...is a pain in the ass compared to scanning slides.
You got that right. I hate scanning negs. Prints are OK because I
have some daylight-balanced tungsten bulbs if I need a reference...
provided I actually want to match the print. ...
Hmm. I started scanning film somewhere around 1988
And a very BAD link
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm
Artistically most people tend to prefer sharper foregrounds
and softer backgrounds. Fuzzy foregrounds tend to make people
crazy, and fuzzy backgrounds are fine. Therefore I classify
lenses with good bokeh as those with good
Actually, the idea of eating someone's face is rather intriguing.
Depending on who it was, of course.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
I like it braised and roasted with caramelised mango and puréed potato with
Périgord truffle.
Let me know how you enjoy it, Clarice.
Hannibal.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/07 Tue PM 11:45:50 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Helmut Newton
Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether or not
photography is art. Far as I'm concerned it is and
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/08 Wed AM 12:23:15 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Sad decline of PDML /WAS Re: GFM
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2006 23:59
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Sad decline of
Op Wed, 08 Feb 2006 05:31:40 +0100 schreef Juan Buhler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also, take a look at this page:
http://flarg.com/Graphics/Bokeh.html
My friend Dan Wexler implemented realistic optical bokeh in a
computer renderer, and he has a little interactive image in that page
that helps see
On 7/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello, new guy here. Could any of you tell me where the word boketh came
from ?
Sure. It's the plural of bokeh.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
In a message dated 2/7/2006 8:27:34 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And a very BAD link
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/bokeh.htm
Fuzzy foregrounds tend to make people crazy...
Derby
Is this what happend Frank?
Dave
VBG
On Feb 7, 2006, at 4:24 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I saw the Helmut Newton documentary this evening. Brilliant stuff.
He posessed this amasing secure eye for the image.
That self-assurance is characteristic of most great photographers.
Newton was one of the best. He was an idol of mine for
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether or not
photography is art. Far as I'm concerned it is and that's settled
law. Helmut's answer is a bit oblique for me and since you don't
disagree, care to comment further? Thanks!
In
On Feb 7, 2006, at 6:45 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
BTW: The local supermarket now has a device with which they can take
your digital image file and print it on a cake in colored icing. So
good taste *can* be discussed with regards to photography.
Sorry Charley, we want photographs that taste
On Feb 7, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
While I'm at it, Pentax's lack of a lens line-up made me think that
the company is promoting a Zen approach to photography:
Have lenses. Don't have lenses. It matters not.
Want lenses. Don't have lenses. Brings unhappiness.
Don't have
On Feb 7, 2006, at 11:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bokeh comes from the Japanese word for fuzziness (especially
applied befuddled
senior citizens).
Thus the ancient Japanese saying, If it ain't bokeh, don't fix it.
Bob
Hmmm...
I received an email from rugift today. Seems they have signed an
agreement with the Lomographic Society so that Horizon cameras will only
be available through them. So a Horizon S3 U-500, currently available on
the rugift.com site for $US369, will soon only be available for a
On it's way: A*85/1.4 from Canada. It'll need some mount repair,
but I've performed that feat before. After that will come a comparison:
Will I keep it or the A100/2.8? And is WW still lusting for an A100/2.8?
They're really tough to find and even harder yet to part with.
It will be
Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...is a pain in the ass compared to scanning slides.
Yes.
Sorry. I don't have anything to add to that!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
In a message dated 2/6/2006 9:47:02
AM Pacific
Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Home sick today, so i'm playing in PS abit.
Heres is one from Saturday night. Converted to BW in PS Ver 6
Nikon D2H, 35-70 f2.8, SB80dx flash 125 at F4
Bob Shell wrote on 08.02.06 12:33:
Zen would say: The lens is irrelevant to the blind photographer.
And Murphy's law says: you can desire whatever Pentax lens you want but it
won't be in stock when you come to buy it ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
More than anything else, regardless of how it was handled, the withdrawing
of the request simply because there were a number of rude people and
saying 'it's more trouble than it's worth' when the images
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
You guys don't have an overabundance of lawyers up there?
We encourage them to become politicians. It's easier to keep track of them
that way.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Hmmm. I'd say the whole thing was just sort of bungled from the PDML side.
The photographer always retains all rights unless otherwise indicated.
Anyone who has ever sold a photo or even displayed
Those Lomography people sure know how to drive prices up. Now if
they offered a really good warranty it might be worth the extra
money. I've never bought from them because of their prices. Anyone
here bought from them?
Bob
On Feb 8, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Hmmm...
I
On Feb 8, 2006, at 7:43 AM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Bob Shell wrote on 08.02.06 12:33:
Zen would say: The lens is irrelevant to the blind photographer.
And Murphy's law says: you can desire whatever Pentax lens you
want but it
won't be in stock when you come to buy it ;-)
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/08 Wed PM 12:42:21 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Hmmm. I'd say the whole thing was just
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/08 Wed PM 12:57:57 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: LomoSoc swallows Rugift
Those Lomography people sure know how to drive prices up. Now if
they offered a really good warranty it might be worth the extra
money. I've
Some one mentioned this the other day. There are
two -- one with seven elements and one other. Does
anyone know these things well? I've seen one AF
version on some US dealers page but now forget where.
Zen would say: If you don't use them is there any
difference to the quality.
Don
--
Dr E
I see your point. :-(
It doesn't appear that the 3229 could be modified either.
However it looks as though you could replace the tilt head
with a small QR ballhead, then you could have the correct
orientation.
The only purpose of the tilt is to let the lens down to
rest in the cradle, since
Adorama carries the Kenko, Tamron and Tokina.
The Tokina is the lowest priced 7 element 2x.
I have/have had the Tamron and Promaster 4 and
7 element ones, the 7 element are far better
optically.(Tamron and Promaster are identical.)
They are very usable but image quality still
suffers noticably.
Well, it may be far easier once one is at the top of
the learning curve, but the curve is steep and high.
I am scanning skiing pics, so the contrast is high.
When I get the snow white, the highlights blow. Bring
down the highlights, the colors get muddy. Bring up
the colors, the snow isn't
Thus the ancient Japanese saying, If it ain't bokeh, don't fix it.
ROTFL.
--
Boris
Don Williams wrote:
Zen would say: If you don't use them is there any difference
to the quality.
I think Zen ought to say if he's a Pentax user first.
Malcolm
I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether or not
photography is art. Far as I'm concerned it is and that's
settled law. Helmut's answer is a bit oblique for me and
since you don't disagree, care to comment further? Thanks!
Define art
Guy who was buddies with Ralphy boy.
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Here goes:
http://www.fotoralf.de/temp/0600536bw.jpg
...and, for comparison, the original colour version...
http://www.fotoralf.de/temp/0600536.jpg
So, whats the verdict. I like the b/w version. But is it still
recognizable as a night shot?
Nope sorry The
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello, new guy here. Could any of you tell me where the word boketh came
from ? To me it sounds sorta,kinda like hebrew, yes, no?. Also, was there
another meaning other then our use in photo-speak? thanks, sgstory
Well thanks folks,that was helpfull even if i
Thanks, Jens.
I thought maybe Helmut had further commented about his art remark.
Wondered if the comment might have been his conclusion on the subject,
in which case, I was interested in his reasoning.
Jack
--- Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Helmuts answer was very elegant - and
Tom C wrote:
The whole thing was just sort of bungled from the Pentax side...
Nothing new there! :-)
oh yeah, MARK!
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Hear, hear!
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 7, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether or not
photography is art. Far as I'm concerned it is and that's
settled
law. Helmut's answer is a bit oblique for me and since
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In a message dated 2/6/2006 9:47:02 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Home sick today, so i'm playing in PS abit.
Heres is one from Saturday night. Converted to BW in PS Ver 6
Nikon D2H, 35-70 f2.8, SB80dx flash 125 at F4
Bob wrote:
Art is anything an artist says, it is.
BTW It's very tempting to answer: Define an artist!
But, I don't think so. Art is what the buyers, spectators, listeners etc.
consider to be art. Everyone but the artist, basicly.
Theartist never knows for sure if it's art. The label art must be
No, he was/is a singer, used to work with Paul Simon :-)
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Dave Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. februar 2006 15:45
Til: PDML
Emne: RE: OT: Helmut Newton
I don't want to start a whole big thing about whether
William Robb wrote:
Tom, I think you are being a bit unfair.
It's pretty obvious to me that Marco was doing this on a bit of a lark. As
soon as it became apparent that he was going to have to involve the legal
team, I would guess that it became more trouble than it was worth.
Possibly.
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
:o)
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Juan Buhler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 07 February 2006 17:07
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Street
It is probably the same teleconverter, that is KENKO MC7. It's excellent. (I
read test test).
I have the Tele Plus versione that is an adjustable Macro converter. It is
excellent too.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL
I forgot to tell, that the question was put to him, as he was opening a
Helmut Newton exibition in an art museum.
BTW. What struck me was his method of working.
He always seemed to know in advance ehat he wanted to do. He picked out the
model especially for each photograph or session by making a
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
No,
Yes.
This was the first time I know of that an individual representing a
corporate entity came to the list looking for photographs to use in a
trade show or for marketing purposes.
Did I miss an email? I don't recall seeing an email from Pentax Canada
soliciting images for their usage. I do
Mailing me a TIFF file would be of limited value since you've done
the analog to digital capture in the TIFF. Getting a good scan to
work with is important.
The primary job of the scanner is to acquire the data. The key to
getting good scans is setting up the capture to bring in all the
Gonz wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
Why look at her? It's all plastic anyways.
-Adam
Who's seen Eileen Twain's yearbook pics from highschool. She didn't look
at all similar to how she does today.
Summing up:
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
No,
Yes,
Hello, new guy here. Could any of you tell me where the word boketh came
from ?
Sure. It's the plural of bokeh.
No, No, No. It came from the mouth of a person with a lisp.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: THEWORD?
On 7/2/06, [EMAIL
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hmmm. I'd say the whole thing was just sort of bungled from the PDML side.
The photographer always retains all rights unless otherwise indicated.
Anyone who has ever sold a photo or even displayed a photo must know that.
It's as obvious as the nose on your face.
Paul
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gonz wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
You don't impress me much...
Kostas :-)
Okay, Tom, let me rephrase my question. Does your Jack Ass remark
have anything to do with the Pentax wants your digital pix thread. I
haven't been following that thread, but just took a quick look at a
couple responses and gather that the request is now some sort of
mystery and has been summarily
How good is the DA 16-45 lens? Is it worth the extra $ purchasing this
over the 18-55 or would the FA 24-90 be a better choice?
DG
I think it was natural to think that since the person works for Pentax
Canada and the photos were to be used by somone representing Pentax Canada
at a trade show, that it was indeed Pentax Canada that using our photos and
not just an individual.
At least that was my perception.
Tom C.
And Pam Anderson...
From: Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Street photography illegal in Quebec?
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 10:01:30 -0600
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except
I love the DA 16-45. It's as sharp as a decent prime and has a high quality
feel. It's among my most used lenses. I have no experience with either of the
other two lenses you mention.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: dick graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How good is
For being a guy that appreciats, jokes, puns, etc., you miss mine
frequently. :-) I admit this one was very oblique.
Your name is Jack right? The other thread of predominance was mentioning
jackasses.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
I don't disagree.
I feel it would have had more legitimacy if he had directly contacted the
list on behalf of Pentax Canada.
Why didn't he is the question.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
I think it was
Jack Davis wrote:
Okay, Tom, let me rephrase my question. Does your Jack Ass remark
have anything to do with the Pentax wants your digital pix thread. I
haven't been following that thread, but just took a quick look at a
couple responses and gather that the request is now some sort of
mystery
If someone wanted to download the PUG images, they wouldn't have to ask. All
they would have to do is open the images and drag them to their desktop. That's
the nature of the web, and anyone who contributes an image should know it.
Paul
-- Original message --
On Feb 8, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Gonz wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
There's two of her?
Bob
I received mine on 13th Jan.
I ordered it from cameracanada.com
Paid CDN644
Didn't know how that compared with the US because at the time none of
the sites (BH Adorama) were listing it
Wendy
On 2/7/06, Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I placed an order for the DA 10-17 three weeks ago
That has been my feeling as well. If I was putting 2 + 2 together, I would
guess that I percieved an official request being handled in an unofficial
manner, when the reality may have been that it was an unofficial request.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Hmmm. I'd say the whole thing was just sort of bungled from the PDML side.
Now that's being a little unfair because it wasn't just the PDML that
was involved. But, yes, it was us rather than Pentax who bungled: Some
people hit the send key without thinking. A moment's
Good grief Paul - I know that. You didn't read my last sentence? :-)
Tom C.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:51:08 +
If someone wanted to download the PUG images,
And that's really not too difficult. There are, if needed, literally
hundreds of tutorials on the net that deal with scanning color negatives.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
The primary job of the scanner is to acquire the data. The key to
getting good scans is setting
I found the DA16-45 to be an excellent performer where the DA18-55
seemed somewhat lacking in contrast wide open as well as a bit too
slow. However, it's much larger/heavier than the DA18-55. Ultimately,
I find I prefer the FA20-35 as my wide zoom.
I only have a little experience with the
Worth every penny.
dick graham wrote:
How good is the DA 16-45 lens? Is it worth the extra $ purchasing this
over the 18-55 or would the FA 24-90 be a better choice?
DG
--
Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture of me when I
was younger. Every picture of you is when you
I didn't hit the 'SEND' button without thinking. I asked perfectly
legitimate questions based on the nature of the request.
If other prople didn't think to ask, it doesn't make me suspicious any more
than it makes them careless, does it?
Tom C.
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I mainly bought the 16-45 (over the FAJ 18-35, since the DA 18-55mm was not
yet available) for its 16mm end. Then I compared the DA 16-45 to the 18-55
and I find the former to be better, especially at wider end. Their prices
are so much apart that it's not easy to suggest you to go for the
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:58:18AM -0700, Tom C wrote:
My perception (probably incorrectly) at the outset and I think others was,
that this was more or less Pentax Canada asking for these pictures.
And that, I think, is where the root of the problem lies.
I assumed that, as it *didn't* come
From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Wants Your Digital Pix
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:26:35 -0500
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:58:18AM -0700, Tom C wrote:
My perception (probably incorrectly) at the outset and I
I have just seen this in a Spanish photo site (in
Spanish):
http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/Pentax-objetivos-reflex,1_2278
that refers to a press release (in English):
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2006/200604.html
The Spanish site hypothetizes about Pentax
concentrating on lens, with
Gonz wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
Why look at her? It's all plastic anyways.
Plastic is our friend.:-)
-Adam
Who's seen Eileen Twain's
I find that interesting. Thanks Jaume!
I won't subscribe to that hypotesis so easy. What is known is that Pentax is
increasing their manufacturing capability, thinking to sell more lenses.
That's good for users, who experience so much shortage.
BTW, 1 million lenses (to become 1.6 million
I mainly bought the 16-45 (over the
FAJ 18-35,
since the DA 18-55mm was not
yet available) for its 16mm end. Then I compared the DA 16-45 to the 18-55
and I find the former to be better, especially at wider end.
Dario
I'm still a bit worried about
As I said, I wasn't following that thread. (if it was/is the one I
mentioned).
I thought it a possible r e a c h, but I'm just insecure enough to want
to know for sure.
Incidently, not always certain what my name is. =))
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For being a guy that appreciats,
On 2/7/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. Frank's word is good enough for me.
Words you may live to regret, Paul! LOL
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Hi Guys,
I wanted to use two manual focus lenses more effectively on my Pentax
ZX-5n and ordered the split image focusing screen of ZX-M. It arrived today.
Now how do I change it? I have changed the screen on my PZ-1 (I used
a Beattie Intenscreen). That was very easy. Any instructions/tips for
Pretty much the same as the PZ-1 except on the 5n the little
release tab hides behind the mirror bumper foam.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Gaurav Aggarwal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 12:53 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: how to change
On 2/7/06, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. Frank's word is good enough for me.
Words you may live to regret, Paul! LOL
-frank
Just ask border patrol.
Dave
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Excellent! They've hired a helper for Nyugen. Seriously, this is a bit of good
news. How long will it be before someone here determines that it's yet another
sign of Pentax's imminent demise?
-- Original message --
From: Jaume Lahuerta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gonz wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
You don't impress me much...
Okay, so you're a rocket scientist...
Kostas :-)
--
Someone handed me a picture
:) (forgot that)
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Gonz wrote:
Bob W wrote:
Don't worry about it. Nobody wants to look at Canadians anyway...
Except for Shania Twain!
You don't impress me much...
Kostas :-)
--
Someone handed me a picture and said, This is a picture
--- Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
BTW, 1 million lenses (to become 1.6 million lenses)
include PS, CCTV and
cameraphones. Which cameraphones?
Maybe this ones?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0410/04102001samsung_schs250.asp
...Samsung again!
Hi Aaron.
I skipped the images wanted thread.
great to see you on the list again, even if it was that brief.
Would be nice to have you around for a little longer at a time,
though. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
In a message dated 2/8/2006 8:50:09 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I love the DA 16-45. It's as sharp as a decent prime and has a high quality
feel. It's among my most used lenses. I have no experience with either of the
other two lenses you mention.
Paul
--
In response to the tired Is photography art? question, I
think it was Man Ray who responded Art is not photograpy!
Basically it was a stupid question when first asked, and
betrays the stupidity of anyone who continues to ask it
today. Art is anything an artist says it is.
Define
In a message dated 2/8/2006 10:43:24 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I said, I wasn't following that thread. (if it was/is the one I
mentioned).
I thought it a possible r e a c h, but I'm just insecure enough to want
to know for sure.
Incidently, not always certain what my
In a message dated 2/8/2006 8:46:26 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And Pam Anderson...
===
Oh, can we blame Canada for her?
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
In a message dated 2/8/2006 11:36:56 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Define artist.
Bob
===
Someone who makes/creates art.
Marnie aka Doe vbg
A link somebody sent me to some very good photos:
http://www.paulmellorphotography.co.uk/pmpimage3.htm
Bob
It's obvious that Pentax will be getting out of the camera business and
concentrating on optics. This will not be the demise of Pentax, but the
demise of Pentax designed and manufactured SLR bodies. Soon Pentax will be
primarily an aftermarket lens manufacturer, like Tokina and Sigma, and a
Thanks for sharing these. I find them interesting both for their contrast and
their high contrast texture. Although it's difficult to say for certain when
viewing images this small, it appears that the photographer may have
intentionally oversharpened a bit for effect. Good stuff.
Paul
Although that flies in the face of what Pentax has said. Specifically, that
they will be focusing less on PS cameras and more on DSLR cameras. However, I
wouldn't be suprised if Samsung builds some of the bodies. Makes no difference
as far as I'm concerned.
-- Original message
Not being a naysayer... but I've worked on a number of contracts that were
cancelled and at a number of firms that were purchased, merged, or
otherwise/subsequently became defunct.
A common thread throughout is that 'the powers that be' do not let on that
anything is coming. It's full speed
On Feb 8, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Bob W wrote:
Define artist.
An artist is anyone who says he is an artist.
Bob
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/45122
-- Original message --
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not being a naysayer... but
You? Never :-))
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
