Hi,
Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 1:01:07 AM, Shel wrote:
> What' s FW, O, man of many acronyms
obviously somebody who knows nothing about TTL and talks TTA!
Or, what the good Dr. Spooner would have called a wuckfit.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Hi,
Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 5:29:47 AM, Bruce wrote:
> The tree is over 267 feet tall, 40 feet across its base and over 107
> feet around. Estimates of its age range from 1500 to 2000 years old.
> For those who wanted to get a sense of scale, here are two shots with
> my kids at the base o
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Mark Cassino wrote:
> The only problem with the X's Drive is the battery - after a year's use my
> X's Drive II can't hold a charge long enough to dump a 1 gig card. I
> contacted the place where I bought the drive, who basically said they
> recommended sending the drive in
Any particular reason why I can't post but replies in existing
threads...?
Servus, Alin
Godfrey, David and Peter:
Thanks very much, for your lens mount explanations.
Jim
Hello Frank,
Peter, do I understand correctly that you and William are trying to say
me, that this picture is not sharp enough?
I'm quite sure that it was meant as a compliment in the highest order!
(as if... )
yeah! I feel really honored!
~Maybe~ they're trying to say (even if they don't realiz
William,
Peter, do I understand correctly that you and William are trying to
say me, that this picture is not sharp enough?
Sharp enough is for you to decide.
But it isn't very sharp.
Anyway, I'm just having some fun, don't take it seriously.
I welcome any comment, positive as well as negative
Frank:
Nice shot! I wish that I had taken it.
Jim
frank theriault wrote:
On the weekend I posted a little gallery of 4 or 5 of my favourite
shots from this years bike messengers' Ice Race here in Toronto.
I took my favourite of all, cropped it (gasp!) to get some crap out of
the edges that I misse
Alin Flaider wrote:
Any particular reason why I can't post but replies in existing
threads...?
Apologies for sending this to the list. Alin: your email system is
messed up. I tried to email you and tell you this, but my message
bounced because your email system is messed up. Have a chat wi
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I seem to recall some differences in the operation of the
> auto-diaphragm actuation mechanism between K and M,
No, that's M and A. K and M are operationally identical.
Kostas (but I am a fool for Ks)
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:34:09 -0500, Mark Cassino wrote:
>The only problem with the X's Drive is the battery - after a year's use my
>X's Drive II can't hold a charge long enough to dump a 1 gig card. I
>contacted the place where I bought the drive, who basically said they
>recommended sending t
Hi Frank,
I think most photographers are running monitors with 1050 pixels on the
vertical. But I've been keeping my files smaller lately after some
complaints.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 2/22/2005 4:10:17 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTE
I use the Apacer Disk Steno CP200 Combo since a few months. First I had
a bad rechargeable Li-battery, but the whole set was replaced within
guarantee. The Apacer does what is should do, you can easily write to
multiple CDs if storage on a 1 GB card exceeds the capacity of the disk.
Sofar very safe
Yep, that's the way all manual flashes used to work. You just set your
stop based on the distance. Pretty simple really, especially with a
small flash of very limited range.
Paul
On Feb 22, 2005, at 11:59 PM, Mark Erickson wrote:
I took a look at the *ist-Ds manual, and it appears that if an old
Very nice shot, Frank. Frame it!
Paul
On Feb 22, 2005, at 11:51 PM, David Savage wrote:
I liked this one first time round. Cropped I like it even better. The
orange witches hat to the left was a bit of a nuisance.
Dave S
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:16:35 -0500, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Alin Flaider wrote:
> I have re-subscribed hoping this post will make it on the list. I
I have seen it all four times.
Kostas
Just had to share this link, this is how I expected on-line maps might work in
the future :-)
http://maps.google.com/
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986
Hello old friends!
Been on quite a lay off from the PDML and PUG. What's it been, 4 or 5
years? Well, I didn't change brands, just priority for a while. Had some
major personal crisis to deal with that didn't leave much time for fun.
Moved since then, and lost a little interest in film since I d
On 23 Feb 2005 at 7:59, Eric J. Viglione wrote:
> Hello old friends!
>
> Been on quite a lay off from the PDML and PUG. What's it been, 4 or 5
> years? Well, I didn't change brands, just priority for a while. Had some
> major personal crisis to deal with that didn't leave much time for fun.
>
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:42:10 +, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> At worst someone will buy the company for the name.
>
>Didn't Hermes already do that?
Someone will buy Leica.
Now *who* it will be is another question.
I pick Matsushita (Panas
Impressive design, especially that everything appears to be in
dhtml. Geo-advertising is a hot topic, expect smart popups on the
map in less than an year.
Servus, Alin
Rob wrote:
RS> Just had to share this link, this is how I expected on-line maps might work
in
RS> the future :-)
RS>
Hi Eric, welcome back!
I browsed around your site a bit. Some very good photography there, despite
what you're implying about "old stuf".
See you,
Lasse (one of the Scandinavian guys.)
- Original Message -
From: "Eric J. Viglione" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML"
Sent: Wednesday, Febr
>
> From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/02/23 Wed PM 01:51:48 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: OT Truely impressive on-line map service
>
> Just had to share this link, this is how I expected on-line maps might work
> in
> the future :-)
>
> http://maps.google.co
Dear colleagues,
What Sigma zoom lenses (EX series only) you can describe as
"good lenses" and can safely advise for the buying? Primary use -
photojournalism for the magazine (A4, A3) and for medium size prints (20x30
and 30x45 cm from the film) for the customers. I am interest
A friend just suggested http://www.map24.com for us foreigners.
Can be dragged as well and the detail level is very good. [Still
can't find my street... ;o) ]
Servus, Alin
m9wnc> Can't find your house on it. Or mine...
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert"
Subject: OT Truely impressive on-line map service
Just had to share this link, this is how I expected on-line maps
might work in
the future :-)
http://maps.google.com/
I like that Canada doesn't exist unless you look closely.
William Robb
Christian,
http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=1&pos=3
wow, this one is absolutely gorgeous!
Cheers,
Bedo.
This is really nice, Frank.
I would crop it more, though, about 1/4 in from the
left and 1/4 up from the bottom.
Rick
--- frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the weekend I posted a little gallery of 4 or 5
> of my favourite
> shots from this years bike messengers' Ice Race here
>
It is even worse. If you sail to the west or to the east from the US
coast you will fall off this world. It's the opposite of the thinking in
the time of Columbus. Hopefully this isn't a future map since these
Google people are very clever..
Henk
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mai
Hello David,
By the way, I've got some samples from the SMC-Pentax FA 20-35mm f/4 AL
at http://davido.perlmonk.org/pictures/zx5n
The shots were taken about four years ago at Sunriver, Oregon with my
ZX-5n at very close range to subject (I was just trying to emphasize the
perspective).
indeed
It's come through all four times for me.
If there is a price war, then smaller companies that derive the greater
portion of their income form photo gear (e..g Pentax) would suffer more.
The electronics giants that Keppler talks about would suffer less since they
have other product lines to subsi
My personal opinion about Sigma lenses is that I've tried them
on four separate occasions and on all four occasions ended up
returning them, buying the manufacturers' lens instead.
Sometimes after multiple exchanges. For straightforward defects
or poor performance optically: their build quality is
> Yeah... It looks like the 135-400/4.5-5.6 is the replacement to the
> 400/5.6 much like the 100-300/4 is the replacement to the 300/4.
I missed this somehow yesterday. Myself I think the 400 prime was probably a
better lens optically than the 135-400 but I can't comment through
experience. I
I probably should of looked harder for batteries for the X's Drive, but in
large part I was also looking for an upgrade. Even brand new I could not get
more than 3 gigs into the drive before the battery started to flag (roughly
1 hour of run time.)
One design problem (IMHO) with the X's drive i
Marnie,
Took about eight of these shots, all from slightly different perspectives. So
I don't know that this is the BEST one -- they are all about equally
good/bad. I realize there are some possible technical criticisms. But they are PRETTY.
:-)
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/hayfe
On 23 Feb 2005 at 9:01, Mark Cassino wrote:
> Digital gains a lot in image quality with better acuatance and less noise
> than film, but it still will need to improve resolving power to match film in
> some applications. My own guess what that a 30-36 megapixel sensor could
> produce results on
Hi all.
Gee, what a ton of responses. :-)
Just want to say thanks to one and all,and a decision has been made. I'll let
you know how
it works out.
Look out you Great Gret Owl.
Dave Brooks
> > Yeah... It looks like the 135-400/4.5-5.6
is the
replacem
To answer the first question, I bought a DS, and I tried JPG at first,
and decided to try RAW and I will stay with RAW for the serious stuff.
Much more post processing image data to work with. Since I lost my wet
darkroom, my digital darkroom has taken it's place. I'm still using old
Photoshop
Resend - Didn't see my reply come through
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have decided i need some longer glass. I dont do a
> lot of nature work,but in the past
> 6-8 months i
> have missed a few opportunities to get a decent shot
> as my glass could not "reach out and
> touch
> something"
At least part of this is blurred. Actually it's a very very good shot,
not quite up to SI standards but then
again you didn't machine gun thousands of pictures to get results just a
little bit better than this.
frank theriault wrote:
On the weekend I posted a little gallery of 4 or 5 of my fav
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Try to be helpful and
Asbestos can be a useful material for underwear as well.
Have you ever noticed that everything you sit on feels like underwear?
William Robb
I don't even want to think abo
Get a ZX/MZ 5n or MZ3 and it won't matter. You'll feel right at home.
Isaac wrote:
I'm lucky that I don't have to choose. I just have the K1000 right now. I
would like to add another one, but have no clue what I want. An autofocus
model would be nice, but I don't know what to look for. All those m
Anecdotal evidence is sometimes all you have. You just have to weight
it according to where it comes from.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
Subject: RE: Manual Focus Pentax Glass on istD
Re: scientific... My original words were meant to mean that 'taking a
1000 fr
> My personal opinion about Sigma lenses is that I've tried them on four
> separate occasions and on all four occasions ended up returning them,
> buying the manufacturers' lens instead. Sometimes after multiple
> exchanges. For straightforward defects or poor performance optically:
> their build q
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Isaac"
Subject: RE: Keppler's take on DSLR prices drop
I'm lucky that I don't have to choose. I just have the K1000 right
now. I
would like to add another one, but have no clue what I want. An
autofocus
model would be nice, but I don't know
Not on the shutter speed. I haven't noticed any blatant under exposures
or over exposures so I assumed it was using TTL.
I'll have to check the manual and maybe experiment. (I'm more and more
glad I got the D and not the Ds, though a bigger buffer
would be nice).
Mark Erickson wrote:
I took a
Great! Thanks for the link.
Travel times from my area to San Francisco are a bit optimistic unless one
is making the trip at 3:00am on a national holiday Great map service!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Rob Studdert
> Just had to share this link, this is how I expected on-line maps mig
http://maps.google.com/
No support for Safari yet...
Andre
I had one Sigma zoom. I think it was designated EX 17-35/3.2-4.5 or something
close to that. It didn't impress. I sold it when I bought the Pentax DA
16-45/4. No comparison. The Pentax lens is light years better.
Paul
> > My personal opinion about Sigma lenses is that I've tried them on four
>
Not a clue. Doesn't seem like it should be a problem. I don't think
anyone would bother to make the software that bright, and what would be
the purpose.
Alin Flaider wrote:
Any particular reason why I can't post but replies in existing
threads...?
Servus, Alin
--
I can understand why ma
What drivel ...
Surely as a photographer you can determine what lenses work best for you
after using them for thousands of exposures. If you can't, grab a box of
crayons and a coloring book and make your images that way. I certainly
hope your comments were tongue-in-cheek.
Shel
> - Origi
Wendy penned:>
> Longest FL I have is 300mm, but I have a 1.4x (canon),
> 1.7x (pentax) and 2x (tamron/canon) at my disposal.
> I have the Sigma 100-300 f4 and have been pretty
> pleased with it. Bought it second hand too so it
> wasn't very expensive eithe
Àðòóð Ãðîõîâñêèé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dear colleagues,
> What Sigma zoom lenses (EX series only) you can
describe as
> "good lenses" and can safely advise for the buying? Primary
use -
> photojournalism for the magazine (A4, A3) and for medium size
prints (20x30
> and 30
Welcome home, Eric!
I remember you from way back then - hard to believe I've been on this
list so long. When I get a sec, I'll check out your site. Please
start submitting to the PUG and post PESO's (Picture Every So Often) for us
occasionally.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 23,
AMF bought it, cheapened it, made it a rattle trap, sales plunged. Harley
Bros. bought it back, brought back their standards - and improved them
(can't call them "oil slingers" anymore). Now they're an American icon
again. Could happen with Leica, but buy backs like this happen so seldom.
Regar
Mark,
respects, Canon _is_ one of those big diversified giants. I just did a
quick check on gross revenues and on Hoovers.com and found Sony with 72
billion, Canon with 33 billion, while Nikon and Pentax came in at 4.7
and 1.2 billion respectively. (Couldn't find Panasonic.)
search for Matsushit
I've had the Sigma 70-200 f2.8 for a few years, with no complaints. Bill
Sawyer and I did a head to head (but rather informal) comparison of it to
the Pentax 80-200, and the Pentax did come out as slightly sharper. But for
me, the Sigma has worked fine. A good chunk of my lighthouse photos were
So much mail here that I cannot subscribe to any more lists. Sometimes I
switch, though.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Hemenway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:1
Thanks - $72 billion for Matsushita Electric.
- MCC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
www.markcassino.com
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Lacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 200
Henk Terhell wrote:
It is even worse. If you sail to the west or to the east from the US
coast you will fall off this world. It's the opposite of the thinking in
the time of Columbus. Hopefully this isn't a future map since these
Google people are very clever..
Henk
-Original Message-
From:
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3127922&size=lg
If I was really nitpicky, I might say things like:
it would be nice to see all his shadow
he is a little too far forward (his forward - to the left)in the frame
it's difficult to distinguish his forearm
but that wou
Eric J. Viglione wrote:
As to knocking the old equipment, sorry if I offended anyone, I was not
knocking the camera equipment, just the old computer and scanner I used
to have. I used to lust after a real negative scanner that would do
medium format negs!
http://www.morgancomputers.co.uk/shop/d
> Lastly, I briefly owned the Sigma 400 f5.6 macro, but wound up switching
> to the Tokina ATX 400 f5.6. I don't know about build quality (the
> Tokina is built like a tank) but the Sigma was better optically.
I was never (optically) impressed with the AT-X 400/5.6, either.
Fred
Actually that makes it inclusion by exclusion.
mike wilson wrote:
Henk Terhell wrote:
It is even worse. If you sail to the west or to the east from the US
coast you will fall off this world. It's the opposite of the thinking in
the time of Columbus. Hopefully this isn't a future map since these
Goo
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Mark Erickson wrote:
> I took a look at the *ist-Ds manual, and it appears that if an
> older lens (i.e., not an FA, FAJ, D FA or DA) is mounted and
> the built-in flash is used, the shutter speed is fixed at 1/180
> and the flash always fires at full power (see page 147 of
Bob Blakely wrote:
AMF bought it, cheapened it, made it a rattle trap, sales plunged.
Harley Bros. bought it back, brought back their standards - and improved
them (can't call them "oil slingers" anymore). Now they're an American
icon again. Could happen with Leica, but buy backs like this happe
There's a difference between saying "What lenses do I like that
worked on my film cameras and which of them work nicely on my
digital cameras?" vs trying to evaluate actual performance of
lenses on the two different imaging systems.
For instance: the various comments on the Pentax-A 28/2.8 that
I
Frantisek,
Sad news :-( Perhaps I should by more Hermes shawls?
damn the digital ;-)
I can't imagine what could digital offer to the Leica users. IMHO Leica
always operated on the niche market, so those financial troubles are
little bit mysterious to me. Perhaps every Leica fan does have his/her
I want to buy a telephoto macro lens. After doing some research I'm
starting to like the D-FA 100 lens. It is more compact, lighter, and
just seems to look better than the FA 100. I have read little in the
way of chatter on this lens. Does anyone on the list have experience
with this lens?
Seeing
Mark,
You can quote the manual all you want. The manual is not correct
in that it doesn't specify the "A" series manual focus lenses'
operation properly.
I tested flash behavior using a Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7 lens on my
DS body and what I reported is how it behaves. The flash does
P-TTL in all expo
Godfrey,
For instance: the various comments on the Pentax-A 28/2.8 that
I've read tell me that it's not a particularly good performer.
In actual use, I find it a mite soft wide open, very sharp a
stop down, with beautiful oof rendering and fine detailing, zero
CA on the *istDS. I haven't tested it
I posted this before (over a year ago), but I think it's an interesting
illustration of what is being discussed in terms of how lenses differ
between film and digital:
http://www.markcassino.com/temp/robin/
This shot was taken with the Tokina 400mm ATX, handheld. In the actual pixel
shot, the d
Here's a little peek into my office. There are literally several thousand
files in the cabinets (far more cabinets than one can see here), and I hate
filing. Every now and then Becky comes in and cleans up my mess .
Here she is sorting and organizing a few files.
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-p
Mark,
That lens has done an *excellent* job of capturing the breast
feathers' structure. I used to keep birds (parrots mostly) and
that's what their breast feathers look like when seen close up.
Robins are much the same.
Godfrey
--- Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.markcas
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Here's a little peek into my office. There are literally several thousand
files in the cabinets (far more cabinets than one can see here), and I hate
filing. Every now and then Becky comes in and cleans up my mess .
Here she is sorting and organizing a few files.
How in he
Mark,
You can quote the manual all you want. The manual is not correct
in that it doesn't specify the "A" series manual focus lenses'
operation properly.
I tested flash behavior using a Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7 lens on my
DS body and what I reported is how it behaves. The flash does
P-TTL in all expo
> I think that the primary ribs of the feathers have been exaggerated and
> the connecting fibers have been all but lost in this shot.
> Psychologically, one looks at that and thinks "Wow - what detail!" but I
> really question that.
I would tend to agree. The "fuzziness" of those "hairs" has be
On 23/2/05, Артур Гроховский, discombobulated, unleashed:
> What Sigma zoom lenses (EX series only) you can describe as
>"good lenses" and can safely advise for the buying? Primary use -
>photojournalism for the magazine (A4, A3) and for medium size prints (20x30
>and 30x45 cm from the
But Shel, where is the EXIF data and serial # of camera and lens?
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 10:16:13 AM, you wrote:
SB> Here's a little peek into my office. There are literally several thousand
SB> files in the cabinets (far more cabinets than one can see here), an
Hi,
Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 6:16:13 PM, Shel wrote:
> Here's a little peek into my office. There are literally several thousand
> files in the cabinets (far more cabinets than one can see here), and I hate
> filing.
that's why God gave us fire.
--
Cheers,
Bob
I have two Tokina 400mm F5.6 lenses. One is a RMC 400mm F5.6 IF in M42
mount
and the other is the AT-X 400mm F5.6 IF in PK mount. Both are
exceptionally
good on film. I can recommend them strongly as they are not very
expensive
and represent great values.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Godf
On 23/2/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/ebay/becky4.html
>
>Technical details: SMC Pentax-M 50mm F1.4 on MX shot hand held @ 1/15 sec,
>aperture F 4.0, film Tri-X @ 250 developed in ID-11 for 8.75 minutes with
>gentle agitation for five seconds
> That lens has done an *excellent* job of capturing the breast
> feathers' structure. I used to keep birds (parrots mostly) and
> that's what their breast feathers look like when seen close up.
> Robins are much the same.
Well, I'm not so sure...
http://trc.ucdavis.edu/mjguinan/apc100/modules/In
Shel,
My comments were not drivel and not tongue-in-cheek. Without a controlled
environment and criteria for making a judgement, any conclusions drawn can
be/probably are highly subjective.
Have you ever looked at two photos you took with the SAME body and SAME
lens, of the SAME subject and ha
Hello,
I've been following the list for quite a while, now it's time to join
in, in spite of the tons of email this will bring along...
I got to Pentax about a year ago, when I purchased my first SLR
remembering some words in favor of Pentax from an aunt of mine, who was
a photographer in her young
Hi,
Wednesday, February 23, 2005, 1:34:43 PM, Alin wrote:
> A friend just suggested http://www.map24.com for us foreigners.
> Can be dragged as well and the detail level is very good. [Still
> can't find my street... ;o) ]
it can find my street, so I have just plotted my route to France
On 23/2/05, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I think most photographers are running monitors with 1050 pixels on the
>vertical. But I've been keeping my files smaller lately after some
>complaints.
1024X768 on both machines here :(
With larger pics on photo.net I just select the 's
Toto, I don't think we're in Kansas anymore.
Tom C.
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT Truely impressive on-line map service
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:51:48 +1000
Just had to share this link, this is how I expected on-
Interesting theory, Mark.
Please report any further findings on this.
Lasse
From: "Mark Cassino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: Opinions about Tokinas (Was Sigmas)
> I posted this before (over a year ago), but I think it's an interesting
> il
frank theriault wrote on 2/22/2005, 11:16 PM:
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3127922&size=lg
It's a bit soft :-P
Seriously, the sense of motion is great and it's nicely framed. See,
you DO know how to use that fisheye!
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Putting the files in alphabetical order seems to work pretty well ...
Strong tea in the morning does make me silly ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Keith Whaley
> How in heaven's name can anyone _else_ put some categorization sense to
> your files? Especially if a part of the criteri
John Whittingham wrote on 2/22/2005, 6:38 PM:
> Hi Christian
>
> WOW! can't wait to try it now. I really need to stop pondering about
> equipment issues and just use the kit I have. I'm looking forward to the
> summer months. Many thanks.
My feelings about gear are "use what you have" beca
> Take the ferry for the next 39 yards
> You are leaving United Kingdom
Well, the Empire's not as big as it used to be...
Fred
Peter Lacus wrote on 2/23/2005, 8:42 AM:
> Christian,
>
> > http://www.skofteland.net/displayimage.php?album=1&pos=3
>
> wow, this one is absolutely gorgeous!
Thanks! Here is what Cotty did with it in a moment of whimsy:
http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id11.html
--
Christian
[E
On 23/2/05, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>My feelings about gear are "use what you have" because you can speculate
>and lust after gear for a lifetime and have nothing to show for it in
>the end. So just go out and use it!
Yeah yeah I agree with Christian. Well, just the bit about lu
Hi Bruce ...
I don't believe the MX generates EXIF data. My insurance carrier suggested
that I not post serial numbers of my equipment, however, I can tell you
this (and I apologize for not mentioning it ), the camera used was a
black, second series MX and the lens hood used was a metal Takumar h
Hi,
Nothing but strong tea in the morning (Mariage Freres, Eros, hot).
Thanks for commenting.,
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Cotty
> On 23/2/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/ebay/becky4.html
> >
> >Technical details: SMC Pentax-M 50
I use MZ-S and I am in reflection about the new lenses and second
body also. I now about the EX 2.8/70-200 but also I am interesting about
4.0/100-300 and some normal and wide-angle. Because FA 2.8/28-70 and
2.8/80-200 are now too expensive for me (if new) and well used are very rare
here in
Hi Mark,
Here's a robin I shot a few weeks ago.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3095297&size=lg
It's not as sharp as your pic. It's handheld with the a 400/5.6 and the A2X-S
converter at 5.6, 1/500. But you can get some idea of the feather texture. The
branch he's perched on provides
Thanks for the info Paul. I may go the JOBO route. My only concern
overall, of course, is the inability to know if the copied files are
readable or not, w/o a computer. Hmm... if I also got a cheap portable DVD
player. May cost less in total than another laptop and may be a little more
port
1 - 100 of 266 matches
Mail list logo
