On 12/13/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
It needs one of the black limited lenses fitted. I recommend the 31mm.
:-) Like this?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/i_suck/k1031.html
Yes.
That's a sweet looking combination. :-)
For those who don't frequent DPR, this is an interesting video of the
K100D's SR ina action:
http://pixinfo.com/img/Pentax/K100D/a/CCD_shift.mpg
Dave
On 12/13/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/12/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fra: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL
It does rotate a little, thanks!
DagT
Den 13. des. 2006 kl. 09.42 skrev David Savage:
For those who don't frequent DPR, this is an interesting video of the
K100D's SR ina action:
http://pixinfo.com/img/Pentax/K100D/a/CCD_shift.mpg
Dave
On 12/13/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/12 Tue PM 11:46:55 GMT
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Request for photos
In that case it was an e-mail that took over two weeks to reach my inbox,
because I just received it Sunday night.
I went back and looked at the headers and it was
For those who don't frequent DPR, this is an interesting video of the
K100D's SR ina action:
http://pixinfo.com/img/Pentax/K100D/a/CCD_shift.mpg
Dave
Interesting, thanks for the link.
I've just been playing with my K10D a little, set on 15sec exposure with no
lens to see the sensor move.
Joe, I just tried again with 3.6. It would allow me to open, manipulate,
save again as a dng file and then it would allow me to open to PE 4.0. Then
I saved it as a png file, and reopened the png file. However, when I tried
to open the newly saved dng file it would open to ACR but would not
From: Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/13 Wed AM 12:14:18 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D in Israel
Hi Rob,
Bit of a premium to get it to Israel, eh?
more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
Price here in the
On 12/13/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060820100454
^^^ Just my 2¢ for what year 2006 was... quite nice, no?
Doesn't do anything for me...in any way.
But, thanks for posting it.
SOMEbody might be interested. ;-)
Another poor soul
Ops, sorry.
My question wasn't very well phrased.
With just one lens reversed (eg. with bellows), it doesn't matter what
kind of lens you use, since there's no communciation between the
camera and lens.
My query was for using two lenses. For example a 200mm and a reversed
50mm stacked via the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Well, the camera is about 1/3rd cheaper in the US than the cheapest
UK price. By the time you have added duty, postage and VAT it will
be about the same, I suspect. The advantage being that US stockists
have some to sell.
Last time I checked,
That came later. I was wondering if someone was going to pick up on
that.
Paul
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:45 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Another pic from the wedding shoot:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321317size=lg
K10D, DA 16-45, f4.5, 1/25th, ISO 100, flash
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/13 Wed AM 10:42:09 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D in Israel
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Well, the camera is about 1/3rd cheaper in the US than the cheapest
UK price. By the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Don't get me wrong, Kostas. _I'm_ not interested in buying one. 8-)))
Who cares; what does the wife say?
Kostas :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I bought a cheapo third party K series right angle finder. Its
mounting clip was too small to fit the D, but it was nothing a little
filing could not fix. If you do not care that it is a little loose on
the older camera then it is easy to get the finder working on the D
series or K series DSLRs.
I didn't say no processing was done. You did. It was stated in one of
the interviews with the engineers that Ken translated that they took
opportunities to do signal processing due to the 22bit A-D that were
not otherwise feasible.
... *before*. The common thought previously was that
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 20:21:01 +1300
David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:55 AM, SJ wrote:
funnily enough :) the same thing happens with me too. can't ever
access
robertstech.com from home but no problems at the workplace...
It times out for me, but my ISP doesn't
If Pentax are using the Nucore NDX-2240 AFE on the front end of their
PRIME Image Processor (which hasn't been denied and was rumored to be
confirmed) the it provides what they deem as a color sensitive PGA
prior to the input to the 22 bit ADC. You can read up more here:
I never not tried these type of combinations so I am not sure I can
help. However, can't you take the lens off the A position and fool
the camera to not use the focal distance?
On 12/13/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ops, sorry.
My question wasn't very well phrased.
With just one
On 14/12/06, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That flies in the face
of the idea that one can, shoot in RAW and not worry about WB and other
color settings.
The idea that RAW data is unaltered by WB settings etc isn't a rule it
was just a convention that was taken for granted when
On 13/12/06, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, for example, if one were to apply a cloudy WB vs. a tungsten
WB, the red channel gain would likely be at least a bit (i.e. f-stop) or
two different. It makes sense to chose a different dynamic range for
each channel based on
Perfect solution! =)
Jack
--- Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a film look to ones photographs can easily be done (at the
present
moment) - by using film.
These were - of course - done more than 30 years ago:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594413264675/show/
Regards
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Dec 12, 2006, at 3:46 PM, Tom C wrote:
Oh well, it show hows unprofessional the whole thing might have
been. I was being given less than 24 hours notice before she
needed to have the material completed.
Happens all the time. I had three people request usage
The contact that transmits lens data is independent of the A
contact.. Otherwise I would be able to manually set the SR focal
length on the K10D.
Adding the 1.7x AF adapter to any FA lens tricks the camera though.
Dave
On 12/13/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I never not tried
I don't think they trying to make digital images look like film,
rather they're goal is to try and have the high ISO digital noise look
more like grain as opposed to pixels.
Dave
On 12/13/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image
David Mann wrote:
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:55 AM, SJ wrote:
funnily enough :) the same thing happens with me too. can't ever
access
robertstech.com from home but no problems at the workplace...
It times out for me, but my ISP doesn't exactly have the best
reputation so it's probably been
On 14/12/06, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't this whole discussion pedantic? :)
Quite.
What I *meant* to say was the the per-channel transfer function
from input to output is a function of WB and colorspace. Once the output
has to be truncated to 12-bits,
Bottom line: It was better to filter out (via the lens filter)
the light that would blow out a single channel (like blue on an
overcast day or red for a sunset) and then increase the exposure to
bring *all* the levels up. Quantifiably less noise in the lower-
level channels by
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
I don't think they trying to make digital images look like film,
rather they're goal is to try and have the high ISO digital noise look
more like grain as opposed to pixels.
That's what I read in Ken's translation: film-grain-like noise.
Kostas
--
Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified viewer
will
fit the K10D?
No, but if you remove the fitting that attaches to the viewfinder (four
screws) and substitute the back of eyecup 'M' (filed down flat) and
superglue it in place it will fit all viewfinders after 'M'
Bill Lawlor escribió:
Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified viewer will
fit the K10D?
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
You need an M or A Refconverter. The Spotmatic one will not fit. There
is also a Chinese made refconverter (Seagull) which is said to fit
Pentax and
What I *meant* to say was the the per-channel transfer function
from input to output is a function of WB and colorspace. Once the output
has to be truncated to 12-bits, those parameters now affect the output
dynamic range.
However if the linear data has been subjected to some
Dont you mean the EYEPIECE where the viewfinder
attachments connect is different size, not the viewfinder
size itself? I wouldnt even call one smaller or larger,
they are about the same area, the spotmatic one is not
as wide but taller, while the M series and later is wider
but not as tall.
jco
oops
I thought she wrote the letter in December um I confess i didnt respond
to the number 7.12.2006 as a date
when skimming.
sorry mike -- my glasses are clean but my mind isnt
ann :)
mike wilson wrote:
Tom C wrote:
I figure she made a typo somewhere.
I need to finish
Hail , Cesar!
I'm barely lurking myself - I am remembering that you are a
co-Sagitarian but can't remember the date. Happy
Birthday anyway :)
regarding the TV nuptuals - I thought I remembered there being a number
8.
note I have a new email addie -
hope to see you sometime on one of your
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/13 Wed PM 12:20:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D in Israel
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Don't get me wrong, Kostas. _I'm_ not interested in buying one. 8-)))
Who cares; what
Nice, Paul! I like the way you used bounce flash but
were able to avoid raccoon eyes or a bright white
ceiling. How did you do that?
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pic from the wedding shoot:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321317size=lg
K10D, DA
On Dec 13, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Carlos Royo wrote:
Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified
viewer will
fit the K10D?
You need an M or A Refconverter. The Spotmatic one will not fit. There
is also a Chinese made refconverter (Seagull) which is said to fit
Pentax and
I did the same thing, Cory, and found no practical difference in the
results.
I've not suffered from excessive noise in any event ...
G
On Dec 13, 2006, at 5:28 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
It's not pure speculation. When I first got my -DS, I dove into
the color management and white
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.msn.com/MyRugbyPictures/7tv.msnw
Damndest rugby photos I've ever seen!
(Seems the game isn't as rough as it used to be...)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
As long as PS allows me to effectively reduce objectionable levels of
grain (film like), I'll be fine.
Jack
--- Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
I don't think they trying to make digital images look like film,
rather they're goal is to
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/13 Wed PM 02:50:46 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Request for photos
oops
I thought she wrote the letter in December um I confess i didnt respond
to the number 7.12.2006 as a date
when skimming.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:25 PM, David Mann wrote:
I've also seen some funky old motorcycles that have an in-hub
engine. Not to mention those crazy contraptions where the rider sits
inside the wheel.
I forget the name of that one. It had a 7 cylinder radial engine in
the front wheel ... talk
I just knew someone would point this out.
Doug Franklin wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Another pic from the wedding shoot:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321317size=lg
K10D, DA 16-45, f4.5, 1/25th, ISO 100, flash bounced off the ceiling
Wedding 69? None of them are
I shot this with a Lumiquest Omnibounce attached to the head of the flash and
the head tilted to a straight up position. This bounces the majority of the
light off the surface of the reflector, but also spills some light onto the
ceiling, which softens the look.
Paul
-- Original
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/13 Wed PM 03:55:56 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: TV 7's wedding...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.msn.com/MyRugbyPictures/7tv.msnw
Damndest rugby photos I've ever seen!
(Seems the game isn't
I did the same thing, Cory, and found no practical difference in the
results.
I've not suffered from excessive noise in any event ...
I didn't say practical... I said quantifiable. Revert to previous
post about this being a pedantic discussion... :)
--
Finally getting around to finishing up the mountain/glacier
panorama I started working on in July.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/4/
Comments welcome.
-Cory
--
*
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA
Luckily we can adjust that in Photoshop. It does help some.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
But the look is similar. I forgot to
post that in either of these cases
the film grain is NOT an issue. Its more
the tonal range captured and the look
of the extreme highlights. Film captures
more but the
Very Nice!
Tom C.
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Another Panorama PESO...
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:19:40 -0500 (EST)
Finally getting around to finishing up the mountain/glacier
panorama I started
On 12/13/06 11:07 AM, mike wilson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.diseno-art.com/encyclopedia/strange_vehicles/
mclean_v8_monowheel.html
Pretty cool looking ... silly as all heck though.
Ever seen one try to emergency brake?
8-
I saw just that in one of those Amazing Video
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/12/13 Wed PM 03:51:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Dave's new bike (was: The momentous day is here)
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:25 PM, David Mann wrote:
I've also seen some funky old motorcycles that have
On 12/13/06, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally getting around to finishing up the mountain/glacier
panorama I started working on in July.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/4/
Comments welcome.
Specutacular!
I see the glacier is ending into a lake or fjord which
Gorgeous. Excellent work. I'd love to see a ten-foot long print.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Finally getting around to finishing up the mountain/glacier
panorama I started working on in July.
On Dec 13, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Finally getting around to finishing up the mountain/glacier
panorama I started working on in July.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/4/
Nice job!
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Dec 13, 2006, at 8:07 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I forget the name of that one. It had a 7 cylinder radial engine in
the front wheel ... talk about heavy steering, eh? ;-)
There were a number; Singer was one of the most popular but that
only had a single cylinder engine. The one you are
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.msn.com/MyRugbyPictures/7tv.msnw
Damndest rugby photos I've ever seen!
(Seems the game isn't as rough as it used to be...)
It was a place before it was a game.
I know, I used to live
You may be able to undo the knee on
the film captures but its going to be
impossible to undo the clipping on
the digital capture when the dynamic
range of the scene exceeds the digital system's
(sensor) recording capability.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:28:30AM -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
... *before*. The common thought previously was that RAW provided
unaltered A/D data of the sensor. That may or may not have been true, but
at least it *could* have been. Now with truncation necessary, it *cannot*
be
On 12/13/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://groups.msn.com/MyRugbyPictures/7tv.msnw
Damndest rugby photos I've ever seen!
(Seems the game isn't as rough as it used to be...)
It was a
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gorgeous. Excellent work. I'd love to see a ten-foot long print.
Paul
Thanks... that's why I've been trying to finish it up... to make
prints for the family. The ones I'm giving away I printed at 8x52 at
466 dpi.
What's the
... *before*. The common thought previously was that RAW provided
unaltered A/D data of the sensor. That may or may not have been true, but
at least it *could* have been. Now with truncation necessary, it *cannot*
be true that a RAW file contains unaltered digitzed sensor data.
You
If he's smart, he has his turned off at 2AM. (Have you ever gotten good
news, at 2AM? I thought not.)
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 12/13/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see the glacier is ending into a lake or fjord which gives a good
perspective.
Nice;
Technically, it's a lake on the right. Drains right into the
ocean a couple miles away. The water on the left is the ocean.
--
On Dec 13, 2006, at 2:42, David Savage wrote:
For those who don't frequent DPR, this is an interesting video of the
K100D's SR ina action:
http://pixinfo.com/img/Pentax/K100D/a/CCD_shift.mpg
I had to remove the trailing space from your link to get it to work -
but once I did that: That
Aha!
I've got one of those--makes the camera look really
imposing and works pretty well too.
Rick
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shot this with a Lumiquest Omnibounce attached to
the head of the flash and the head tilted to a
straight up position. This bounces the majority of
the light
Hi!
G'day All,
Not a true PESO, just a silly shot I took while goofing around:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/_IGP0547.jpg
Pentax K10D, FA 100mm f2.8 Macro with 1.7x AF Adapter, 1/180 @ f10,
ISO 1600, AF-540 FGZ flash.
Dave, I definitely disagree with the sentiment here,
Hi!
Cesar, if you have a chance - please pass to Tom my congratulations.
That of course, unless he is reading the list or archives ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: J. C. O'Connell
Subject: RE: New (old stock) Pentax DSLR kits even lower prices?
NO, my point is they are essentially worthless
once you get better model IN HAND because it's
just plain dumb to keep using your old inferior
DSLR camera when you have **already got** a
Hi!
Can you please elaborate further about the improvement over the
DS part?
- more pixel resolution
- more dynamic range
Har! Now, kind sir, will you please tell me what kind of
improvement in
dynamic range you observe so far?
I have not done quantified
Adam,
Even SMC coating technology has been continuously updated over the
years, as improved production technology has become available. As good
as SMC was at inctroduction, it's better now.
this is not necessarily true - may be just as good but cheaper to
manufacture, for example. Actually
On Dec 13, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
... *before*. The common thought previously was that RAW provided
unaltered A/D data of the sensor. That may or may not have been
true, but
at least it *could* have been. Now with truncation necessary, it
*cannot*
be true that a
Especially if it's Norm on the other end.
On 12/13/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If he's smart, he has his turned off at 2AM. (Have you ever gotten good
news, at 2AM? I thought not.)
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 12/13/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mike wilson
On Dec 13, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gorgeous. Excellent work. I'd love to see a ten-foot long print.
Paul
Thanks... that's why I've been trying to finish it up... to make
prints for the family. The ones I'm giving away I
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=15884
I generally refrain from publishing a shot that is obviously made in the
zoo, but this time I'll made an exception.
very nice 'street' photo, Boris. I like it very much.
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I guess you missed my earlier post(s), I stated
its worthless to someone who's aleady got a better
body in hand because they are not really going
to want to use it anymore, and I also posted that these are selling
brand new kits for less than what you quoted (also on ebay)
so lone buyer does not
Of course it doesn't. What it *does* allow for is a different
gain for the three different channels for wider dynamic range. That
gain is a function of settings like colorspace and white balance.
Or it might not be anything user adjustable at all. You're making
assumptions here.
Kostas,
Last time I checked, digital cameras were exempt of duty, but that was
a couple of years ago. The killer is VAT; have you checked prices in
Europe? Warranty may also be more straightforward, I don't know, but
in general sending something out to be fixed/replaced may be an issue.
I decided to add the performance testing I did with the K10D to the
page I did on the *ist DS bodies last July. Updated and QuickTime
movies of the capture included ... you can see how the cameras'
buffer size and write speed to the cards affects the distribution of
sequence captures
On Dec 13, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Of course it doesn't. What it *does* allow for is a different
gain for the three different channels for wider dynamic range. That
gain is a function of settings like colorspace and white balance.
Or it might not be anything user
They thought the Hasselblad was some sort of trick camera because they
couldn't find a display screen, he said. They wouldn't believe it
wasn't a digital camera.
That cracks me up...
Norm
Digital Image Studio wrote:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20895457-5006784,00.html
Hey, big congrats from me too!
I met TvV (aka Gateboy) at GFM in 2004. Was that is last appearance there?
Jostein
On 12/13/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Cesar, if you have a chance - please pass to Tom my congratulations.
That of course, unless he is reading the list or
I take it you never shot slide film, JCO.
I did, and the dynamic range of the *istD was a welcome increase.
Jostein
On 12/13/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may be able to undo the knee on
the film captures but its going to be
impossible to undo the clipping on
the digital
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060820100454
^^^ Just my 2¢ for what year 2006 was... quite nice, no?
Doesn't do anything for me...in any way.
But, thanks for posting it.
SOMEbody might be interested. ;-)
Another poor soul with a tampon stuck in his ear.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
-
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for the K10D?
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mark R. wrote:
Trivia: Approximately 1% of women have tetrachromatic color vision -
that is, four different types of cone cells in their retinas - and can
see a vastly broader gamut than normal people. Exactly 0% of men have
this ability; you need two X chromasomes to get it.
Add their
I refer to the store as Temple BH...
Norm
gfen wrote:
snip
As to BH being an interesting sight, you're right. When I first went
there, it reminded me of what the North Pole might look like if the elves
were all Orthodox Jews. A constant train of little baskets moving on lines
overhead,
Definitively congrats from me too. He better be there next year or I'm
gonna bring extra batteries for my phone...actually, that threat is
directed at a lot of you last year no shows. Norm has phone numbers,
lots of numbers... insert evil laugh here
Norm
Jostein Øksne wrote:
Hey, big congrats
Here we have actual evidence from Godfrey. Whatever happened to idle
speculation and blind prejudice, the mainstay of many a lengthy
thread!
All I need now is the money for the camera, I already have the 150x card
Thanks Godfrey
Peter
On 12/13/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
I was reffering to color or BW neg film. Can you
get slides from digital files and are
they any wider dynamic range than shooting
slide film in the first place? If you
dont really need slides, then there
isnt much point in shooting slide film
unless you really want a certain look
not available in
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x
gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for
LOL ... I like to think that I'm not being innovative, Peter. ;-)
you're welcome.
Godfrey
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:45 PM, Peter Fairweather wrote:
Here we have actual evidence from Godfrey. Whatever happened to idle
speculation and blind prejudice, the mainstay of many a lengthy
thread!
All
Joseph Tainter wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/Pentax-DS-150x-timing/
-
A valuable test, Godfrey. Interesting that with the K10D the 150x gives
so little improvement over the 60x. Is the difference due to different
brands of card? Or is 150x overkill for the K10D?
Joe
On 12/14/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
G'day All,
Not a true PESO, just a silly shot I took while goofing around:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/_IGP0547.jpg
Dave, I definitely disagree with the sentiment here, unless there was a
smiley attached which
On 12/14/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060820100454
^^^ Just my 2¢ for what year 2006 was... quite nice, no?
Doesn't do anything for me...in any way.
But, thanks for posting it.
SOMEbody might be interested. ;-)
Hi Cory
a very nice panorama!
I would cut the last part because of the different lightning or try to
correct it.
I have the same problem with one of my panos from Mt. Pilatus, one shot is
darker than the other 5.
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
But Cory, Im' I really the only one seing it beeing darker at the right end?
Before printing you should equalize the lightning or cut that part IMHO
greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cory Papenfuss
Sent: Wednesday, December
Thanks Adam.
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/12/06, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Heh
Nice.
-Adam
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Not a true PESO, just a silly shot I took while goofing around:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/_IGP0547.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That's why I'm holding onto it.
Who knows, in 20 years it might be woth $25 as opposed to 50c?
:-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/12/06, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That might be true of the plain old white lettered version. The gold
one is a collecter item ;-)
On 12/12/06, David Savage
That's lovely Cory.
Nicely done,
Cheers,
Dave
On 12/14/06, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Finally getting around to finishing up the mountain/glacier
panorama I started working on in July.
http://www.ee.vt.edu/~mythtv/PESO/4/
Comments welcome.
-Cory
--
PDML
On 12/14/06, J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was reffering to color or BW neg film. Can you
get slides from digital files
Yes
and are
they any wider dynamic range than shooting
slide film in the first place?
I don't know.
If you
dont really need slides, then there
isnt much
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
