Hi Pentaxians
Last week I found some very old wooden framed photographs hidden under a lot
of paintings in a second hand store.
This are just qwuick scans from the framed photos, which are too big to fit
completely on the A4 scanner ;-)
One is undated with a very nice golden passepartout with
I've undusted and updated an old project, hence April issue is now available
in your newsstand!
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/misstan.jpg
The nude beach is about out 15min further up the coast :-)
But you do see topless bathers at the less overcrowded beaches.
Dave
On 3/23/06, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:47 PM, David Savage wrote:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_017.htm
Perth's
LOL!
Very, very good!
Jostein
Still giggling
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: PDML magazines (was: Which tele lens for poor mans bird
photography)
I've undusted and updated
Hi!
Shel, it seems my e-mail don't reach you. Probably something wrong with
my e-mail set up.
If you see this message please reply off-list.
Thanks.
Boris
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Dario Bonazza wrote:
I've undusted and updated an old project, hence April issue is now available
in your newsstand!
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/misstan.jpg
I think it ties in well with the (old) topic-subject: with the right
bird, even your bog standard M135/3.5
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Dario Bonazza wrote:
I've undusted and updated an old project, hence April issue is now
available in your newsstand!
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/misstan.jpg
I have to say, the cormorant is inspired...
Kostas
On 23/3/06, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've undusted and updated an old project, hence April issue is now available
in your newsstand!
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/misstan.jpg
Italian humour : oxymoron
;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The plethora of panoramas posted here in recent weeks is interesting from a
technical standpoint, but for the most part they are boring and
uninteresting photos - at best a documentary of some space that looks good
spread out over a wide number of pixels. I've seen nothing
If you start to compare medium format and DSLR, you have to think about
lenses.
Image quality, file size, resolution... it is only for pixel-peepers.
Even at A4 print size you can see difference how out of focus areas are
rendered. Medium format lenses draw image differently. And bokeh from
On 3/23/06, Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
What battery replacement do you use for the Leica instead of the Mercury
PX625?
I don't know, as I've not had to replace the battery yet (I think I've
owned it for about 3 or 4 years now). Since it only powers the
match-needle meter, they
I don't shoot panos and have no desire to. I don't care much for nature
photography of the type frequently seen here, and cityscapes generally bore
me, having lived in and around many cities all my life. That doesn't mean
that I can't enjoy some, dislike others, or have some ideas and opinions
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17714426
Can't be, but who knows :-).
Ken
On 3/23/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17714426
Can't be, but who knows :-).
Ken
I don't think it will be that low. I suspect it'll be priced more in
line with the 20D/30D.
But I'd love to be proven wrong :-)
--
All
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/03/23/3486.html
I just got a A50/1.7 (i know, in a thread a while ago i said i will not
get more fifties...). I don´t know if the problem is in the lens or the
LX, but when i mount the lens to the bayonet the lens aperture doesn´t
stay wide-open, but closes down to the selected aperture ?? The problem
On 3/23/06 8:44 AM, David Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17714426
Can't be, but who knows :-).
Ken
I don't think it will be that low. I suspect it'll be priced more in
line with the 20D/30D.
I too seriously doubt this
You've thrown down the gauntlet to those of use who do shoot pano's to
do something different creative.
Have a go, and give us the benefit of your vision. ;-)
To get you started on the software side, here's a simple to use free
auto stitching application:
That's nice, Juan. My slow connection makes it difficult to see the whole
photo in a reasonable amount of time. I may download it again late some
night when the computer/phone lines are nit needed for other things.
Thanks!
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Juan Buhler
Here is an
I found the problem. I looked at the lens and the camera bayonet once
more after posting here. I realised the cam on the lens which couples
the aperture with the camera had bent just slightly inwards. It was hard
to notice, it hadn´t bent too much as you might have quessed from the
fact that
Neat idea - I don't think I've ever knowingly seen a vertical pano before.
;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Mann
My only real complaint about most pans is that they're too wide.
Bigger than about 3:1 I really can't view the whole thing as an
entire photo: I end up getting
On Mar 23, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/03/23/3486.html
DA 21 has funny sun shade and new DA 70 is on the display ;-)
Otherwise nothing new since PMA.
Cheers,
Sylwek
On 3/23/06, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I too seriously doubt this rumour from a little camera store down-under.
But assuming that this is not too far from the truth, the only way Pentax
could do this is they have a cheap (competitive ?-) sensor supply, that
means...
Makes sense
The first seems like a typical pano, although there may be more there than
can be seen on my cell phone screen. The second is clearly little
different for me, and I like it quite a bit. Thanks for posting it ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Op Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:00:16 +0100 schreef Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, very nice photo's, especially the tulip. But is a vertical 'narrow
photo' still a panorama? Doesn't a panorama by definition need to be
horizontal, and a wide sweeping view? Panorama's in nature are,
From: K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/23 Thu PM 01:32:30 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Price of new D
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17714426
Can't be, but who knows :-).
Ken
If it's true about the D2, then the 645D might come
It's a pretty small file to make such big panoramas ;-))
Maybe I'll give it a shot when things settle down here, Tks for the
pointer to the software.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
You've thrown down the gauntlet to those of use who do shoot pano's to
do something different
K.Takeshita wrote on 23.03.06 14:32:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17714426
Can't be, but who knows :-).
I bet this price will be true but rather in USD than in AUD ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Airy fresh feeling. Lighting very soothing and calming.
Technically apt photog.
Nice!
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The nude beach is about out 15min further up the coast :-)
But you do see topless bathers at the less overcrowded beaches.
Dave
On 3/23/06, David Mann [EMAIL
On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:00 AM, Niko Koskela wrote:
I found the problem. I looked at the lens and the camera bayonet once
more after posting here. I realised the cam on the lens which couples
the aperture with the camera had bent just slightly inwards. It was
hard to notice, it hadn´t bent too
What is the monetary exchange rate between the AUD and the USD?
Jack
--- K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/06 8:44 AM, David Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=17714426
Can't be, but who knows :-).
Ken
US$1 approx. AU$1.40
Dave
On 3/23/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the monetary exchange rate between the AUD and the USD?
Jack
--- K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/06 8:44 AM, David Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the monetary exchange rate between the AUD and the USD?
Jack
http://www.xe.com/ucc/
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
You have to hold the button down -Arnold Newman
On 3/23/06 9:30 AM, Jack Davis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the monetary exchange rate between the AUD and the USD?
Hearing everything is priced high in Au, this sounds even stranger.
But again, nobody complains about the lower price ;-).
Ken
It only accepts .jpg files but it's not too bad at doing QD sequences.
Dave
On 3/23/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a pretty small file to make such big panoramas ;-))
Maybe I'll give it a shot when things settle down here, Tks for the
pointer to the software.
Shel
so..
if you were to take a photo at 50mm with an 8x10, 25mm and digital,
each time moving farther away to keep the same composition, and then
enlarge each to the same size print, they will be the same?
also..
so then on a large format, a 50mm is not really wide, it is just
larger,
also, also..
1) A 50mm focal length is still a normal perspective only with the
sides cut off, because the sensor is smaller than a 35mm negative, and
so the recorded image is simply smaller because of that.
which is the one that really makes more sense is correct.
Russell
He's painted a panda onto a human hair...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4836662.stm
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 23/3/06, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's painted a panda onto a human hair...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4836662.stm
Apologies - he is Chinese.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Russell Kerstetter wrote:
so..
if you were to take a photo at 50mm with an 8x10, 25mm and digital,
each time moving farther away to keep the same composition, and then
enlarge each to the same size print, they will be the same?
No, because perspective will change. Perspective is
Russell Kerstetter wrote:
also, also..
1) A 50mm focal length is still a normal perspective only with the
sides cut off, because the sensor is smaller than a 35mm negative, and
so the recorded image is simply smaller because of that.
which is the one that really makes more sense
Your sideways sneering, implying that anyone looking to assess
objective print quality is only for pixel peepers, is insulting.
The coupling of DoF and FoV is different between the two formats. I
didn't say that medium format film and the output from my DSLRs was
identical. I said print
At what ratios does a rectangle become a panoramic format?
1:3 aspect.
Is this another photographic rule? BG
Just curious if this is an accepted industry standard or what.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Panorama Challenge -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/03/23 Thu PM 03:04:45 GMT
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Japanese micro-artist does it again
He's painted a panda onto a human hair...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4836662.stm
Isn't that the cover of
Hi Jack,
If you're gonna be on a sophisticated international list such as this, you
really should know about the Universal Currency Converter:
http://www.xe.com/ucc/
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
What is the monetary exchange rate between the AUD and the USD?
NBD - it's only to learn with - gotta start someplace ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
It only accepts .jpg files but it's not too bad at doing QD sequences.
Dave
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's a pretty small file to make such big panoramas ;-))
Maybe I'll give it a
The resolution sucks though... :-)
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Japanese micro-artist does it again
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 15:04:45 +
He's painted a panda onto a human hair...
On 3/22/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/rejects.html
Darn pic just reached out and grabbed me LOL
Shel
Actually, for me the kid on the left, with the blank stare and the can
of beer (if that's what it is) makes the pic.
Good one!!
cheers,
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060323152827
Spring time, and living is easy...
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Peter Fairweather wrote:
The kind chancellor of the exchequer has raised the limit in goods
that can be imported tax/duty free from outside the EU to 1000!
Thanks for the heads-up.
Effective from when? Does it apply to used mail-order?
On 3/23/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He's painted a panda onto a human hair...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4836662.stm
Hey,
It's a living...
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Believe article says he is Chinese
On 3/23/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The resolution sucks though... :-)
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Japanese micro-artist does it again
Date:
On 3/22/06, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see your point, but what's wrong with photos that just document a
scene? Thanks to Marks, recent shot (as an example) I now know what
Pittsburgh looks like. And I find that kind of thing
The nearest one on the swan market appears to have a nose drip...:-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 5:31 PM
Subject: Swans: Foreplay...
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060323152827
Spring
Maybe it's a Canon scope. snort
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The resolution sucks though... :-)
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax list pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Japanese micro-artist does it again
And you're complaining about a few seconds or minutes when it used to
take at minimum an hour, if not a day or multiple days to get film back?
Shame on you. ;-)
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: New
The thing to remember is that, just like the camera, the card reader
has a maximum speed that it will read/write to the card. So you're
right, a better card reader will read and write faster than an
older/crappier one.
I just ordered a small SD card reader/jump drive for $6. We'll see how
fast it
On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Tom C wrote:
And you're complaining about a few seconds or minutes when it
used to take at minimum an hour, if not a day or multiple days to
get film back? ...
I've been wandering through my digital photo/picture archives of the
past 20 years lately, and
More pics:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:45 PM
Subject: PIE 2006
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/other/2006/03/23/3486.html
What's that?
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/whats.jpg
Also see the Tokina lenses:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/
Dario
And what about that Fuji KLASSE W?
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: PIE 2006
More pics:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/
Mat Maessen wrote:
The thing to remember is that, just like the camera, the card reader
has a maximum speed that it will read/write to the card. So you're
right, a better card reader will read and write faster than an
older/crappier one.
I just ordered a small SD card reader/jump drive for $6.
On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
What's that?
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/whats.jpg
Yes, I noticed it on PMA ;-) I think it can be SR activity indicator
or just place for button that will appear in final version.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
A few weeks ago I posted a query about digital alternatives to the
Kodachrome look. A couple of you had the most ingenious suggestion:
Why not shoot Kodachrome? So I did. The first roll came back today.
(Scans later. Lucky you.) It was dropped off early last week at the
pharmacy with
Well, being a micro-painter let's you carry your portfolio in a
pocket, that's handy ;oP
On 3/23/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 23/3/06, Cotty, discombobulated, unleashed:
He's painted a panda onto a human hair...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4836662.stm
Apologies - he
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: The Time Machine (was: Re: New SD Card...)
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 09:26:16 -0800
On Mar 23, 2006, at 9:02 AM, Tom C wrote:
And you're complaining about a few seconds or minutes
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ken didn't mean flat as in lacking contrast. He meant that he finds
that analog prints have more of a three dimensional look. I don't see
that, but he may well have a more discriminating eye.
Gotta be the lenses.
Y'know, the good Pentax glass that *can* be used on a
I use www.oanda.com
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 23. marts 2006 17:07
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Price of new D
Hi Jack,
If you're gonna be on a sophisticated international list
- Original Message -
From: Russell Kerstetter
Subject: Re: crop factor vs. telephoto factor
also, also..
1) A 50mm focal length is still a normal perspective only with the
sides cut off, because the sensor is smaller than a 35mm negative, and
so the recorded image is
- Original Message -
From: Russell Kerstetter
Subject: Re: crop factor vs. telephoto factor
so..
if you were to take a photo at 50mm with an 8x10, 25mm and digital,
each time moving farther away to keep the same composition, and then
enlarge each to the same size print, they
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: Panorama Challenge - Attempt Something Unique
At what ratios does a rectangle become a panoramic format?
1:3 aspect.
Is this another photographic rule? BG
Just curious if this is an accepted industry standard or what.
I
On 3/23/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I started at JPL in 1984, a single [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1024x1024 image
(1Mpixel) took upwards of 9 hours to render from our raw data on
$2.5M worth of computer equipment. By the time I left in 1988, I
could do five of them in the same
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 11:08:35AM -0800, Juan Buhler wrote:
Nothing to do with the point, but it's funny how render times stay
constant as complexity grows :)
That was a point first expounded, AFAIK, by Turner Whitted.
There are three classes of image: a 5-to-30-minute image,
a two hour
I have a daguerrotype I picked up in a junk shop. They are not rare at all,
and are usually quite cheap. One of the things I intend to do someday -
perhaps if the government ever allows me to retire - is to make some
daguerrotypes myself.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From:
I like this one Shel.
The lines don't,atleast for me, distract from the people at all.
Nice geometry.
I read in Bruce Frasers book a quick ACR fix to BW, but it was basic.
Adjust slders and go
Dave
Quoting Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/waiting1.html
I'm surprised! These are from a book of the same name:
http://www.imageexchange.com/posters/city/newyork/
http://www.imageexchange.com/posters/city/newyork/
Some of the Magnum photographers have also done a lot of panorama
photography too. Notably Josef Koudelka:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 09:46:43AM -0800, David Oswald wrote:
Mat Maessen wrote:
The thing to remember is that, just like the camera, the card reader
has a maximum speed that it will read/write to the card. So you're
right, a better card reader will read and write faster than an
Hi Bob
So do you think I will not destroy a fortune when I open the frames and them
and the nice passepartouts for my own photos?
I paid nearly nothing for them, maybe 1 dollar for one in a bundle with
other things.
But as the most expensive photo in the world has proved lately, you never
know
That sounds like you're getting the same throughput as I see with a
Belkin USB 2.0 card reader and a 2G Sandisk Ultra II CF card: about 5
minutes for a complete, full card download.
The differential from USB 2.0 to USB 1.1 is typically about 30-40x in
transfer time. Cardbus should allow a
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=438975
Here is my first attempt in 2001 with Ilford 3200 pushed to 6400. Also
first home attempt at scanning, as you may be able to tell.:-)
Dave
Equine Photography in York Region
Hi Gautam
thanks a lot for your samples.
The second one looks horrible here, maybe removing the color cast did that,
since the third one is a lot better.
Otherwise I would never use Fuji 1600 superia ;-)
I'm favoring a black and white film at the moment, I think that would also
fit the 75
Hi Aaron
this was by far the most useful contribution so far, thanks a lot for your
work.
I will have to study the large sample a bit more, I have safed it.
B/W has it's own fascination, I think that is the way to go for that 75
anniversary event.
There will be a lot of film people coming, I think
Hi Herb
I would like to see some people shots and portraits you made with the Ilford
3200 since it seems to be the way to go for me at the moment. I would use
the film at its default DX setting.
I have not found such a thing as A good photolab that will also do a test
development yet and would
Hi Godfrey
thanks for the explanation, I mostly order A4 or A3+ enlarments at the
moment printed on a professional ink printer.
On A3 the clay figures close-up made with the Pentax SFXn on ISO 100-200
still looked quite good.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Hi Gatis
My Scanner can scan 120 film so a sidestep to mid format only depends on my
limited photo budget at the moment ;-)
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Gasha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 4:14 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: mid
I wonder how Pentax determines attached lense type. I can read
Lens Type : smc PENTAX-FA J 75-300mm F4.5-5.8 AL
in EXIF for example which is correct. Does it only apply for Pentax SMC
lenses or other, Sigma lense has coding recognized by the camera?
Ideas appreciated,
The body obtains the specific lens information from the lens' ROM. I
believe it only gets this level of data from SMC Pentax- F, FA, DA
and D-FA series lenses.
Sigma and other third party manufacturers reverse engineer the Pentax
lens mount and lens ROMs, so the EXIF metadata with them
- Original Message -
From: Roman
Subject: Lense types in EXIF
I wonder how Pentax determines attached lense type. I can read
Lens Type : smc PENTAX-FA J 75-300mm F4.5-5.8 AL
in EXIF for example which is correct. Does it only apply for Pentax SMC
lenses or
Comparing against ASA 100-200 35mm color negative film scanned at
4000ppi rather than medium format film scans, the 6Mpixel images at
A3 Super (13x19) full bleed size look better.
Of course, that assumes an excellent quality capture for both: tripod
mounted camera and proper exposure,
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: mid format cameras - running cost?
Comparing against ASA 100-200 35mm color negative film scanned at 4000ppi
rather than medium format film scans, the 6Mpixel images at A3 Super
(13x19) full bleed size look better.
Of
On Mar 23, 2006, at 12:56 PM, William Robb wrote:
Comparing against ASA 100-200 35mm color negative film scanned at
4000ppi rather than medium format film scans, the 6Mpixel images
at A3 Super (13x19) full bleed size look better.
Of course, that assumes an excellent quality capture for
Roman.
When i view my Exif data using the Sigma 300 F4, it says its a Pentax
A300 f4 lens.
With the Zeniter 16, it says, what the hell is this on me.:-)
Dave Brooks
Quoting Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder how Pentax determines attached lense type. I can read
Lens Type
The Kingston cards aren't nearly as fast as an Ultra II. Which is where
the performance bottleneck comes in. The Kingston cards (I've got a 1GB
CF unit) are solidly middle of the road for performance.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
That sounds like you're getting the same throughput as I see
On 3/22/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/enjoying.html
I like this pic because it's really not about anything.
Tech: istDS, K135/2.8, ISO 200
I think it's an awesome shot.
Other than the fact that this guy's just sitting there enjoying a
Mine (an Elite Pro 2GB) claims to be a 50x card.
The comparison tests Shel posted recently measured this card
at 9.6MB/Sec - not the 12.5MB/Sec of the fastest cards, perhaps,
but a little better than middle-of-the-road if you ask me.
In any case, it's more than fast enough for my *ist-D, and I'm
On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
The Kingston cards aren't nearly as fast as an Ultra II.
Which Kingston cards -- the slow ones or the fast ones?
-Aaron
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Mar 23, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
The Kingston cards aren't nearly as fast as an Ultra II.
Which Kingston cards -- the slow ones or the fast ones?
-Aaron
The fast ones. Good, but not spectacular, unlike the Ultra II, which is
typically one of the
Perspective has very little to do with the focal length of a lens.
Only chaning the POSITION of the camera relative to the subject will change
the image perspective. The focal lengh wont.
Crop the middle out of an image taken with a 35mm and you can get EXACTLY
the same image that can be made from
True (except the rubbish about perspective - wrong frase):
1) A 50mm focal length is still a normal perspective only with the
sides cut off, because the sensor is smaller than a 35mm negative, and
so the recorded image is simply smaller because of that.
NoOnsence:
2) A 50mm focal length is
On 3/15/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taylor loves the computer screen, and amuses himself by studying
Photoshop and keeping an eye on his friend, Felix.
http://home.earthlink.net/~shel-pix/watching_felix.html
Just a QuikSnap with the old PS which is keot on the desk for such
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
