Could use a little sharpening perhaps? But I like the almost infra-red
look to it- looks like a scene from an old western B&W movie
Alastair
On 4/13/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well I like, but I have a soft spot in my head for Joshua Trees.
>
> Norm Baugher wrote:
> > Shot this
In a message dated 4/12/2007 8:39:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Joining the congratulatory crowd here.
I like it a lot, It certainly deserves to be printed large and nicely framed.
Great work.
=
Thanks. I am definitely trying to figure out where I can h
Hi,
I'll be in NY for 7 nights in the second half of june, any one got any
reccomendations for a good and well priced (cheap) place to stay? Some
where with a kitchen or kitchenette of some sort would be preferable,
but not essential.
Also if any one wants to catch up for a drink then let me k
Rick
I am not sure which crop I prefer, I like the square, but I keep
trying to look to the sky. And yes the house is a fair bit more
noticeable, although I think the increased contrast is definatly
better. Thanks for your input contrary or otherwise :)
Russ
On 4/12/07, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTE
Thanks Marnie,
I one thing I struggled with in this was the contrast, I felt that too
much gave it too much 'oomph' to let it still be moody, and I guess
that too much 'do nothing sky' makes it just blah. Thanks for your
input.
Russ
On 4/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In
Thanks Bruce for your response, that is encouraging to me as I learn.
I think my pictures sometimes lack a 'soul', so what I have been
trying to do lately is really think about the feeling I want to
capture instead of snapping away and then trying to clean up a mess
later.
Russ
On 4/12/07, Bruce
Thanks. This is actually the first crop I tried, but I decided that I
wanted more sky and water. I do like the square, but I find myself
looking up at the sky, and there is nothing there. Maybe I will have
to print them and then we will see... Thanks for your input.
Russ
On 4/12/07, Godfrey
Markus,
I forgot to answer your question earlier today. I actually did shoot
a horizontal after I shot the vertical, but I do not like it. It is
shot at 50mm where this one is 200, and there are a *lot* more houses
in the horizontal. When I originally took the shot, I envisioned it
being vertica
Joining the congratulatory crowd here.
I like it a lot, It certainly deserves to be printed large and nicely framed.
Great work.
On 4/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Another from Yosemite.
>
> A different way to look at Big Rocks.
>
> http://members.aol.com/eactivi
On 4/12/07, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Fernando
> Thanks for looking. Swissair isn't anymore and the new Swiss belongs mostly
> to the German Lufthansa.
That explains the affordable air tickets I guess...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailm
Hi Fernando
Thanks for looking. Swissair isn't anymore and the new Swiss belongs mostly
to the German Lufthansa.
The river is the Limmat which you see on one of the photos. The prices are
indeed very high here but Zurich just won an award again for the city with
the
highest "life quality" whatever
I'm going to be a contrary old cuss and say that I
liked the original better! With this crop, the
building distracts from the mood.
Rick
--- Russell Kerstetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and
> Bruce for your input.
> Several of you commented that it
The 28/2.8 sounds interesting. Where are you shipping
from?
Rick
--- Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have for sale:
>
> 1). 16-45/4, it came with one of my bodies and has
> hardly been used.
> Includes box and all literature. $320
> 2). FA 28/2.8, in essentialy as new condition w
goodbye monkey house...
best,
mishka
On 4/12/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Vonnegut has passed.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/books/12vonnegut.html
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
--
PDML
Samsung should buy their camera division, together with Spotmatic trademark.
best,
mishka
On 4/12/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom,
> You have to stop worrying about this. It seems to be affecting you
> deeply, and I wouldn't want it to affect your health. Life will go
> on, an
Tom,
You have to stop worrying about this. It seems to be affecting you
deeply, and I wouldn't want it to affect your health. Life will go
on, and we'll all keep taking pictures. With or without Pentax.
Although I strongly suspect, it will be "with" for quite a few years
to come.
Paul
On
The really cool thing is that he is a modest, gentle
guy. Your relationship with him was probably a lot
more relaxed and comfortable because you =didn't= know
who he was.
Rick
--- cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 2002 when we had the men's Final Four at my
> stadium of employment, I had
In 2002 when we had the men's Final Four at my stadium of employment, I had
the occasion to work with a photographer who wanted to put his Nikon under
the scoreboard and shoot down towards the center-court logo. After the
tournament, I received a print of this image from the photographer for my
http://www.reuters.com/article/mergersNews/idUST32528620070412
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 4/12/2007 2:17:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:31:23 PM, you wrote:
RK> Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
RK> Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
RK> tha
Hi,
I have for sale:
1). 16-45/4, it came with one of my bodies and has hardly been used.
Includes box and all literature. $320
2). FA 28/2.8, in essentialy as new condition with filter. $220
Payment by Paypal, will post world wide.
email me off list if interested.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Ma
I've been doing that and it worked before. Wondering if there's a glitch now.
Oh well...I submitted the issue in their "contact us" online form.
Maybe I'll hear something from them...
Thanks!
Bong
On 4/13/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It did 'til someone advised me to put the fin
That did it!!
Thanks, Peter, Godfrey and Rod.
(actually, I had stumbled onto it once, but couldn't recall the path).
Jack
--- Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack,
>
> > I am using PSE 5. I'm wondering if EXIF data are available as a
> result
> > of downloading RAW/jpg shots from a memo
Woof!
Woof
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Norm, it never ceases to amaze me how articulate you can be.
>
> Shel
> From: Norm Baugher
>
>> Woof, woo woo woof!
>> Woof
>>
>
>
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Don't worry about it. It should go away when the transaction posts.
They just sent through a test authorisation to make sure the account
was good.
At 9:32 AM +1000 4/13/07, Digital Image Studio wrote:
>I recently made a payment for an eBay auction with my Personal Paypal
>Account using my linked
If you track your credit cards on line, you often see these kinds of
temporary, small amount transactions posted as part of the card
verification/authorization process. They should be eliminated once
the actual transaction has been posted.
Godfrey
On Apr 12, 2007, at 4:32 PM, Digital Image
I was about to ask the same question. I've had great success with it.
After calibrating with the Spyder 2 my screen images are identical to
my printer output.
Paul
On Apr 12, 2007, at 6:02 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 13/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have no e
Jack,
> I am using PSE 5. I'm wondering if EXIF data are available as a result
> of downloading RAW/jpg shots from a memory card.
in PSE 3 (hopefully they haven't changed it later):
File -> File Info (in the Editor) or
Window -> Properties -> Metadata tab (in the Organizer)
however the latter ap
I'm not surprised.
Bob W wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6548719.stm
>
> Bone appetit!
>
> Bob
>
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Apr 12, 2007, at 4:03 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 13/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Poor or inconsistent profiles on various different monitors.
>
> OK, not that I can appreciate this given that I've profiled at least
> ten very different monitors using my Spy
I recently made a payment for an eBay auction with my Personal Paypal
Account using my linked credit card and now my bank reports an
additional fee of AUD$1 to Paypal with the same eBay reference number.
However this additional fee is not recorded in my Paypal transaction
history.
Can anyone shed
Every RAW file from the camera contains metadata, some of which is
EXIF data.
Every JPEG file from the camera contains EXIF metadata.
The EXIF data is embedded in the image file, you need an application
to view it. On Mac OS X, opening any JPEG from the camera with the
Preview application al
On 13/04/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using PSE 5. I'm wondering if EXIF data are available as a result
> of downloading RAW/jpg shots from a memory card.
> PSE 5 "HELP" defines it, but doesn't answer my question.
> IOW, if it's recorded, where do I find it?
> Low tech answer pl
Well I like, but I have a soft spot in my head for Joshua Trees.
Norm Baugher wrote:
> Shot this in Joshua Tree National Monument, love that place. Pentax ME
> Super SE.
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nbaugher/joshuatree.htm
>
> Norm
>
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer stud
On 13/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Poor or inconsistent profiles on various different monitors.
OK, not that I can appreciate this given that I've profiled at least
ten very different monitors using my Spyder2 always with excellent
measurements and apparent visual consiste
Well the answer to your question was so obvious, I didn't want to imply that
you were a dunderhead, dunce, or numbskull by asking it. :-)
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Su
I am using PSE 5. I'm wondering if EXIF data are available as a result
of downloading RAW/jpg shots from a memory card.
PSE 5 "HELP" defines it, but doesn't answer my question.
IOW, if it's recorded, where do I find it?
Low tech answer please. :)
Thanks!
Jack
Paul wrote:
> Dear Friends,
>
> I would like to use my K100D Pentax Digital Camera
> to take pictures using either a Zeiss Standard
> Pol 16 (petrographic) and Standard 16 Microscopes
> with trinocular heads, which I use. Can anyone tell
> me what specific adapters, which I can use to
> attache
Congratulation. You are the first to pass the test ;-)
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: 13. april 2007 00:05
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The mysterious ways
On Apr 12, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 13/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I have no experience with that particular setup, but I and others
>> have seen various issues with the Pantone Huey and different system
>> configurations. Because of those issue
What do you expect from Baugh-waugh Baugher?
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: 12 April 2007 23:20
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: See ya later
>
> Norm, it never ceases to amaze me how
Norm, it never ceases to amaze me how articulate you can be.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Norm Baugher
> Woof, woo woo woof!
> Woof
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Paul,
Pentax made a couple different microscope adapters. Not sure if either are
still available. Check the lens section at http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/ for
more info.
The Pentax Universal T-ring adapter you mentioned is for cameras with M42
threads. i.e. Spotmatic. You can use this with y
So they can sell it 3 times more? LOL.
2007/4/12, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Couldn't agree more.
>
> But then why revise the book three times?
>
>
> Tim Typo
> Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
On 13/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no experience with that particular setup, but I and others
> have seen various issues with the Pantone Huey and different system
> configurations. Because of those issues, and similar issues with the
> Spyder2 product, I generally re
Dear Friends,
I would like to use my K100D Pentax Digital Camera
to take pictures using either a Zeiss Standard
Pol 16 (petrographic) and Standard 16 Microscopes
with trinocular heads, which I use. Can anyone tell
me what specific adapters, which I can use to
attached my digital camera to these
In a message dated 4/12/2007 1:28:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I rather like this one. Good concept!
--
Bruce
===
Thanks, Bruce!
Marnie aka Doe :-)
Eac> Another from Yosemite.
Eac> A different way to look at Big Rocks.
Eac> http://members.aol.com
I guess you're not familiar with amateur league football! There are
multiple pitches next to each other where several games can take place
simultaneously.
Across the river from me is Hackney Marshes, where there are over 90
full-size football pitches next to each other, and about 1500 people
play
On 13/04/07, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6548719.stm
>
> Bone appetit!
Well isn't that a surprise, LOL ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publ
Couldn't agree more.
But then why revise the book three times?
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
C
Sent: 12. april 2007 23:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The mysterious ways of
Thanks John!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:52 PM, John Whittingham wrote:
> I've had the Sigma 135-400 APO, while not in the same league as the
> 50-500 it
> really is quite a good lens. My main gripe with the lens was the
> amount of
> extension and weight transferral when zoomed, it's at least a
Windows 95
Windows 98
Windows 2000
Windows XP
Where do you want to go today?
The basic principles of photography and dealing with exposure, light,
composition do not expire. Technology moves on and things change a little,
but not alot.
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To
Yes, this looks much better - I don't think you lost the feel you were
trying to convey.
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 1:31:23 PM, you wrote:
RK> Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
RK> Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
R
I see your point. But this guy isn't so bad. In fact it could be used as a
coffee table book. Not at a classy coffee table, but, you get the idea.
The thing that really caught my attention was the does not expire part. How
dumb do they think we are?
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian
I did not wonder at all.
Just thought you where your own thorough self ;-)
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 12. april 2007 21:54
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subjec
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:36:13 -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote
> A friend is looking for decent quality lens with a 300mm tele
> capability, at least. This is out of the range of my experience in
> Pentax lenses.
>
> Anyone worked with the FA-J75-300? or the Sigma 135-400? I know the
> Sigma 50-
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I didnt do any controlled testing if this screen has
> any measurable change effect on metering, but so
> far with program mode using "A" lenses, screw lenses
> in AV mode, and PK/M lenses using stop down GB
> method I am not noticing any differences v
I think that's definitely a stronger photo. The square crop suits it
well, the larger size and tonal edits make it more than the prior
rendering. Good job!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Russell Kerstetter wrote:
> Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
> Sever
Saw the headline news on the local student newspaper, didn't realize who he
was and
didn't read the article, until now. Now I know he taught a couple of years
at Iowa's
Writer's Workshop back in the '60s. I'll make sure to read some of his
books.
Yefei
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 12
I didnt do any controlled testing if this screen has
any measurable change effect on metering, but so
far with program mode using "A" lenses, screw lenses
in AV mode, and PK/M lenses using stop down GB
method I am not noticing any differences visibly.
I use the centerweighted metering mode ususally
Godfrey,
Unfortunately, I don't have experience with either.
I've been using Tamron 70-300 4-5.6 LD/Macro that I bought
back in 1998. It is a reasonable lens. I found that the quality
of the photos is comparable to what I am getting with SMCP-F-70-210
in the same range of focal lengths.
It is n
Hello Jens,
Kids and sports - tricky to shoot well. I like the 'pose' you
captured of them. What I struggle with is feeling like they are in a
game, rather than a practice. What contributes to that
is the great DOF allowing me to very clearly make out other fields and
goals. I would still like
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6548719.stm
Bone appetit!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It did 'til someone advised me to put the final jpg image through "save
for the web". I've had no problems since.
Seems it clears the EXIF data.(?)
Jack
--- Bong Manayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery,
> most
> were film shot
Thanks Bill, Jack, Godders, Rick Markus, PJ and Bruce for your input.
Several of you commented that it is rather flat. I actually did do
that on purpose because, Rick you are correct, I was wanting it to be
moody and dreary. However, I guess I went too far :) Here is a
different take on it: squa
An excerpt from another report yesterday. It would appear to indicate that
Pentax et al. may not be opposed to a merger, they just changed their mind
regarding the conditions of the formerly proposed merger.
---
Watanuki, who was formerly a corporate vice president, also le
Most technical photo books are very poor, and just an excuse for the
photographer to show off some of his pictures (they're almost all by
men).
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
> Sent: 12 April 2007 16:27
> To: [
Well, it caught my eye. There is certainly a 'mood' to it. I like
the B&W treatment and the elements that are in the shot.
Thanks for showing it.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 11:40:07 PM, you wrote:
AR> Hi
AR> http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/77040452
AR> another from the s
I rather like this one. Good concept!
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 8:04:30 AM, you wrote:
Eac> Another from Yosemite.
Eac> A different way to look at Big Rocks.
Eac> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Eac> Comments welcome.
Eac> Marnie aka Doe :-)
It seems Pentax is/was/will be bit that much interested into a merger
but Urano was. It's not clear at all (yet) if Pentax (its
shareholders) are really interested in a merger or if Urano's proposal
was "well why not after all".
2007/4/12, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Why would it make it suspect?
Thanks for the note on the FA-J 70-300!
> I have two questions:
> 1. I want to buy a bag pack, which can hold my K10D, + 3 lenses
> including,
> Pentax 70-300mm, an external flash, tripod and laptop.
> Which bag pack do you suggest?
If you are thinking a backpack style bag, the Lowepro CompuTre
It is big enough and bright enough for me. I think there is too much
sky that has nothing in it. So I would crop it a bit differently.
Take most of it off and go for a more square shot. With that kind of
crop, I think it would be a pretty good photo.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 4:40:
Excellent. Very effective, and an original way of looking at a cliched
subject.
--
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 12 April 2007 16:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PESO - Tree Screen
>
>
>
>
Indeed. I was very sorry to hear that. I love his books. Even his less
well-known ones are full of gems. "Galapagos" was about an event which
killed all humans except for a small group of people who happened to
be on a tourist trip to the Galapagos. It traces their descendants
over a period of 2 mi
On Apr 12, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
...
>> I would recommend
>> downloading the free trial and going through Michael Tapes' tutorial
>> videos to refresh your memory and understand the basics. They're
>> available at
>>http://www.rawworkflow.com/
>> ...
>
> I just stumbled over a lo
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you for sharing your experience and expertise.
I am new to D/SLR camera world (just 4 months) and hope that I could
increase my knowledge in photography.
I am working as disaster relief doctor and taking pictures would be a good
hobby after hard days in field.
I have two qu
In a message dated 4/12/2007 11:39:39 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd want to pull the highs down a little bit while separating and
expanding the tonal contrasts in the trees, bringing them up a notch
too. To me, this says a combination of curves adjustment layers
Why would it make it suspect? They are the majority shareholder. Almost
all (if not all) shareholders are in it for primarily one thing - making
money.
If making the most amount of profit in the shortest amount of time is
Sparx's goal, it's also the goal of many other shareholders.
I'm not
Don't do anything you know I wouldn't do. Then you'll be ok.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 12. april 2007 20:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: See ya later
We
I have no experience with that particular setup, but I and others
have seen various issues with the Pantone Huey and different system
configurations. Because of those issues, and similar issues with the
Spyder2 product, I generally recommend the Eye One Display 2 instead.
Godfrey
On Apr 12
I just stumbled over a load of short tutorials
http://www.lightroomkillertips.com/
What I've seen so far looks good.
Tim Typo
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: 12. april 2007
Woof, woo woo woof!
Woof
William Robb wrote:
> We are off to the Battlefords for a dawg show.
> I am showing Jester, the ADHD puppy, Charmi is showing Bella, the lovely
> Walloon.
> I will be back on Sunday, depending on how well we do, perhaps earlier than
> later.
>
> Have fun.
>
> William Rob
On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:48, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Certainly worth it for the lens alone. Ah well, there are other fish
> in the pond...
>
...and my wife had even bought into the the idea, too!
Ah well.
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robins
The beta was occasionally challenging in the Print module with regard
to setup and sizing. However, all of that seems to have been fully
sorted out ... I use it exclusively for my printing now and am
extremely happy with it.
I find it best in Lightroom, just as in Photoshop, to use a profile
Bill,
Good luck!
--
Bruce
Thursday, April 12, 2007, 11:44:21 AM, you wrote:
WR> We are off to the Battlefords for a dawg show.
WR> I am showing Jester, the ADHD puppy, Charmi is showing Bella, the lovely
WR> Walloon.
WR> I will be back on Sunday, depending on how well we do, perhaps earlier t
I had them analyze one of mine that got rejected that way. What they
told me was there was some exif data. If there is any exif data, then
they scan for pentax cameras in it. If they don't find it, they
reject. So what you really want to do with the scanned images is to
strip all exif data from
Shot this in Joshua Tree National Monument, love that place. Pentax ME
Super SE.
http://home.earthlink.net/~nbaugher/joshuatree.htm
Norm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
> I like this shot. What do you think:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/456765816/
Hmm. The color seems a little odd ... kinda flat somehow ... and I'm
not sure that the expression of the two boys is really the best.
Neither seem to be focu
Does anybody else have a PowerPC-based G5 iMac that
they have calibrated with a Huey?
What results do you get?
I get peculiar discolored posterized shadows; Pantone
has no idea why. The Huey works wonderfully on our
MacBook.
Rick
http://www.photo.net/photos/RickW
I downloaded the Beta some time back and basically liked what I saw.
However, I could never get it to print decent stuff. I wasn't willing to
chase driver problems, etc, so just deleted it and never looked backwards.
Now, with the positive reports I am reading everywhere, I am wondering if
mayb
We are off to the Battlefords for a dawg show.
I am showing Jester, the ADHD puppy, Charmi is showing Bella, the lovely
Walloon.
I will be back on Sunday, depending on how well we do, perhaps earlier than
later.
Have fun.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
I don't have it anymore, but I once owned the Sigma 70~300 APO Super. The
latest Digital version is a little more expensive, but still very
affordable. I truly wonder what the diff is compared to the regular version.
Anyway, I found it to be a VG to E+ lens, especially when factoring in
price. I
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:09 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I just used shadow/highlights on it to bring out the shadow
> details, which
> is a quicker fix and not necessarily the best for tonal
> gradations. I was
> aware the rock was light and the trees very dark, and that was a
> situatio
thanks walt!
G
On Apr 12, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> I don't have it anymore, but I once owned the Sigma 70~300 APO
> Super. The
> latest Digital version is a little more expensive, but still very
> affordable. I truly wonder what the diff is compared to the regular
> version.
I like this shot. What do you think:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/456765816/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.3.0
In a message dated 4/12/2007 9:55:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well struck balance between the screening trees and the graduated
lighting of the rocks. Trees allow adequate definition of the
background, yet retain their identity against the less well lit
portion. Ni
Hi,
After a long spell, I added new(old) stuff to the Pentax Gallery, most
were film shots. They were consistent rejected because of lack of
EXIF data blah blah blah ... even with the "scanned..." box ticked.
Most of my previous shots that were accepted were film photos--this
happening to anyone
In a message dated 4/12/2007 10:57:45 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/treescreen.htm
Followup:
It looks better on my big screen than it did on the laptop, but I
still
Finally scanned in a couple of pictures I like. This was from my first
trip to the Amazon...
http://home.earthlink.net/~nbaugher/manaus.htm
Norm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 4/12/2007 8:54:57 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cool shot, aka. Your artistic sensibilities are starting to merge nicely
with photographic technology. Pretty soon Bill Robb will suggest that you
get a camera better suited to your vision ;-))
Shel
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
