On Aug 14, 2013, at 12:41 AM, John wrote:
> It's another one of those Invalid user ID or Password, can't change the
> password, can't create a new user ID because a user ID already exists
> circular hells.
I've had something similar before. The worst one was when I was able to access
the lost-
So where do the Super-Multi-Coated Takumar & SMC Takumar versions fit into
this puzzle?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Darren Addy
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 8:48 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Found a Pentax mistake in the Super Tak 50mm f1.4
Don't know how many will
I consider myself somewhat of an 'adventure' photographer and I too can say
weathersealing has never made any difference in my photography - rain,
sleet, snow, blowing sand etc.
IMO its more of a marketing thing than an actual factor.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwal
Nice. I particularly like the second one, the b&w of the pair. It has a very
different quality compared to the color photos.
G
On Aug 13, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few of you might recall the image I shared a couple of weeks ago, of
> newborn twins, having a
It's not the right camera for me either, although I think the yellow one is
darn nice looking. All I was saying is that Kirk's a pretty solid eye-level
viewfinder person, yet he's figured out how to work with LCD only cameras and
seems to be enjoying them.
I do often take my X2 out and go shoo
They're not "stitching a video" with the iPhone Panorama feature, the number of
vertical pixels is wrong for that.
G
On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Apple may have popularized stitching a video to make a panorama, but they
> weren't the first to do so. Is there any software
Lovely tone and rendering. I'm not sure the photo works for me, but it is
beautifully rendered.
The meta-question in this case is "what do you mean by abstract?"
G
On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Don Guthrie wrote:
> Seems I am in a black & white mood or mode and I am distracted or in this
>
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-02-11-24.shtml
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and fo
Thanks for commenting, John.
It's a contact sheet ... I haven't rendered or finished annotation of all the
exposures. I roll out a contact sheet with camera and lens named so I can
identify if there are any problems with that camera or lens. I take pains to
embed camera, lens, max f/number, an
Make that my H3v. Can't type on a phone.
Paul via phone
On Aug 13, 2013, at 11:02 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Just checked my H3b. It has the orange "R."
>
> Paul via phone
>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 10:55 PM, "Joe J. Wilensky" wrote:
>
>> The earlier 8-element version was sought after by coll
Just checked my H3b. It has the orange "R."
Paul via phone
On Aug 13, 2013, at 10:55 PM, "Joe J. Wilensky" wrote:
> The earlier 8-element version was sought after by collectors for a while
> because it didn't yellow with age, as the 7-element lens did. The 7-element
> 50/1.4 Takumar used thor
The earlier 8-element version was sought after by collectors for a while
because it didn't yellow with age, as the 7-element lens did. The 7-element
50/1.4 Takumar used thorium in (one?) rare-earth glass element, as did a couple
of other Takumars of the time.
I think the earlier lens was worse
Oh I see. Reading a bit on this there appears to be little quality
difference in pictures between the two optical formulas and that the 8
element is rare, and obviously more valuable. Pretty much as much as I
assumed. I guess if hybrids existed they would be rare yet and worth a
bit more.
On Tue,
I'm going to be the dumb guy here and ask is there any real major
differences between the 7 and 8 element version optically? IIRC the
earlier version is more desirable? Or do I have it the wrong way
around? I never got what the big deal was over the Takumar 50/1.4. I
have a M50/1.4 and its very, ve
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
>>
>> The one thing the GX7 doesn't have is weather sealing, but given how few
>> m4/3 and 4/3 lenses do, I suppose it's not a huge drawback.
>
> The only cameras I've had that have been weathersealed
Thanks Mark! Other than Whitefish Point for birding, this was the first time
I've spent an appreciable time on Lake Superior shore and vicinity. Nice
country. I had a real struggle with the blueberries, but I did leave them
behind for another to shoot, and then found my snack from a less photoge
On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Godfrey, don't you think that x2 crop can pose a problem? I mean in
> terms of wide angle shooting.
Panasonic and Olympus offer lenses down to 7mm for ultra-wide-angle shooting.
One of my few remaining lenses is the Olympus ZD 11-22mm f/2.8-3
First I've heard of anyone having problems with the GXR EVF, other than those
folks who jammed it in the upright position.
I've had several swivel EVFs: the Minolta A2, the GXR VF-2 and the Olympus
VF-2. No problems with any of them.
G
On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:20 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> I
On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Aahz Maruch wrote:
> The one thing the GX7 doesn't have is weather sealing, but given how few
> m4/3 and 4/3 lenses do, I suppose it's not a huge drawback.
The only cameras I've had that have been weathersealed are the Olympus E-1,
E-5, and Pentax K10D. It's never m
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:41:41PM -0600, steve harley wrote:
> on 2013-08-13 16:15 Larry Colen wrote
> >http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/9499052769/
>
> you caught the moment when the worm escaped her head!
>
> >But, to paraphrase
> >Utah Phillips, "It's fun though!".
>
> i admire Utah Phi
Nice shots - the blueberries look great and I love the dragonfly on the
coneflower. Interesting use of stack focus for the truck cab, landscapes
and beach scenes. I had not thought of using it for landscapes but that
would be interesting - no more stopping down for DOF, no more
diffraction com
on 2013-08-13 16:15 Larry Colen wrote
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/9499052769/
you caught the moment when the worm escaped her head!
But, to paraphrase
Utah Phillips, "It's fun though!".
i admire Utah Phillips!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
on 2013-08-13 15:02 Larry Colen wrote
Apple may have popularized stitching a video to make a panorama, but they
weren't the first to do so.
i'm not sure that's what Apple does; iOS seems to merely do a typical live view
while you pan, but then also auto-detects, captures and stitches appropria
I'm thinking about selling mine... I can pull together more info for
FS Friday, but just a heads up, I thought I rememebred that someone
was looking... let me know...
:)
-c
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Giggle... or groan? :)
Great catch, Paul.
-c
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Nice giggle there
> ann
>
>
> On 8/13/2013 16:22, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> While shooting cars at the Mopar Nationals last weekend.
>>
>> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17494882&si
Thanks for your thoughts, Ann... I am interested in reactions to that
second one, the black & white ... I go back & forth a bit, myself.
The babies do have an intense look going there. And I agree that
"take one" did have its own charm. I think that shell-shocked
parents of newborn twins might
Thanks, Jack & Charles! The parents were happy, used the image on the
birth announcements, and the overall look is more like what I was
trying to accomplish the first time out...
:)
-c
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Super cute!!
>
> Jack
>
>
> _
I saved my copy on my website. If like Brian you can't download a
copy, drop me a note and I'll send you the url.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:09:13AM +1000, Brian Walters wrote:
> Quoting Bruce Walker :
>
> >"4 years ago I wrote a small eBook called TEN, Ten Ways to Improve
> >Your Craft Without
I was at an event last night with a bunch of colored lights on the ceiling.
I tried some photos of a young lady, using the IR flash, with the camera
colorbalanced to make that come out neutral, and the shutter on bulb.
After the camera flashed, I rotated the camera and zoomed the 16-50.
http://w
Quoting Bruce Walker :
"4 years ago I wrote a small eBook called TEN, Ten Ways to Improve
Your Craft Without Buying Gear. [...] now we’re putting it out to
pasture and giving it away. If you don’t have a copy, it’s all yours."
http://davidduchemin.com/2013/08/ten-yours-free/
There's a daily
"Ten Ways to Improve Your Craft Without Buying Gear" ???
What a dangerous idea. I'll pay you $10 to make sure my wife never
even sees that title.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:12 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> "4 years ago I wrote a small eBook called TEN, Ten Ways to Improve
> Your Craft Without Buying
Nice giggle there
ann
On 8/13/2013 16:22, Paul Stenquist wrote:
While shooting cars at the Mopar Nationals last weekend.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17494882&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Apple may have popularized stitching a video to make a panorama, but they
weren't the first to do so. Is there any software to take full resolution
video from a DSLR and stitch it together into a panorama?
I guess you'd need a DSLR that would do full resolution video first.
If you could afford a R
That's true, J.C. but that is the part you are least likely to see
when looking at photos (online auctions, etc.)
The lens will either be on the camera or they will have a cap on the
back. Unless the seller knows what they actually have, in which case
somebody else can buy it.
: )
On Tue, Aug 13
FWIW,
The easiest way to tell a true 8 element is the rear glass element
protrudes unprotected. On the later 7 element versions the rear
element glass has a metal rim protecting it.
jco
On 8/13/2013 2:48 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
Don't know how many will be interested in this, but it is kind of
The second one is very Diane Arbus.. rather dark in feeling...
The tootsies was a nice idea and nicely done...
The take one shot I thought was lots of fun.. Their uncooperativeness
added to the charm.
the babes look kinda uncomfortable in the firefighter gear - I don't
think that one quite work
While shooting cars at the Mopar Nationals last weekend.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17494882&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the direc
If you want another solid camera, get a hold of a Topcon Super D. The
Nikon F was the camera of choice for all the U.S. Armed Forces except
the Navy. They chose the Topcon Super D.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 14:18 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>>
On 13 Aug 2013, at 20:13, Rick Womer wrote:
> Bob,
>
> You are correct in re the pub.
>
> I hope that you are incorrect in re more Fuller's--I like it, and it's a lot
> easier to find than Meantime!
>
Au contraire - Meantime is remarkably easy to find. The brewery is only 50
yards from my h
on 2013-08-13 7:50 George Sinos wrote
I was also thinking about the Panasonic GX-7. I noticed the eyepiece
swivels 90 degrees. That interested me more than a flip-out back lcd
panel. It's still and EVF, but I think I could get used to that as
long as it's in the eyepiece. It looks like a nice
On Aug 13, 2013, at 14:18 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 08:24 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Aug 13, 2013, at 10:14 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>>
>>> I acquired a 1972 black paint Nikon F Photomic FTn body last year via a
>>> friend. The Nikon F Photomic FTn was my firs
I'm not saying it is a hybrid, but that was what the OP called it.
The infrared mark is clearly a mistake. The wrong line is painted red.
Disassembly and reassembly have nothing to do with changing what lines
are painted what colors on a single part.
As an aside, I'm told via a comment on my Flick
There was a Pentax logo on the shop front, too.
Cheerio,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Don Guthrie
To: pdml@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - At the Pub
Took me a sec - at the pub looking out pre-framed. I like
Darren,
A 40+ year old hybrid lens nobody has ever discovered?
Lots of dis-assembly and re-assembly possible over the years.
In the old days, people paid VERY close attention and missed it?
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Don't know how many will be interest
Bob,
You are correct in re the pub.
I hope that you are incorrect in re more Fuller's--I like it, and it's a lot
easier to find than Meantime!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:12
Don't know how many will be interested in this, but it is kind of a
big deal if you are looking for the original 8 element Super Takumar
50mm f1.4 (or think you already own one).
It started when I found this photo on Flickr: 3 versions of Super
Takumar f1.4/50mm ?!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/kuu
Seems I am in a black & white mood or mode and I am distracted or in
this case abstract.
Comments etc. welcomed.
http://donguthriephotos.com/2013/08/13/black-and-white-mood-103/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
Took me a sec - at the pub looking out pre-framed. I like it but it
seems you were near an Olympus dealer or maybe they also had Pentax in
backroom . Cheers ol'chap.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rick Womer
To: Pentax List
Subject: P
"Henry Ford."
J
- Original Message -
From: Steve Cottrell
To: pentax list
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 10:59 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax name is now gone...
On 13/8/13, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>In my experience, the old Pentaxians are the last people on th
Super cute!!
Jack
From: Christine Nielsen
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 10:22 AM
Subject: PESO... Wonder Twins, take 2
Hi all,
A few of you might recall the image I shared a couple of weeks ago, of
newborn twins, having a reall
"4 years ago I wrote a small eBook called TEN, Ten Ways to Improve
Your Craft Without Buying Gear. [...] now we’re putting it out to
pasture and giving it away. If you don’t have a copy, it’s all yours."
http://davidduchemin.com/2013/08/ten-yours-free/
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That's the Jack Horner on Tottenham Court Road.
Now that you've tasted Meantime Beer I expect you'll never have another fullers
:0)
B
On 13 Aug 2013, at 17:34, Rick Womer wrote:
> I'm finally getting around to the pix I took during my lightning visit to
> London last month. I had promised m
On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:22 , Christine Nielsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A few of you might recall the image I shared a couple of weeks ago, of
> newborn twins, having a really bad day? Although that shoot was a
> bit of a train wreck, I was lucky enough to get another crack at it.
> So, I double
Thanks, John. I can only marvel at the parents of these boys... there are two
more at home under the age of 5 - that's a handful! My first baby heads off to
college next week, but I remember well the sleepless nights and foggy days with
just one baby... Hats off to parents of multiples!
:)
-c
On 13/8/13, Ralf R. Radermacher, discombobulated, unleashed:
>In my experience, the old Pentaxians are the last people on this planet
>who would want a camera in fancyful colours.
For me, you can make it any fanciful colour you like - as long as it's black.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Bro
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 01:27:13PM -0400, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Some pretty damn good results in there!
Thanks Dan. I'd love to try stacking software on them, and see if that cleans
up the noise.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 20
Christine,
Being a parent of twins, I can say that those two look gorgeous but
there are many things to come. The real prize for us was a gift of
diaper service which unknowingly came with twin insurance. Twins are
fun! Mine are boy, girl but for a long time, it was hard enough just
keepin
I like it for the colors, textures, and shadows. The geometry puzzles me,
though: the level and sloping bits don't seem to match.
One other question: Why can't Americans make the security bars on their windows
look as nice as the Italians do?
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Origin
Thanks, Bob. For many (but not all) I was practicing with the FA
100mm f2.8 Macro. I find it a very useful lens, but focus is
sometimes tricky, especially with a subject that is constantly moving.
like these butterflies.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Aug
Some pretty damn good results in there!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Lesson learned. If you try to photograph meteors and have the camera set
> for auto darkfield noise reduction, that is exactly what will ha
Hi all,
A few of you might recall the image I shared a couple of weeks ago, of
newborn twins, having a really bad day? Although that shoot was a
bit of a train wreck, I was lucky enough to get another crack at it.
So, I doubled-down on all of my baby-whispering tactics, crossed my
fingers & h
Well, I think the guy should be encouraged to produce his product for
the Q and he would probably find more than a few buyers.
What his product would allow is testing to see if the Auto 110 lenses
can perform better at smaller apertures. FWIW, I'm not impressed with
what I see of them wide open:
h
Christine,
Some kids go on to be soccer stars, some even play in college, but
only if you have a Hispanic surname.
Others grow up to be superstars in other things, wives, and mothers.
Spend your money where you want, but which do you think we need more of?
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at
Ha... I love this! So many times, my daughter at that age would be
out in the middle of the soccer field, just spinning, or looking at
bugs, or staring into space...
Ah yes, money well-spent.
:)
-c
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:16 AM, George Sinos wrote:
> Little Kids are unpredictable on the soc
So yesterday I discovered there's a guy who makes a 110-to-micro4/3
lens adapter with a built-in aperture:
http://www.rjcamera.com/ocart/index.php?route=product/product&path=20&product_id=50
As you probably know, Auto 110 lenses don't have apertures in them, as
that was part of the camera body. Th
I often feel that way... but am too inhibited to sit on the floor and pull my
shirt over my head, especially at work.
Nice pic!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: George Sinos
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Cc:
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:16 AM
Subjec
I'm finally getting around to the pix I took during my lightning visit to
London last month. I had promised myself lunch at a Fuller's pub after my
arrival, and took this waiting for my meal:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17494350
Just the plain stark pic:
http://gallery.photo.net/
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 08:00:09AM +0100, Bob W wrote:
> On 13 Aug 2013, at 02:22, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > just my 2 cents as I procrastinate this evening.
> >
>
> You should leave that until tomorrow evening.
>
Never put of until tomorrow what can be postponed to the day af
For what it's worth, most of the photos were taken in astrotracer mode.
Also, it is not surprising that I can push the ISO a lot harder with
the K-5 than I was able to with the K20. For some reason the K20 seemed
a bit better at star photography than the K-x.
It is important to learn where inf
I agree. India is a pretty big potential market in the world and I
find it hard to believe that it has been ignored up until recently.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
>
>> :) Pentax is finally, officially here in India. Ric
On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:42 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
> :) Pentax is finally, officially here in India. Ricoh is opening
> sales/service centres in five cities in India (delhi, bombay,
> calcutta, madras and bangalore) and will start selling pentax
> cameras, lenses and binoculars from next month.
Just a small nit to pick. If you're going to have captions, I'd much
rather see something about the image instead of just the camera/lens combo.
On 8/13/2013 11:14 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I acquired a 1972 black paint Nikon F Photomic FTn body last year
via a friend. The Nikon F Photomic FTn
My sister-in-law (a very good photographer) has one of those that she can't
bear to part with, but rarely uses. The thing is as solid as a yacht anchor
and just as heavy. It handles beautifully; the craftsmanship in the body and
lenses is amazing. The metering head uses obsolete mercury batte
Since there is a lot of experience on this list, I thought I would ask
for opinions on the original 8 element Super Takumar 50mm f1.4. There
are various stories (and or theories) on this lens and I'm not sure
what to believe. Some say that this was a Pentax loss-leader and
designed to equal or bett
On Aug 13, 2013, at 10:14 , Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> I acquired a 1972 black paint Nikon F Photomic FTn body last year via a
> friend. The Nikon F Photomic FTn was my first SLR camera, and is still one of
> my favorites. I always wanted a black paint one! I still have a few of my
> favorite N
I acquired a 1972 black paint Nikon F Photomic FTn body last year via a friend.
The Nikon F Photomic FTn was my first SLR camera, and is still one of my
favorites. I always wanted a black paint one! I still have a few of my favorite
Nikkor lenses, still like 'em a lot. I fitted plain prism finde
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Pentax,
> like I said earlier, seems to preoccupy itself with colorful bodies or
> things like Pentax Q, which IMO is total waste of good engineering and
> marketing resources. But then again, I am among the younger Pentaxians
> who joined the fold some 10+ years ago. So I
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:38 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> What kills me is that their facebook avatar is now just the ricoh
> logo.
I think I actually understand you, Zos. You're trying to say that in
terms of brand exposure, they're doing everything to hide Pentax.
In my totally uneducated opinion,
Godfrey, don't you think that x2 crop can pose a problem? I mean in
terms of wide angle shooting.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Indeed, I'm waiting for them to become available and for Lightroom to support
> the raw files.
>
> - nicely laid out, magnesium body
> - IB
It turns out that the way Ricoh GXR EVF is constructed - the 90 deg
swivel feature (that it also has) is in fact is Achilles heal. The
contacts become flaky...
I hope that modern swivel designs don't have this problem. At least
with Ricoh the EVF is detachable and can be replaced if necessary.
OT
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Indeed, I'm waiting for them to become available and for Lightroom to support
> the raw files.
>
> - nicely laid out, magnesium body
> - IBIS
> - new 16 Mpixel sensor
> - ultrasonic wave sensor cleaning
> - easy adaptation to Leica M, R, and Niko
Indeed, I'm waiting for them to become available and for Lightroom to support
the raw files.
- nicely laid out, magnesium body
- IBIS
- new 16 Mpixel sensor
- ultrasonic wave sensor cleaning
- easy adaptation to Leica M, R, and Nikon F mount manual lenses (Pentax and
others too)
- easy adaptati
On 8/13/2013 9:41 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Zos Xavius wrote:
What kills me is that their facebook avatar is now just the ricoh
logo.
Man, life is hard, isn't it?
Life is easy, Comedy is hard.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Godfrey -
I was also thinking about the Panasonic GX-7. I noticed the eyepiece
swivels 90 degrees. That interested me more than a flip-out back lcd
panel. It's still and EVF, but I think I could get used to that as
long as it's in the eyepiece. It looks like a nice little camera that
would be e
On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:16 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
> Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi :
>
>> http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheVisualScienceLab/~3/vPy03CZrbYc/pentax-k-01-please-send-me-case-of.html
>
>
> Well, I'm glad for Kirk but having spent about 6 months with the Q, it's
> taught me one thing.
Zos Xavius wrote:
>What kills me is that their facebook avatar is now just the ricoh
>logo.
Man, life is hard, isn't it?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSC
"there are several with my full spectrum body"
So I see!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 11:38 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: geso, pleiades
Lesson learned. If you try to photograph meteors and have the camera set
for auto darkfie
Yawn.
On Aug 12, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:
> What kills me is that their facebook avatar is now just the ricoh
> logo.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
On 8/13/2013 2:36 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheVisualScienceLab/~3/vPy03CZrbYc/pentax-k-01-please-send-me-case-of.html
Godfrey
It still doesn't have an eye-level viewfinder, and my arms are neither
long enough, nor steady enough to hold it out at arms length
Yeah. That's where I'm at right now. I know that Toshiba's tech support
won't be any help.
But, I was kind of hoping their "forums" might be a bit more useful, but I
can't log in to ask a question.
It's another one of those Invalid user ID or Password, can't change the
password, can't create a n
On 8/13/2013 4:06 AM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Zos Xavius :
with the current model or after a sucessor. The K-3 (24mp APS-C) is a
warmed over k-5 body redesign with more curves and 11 point AF still
(which I am actually fine with, just more accuracy damnit!), No wifi,
nothing innovative.
Dan,
That's a nice shot on the butterfly bush.
And as Alan C points out, there are a bunch of them too!
You've done really well to catch them outside.
Lovely images.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17493767
> Fr
Lesson learned. If you try to photograph meteors and have the camera set
for auto darkfield noise reduction, that is exactly what will happen during
one minute during which three meteors will go overhead, one close enough to
hear.
http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157635054367568/
T
Quoting Godfrey DiGiorgi :
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheVisualScienceLab/~3/vPy03CZrbYc/pentax-k-01-please-send-me-case-of.html
Well, I'm glad for Kirk but having spent about 6 months with the Q,
it's taught me one thing. I will never buy another camera that
doesn't have a eye-leve
Quoting Zos Xavius :
with the current model or after a sucessor. The K-3 (24mp APS-C) is a
warmed over k-5 body redesign with more curves and 11 point AF still
(which I am actually fine with, just more accuracy damnit!), No wifi,
nothing innovative. Just a new processing engine and sony chip.
Quoting Darren Addy :
from the domain names and web sites and social media of the formerly
Pentax-RIcoh Imaging (as expected). Still kind of a shock to see it
for real.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2013/08/12/pentax-websites-social-networking-properties-switch-to-ricoh-branding
It will
On 13 Aug 2013, at 02:22, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> [...]
>
> just my 2 cents as I procrastinate this evening.
>
You should leave that until tomorrow evening.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi
97 matches
Mail list logo
