This didn't seem to get to the list so I'm sending it again.
A few PESOs today. A couple of informal portraits, but first another in
my Connecticut ZEN series...
Connecticut Zen IV
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_connzen4.html
Technical Info:
Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 400 @ 1/100sec
smc Pe
No problem, some will object to your posting other peoples auctions, but
your own is fair game.
Michael Hamilton wrote:
I've got an auction on Ebay for a Pentax camera + lens. Is it
acceptable to post a link on this list to my auction? I know people
post things for sale on the list, I'm j
If you recall, I posted this photo last week:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/06.htm
As I mentioned, it is a crop from a 6x6 cm negative. While I like the
cropped version, I also applied the same adjustments to a full-frame,
square format rendering:
http://homepage.mac.com/ra
Hi!
This morning a friend and I met for breakfast. Afterwards, we took a
stroll along the avenue and did a little window shopping. Machrina liked
these glasses, and I liked the photo opportunity.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/glasses_in_window.html
Tech: istDS, FA77mm, f8.0, ISO 200, 1/
On 7-May-06, at 11:02 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Thankfully, this shot didn't harm anything.
Birds jaunt from a tree outside my window to a feeder on my
porch. Your photos have inspired me to take some of my own! Thanks!
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/2000.jpg
tech:
*istDS; Sigma
On May 7, 2006, at 5:39 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ooh! Can you get me in to see Juan Buhler's stuff, too?
For that, you'll have to arbitrate with Signor Buhler.
Godfrey
Hi!
Tom C. commented on my previous puffin pic that the background looked
like a studio drop-down.
Here's a different perspective, taken from the exact same spot, about
three quarters of an hour later. It gives a good idea about why the
background turned out as it did in the previous pic.
Hi!
Thankfully, this shot didn't harm anything.
Birds jaunt from a tree outside my window to a feeder on my porch. Your
photos have inspired me to take some of my own! Thanks!
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/2000.jpg
tech:
*istDS; Sigma 70-300 APO @ 300mm, 1/125s f/5.6, ISO 400
http
Hi!
This morning a friend and I met for breakfast. Afterwards, we took a
stroll along the avenue and did a little window shopping. Machrina liked
these glasses, and I liked the photo opportunity.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/glasses_in_window.html
Tech: istDS, FA77mm, f8.0, ISO 200, 1/
Hi!
Finally pulled together a gallery of some 26 pix to post. Not expecting
comments on all, but if you see something you like or dislike, I'll
accept kudos and/or brickbats. Except as noted in the comments, all
photos taken with either a DS or DS2.
http://www.studio1941.com/geso/index.htm
Paul, a really wonderful & cute shot except for the green & white.
GO BLUE!
(Michiganders will understand this)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Peso- go green, go white!
Just a family snap, but important to me. My youngest
Hi!
Usually, which seems to be a part of human nature (especially male)
there is a tendency to neglect "the other toy"...
I'm weird in that I have my "comfort zone" and it takes a good push out
of it to get me to use something new. I bought that 75mm f2.8AL for the
6x7, and after a flurry o
Shel, well seen & captured.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Glasses in the Shop Window
This morning a friend and I met for breakfast. Afterwards, we took a
stroll along the avenue and did a little window shopping. Mach
Beak on the first shot is really difficult to sort out and see.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/7/06, Michael Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thankfully, this shot didn't harm anything.
Birds jaunt from a tree outside my window to a feeder on my porch.
Your photos have inspired me to take some of my
Thankfully, this shot didn't harm anything.
Birds jaunt from a tree outside my window to a feeder on my porch.
Your photos have inspired me to take some of my own! Thanks!
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/images/2000.jpg
tech:
*istDS; Sigma 70-300 APO @ 300mm, 1/125s f/5.6, ISO 400
http://
Striking display...
On 5/7/06, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This morning a friend and I met for breakfast. Afterwards, we took a
stroll along the avenue and did a little window shopping. Machrina liked
these glasses, and I liked the photo opportunity.
http://home.earthlink.net/~mo
http://cgi.ebay.ca/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7617246606
Take a look! :)
Michael Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca
Michael,
Yes, it is fine, since it is your auction.
The FAQ maintained by Graywolf
( http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html )
says:
EBAY-- It is all right to mention your own auctions. Do not mention
other items until the auction is over (common courtesy).
An exception is obviously fu
Ryan Brooks wrote:
>
> DagT wrote:
> > No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
> > person in the background.
> >
> > DagT
> >
> Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
> timing on the shot too- sums things up well.
>
> -Ryan
Ditto ditto
In a message dated 5/7/2006 7:08:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've got an auction on Ebay for a Pentax camera + lens. Is it
acceptable to post a link on this list to my auction? I know people
post things for sale on the list, I'm just not sure if this is "proper".
I've got an auction on Ebay for a Pentax camera + lens. Is it
acceptable to post a link on this list to my auction? I know people
post things for sale on the list, I'm just not sure if this is "proper".
Thanks!
Michael Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca
Jostein wrote:
>
> Tom C. commented on my previous puffin pic that the background looked
> like a studio drop-down.
>
> Here's a different perspective, taken from the exact same spot, about
> three quarters of an hour later. It gives a good idea about why the
> background turned out as it did in
In a message dated 5/6/2006 4:36:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I agree that Yahoo is evil
ann
Ditto.
You go for it, Doug. Would you like people to chip in to pay for the new
software?
Marine aka Doe
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> William Robb wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "David Dixon"
> > Subject: Re: A problem of reassembly
> >
> > >
> > > Place the filter up to your eye, and look at yourself in a mirror.
> > > If the camera-side is nearest you, you will be able to see the
This morning a friend and I met for breakfast. Afterwards, we took a
stroll along the avenue and did a little window shopping. Machrina liked
these glasses, and I liked the photo opportunity.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/glasses_in_window.html
Tech: istDS, FA77mm, f8.0, ISO 200, 1/320 s
William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Dixon"
> Subject: Re: A problem of reassembly
>
> >
> > Place the filter up to your eye, and look at yourself in a mirror.
> > If the camera-side is nearest you, you will be able to see the reflection
> > of your eye.
> > If the
Beautiful shot. Nice work.
On May 7, 2006, at 5:42 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Very good Jostein! It documents how they live very well.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>Regardless of if a show is up, if you and your wife are in the
>neighborhood of SF please let me know. A "private showing" can always
>be arranged. ;-)
Ooh! Can you get me in to see Juan Buhler's stuff, too?
;-)
Just a family snap, but important to me. My youngest daughter, Ingrid,
graduated from Michigan State University yesterday with two degrees:
English Literature and Classics. She wants to follow in my footsteps
and work as a writer. My granddaughter was on hand, and we dressed her
in an MSU cheer
- Original Message -
From: "Lucas Rijnders"
Subject: Re: OT: In support of Old Stuff.
I was amazed, as always, at the spread of equipment used in the last pug:
from spotmatic to *ist-dl and from 67 to optio S. I did not note an
immediate correlation between equipment age (or size
- Original Message -
From: "David Dixon"
Subject: Re: A problem of reassembly
Place the filter up to your eye, and look at yourself in a mirror.
If the camera-side is nearest you, you will be able to see the reflection
of your eye.
If the camera-side is away from you, your eye wi
Kenneth, I have mine set to the middle setting, which appeared to be the
consensus after much discussion in this group. The next obvious step would
be to try the same shot at all three settings and do an unmanipulated print
comparison.
My objective was to test for myself the (apparent) received
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>I have a few photos accepted for upcoming gallery shows at Pacific
>Arts League. I'd like to invite you to come see them and enjoy the
>reception, if you have the moment.
Man, I'd love to get out to see one of your shows some time, but it's
just a little bit out of th
Any color cast or anomaly you see is not as a result of in camera
processing. I shoot raw pretty much exclusively.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Coyle
> Shel - the skin tones do look a little red to me, on my admittedly
> uncalibrated monitor.
> I wonder whether this is a feature o
Just a family snap, but important to me. My youngest daughter, Ingrid,
graduated from Michigan State University yesterday with two degrees:
English Literature and Classics. She wants to follow in my footsteps
and work as a writer. My granddaughter was on hand, and we dressed her
in an MSU cheer
Especially like this shot partially due to it's total content...with a
few exceptions. You should easily be able to take care of those with
the cloning tool, for example.
#1 is a very nice "study" and one that I would have, also, shot, but #2
appeals to me more.
Artfully composed.
Jack
_
On May 7, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have a few photos accepted for upcoming gallery shows at Pacific
Arts League. I'd like to invite you to come see them and enjoy the
reception, if you have the moment.
Man, I'd love to get out to see one of your shows s
Igor,
The photographer did the job in a very typical way and it's perfectly
successful. The editor who wrote the caption likely didn't even know
who the photographer was.
Godfrey
On May 7, 2006, at 2:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
... If indeed, the photographer's intention was to draw atte
I still regret never having used that lens on my 6x7. I watched for a
used one, but never found one. I probably should have bought one new. I
spent more on the DA 12-24. But I think my film days are largely over.
However, I regret not having shot with that lens. You produced some
great work wit
I enjoyed these. I like Boston at Night. I like some of the tulip pics.
What you call Monarda, we call Bee Balm. That shot is a little too
bright, and lacking saturation. I would frame it tighter as well. The
cemetery and health world shots are well executed. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
On May 7,
On May 6, 2006, at 1:44 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Usually, which seems to be a part of human nature (especially male)
there is a tendency to neglect "the other toy"...
I'm weird in that I have my "comfort zone" and it takes a good push out
of it to get me to use something new. I bought that
Very good Jostein! It documents how they live very well.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Valid reasons all. Two versions might be the ultimate solution:-)
Paul
On May 7, 2006, at 5:23 PM, cbwaters wrote:
I will confess to wanting to get rid of the foreground heads but
decided to leave it as there are those who will be sent the link
(Grandmothers/Aunts, etc.) who will be interested
Hi Paul
I really like the Boston night shot and the lilly pads and the cemetry.
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Paul Sorenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 7:33 PM
>>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>>Subject: GESO: No theme, just pix
>>
>>
>>Finally pull
Cotty wrote:
On 7/5/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Is she still walking lop-sided, or have you had a proper prosthetic fitted?
Har! Jim lad!
Blackbeard Bob
Har! Me hearties...aye, she was built like a square rigger tis true,
and just as fast accordin to Fat Jack in Portsmouth
Thanks, Bob. Me, too - the variegated colors in the tulips was hard to
resist.
-P
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Nice shots Paul. I'm a sucker for those early landscapes and
flowers/plants.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/7/06, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally pulled together a gallery
I will confess to wanting to get rid of the foreground heads but decided to
leave it as there are those who will be sent the link (Grandmothers/Aunts,
etc.) who will be interested in the dress. I like the background too. It
adds a sense of place. But then, that's my opinion...
CW
- Orig
Good point. You should be a writer, says Paul (Who is a writer 90% of
the time.)
On May 7, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
ood
On May 7, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
2. The caption says:
"President Bush (R) announces the resignation of CIA Director Porter
Goss (L)
.. "
So
On May 7, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
2. The caption says:
"President Bush (R) announces the resignation of CIA Director Porter
Goss (L)
.. "
So, I expect at least the subject (as opposed to just the object) of
the caption sentence being in focus.
If indeed, the photographer's inte
First, I guess the photographer used a long lens, because if he would
have used wide angle, he must have been on the President's lap. This
already reduces DOF-range.
Second, he's using available light (which definitely is better for
portraits or even any photography), so probably large apertur
On May 7, 2006, at 4:46 PM, Cotty wrote:
I think the photographer wanted to direct attention to the man on the
left of frame, leaving enough detail with the man on the right to be
identified. It's a fairly common way of guiding attention in a shot.
I don't think it's a case of you being too cr
Sun, 07 May 2006 13:31:26 -0700
Ryan Brooks wrote:
> DagT wrote:
> > No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
> > person in the background.
> >
> > DagT
>
> Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
> timing on the shot too- sums things up
Tom C. commented on my previous puffin pic that the background looked
like a studio drop-down.
Here's a different perspective, taken from the exact same spot, about
three quarters of an hour later. It gives a good idea about why the
background turned out as it did in the previous pic.
http
On 7/5/06, Eric Featherstone, discombobulated, unleashed:
>My MX has a niggling problem at the moment, which I haven't been able
>to solve. Namely, the shutter lock is very unreliable. It always
>unlocks, so the camera is perfectly usable, but it often doesn't lock
>properly. I'm rather more worri
On 7/5/06, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Reading some news on Reuters web-site, I saw this photo:
>http://today.reuters.com/news/newsPhotoPresentation.aspx?
>type=topNews&imageID=2006-05-07T163934Z_01_N05403243_RTRUKOP_0_PICTURE0.xml
>http://tinyurl.com/l98u6
>
>(from this new articl
Thanks to all who took a peek at the piccie:
http://www.oksne.net/paw/runde/gannet.html
And more thanks for the comments! Only a few have reached my inbox, so
I'll do a C&P from the archive and reply to all here:
Tim Ø. wrote:
"Is it cropped? IMO, the bird needs a tiny bit more gliding spac
On 7/5/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Is she still walking lop-sided, or have you had a proper prosthetic fitted?
>
>Har! Jim lad!
>
>Blackbeard Bob
Har! Me hearties...aye, she was built like a square rigger tis true,
and just as fast accordin to Fat Jack in Portsmouth harbour!
DagT wrote:
No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
person in the background.
DagT
Ditto here. The story was the CIA guy, not the President. Excellent
timing on the shot too- sums things up well.
-Ryan
Den 7. mai. 2006 kl. 19.47 skrev Igor Roshchin:
Readi
On 7-May-06, at 2:21 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What difference does it make what brand of camera he's using?
It doesn't Shel. I made a light joke that didn't translate well into
text. Next time i'll include some photos to show my facial
expression. Or perhaps a simple winking smiley. ;
Since I was there, and watched him for a while, I can assure you he was
framing and setting the composition. He took the pic a second or so later
and moved on to the next motorcycle while I spoke with his mother, who, as
Doug Brewer intimated, was a lovely woman in all respects.
Thanks for lookin
What difference does it make what brand of camera he's using?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Hamilton
> On 7-May-06, at 10:00 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
>> She said that he takes the hobby seriously.
> >
> > Yeah, but he's chimping!
> >
>
> Hm, doesn't look like a Canon to me... b
Hi Everyone,
I rarely post anything here (not for a long time anyway) so I hope I'm
not intruding by asking a question.
My MX has a niggling problem at the moment, which I haven't been able
to solve. Namely, the shutter lock is very unreliable. It always
unlocks, so the camera is perfectly usab
Chimping? No, he's framing and composing the shot. I understand chimping
to be when you look at the shot later, after it's been made.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Kenneth Waller
> > She said that he takes the hobby seriously.
>
> Yeah, but he's chimping!
>
> >I may work on it some more
I like this one. He could very well be shooting, since it's a P&S that
probably has an LCD finder. If he was chimping, he probably wouldn't be
holding the camera up that high. In any case, it's an excellent shot.
Paul
On May 7, 2006, at 12:12 PM, Michael Hamilton wrote:
On 7-May-06, at 10:00 A
No, the photographer used DOF correctly to lead our attention to the
person in the background.
DagT
Den 7. mai. 2006 kl. 19.47 skrev Igor Roshchin:
Reading some news on Reuters web-site, I saw this photo:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsPhotoPresentation.aspx?
type=topNews&imageID=2006-0
The area of interest looks great. I second what Ken says and raise him
one. I'd crop out the top of the frame as well, leaving a square image
that includes just your daughter, the priest and the deacon.
Paul
On May 7, 2006, at 12:02 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
If it were mine, I'd crop out the h
Nice shots Paul. I'm a sucker for those early landscapes and flowers/plants.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/7/06, Paul Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally pulled together a gallery of some 26 pix to post. Not expecting
comments on all, but if you see something you like or dislike, I'll
accept k
John Francis wrote:
I was out shooting yesterday, and my polarizing filter
fell off the front of the lens and onto the path.
Fortunately the glass didn't break, but it did pop out
of the filter holder, leaving me with three pieces to
reassemble - holder, glass and retaining clip.
My problem is -
This morning a friend and I met for breakfast. Afterwards, we took a
stroll along the avenue and did a little window shopping. Machrina liked
these glasses, and I liked the photo opportunity.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/glasses_in_window.html
Tech: istDS, FA77mm, f8.0, ISO 200, 1/320 sec
Lovely moment.
Tender and sincere are the first words that popped up with me.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "cbwaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: PESO: Once in a lifetime shot!!!
Ok, well, I have two kids and presumably, I'll get to tak
The blue sky reflects nicely in the guano. Too bad we couldn't get
closer to that stone.
Or could we? It's just beside Kaldekloven, isn't it?
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 2:39 PM
Subject: PESO: Community before su
I'd probably spend some time talking with his mom, too...
On May 7, 2006, at 9:56 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I watched this young man for a while, and with each photo he took
he seemed
to be lost in concentration, and taking his time with framing and
composition. I spoke with his mom and she
A few PESOs today. A couple of informal portraits, but first another in
my Connecticut ZEN series...
Connecticut Zen IV
http://www.mindspring.com/~megazip/PESO_--_connzen4.html
Technical Info:
Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 400 @ 1/100sec
smc Pentax-F 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 @ f8.0
Dave
http://www.mindspring.c
On Sat, 06 May 2006 18:47:02 +0200, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
PDMLers are innoculated against expecting new things=good, old
things=bad. We don't have that much choice about new things, since they
so seldom occur. That's why we fiddle around with 40 year old m42 lenses
and ta
Thanks. They're just minilab scans which have been through Photoshop's 'make
a web gallery' function. I haven't done anything to them at all.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 May 2006 17:54
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Reading some news on Reuters web-site, I saw this photo:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsPhotoPresentation.aspx?type=topNews&imageID=2006-05-07T163934Z_01_N05403243_RTRUKOP_0_PICTURE0.xml
http://tinyurl.com/l98u6
(from this new article
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=topNews
Finally pulled together a gallery of some 26 pix to post. Not expecting
comments on all, but if you see something you like or dislike, I'll
accept kudos and/or brickbats. Except as noted in the comments, all
photos taken with either a DS or DS2.
http://www.studio1941.com/geso/index.htm
BTW,
Previously written;
Is direct digital better than a film to digital image? How about a
first class optical print compared to a cheap inkjet print viewed at
100x magnification. Now that is an oranges to apples comparison
instead of this usual apples to oranges comparison.
graywolf
You
On May 7, 2006, at 8:51 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I printed an image with no manipulation at all,
What were the in camera settings?
I been operating under the "rule" that all digitally captured
images need sharpening.
The default in-camera JPEG settings for the Pentax *ist DS/DL are
d
On May 7, 2006, at 1:50 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Anyhow, to settle the debate, film is better.
I'm glad that's settled.
Now I know that all film manufacture will be discontinued forever soon.
Godfrey
On May 7, 2006, at 7:51 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:
That's insane. I'd rather host the PDML myself than put up with
that. :-)
Most people never even see it as it is appended well below the last
line of an individual message post. I often forget it is there at all.
It's FAR less obnoxious th
On May 7, 2006, at 5:34 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
On May 6, 2006, at 10:47 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Whoa! Yahoo had serious problems on all of their lists last
week. Much worse than anything here. This happens with Yahoo
all the time. If you want trouble-free lists, Yahoo is not the
p
Most of the compositions are very good!
Rendering wise, there seems to be a very strong magenta cast in most
of them, and they could stand some contrast control/adjustment.
Godfrey
On May 7, 2006, at 1:52 AM, Bob W wrote:
http://www.web-options.com/Windows/
Hey come on,
you've got all the faces on the picture, that's great. So it's got very
nice, probably only suffering by a slight lack of theriaultness, but who
cares.
Each time I'm shooting people I have the impression everybody turns his
back on me so I can't get the faces on the picture...
> >>
> >> Now what idiot would make a piece of Pentax gear out of a
> table leg??
>
> Actually I was tempted to buy the grip back off Illinois Bill
> as a momento, until I remembered that the table leg I made it
> from came from my mother-in-law.
Is she still walking lop-sided, or have you ha
Hi,
I haven't any DVD burner by now, but I Think I#ll probably purchase an
LG 4167, as Alex was looking at. It is one of those that can read/write
DVD-RAM, which is more reliable than any *RWs. I don#t know if the
Plextors can do that. My CD burner is a Plextor anyway, and I'm very
happy with
Read a gushing Shutterbug review of both the V700 and V750 Epson
Perfection scanners.
There is a claimed center capability of a 6400dpi optical resolution
with a 4800dpi outer resolution. What does this mean?
Are these numbers an expression of full bed scan capability? Would a
single 35mm frame be
On 7-May-06, at 10:00 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
She said that he takes the hobby seriously.
Yeah, but he's chimping!
Hm, doesn't look like a Canon to me... but i could be wrong, Kenneth.
Michael Hamilton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca
- Original Message - From: "
Does it make a difference? Well, I'd assume so, otherwise
you wouldn't have to make sure you used a circular polarizer
(rather than a linear polarizer) with auto-focus cameras.
My understanding is that a circular polarizer is, effectively,
a linear polarizer with a quarter-wavelength plate behin
If it were mine, I'd crop out the heads along the bottom border>
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO: Once in a lifetime shot!!!
A memorable moment! Someday you will marvel at how small and young
she was. This picture wil
She said that he takes the hobby seriously.
Yeah, but he's chimping!
I may work on it some more later on.
Looks fine to me, Shel.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Boy with Camera
I watched this young man for a whi
Interesting colors.
I like it.
If it were mine I'd clone out the bird in the LLH corner & about half the
water above the top bird.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Community before sunset
Here is another one from the Runde
I printed an image with no manipulation at all,
What were the in camera settings?
I been operating under the "rule" that all digitally captured images need
sharpening.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "John Coyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Jeff
Shel - the
I'm curious how you think the skin tones look.
Within a range of skin tones I've seen its acceptable.
Towards the outdoor type.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Jeff
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/jeff.html
Taken a
- Original Message -
From: "John Francis"
Subject: A problem of reassembly
I was out shooting yesterday, and my polarizing filter
fell off the front of the lens and onto the path.
Fortunately the glass didn't break, but it did pop out
of the filter holder, leaving me with three piec
When I first took up photography, BW was the province of amateurs, and
the pros shot their kodachrome. Everything is cyclical.
Paul
On May 7, 2006, at 10:08 AM, graywolf wrote:
The public is fickle in its demands. When digital was expensive only
pros, serious amateurs, and rich people had digit
Look through each side of the filter & see which has the greater
polarizing effect?
But does it really make a difference?
Dave S.
On 5/7/06, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was out shooting yesterday, and my polarizing filter
fell off the front of the lens and onto the path.
Fortuna
I was out shooting yesterday, and my polarizing filter
fell off the front of the lens and onto the path.
Fortunately the glass didn't break, but it did pop out
of the filter holder, leaving me with three pieces to
reassemble - holder, glass and retaining clip.
My problem is - which side of the fi
A memorable moment! Someday you will marvel at how small and young
she was. This picture will be a nice key to those memories.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/7/06, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok, well, I have two kids and presumably, I'll get to take another First
Holy Communion shot. But not f
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've been running four Yahoo groups for three years. No spam, an
excellent record of service (3 downtimes in three years for 1 day each,
scheduled), and the only "intrusion" is that Yahoo puts a trailer on
each message post like so:
Yahoo! Gr
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
