Here's one that I call "Too Much Cheesecake Will Shrink Your Head"
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/2muchcheesecake.html
The pix that G posted were of my first successful attempt with trap focus.
A very neat feature!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Thought y'all
Another pic from my trip. I shot a whole heap of these but over a very short
time, I was a bit rushed, now looking back at them there's so much more I could
have done and I'm having great difficulty editing what I did shoot down. Pity
it's the other side of the country :-(
http://home.swiftdsl.
From what I've seen 3. is also optional...
graywolf wrote:
Well, from my experience to be a financially successful professional
photographer you need three things.
1. A really tough ego.
2. Relentless self promotion.
3. An eye for an image.
All else is optional.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfp
On 28 Oct 2005 at 22:31, Patrick Schork wrote:
> Here are some test shots from my modification of a SMC-A 50/2
>
> http://istds.blogspot.com/2005/10/modified-smc-502.html
Very cool. :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.o
On 29 Oct 2005 at 1:21, P. J. Alling wrote:
> I expect that the sensor cover is exceedingly thin, while blue tack
> sounds like it would be wonderful for cleaning relatively thick glass, I
> may look into it for lenses, I would be afraid of putting too much
> pressure on the sensor cover and ca
On 28 Oct 2005 at 23:32, graywolf wrote:
> I bought my first Pentax in 1961 or 62. Pentax has always seemed behind
> the times. Yes they actually invented a lot of the neat stuff that made
> SLR's better for general photography, but they often licensed those
> inventions to competitors rather t
They're old. Lubricants dry out. It's a very good lens, if you can find
someone to do an inexpensive CLA it's worth it.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Hello all,
Today, I've received my 'new' M2.8/35 mm and the aperture closes
extremely slow. I had just discarded another lens of this type for
ex
On 29 Oct 2005 at 0:38, graywolf wrote:
> Back in the 80's when I was trying to make a living with my cameras, I
> expected to get 1 great shot out of 12 and that all 12 would be salable
> (Which is why I hated weddings there were always duds that were not the
> photographer's fault, often of c
Or perhaps I'm just crazy.
I think you hit the thumb squarely with the hammer there...
Peter Jordan wrote:
There is something strangely satisfying in spending more than the cost
of a replacement on a CLA.
A psychologist would be able to explain better, but it's something to
do with the
Thought y'all might like this...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42r.htm
Godfrey
No.
Barry Rice wrote:
Hey Folks,
I just found an old pentax M 50/2 lens. I've already got a Pentax M50/1.4
and an F 50/2.8 macro.
This 50/2 lens is in good shape, but would need a CLA before it would be
even sellable. Is there any compelling reason to keep this lens? Any secrets
about it, like
I don't know, I think they're still using Sony. OTOH, Pentax has teamed
up with Samsung...
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Which actually seems to be the problem. The istD successor was
supposed to hit the she
I think I paid $14.00 plus tax for the flash, it's major purpose in life
is to keep me from destroying a more expensive piece of equipment, sort
of the purpose the ZX-M originally had. Now that I no longer own the
ZX-M...
graywolf wrote:
Um...? If the trigger voltage was much too high, and t
Kentmere Art Classic is a highly regarded paper and
great for toning.
Dave
___
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo!
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com
danilo wrote:
me too, cannot see any map, even if "something" is shown in the place
where the map should be...
it seems some browser related problem, I've tried to look at the
source page, but google is not very keen to let you understand their
code... lol
I mean I've no time to understand all
It looks light struck to me. I'd say either in the can or the lab
screwed up in processing.
Toralf Lund wrote:
Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong here:
http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bilde.php?navn=error
?
I mean, where did the horizontal red band come from? This is a scan
The tokina looks like a pretty good lens. The only gripe I've got about
the photo is that the green leaf below the flower looks to be in better
focus than the flower itself.
Peter McIntosh wrote:
Hi all,
From my mum's garden. Camera shop scanned negative for me, and the
resultant jpeg lef
I think the camera should work without a card. Well, at least allow you
to change settings and control it from the computer with the remote
assistant software. Your *ist-D may have a problem. For example, I've
never been able to get the OK button on my *ist-D to fire the flash, (I
don't know
oops, try these
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dvb356/56945493/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dvb356/56945463/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dvb356/56945443/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dvb356/56945426/
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I got "You need to be signed in to see this page."
LOL (actually)
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "graywolf" Subject: Re: Skills
I keep thinking I ought to mount my Oly on top of my Graphic.
Exposure meter
Here are some test shots from my modification of a SMC-A 50/2
http://istds.blogspot.com/2005/10/modified-smc-502.html
On 10/28/05, Barry Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> OK, I guess I'll probably tear the thing apart just to see what's inside it.
>
>
> B
>
> Barry A. Rice, Ph.D.
On Oct 28, 2005, at 10:21 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
I expect that the sensor cover is exceedingly thin, while blue tack
sounds like it would be wonderful for cleaning relatively thick
glass, I may look into it for lenses, I would be afraid of putting
too much pressure on the sensor cover and
Golly, Don, I figured you would recognize satire when you saw it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Don Williams wrote:
Small pocket change?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/29/nebay29.xml
Shel missed the Norcal PDML gathering a couple of weeks ago. Since he
owed me a cup of moka johina espresso rapide for something or other,
I suggested we get together at his convenience and talk photography,
shoot pictures, etc. Today was the day.
We met in Union Square, yakked and had a gr
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: Skills - was Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Usually, if someone has particularly consistent exposure he also has
correct exposure unless there is an equipment failure. Consistent exposure
requires quite a lot of skill. Howeve
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: Skills
I keep thinking I ought to mount my Oly on top of my Graphic. Exposure
meter, test shots, shots when I think a sheet of 4x5 is too expensive.
Only thing is I can not bring myself to drill a 1/4 inch hole in the top
of th
I'm selling the above on Ebay.
http://cm.ebay.com/cm/ck/1065-29296-2357-0?uid=16202250&site=0&ver=LCA080805&item=7558349951&lk=URL
Gary J Sibio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~garysibio
There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand
binary numbers and those who
I like mine ok, but I paid $69 for it when they were discontinued. I
think that for $150 used you could get something a little more upscale.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Gaurav Aggarwal wrote:
Does anyone have an
Small pocket change?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/29/nebay29.xml
graywolf wrote:
Second chance bids are supposed to come as BIN offers. Anything else is
probably someone trying to pick up a bit of spare pocket change without
working for it.
graywolf
http://www
I kind of like it. The image on my screen however has no differentation
between the sky and the screen. I would like to see the sky burnt in
just a smidge. I if the sky is not paper white on the print disreguard
this comment.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Pro
I expect that the sensor cover is exceedingly thin, while blue tack
sounds like it would be wonderful for cleaning relatively thick glass, I
may look into it for lenses, I would be afraid of putting too much
pressure on the sensor cover and causing it to crack.
Don Williams wrote:
Although t
That figures!
On Oct 29, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
vi
Aaarrghh :)
Java script does this nicely. I use it now and again for real
estate clients.
Flash is the devils spawn and the only thing worse than flash is a
flash coder ;)
I have seen at least two Flash sites that I thought were don
Usually, if someone has particularly consistent exposure he also has
correct exposure unless there is an equipment failure. Consistent
exposure requires quite a lot of skill. However this thread is coming
perilously close to the one which I was told not to post about anymore.
graywolf
http://
50mm focal length *is* a near perfect portrait lens field of view for
the DSLRs.
An M50/2 is most likely not worth the CLA charge ... new Pentax A50/2
lenses are available from B&H Photo for less than $70, and go used on
Ebay for as low as $30 or so in good condition.
Godfrey
On Oct 28,
Cor, he paints with light!
Beat you to it, Cotty. HAR!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank said>
draw your own conclusions...
-frank
Great, now i have to le
Hi!
So, which website editor do you guys use?
I can't do any HTML myself and I want to publish 3D panoramas made with e.i.
Iseemedia/PhotoVista (flash or java).
Good ideas are most welcome.
Jens, I am using ppwizard. But I am a programmer, so it comes natural to me.
You can read more about pp
I do not think it is better. What we think is good changes with time.
Many old photos look stilted and simple, but that is because we have
different tastses today than people had back then. The interesting thing
is the best photos from yesteryear are timeless. That will apply to
today's images
Don't know what moved me, but I decided to work with an exposure I
made last fall when I returned home from San Francisco this evening.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/42q.htm
Comments, critique, always appreciated.
best,
Godfrey
Back when I was in the Air Force (60-63) I had a friend that did a lot
of weddings on the side. He had a stereo camera mounted on top of his
Graphic. He used the stereo shots as a dollar builder, back in those
days everyone sold 12 B&W 8x10's in an album, and no one bought extra
shots.
I keep
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: Cleaning Sensors
I think I have mentioned the Wal-Mart tech who came across the lab to
see what I wanted dragging a customers film on the floor behind him.
Say, Wheatfield, did he learn his lab techniques from you ?
If he was ste
Back in the 80's when I was trying to make a living with my cameras, I
expected to get 1 great shot out of 12 and that all 12 would be salable
(Which is why I hated weddings there were always duds that were not the
photographer's fault, often of critical shots. However, I think
successful weddi
PPA is the Professional Photographers of America. An organization for
portrait studio owners and wedding photographers. It has the same
relation to photography that your National Cheese Council does to
cheese. It is a sales aid for members.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <
On Oct 28, 2005, at 11:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Nothing is worse than having to clean film. My sensor gets nowhere
near as dirty as do those negatives in the lab. I used to figure at
least thirty minutes cleaning every scan. UGH.
That's why I started using dICE with my scanner. It take
I think I have to agree with that, Shel.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's just that attitude that has contributed to the lowering of the quality
bar. Usable results - maybe. But high quali
Was this roll of film in checked luggage on an
airplane? It looks like the work of one of the
high-dose Xray machines that scans checked luggage.
Rick
--- Toralf Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea about what went wrong
> here:
>
>
http://www.procaptura.com/~toralf/bild
Wow, thanks, Frank. I have been saying that almost since my first day on
the list. But then I am a guy who had been told by lab owners' that my
exposures were the most consistant they had ever seen. Too bad my
clients did not think that was real important. While I was make a
midnight snack, I w
Well, from my experience to be a financially successful professional
photographer you need three things.
1. A really tough ego.
2. Relentless self promotion.
3. An eye for an image.
All else is optional.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
I was looking up whetstones today, I thought, "Wow, a thread about it on
the PDML". I am somewhat disappointed.
In case anyone is interested, I discovered that black arkansas stones
are again pretty much available again. And that there is something
called translucent arkansas stones that are
It has happend already. In the movies.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Cotty wrote:
On 27/10/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed:
Back like 30 or more years ago, in the Communist Czechoslovakian
republic,
35-40 years I guess, but it has improve a bunch in the last 20. The
costly part is setting up the program. Once that is done it is quite
cheap (reletively) to run a few parts, or even just one, at a time.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
--
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: Underwater cameras
Thanks Herb and Christian for the help with the camera.
I think I can give my friend a bit of direction now.
Your welcome.
Nice Pictures, Chr
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: Underwater cameras
Wonderful shots! Thank you very much for sharing them.
Thanks.
I'll have to get a housing for my Optio S before I go to Maui andKauai
ne
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I deliberately composted it
I've composted many a film image.. ;-)
Christian
LOL! Yep, I trashed that photo. My smell checker missed that stinker.
Meant composed of course.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
graywolf wrote:
Just to put this stuff into perspective. With my first camera I took a
I bought my first Pentax in 1961 or 62. Pentax has always seemed behind
the times. Yes they actually invented a lot of the neat stuff that made
SLR's better for general photography, but they often licensed those
inventions to competitors rather than using them themselves. Except for
that brief
Hi Bob ...
Why Bob, don't you know the photo was staged and that the razor blade was a
prop
Thanks for looking and for your comment. Most appreciate both ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bob Sullivan
> Like Frank says, a haunting photo.
> It's a simple photo, well executed...
> and
Just to put this stuff into perspective. With my first camera I took a
photo of water flowing over a dam under a bridge. I had to have a buddy
hold my legs while hanging upside down. I deliberately composted it at a
45 degree angle as that is the way I thought it looked best. I took the
film to
Shel,
Like Frank says, a haunting photo.
It's a simple photo, well executed...
and just screams DANGER to me.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/27/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An oldie
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/mikesspoon.html
>
> Spotmatic, ST 50/1.4, Tri-x in Acufine,
Second chance bids are supposed to come as BIN offers. Anything else is
probably someone trying to pick up a bit of spare pocket change without
working for it.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Peter Jordan wrote:
I h
The is actually a slight change of angle of view with aperture. It is
more obvious very close distances. However, I was not able to load your
photos to look at them, and so have no idea how much you are talking about.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
-
I went through the printer selection process just a few weeks ago and
ended up with the R2400, big brother to the R1800.
If your goal is primarily color prints, and glossy surface, the R1800
is probably a better choice. If you need to print a lot of B&W and
particularly prefer matte papers,
I sometimes like it as a portrait lens on the Pentax DSLR cameras
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Barry Rice
> This 50/2 lens is in good shape, but would need a CLA before it would be
> even sellable. Is there any compelling reason to keep this lens? Any
secrets
> about it, like "oh, m
I do, Boris ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Boris Liberman
> Shel, I have a suggestion which is related to your question only
> indirectly. When you switch lenses I (humbly) suggest you turn off the
> camera... I started doing it about a month ago. I should say that it
> does indeed
I've had two M28/2.8's cleaned for slow aperture blades.
Regards, Bob S.
On 10/28/05, Ralf R. Radermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Today, I've received my 'new' M2.8/35 mm and the aperture closes
> extremely slow. I had just discarded another lens of this type for
> exactly the
i posted earlier but maybe it didn't get through to everyone - $1699USD list
price. by being first at that price/spec point, it is setting the benchmark
by which all successors are judged. the AF and FPS capabilities are much
higher than other cameras at this price point have been in the past.
and it take quite a bit of dust to affect the image.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Tom C"
Subject: RE: My new Macro - a lemon.
The dust would probably both
Nikon designed them. Sony made at least one of them.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 12:42 PM
Subject: Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
Didn't Nikon have to start making their own sensors to get what they
25 year old lenses often have what we tech types refer to as "Gunk!" in
them. It does tend to slow down the diaphagm action. A CLA will most
likely make it work OK for another 20-25 years.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
well, i only have one AF extender. i don't use my 1.4X-L or 2X-L extenders
except on the A* 400/2.8, and even then very seldom. the 1.7X is AF and that
is the main reason. i decided that i just didn't like the Sigma AF ones i
had and got rid of them.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From:
I think I have mentioned the Wal-Mart tech who came across the lab to
see what I wanted dragging a customers film on the floor behind him.
Say, Wheatfield, did he learn his lab techniques from you ?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Gang.
>
> Its not the cover of the Rolling Stone, yet, but this shot made the the cover
> of: Local
> paper called
> Farm and Rural Life.
>
>
> http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=view¤t=KVA_PRS_8389.jpg
>
> Hey, its a start.LOL
>
> Now
If you have to ask, then the answer is probably, no.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Barry Rice wrote:
Hey Folks,
I just found an old pentax M 50/2 lens. I've already got a Pentax M50/1.4
and an F 50/2.8 macro.
This
Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> Ann,
>
> Check the processing forums at photodotnet. You might also search
> through the large format forums. Kentmere is mentioned frequently.
Thanks Scott -
I was hoping for a quick nod or nay from one of
"us" -
this is for a friend, not me. I was going to
suggest
http://www.thejournalnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051028/NEWS02/510280384/1017
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: Skills - was Re: Sent My Brother to the Dark Side
At 18:58 2005.10.28, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:38:05 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ralf R. Radermacher)
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: M 2.8/35 mm - general aperture problem?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encodi
Thanks Herb and Christian for the help with the camera.
I think I can give my friend a bit of direction now.
Nice Pictures, Christian.
William Robb
Wonderful shots! Thank you very much for sharing them.
I'll have to get a housing for my Optio S before I go to Maui andKauai next
year!
I have no trouble using the map with Firefox. Check your settings.
I remember seeing it the first time at a machine shop in Chicago in the
late seventies. So it's been around quite a while.
Paul
On Oct 28, 2005, at 6:57 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 28 Oct 2005 at 13:06, graywolf wrote:
Apparently you are not aware of how numerical contolled machine tools
work.
Ann,
Check the processing forums at photodotnet. You might also search
through the large format forums. Kentmere is mentioned frequently.
On 10/28/05, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone use this stuff?
> I have a friend who asked me to ask.
> He is going to be taking an advanced
I got "You need to be signed in to see this page."
Had the same problem with one I bought from ebay, the seller sent me an
A version to replace the bad M version.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Hello all,
Today, I've received my 'new' M2.8/35 mm and the aperture closes
extremely slow. I had just discarded another lens of this type for
exactly the
Looks to me like the following shot was so over exposed that light went
through the film, bounced around, and effected that frame on the take-up reel.
Powell
>In any case, I've now also done a quick scan of the entire negative
>strip. Not a very good one as I used a plain A4 document scanner, b
Barry, don't tear it apart yet - it will make a fine loupe for viewing
slides on a light table or other stuff where you want to get up close and
personal.
Just did a test with another lens. Now I am a tiny bit ashamed. No I am very
ashamed. The spec is in frame, at same spot with the other lens. Don't
really know if I shall laugh or cry.
Haven't had dust on sensor until now.
First I saw the dust in the lens. Didn't think much about it, just did so
On 28 Oct 2005 at 21:06, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
> >
> > Yeah, nay, and/or comments
> > what would you do differently?
>
> Ken, this is very interesting. I cannot notice any fish eye effects here...
Boris the fishe
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby"
Subject: RE: My new Macro - a lemon.
First test shots. Done in a hurry. Roughly converted
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fototim/sets/1234555/
I'm surprised that there is enough depth of focus to bring a speck on the
lens into that sharp of fo
I like the sky in Wildcat -- it's very interesting looking, and I love
Workin' Hard (what a cute bear).
On 10/28/05, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a few photos from this summer that I've meant to post but never
> got around to it...
>
> "Rear Deck"
> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gn
On 28 Oct 2005 at 11:32, graywolf wrote:
> Howcome so many folks here have/had all these troubles with dust and
> scratches on negatives? I have only had much of a problem when I did
> something stupid, which was often enough but aviodable with a little
> effort on my part. Wear those disposabl
Mark,
I have no problem with what I read about the features and capability of
the R800, except the 8.5" limit.
Happy it's serving you well.
Thanks for your help.
Jack
--- Mark Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Jack Davis writeL
> >I'd appreciate any opinions +/- about the Epson R180
Beautiful photo of the hills, but all the leaves look so uniformly brown.
On 10/28/05, Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Southwest Virginia appalachia at sunset. Took a quick flight in
> my plane this week at sunset to try to capture some color. Haven't had
> time to try to get
We have talked about a Fiddly Bits PDML in Oslo next weekend. I had a look
in my almanac, and realized I had run out of time. I have been rather busy
talking shit here, fixing my car (the brakes was no good), deciding what to
do with my roof falling down on me and my beloved in my house, etc. Panic
On 28 Oct 2005 at 6:44, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Nothing is worse than having to clean film. My sensor gets nowhere near
> as dirty as do those negatives in the lab. I used to figure at least
> thirty minutes cleaning every scan. UGH.
I've had some pretty bad sensor dust problems that I've only
On 28 Oct 2005 at 20:03, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Shel, I have a suggestion which is related to your question only
> indirectly. When you switch lenses I (humbly) suggest you turn off the
> camera... I started doing it about a month ago. I should say that it
> does indeed reduce the amount of du
If it's in good shape, it doesn't need a CLA. If it does need a CLA, it's
not in good shape.
John
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:08:21 +0100, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably not, you should be able to find one that doesn't need a CLA for
less than the CLA would cost.
-Adam
Barry
On 28 Oct 2005 at 13:06, graywolf wrote:
> Apparently you are not aware of how numerical contolled machine tools
> work. It is a matter of loading the correct program, chucking the
> correct piece of metal, and hitting the on button. Once you have the
> program, it takes only ten minutes or so
Jack Davis writeL
>I'd appreciate any opinions +/- about the Epson R1800. Whatever your
>experience or have heard about it.
>Have a tired Epson 820, the product of which has been sort of a
>acceptable 'proof', but now feel it's time to get more serious about a
>home produced final print.
>If you
It is a spec, on f5,6. If you look closer at the same spot you will see it.
At f8 it is clearly visible, take my word for it ;-)
And it is more visible for every step up to f32 :-(
I have located it in the glass. It seems to be in one of lenses closest to
the camera body. It's there. And it frustr
Thanks Kevin. I may give it a try.
The Namo has in fact both - HTML and Wizards. This means I can review in one
way what I did in the other :-).
Regards
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 29. ok
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
