--- Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
OMG, Frank discovered that film comes in COLOUR!
woohoo! (just kidding of course!)
Frank, these are cool shots, but this one totally
rocks:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2495248
And btw, why weren't YOU racing?!?!
On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered:
Frank, blowing wind up Tan's arse said:
Dammit, woman, you piss me off.
You're just so damned good!!
Great stuff, tan.
Erm, yeah, like you're such a crap photographer yourself! You SO have
nothing to be pissed about!
And, btw,
...but anything can be photographed. :-)
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2551150size=lg
DagT
Hmmm, well, I thought that was a general expression, not just an Aussie one!
lol.
It means, hmmm, well, it means to suck up to someone, whilst talking crap,
basically.
Jeez, all of this hard yakka that I do here, trying to edumicate you in
Strine, and you guys still don't seem to get it!
I don't even want to know whereabouts that hair is... :)
Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software
- Original Message -
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 4:14 PM
Subject: PAW - You probably won´t like this
Ok, well, thanks for asking!
Here's what I did - *istD exposure settings at ISO400, 1/30th, f3.5,
contrast - high, saturation - high, sharpness - high.
I used the AF-500ftz, set manually, at 1/16th, and with Lumiquest Promax
Softbox attached.
Lens was Tokina atx Pro II 28-70/2.8 with a Tamron
Eek! Is that a self portrait?!?
Jeez, just how SHARP is that bloody lens?!!? I SO have to get me one!
As always, I love your perspective on things, that is a very cool shot.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 23 July 2004 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL
Wow! You got some nice shots. Much better job than I would have
done. My favorites are Drafting down the backstraight and We don't
stop for no stinkin' stop signs! - several others are very good too.
But these two are my top choices. Maybe you should be doing sports
stuff more often.
Bruce
Joseph Tainter wrote:
PUG seems to be back on the Komkon server, right up to this month's
gallery.
Anyone know why that would be? Or what it portends?
The end times are nigh! Repent!
S
Oh. I could swear it was a Holga.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Here's what I did - *istD exposure settings at ISO400, 1/30th, f3.5,
contrast - high, saturation - high, sharpness - high.
I used the AF-500ftz, set manually, at 1/16th, and with Lumiquest Promax
Softbox attached.
Lens was Tokina atx
I've finally got round to shooting some film since I finished a photo
course about a month ago (which sort of removed any joy from taking photos
for a while), and liked this one.
http://www.cowfish.org.uk/paw/lu.html
fiddled with in as much as i made the background properly black rather
than
watch those maracas
Bob W wrote:
y viva Espana!
Back on 5th August. Going for a few days to the Alpujarra, then a few
days in Madrid.
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Then, as I shot, I moved the camera in a slight circlular movement to blur
the bokeh even further and to give the feel of movement.
That's given me a fantastic idea: a tripod mount that rotates about a
point in front of the lens, the distance of which from the lens
That there bug needs a shave, Cotty. A smooth bum would have
made you happy.
Cotty wrote:
snip.. - this was a real pain to get right, and even then I'm
not happy with it:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/nature/images/pic8.html
I think the time to start worrying about film is when
you can no longer buy it, except at camera stores.
About the only film I've seen that's getting tough
to buy here in the USA at various convenience/mart/grocery
stores is consumer 100 color neg film, and true BW film.
I still see even K64 on
If you get a chance go down to a A Gallery for Fine Photography
http://www.agallery.com/ It is very close and a tremendous collection
of great photography.
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
you're assuming that cameras stores will outlast film.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: Film vs Digital
I think the time to start worrying about film is when
you can no longer
And I thought that dealing with eructations would make
you go blind
Cotty wrote:
On 23/7/04, Tanya Mayer Photography, discombobulated, offered:
eructations
I had those once. The scarring is fearsome.
Cheers,
Cotty
This guy's going on my Kill List.
Wink.
Bob W wrote:
Had you truly duffified the lexicon, mayhaps reading boustrophedonically
for incremental velocity, and left it dwizzen as any dudman, you would
have disinterred more than a yeepsen of prolixity. Nevertheless, as we
yaffle our mundivagant
I think that is a safe assumption. Electronics stores
have crap tripods, lower end digicams, etc,
and salespeople who are not into photography.
Ever notice the difference in selection and quality
between, say, a hardware store and WalMart hardware?
Herb Chong wrote:
you're assuming that cameras
OK. I just subscribed to this list. Thought I might start by telling you
about my most recent acquisition. I just bought an ME Super and a couple
of lenses at a net auction, on a time of the year when not a lot of
people care to place bids at such sites, I'm assuming, so the price was
not very
You know what, Frank? I think your experience as an attorney gets in the way.
You think your photos need all these words.
Something to try. Just post a few photos with minimum verbiage and see if they
can stand up all on their own. I think you will find out they can.
This one does. The only
Toralf Lund wrote:
OK. I just subscribed to this list. Thought I might start by telling
you about my most recent acquisition. I just bought an ME Super and a
couple of lenses at a net auction, on a time of the year when not a
lot of people care to place bids at such sites, I'm assuming, so the
I happen to enjoy Frank's comments for the most part. They tell more about
the man than the photos, but perhaps that's just how I read them.
Regardless, for posting here, it's not a bad idea for certain types of
photos to be explained since it allows us to see how close they came to
their
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herb Chong wrote:
you're assuming that cameras stores will outlast film.
I think that is a safe assumption.
I don't. What we're seeing all the time is people coming into camera
stores, picking the brains of the knowledgeable sales staff and then
going
Actually, it's still BW but he added th color in Photoshop ;-)
These are good. As you are the undisputed Master of the Blur, you have
not surprisingly used it to good advantage in these motion shots.
There's a real feeling of there's a race going on here. The thumbs
up is a classic shot.
It really is a technically fine shot. A little gross, but technically
well done. What lens?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/23/2004 3:08:46 AM
Eek! Is that a self portrait?!?
Jeez, just how SHARP is that bloody lens?!!? I SO have to get me one!
As always, I love your perspective on things, that is a
In his former life as a egzotic dancer Steve Desjardins wrote on 23.07.04
14:06:
It really is a technically fine shot. A little gross, but technically
well done. What lens?
FA 100/2.8 macro - it is in details below the photo :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Nice captures Frank. But while some people have tilted horizons you have tilted bikes
- VBG
I really like http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2550847. I can tell its
yours since its blurry ! another VBG
But seriously, for me it really captures what a bike race is all about. Could be a
I just came in and saw this thread. We definitely need some new Pentad
products. While we're here, however, my favorite is tyromancy, which
is foretelling the future by watching cheese curdle. The grand list of
predictive methods can be found at:
http://phrontistery.50megs.com/divine.html
Sorry. I don't scroll before 9 g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/23/2004 8:09:34 AM
In his former life as a egzotic dancer Steve Desjardins wrote on
23.07.04
14:06:
It really is a technically fine shot. A little gross, but
technically
well done. What lens?
FA 100/2.8 macro - it is in details below
Mark Roberts wrote:
Lon Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Herb Chong wrote:
you're assuming that cameras stores will outlast film.
I think that is a safe assumption.
I don't. What we're seeing all the time is people coming into camera
stores, picking the brains of the
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. I
just subscribed to this list.
Hi, Toralf,
First, welcome to the list. Hope you enjoy your stay,
and stay for a long time. Actually, you may not know
it, but you're in for life. One can't actually
unsubscribe from this list. You've now been
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Jerry Todd wrote:
Another interesting Fuji film is Natura, a 1600 speed color print film.
Can't find that in my usual UK supplier. What I can find is the Konica
Centuria Super 1600 (in fact all stops from 100-1600). Has anyone
tried it, esp against Superia/Press? I am
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm
headed out to the wilds of deepest Ohio to shoot
the AMA Superbike
races this weekend! snip
Have fun while I'm away and don't forget to tease
Frank!
I ~was~ going to tell you to have a great
weekend/shoot, but then I read your last line.
Hi Toralf.
Welcome aboard.
I agree that one of the 50mm is an obvious candidate to sell. Also,
your two telezooms have overlapping ranges. Seems a bit redundant to
keep both of those, unless the 70-210 gives very much better quality
than the 100-300 within it's range. Since one is autofocus and
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice captures Frank. But while some people have
tilted horizons you have tilted bikes - VBG
I really like
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2550847.
I can tell its yours since its blurry ! another
VBG
But seriously, for me it really
Keep them all. The good ones you want to keep, and the bad ones aren't
worth selling. g
It definitely gives a sense of action and chaos in the pack.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2550847
15USD for one roll
Norm
William Robb wrote:
Apparently, a limited edition film.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3829317067ssPageName=ADME:B:LC:US:1
--- Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Toralf.
Welcome aboard.
snip
With a name like yours and working for a
Kongsberg-based company, I
hope it's not jumping to conclusions to assume
another Norwegian on
the List? :-)
Lord, no!! Please say it ain't so.
OTOH, maybe Jostien isn't
--- Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It definitely gives a sense of action and chaos in
the pack.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2550847
Thanks, Christian.
-frank
=
The optimist
On 23 Jul 2004 at 8:50, Norm Baugher wrote:
15USD for one roll
That's about the price of Velvia and Provia 135/36 here (and has been for a
long time).
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome to the list, Toralf! Keep'em all, and just buy more... :)
t
On 7/23/04 4:35, Toralf Lund wrote:
OK. I just subscribed to this list. Thought I might start by telling you
about my most recent acquisition. I just bought an ME Super and a couple
of lenses at a net auction, on a time of
--- Jerry Todd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I
happen to enjoy Frank's comments for the most
part. snip
Hi, Jerry,
You just haven't been around here long enough that my
self-absorbed and vacuuous dronings have begun to
irritate you. vbg
As for Greywolf, well, he and I have an understanding.
We
--- Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Welcome to the list, Toralf! Keep'em all, and just
buy more... :)
Yeah,
Just wait until Toralf grasps the concept of
enablement.
Hee hee!
cheers,
frank
=
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it
hehe...
How about you representing Canadians, Frank? :-)
I think there's only four of us posting here at the moment, btw. DagT,
Pål, and myself, and now Toralf. The world in general needs more
Norwegians. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Norm Baugher wrote:
15USD for one roll
Hey, it's Limited. Like in Pentax Limited lens.
So I got a deal on a lens, a Vivitar 70-210/4.5 MC Macro for like, $40.
But - is this a Series 1 lens? It's not on the cult classics page and
it's hard to find information about this lens.
Anyone know something, worth the money?
I don't want to buy another crappy lens, I already have a Tokina
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Henri Toivonen wrote:
But - is this a Series 1 lens? It's not on the cult classics page and
it's hard to find information about this lens.
If it it (which I doubt, though I am not a specialist) it will say so
on the barrel.
Kostas
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Shrek,
You know, when I fantasize about being a professional photog,
then realize that no one wants to buy fuzzy bw photos of
people they don't know, I think that I could be a wedding
photographer. You
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: frank
theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spatula is a good one.
Who's your friend?!
tv
(anyone remember Stripes?)
Go to Minnesota. I believe that there are more Norwegians there than in
Norway.
Jostein wrote:
I think there's only four of us posting here at the moment, btw. DagT,
Pål, and myself, and now Toralf. The world in general needs more
Norwegians. :-)
So I got a deal on a lens, a Vivitar 70-210/4.5 MC Macro for like, $40.
But - is this a Series 1 lens? It's not on the cult classics page and
it's hard to find information about this lens.
I don't think so - I think that this is the consumer grade 70-210
for Vivitar.
Fred
That's cool.
tv
-Original Message-
From: Peter Loveday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 3:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - You probably won´t like this one
I don't even want to know whereabouts that hair is... :)
Love, Light and Peace,
-
Welcome Toralf!
I'd go take some pics with them all, if the pics aren't acceptable to you, get rid of
it!
BTW: There's a nice little FAQ that explains the list goings on a bit:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
It'll help get you up to speed on some of the stuff that goes on
That's what I'm doing next weekend in Guadalajara at my friends wedding.
They have the wedding photog for the formals, then I'm being turned
loose with BW to shoot whatever the hell I want toshould be fun.
Norm
(who says Tequila and BW don't mix?)
tom wrote:
Imagine the possibilities!
Oh, I love his comments, and Frank is a really nice guy on the list and off. It
is just that they so influence the thinking about the photos before you even
look at them. That his photos are entirely capable of standing on their own, was
my intended point.
--
Jerry Todd wrote:
I happen to
- Original Message -
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anytime you put 100 or 200 people together,
put them on a schedule, and add some emotion,
you're going to get the possibility that something screws up.
Heh. I've done two weddings in my life. One of them was up on the west
coast of
A 28-80mm (power)zoom - you know, the one a lot of people seem to
hate.
No reason to hate it. It's not as sharp as (my) Tokina 2.6-2.8 ATX PRO II
28-70.
But befor I bought the Tokina I tested the two lenses Petnax 28-80 vs Tokina
28-70.
I could not see the difference in resolution until I
That's a good one :-))
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. juli 2004 15:44
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Many lenses; which too keep?
Keep them all. The good ones you
Aw, now you have done it, Frank! You have brought tears to my eyes. No, wait,
thats my lunch burning.
--
frank theriault wrote:
He's like my much much
much older brother. vbg
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
I'm assuming this is Guadalajara, Mexico. A Mexican wedding has some
interesting customs. One is where the groomsmen undress the groom down to
his shirt and unmentionables. Then the cloths are handed to his new bride
so she can dress him. Someone hands her a hat and a belt. Someone else
-Original Message-
From: tom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
frank
theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spatula is a good one.
Who's your friend?!
tv
(anyone remember Stripes?)
Ah yes: The Aunt Jemimah treatment
Christian
An A for originality. I like the simplicity.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Billy Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - Window
I've finally got round to shooting some film since I finished a photo
course about a month ago (which sort of removed any joy from taking photos
It is Mexico and from what you've said, this should be good (along with
the embarrassing photo ops)!
Norm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm assuming this is Guadalajara, Mexico. A Mexican wedding has some
interesting customs. One is where the groomsmen undress the groom down to
his shirt and
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, tom wrote:
If you think about it, a wedding is actually one of the most interesting
things you can shoot if you like to shoot people. Everyone looks good,
they're on their best behavior, they're participating in religious and
cultural ceremonies, they're dancing and
A curious camera on Ebay:
item # 3829589486
Pentax P70-2 Camera manufactured for Pentax by Dongwon in Korea. To
Pentax specifications. .
With Pentax zoom lense,1:3.5-4.5, 20-80mm
I have found by Google that Dongwon produced camera for Pentax in the 80'.
Hi, Dan.
On first thought, I was pretty sure you were right, ans it turns out
you're pretty close. In the 1990 USA population census, 3,9 million
people in the USA claimed Norwegian heritage. That's 1 million short
of Norway. Minnesota is one of the states they are most numerous, but
far from the
I've had my ist D for a few weeks like using it. However, I don't think I'll give up
shooting slides any time soon.
I've pretty much kept things simple by going with the default settings.
I saw Tan's post where she talked about the settings for an imasge she posted and saw
that she was
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I've had my ist D for a few weeks like using it. However, I don't
think I'll give up shooting slides any time soon. I've pretty much
kept things simple by going with the default settings. I saw Tan's
post where she talked about the settings for an
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:48:59 +1000, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
What an articulate bunch we are...
We'd be _far_ less articulate if you'd lock up out thesauruses...
keith whaley
Superannuated.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
I wrote this about when film will die:
I think it will be when digital cameras can produce a sharper picture than
film can.
William Robb then replied:
That day has already arrived.
However, sharpness is only one criteria.
That day hasn't arrived in my experience. My experience is that if I
In his former life as a egzotic dancer Kenneth Waller wrote on 23.07.04
17:54:
I've had my ist D for a few weeks like using it. However, I don't think I'll
give up shooting slides any time soon.
I've pretty much kept things simple by going with the default settings.
I saw Tan's post where
In his former life as a egzotic dancer alex wetmore wrote on 23.07.04 17:57:
If you can afford the storage costs RAW is really the way to go.
That's not only storage costs, but it is also time spent to convert all
these RAWs with right settings :-) Something a'la digital darkroom work.
--
Best
Jostein wrote:
Hi, Dan.
On first thought, I was pretty sure you were right, ans it turns out
you're pretty close. In the 1990 USA population census, 3,9 million
people in the USA claimed Norwegian heritage. That's 1 million short
of Norway. Minnesota is one of the states they are most numerous,
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
In his former life as a egzotic dancer alex wetmore wrote on 23.07.04 17:57:
If you can afford the storage costs RAW is really the way to go.
That's not only storage costs, but it is also time spent to convert all
these RAWs with right settings
Oh, Kenneth, I forgot to say on that post, that I was shooting RAW. As
such, I'm not sure just how much those settings actually affect the results.
However, normally, when shooting a wedding for eg, I have the
contrast/saturation level set on low, and the sharpness set on medium.
Again, I'm not
Keith Whaley wrote:
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:48:59 +1000, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
What an articulate bunch we are...
We'd be _far_ less articulate if you'd lock up out thesauruses...
Sighhh. That should be OUR thesauruses...
keith
keith whaley
Superannuated.
TTYL,
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Ann, you'll be close to Cafe Du Munde. You have to visit have a cup of
their chicory coffee and some beignets.
Good luck @ the tourney.
Kenneth Waller
Now what in the world would I want to do that
for??? vbg
If it is really close, it might be the spot for
I picked up the F version of the 28mm f/2.8 lens (same optical
formula as the A, different than the later FA, which I also have) a
couple of months ago. It's in EX+ condition, I see no flaws
whatsoever. Images were beautiful, but I really don't need two 28mm
primes. I'm keeping the FA, as I
Hi all
I just talked to a Canon guy on the phone. He said that the reason Canon is
ruling the world of digital photoraphy at the moment is, that they stuck to
CMOS while everybody else left it for CCD's. I'm not an electronics
engineer, so what do guys think?
All the best
Jens
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
TL OK. I just subscribed to this list. Thought I might start by telling you
TL about my most recent acquisition. I just bought an ME Super and a couple
TL of lenses at a net auction, on a time of the year when not a lot of
TL people care to place bids at such sites, I'm
Don Sanderson wrote:
Welcome Toralf!
Thanks.
I'd go take some pics with them all, if the pics aren't acceptable to you, get rid of it!
That's probably a good idea. And I guess I've started already.
BTW: There's a nice little FAQ that explains the list goings on a bit:
Gee, I always thought that it was because they were bigger than
everyone else (more money) and more aggressive than everyone else.
Technologies change all the time - the style of company doesn't.
Bruce
Friday, July 23, 2004, 12:45:56 PM, you wrote:
JB Hi all
JB I just talked to a Canon guy on
Jostein wrote:
Hi Toralf.
Welcome aboard.
Thankyou...
I agree that one of the 50mm is an obvious candidate to sell. Also,
your two telezooms have overlapping ranges. Seems a bit redundant to
keep both of those, unless the 70-210 gives very much better quality
than the 100-300 within it's range.
Hi Alex,
You wrote:
I use C1DSLR for my conversions.
alex
How do like C1DSLR? Have you compared it to the results from Photoshop? Is
it worth the money? Please give some thoughts on your experience with this
product.
Larry from Prescott
Haven't been able to follow to close today.
Have we had incongruous?
Or my personal favorite, conviviality?
Don
-Original Message-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 2:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Tans prattling again (RE: not
frank theriault wrote:
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK. I
just subscribed to this list.
Hi, Toralf,
First, welcome to the list.
Thanks.
Hope you enjoy your stay,
and stay for a long time. Actually, you may not know
it, but you're in for life. One can't actually
unsubscribe from
--- Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google doesn't recognize it, so it doesn't exist...
keith whaley
Steve Larson wrote:
I've got know, what is a tittynope? Opposite of
Dolly Parton?
Hi,
What are you guys so worried about? Apparently, I'm
being held up as a gazingstock!!
Jens Bladt wrote:
A 28-80mm (power)zoom - you know, the one a lot of people seem to
hate.
No reason to hate it. It's not as sharp as (my) Tokina 2.6-2.8 ATX PRO II
28-70.
But befor I bought the Tokina I tested the two lenses Petnax 28-80 vs Tokina
28-70.
I could not see the difference in
Well, I thought it was the other way around. Everyone else used CCD's because
they were better, and Canon used CMOS because that is what they had the FAB for.
Also Canon's advertising budget seems to be about equal to the sum of everybody
else's. Anyway, that is my opinion, a second beer and it
--- Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up the F version of the 28mm f/2.8 lens
(same optical formula as the A, different than the
snip
Is the F autofocus?
=
jb `:^)
I also saw a used Vivitar 2X teleconverter today. Apart from the
conventional wisdom about teleconverters in general, can anyone tell me
anything about it?
- Toralf
Brian's right, this image has all the potential for being an 'optical
illusion' demo.
I'm wondering what the original image looks like, with detail in the
background instead of pure black?
Neat work.
Badri
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:17:50 -0500, Norm Baugher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool shot.
On 23/7/04, Lon Williamson, discombobulated, offered:
That there bug needs a shave, Cotty. A smooth bum would have
made you happy.
Cotty wrote:
snip.. - this was a real pain to get right, and even then I'm
not happy with it:
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/nature/images/pic8.html
Hmmm,
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/wide-angle/F28f2.8.html
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
--- Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up the F version of the 28mm f/2.8 lens
(same optical formula as the A, different than the
snip
Is the F autofocus?
I also saw a used Vivitar 2X teleconverter today. Apart from the
conventional wisdom about teleconverters in general, can anyone
tell me anything about it?
Hi, Toralf.
I'm familiar with two models of Vivitar 2X TC's:
The 4-element model (labeled something such as 2X-22) is not
particularly
On 23/7/04, Jostein, discombobulated, offered:
I think there's only four of us posting here at the moment, btw. DagT,
Pål, and myself, and now Toralf. The world in general needs more
Norwegians. :-)
What you all don't realise is that the Klingons have landed and are
slowly infiltrating society
På 23. jul. 2004 kl. 17.04 skrev Cotty:
On 23/7/04, Jostein, discombobulated, offered:
I think there's only four of us posting here at the moment, btw. DagT,
Pål, and myself, and now Toralf. The world in general needs more
Norwegians. :-)
What you all don't realise is that the Klingons have landed
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
