basically, when I can use a tripod I
do, but I don't fret when a tripod will get in the way. I suspect
that the vibration issue only really shows up with long lenses. I
always use a tripod or monopod when shooting the 300. I wouldn't want
to handhold that
Hi folks, I've been asked by my friends at Cerious Software to track down
examples of the RAW and other file formats which *ist-D outputs, so that
they'll be able to quickly add support for them in ThumbsPlus. My camera has
not yet arrived; if someone who has access to one could post some files to
Hi all.
I was at the lab near work(Accent Photo)last night,picking up several enlargements
that i
will be
entering in the local fair at the months end.Some were 35mm negs and some were 35mm
internegs but
several were from the 6x7 and the Y-M.The one that really stood out,to me anyway,w
And the image size on the film/sensor is exactly the same size on the
*istD, 35mm, 645 or 6x7
Bill
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Free Long Lenses With Every *istD
- Or
In the US we refer to that color as "No Sale Green."
John Francis wrote:
Actually I think BRG might be out of place on a mini.
I, too, was "enabled" by the list and got an MX recently. Quite simply,
it is the most "pentaxish" of all the Pentax 35 mm SLR's. It's small,
mechanical, well made, and sits well in your hands. (Assuming you don't
have large hands. If so, get a 6x7 but don't handhold it ;-0 See
Above) It als
That sounds like it was a fun party! Brings back memories of my
Halloween parties.
Keep us posted when you open up the AF400T.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003
>>> Oh come on, Feroze! That's like asking why so many people on the
>>> list breathe oxygen or drink alcohol or have sex or...
>> well I ain't doing too bad, I do 2 out the 3...
> Yeah, I gave up breathing a while ago too...
Har!!!
Fred
John Mustarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There have been long and erudite explanations of the FOV crop when
>using the available 6 mp DSLR cameras.
>
>Don't you believe it.
>
>With every DSLR, you get, absolutely free, a lens 1.5x as long as your
>current longest lens. Period. It's that sim
"whickersworld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In future years, when photographers reminisce about the year
>2003, the EOS 300D is the only one of these two digital SLRs
>that anyone will remember. A truly remarkable coup, and
>full marks to Canon for making the first true consumer DSLR.
I'm with M
Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I use GF, and it does a good job of preserving sharp edge definition when
>you extrapolate images.
>
>You can't take a thumbnail and blow it up to full size with decent results,
>but taking a good sized scan and enlarging it by 50 works OK, and I've
>tak
"Christian Skofteland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Thomas VanVeen: Behind the Camera"
"Thomas VanVeen: Somewhere near the Camera, watching helplessly as it
tumbles out of the hands of his latest assistant"
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
"Feroze Kistan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> "Feroze Kistan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Could someone please explain why so many on the list have MX's.
>>
>> Oh come on, Feroze! That's like asking why so many people on the list
>> breathe oxyge
Yes, mine is like that. I think we resolved that there are some that do and
some that don't, but I don't think anybody cared enough to start looking at
serial numbers or production dates.
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
> Are there any documented cases of 400's _really_ only having
> 180degrees
Rain dribbling in the door is a design flaw?
I seem to recall that pretty much every English sports car of the 50's and 60's
featured rain dribbling in from ~somewhere~. I thought you guys did it on
purpose.
cheers,
frank
Cotty wrote:
> Plus, it has design flaws that to this
> day still pre
oops. I should have read down one more post before I wrote mine about leaky
sports cars...
-frank
Keith Whaley wrote:
> Having grown up owning a number of British sports cars, I remember the
> honored "rain rags" all of my friends and I kept stuffed here and there
> in our cars.
> It was part o
Ya got one? You won't be disappointed!
cheers,
whatsisname
Cotty wrote:
> >Besides, not many read your posts, and even fewer pay any attention to
> >the contents of them...
>
> Hey better yet - *I* don't read them and as for paying attention, sorry,
> what was your name again?
>
> :-D
>
> 55mm
Oh fer cryin out loud. Just saw my submission to this month's PUG has the
photographer labelled as "Canada". Don't know if this is my fault or not,
but it wouldn't surprise me if it was.
BTW, Garcia's "Manuel" really stands out as a favourite for me this month,
along with Desjardin's "Balloon Ride
Kevin Waterson wrote:
>
> whickersworld wrote:
>
> > In future years, when photographers reminisce about the
year
> > 2003, the EOS 300D is the only one of these two digital
SLRs
> > that anyone will remember. A truly remarkable coup, and
> > full marks to Canon for making the first true consumer
I've used GF a few times. It can take a _long_ time on
older computers. One advantage it does have is that often
files in its format are smaller than PNG or even JPG at a
high quality setting. As for rezzing up, it seems to be
only slightly better than stair-stepping with bicubic.
Some folks say
Hi,
Bob W. wrote:
> I'd keep my 600mm behind my sporran...
Only 600? Poor man - of course it will be in perfect condition, as
nothing is worn under the kilt
Some of the best fun I ever had was at a fancy dress party, dressed as a
highlander with a flashgun behind the kilt and a concealed s
Don't sweat the small stuff. I've made a thousand misspellings
myself.
-Long
Boris Liberman wrote:
BL> You're terribly right, Long [grin].
Thousand apologies. It was supposed to be "Lon". And [grin] was not
about the way I misspelled it of course. It is a reflex in my typing,
to type certain let
This one time, at band camp, "whickersworld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In future years, when photographers reminisce about the year
> 2003, the EOS 300D is the only one of these two digital SLRs
> that anyone will remember. A truly remarkable coup, and
> full marks to Canon for making the fi
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
>
> Well, I would say, that 200mm lens on APS-sized DSLR will
have the same DOF
> as the same piece of glass on 35mm camera. One condition -
the same camera
> to subject distance. At equal magnification, DSLR will
have greater DOF -
> just because you have to stand at long
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:28:45PM +0100, Bob Walkden wrote:
> Am I an imagist? Not sure about that one.
>From merriam-webster
imagism: a 20th century movement in poetry advocating free verse and the
expression of ideas and emotions through clear precise images
imagist: nou
Feroze Kistan wrote:
>
> Could someone please explain why so many on the list have
MX's. It seems to
> be a very popular model, what gives?
It's fully manual, small, light, simple, robust, reliable,
has excellent handling and is cheap to buy and own.
I can't think of any other reasons right now
Cotty wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Being an old design, the Land Rover Defender is due for the chop. Because
> it is basically a big Mechano (Erector) set, it has to be hand-build and
> is incredibly labour intensive. Plus, it has design flaws that to this
> day still prevail - like rain dribbling in the
zoomshot wrote:
>
> See http://www.dpreview.com/
It's official from Pentax UK:
The *ist D will list at GBP 1400.00 (body only) or GBP
1529.99 with an 18-35mm f/4-5.6 FA-J lens.
Meanwhile, Canon lists the EOS 300D at GBP 899.00 (body
only) or GBP 999.00 with a very interesting zoom lens, and
wil
>I'll tell you what, Cory. I'll cut you in for 10% of my share, just
because I
>like you. But, for that, I'll need a personal assistant.
You'll need a cameraman, Frank. And pots of money.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/sn
>The article was in an English paper for English consumption, I don't think
>they gave a damn about accuracy.
Hmm, I think you'll find that they do, and I think you'll find that the
English pretty much demand some accuracy...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
>The
>first Land Rover (80) was a rebodied US Military Jeep. The Landrover 88 was
>the first with its own chassis. The Defender is a (somewhat) look alike that
>has nothing in common with the original. By that standard the current Jeep
>has be in production since 1941
Graywolf,
A few points of cl
Dnia 3-09-2003 o godz. 1:42 Kenneth Waller napisal:
> I'm surprised no one has mentioned keyless entry.
My brother in-law, about 5 years old at that time, opened Ford
Taurus (IIRC) in less than minute. Plain luck of course but can
make you think... :-)
Cheers, Maciej
--
>Lets see, they are saying the current Defender is basically the same vehicle
>as the original Land Rover? Why I bet it still has a 1941 Jeep chassis too
>.
Close enough. It is very true that during the second world war two
brothers on a farm on Anglesey developed an all purpose car based very
muc
>ah ha! but not the coolest! See here:
>http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/this_britain/story.jsp?story=439425
>
>Make sure you look at what was 2nd.
Right on!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
>Besides, not many read your posts, and even fewer pay any attention to
>the contents of them...
Hey better yet - *I* don't read them and as for paying attention, sorry,
what was your name again?
:-D
55mm Takky on it's way. Postage? £1.68 on a £26 purchase. For once an
eBayer who doesn't rip o
At least you were satisfied for a moment. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I was very strong that day. I just dropped it in the trash.
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page
Man, are you out to lunch. I implied nothing, my statement was clear, there
is nothing to read between the lines.
Ciao,
Graywolf
--
- Original Message -
From: "Dr E D F Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wed
94 matches
Mail list logo
