Some of these aren't too bad...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-34548394
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Thanks Ann, I appreciate your comments.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Bunchberry'
Especially nice geometry, exposure and I dolike bunchberries. Sorry the
center one has been nibbled on,
Heh - you mkae far fewer of those than I do! (case in point - mkae)
Thanks for the props on the photos :-)
ann
On 10/18/2015 11:20 PM, knarf wrote:
"Chronically"?
Damned predictive spelling!
How about "chronicle"?
Geez.
Now, this is interesting: After I typed "how about 'chronicle'?", I se
"Chronically"?
Damned predictive spelling!
How about "chronicle"?
Geez.
Now, this is interesting: After I typed "how about 'chronicle'?", I see the
word "Geez" pop up. Didn't even have to hit the "G". It knows my speech
patterns.
That's scary.
Cheers,
frank
On October 18, 2015 11:11:16
I took a time-trip wandering through the gallery that photo was in.
Holy crap, Ann, such outstanding stuff! Should be in a museum somewhere - what
an amazing chronically of that time and place!
It made my night. I highly encourage others to take a look as well.
Cheers,
frank
On October 18, 2
Thanks anyway, Ann!
I think...
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 6:13 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
>
> I like it too - but like Frank, I have no brain
>
> ann
>
>> On 10/18/2015 8:55 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> Can't be certain, but I think you did too.
>> Your concern is a compliment as w
I like it too - but like Frank, I have no brain
ann
On 10/18/2015 8:55 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Can't be certain, but I think you did too.
Your concern is a compliment as well!
Thanks!!
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 18, 2015, at 5:13 PM, knarf wrote:
I thought I replied to this one but now
It is just a very samll part of what is a well written and fascinating
book, Frank..
Hope it comes soon to a library near you ...
ann
On 10/18/2015 8:01 PM, knarf wrote:
Amazing photo, so evocative of the time. The movie titles, the cars, the
garbage.
I love this. It is so deserving of publi
Love both, Frank!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 4:51 PM, knarf wrote:
>
> Here's a couple of old ones, so someone of you may have this vague feeling of
> deja vu:
>
> Absorbed http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2015/10/absorbed.html
>
> The young lady on the steps was taken wi
Can't be certain, but I think you did too.
Your concern is a compliment as well!
Thanks!!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 5:13 PM, knarf wrote:
>
> I thought I replied to this one but now I can't find my response.
>
> So in case I haven't : I love it! The light is sublime.
>
>
Larry, even the Sun has spots...
:-)
Igor
Sent from mobile phone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Spelling doesn't count.
;-)
Cheers,
frank
On October 15, 2015 11:11:52 PM EDT, Alan C wrote:
>No. (Non smoker). Besides, he can't spell.
>
>Alan C
>
>-Original Message-
>From: frank theriault
>Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:47 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: PESO - Servic
No, he's scowling, Ann. Saw him a few other times that day. Always with the
scowl.
Thanks for your comment!
Cheers,
frank
On October 15, 2015 10:37:08 PM EDT, ann sanfedele wrote:
>actually, I think he is jsut squinting - needs sunglasses...
>but no, wouldn't buy a vape from anyone
>And you
I thought I replied to this one but now I can't find my response.
So in case I haven't : I love it! The light is sublime.
Cheers,
frank
On October 16, 2015 8:39:04 AM EDT, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>Back to the maudlin drum beat. This seems a comfortable composition
>of a Gray Heron who was just a
I like the framing of the old one in the background. And the title is so
apropos given the age of that one along with saurian look of them.
Cheers,
frank
On October 16, 2015 5:46:43 PM EDT, "P.J. Alling"
wrote:
>Preview of a small GESO I may or may not get around to tonight.
>
>https://dl.dr
Amazing photo, so evocative of the time. The movie titles, the cars, the
garbage.
I love this. It is so deserving of publication. Congrats on that!
Cheers,
frank
On October 16, 2015 9:34:32 AM EDT, ann sanfedele wrote:
>.. see page 212 ;-)
>
>http://books.wwnorton.com/books/St-Marks-Is-Dea
Interesting. Not sure what it is, but interesting none-the-less.
Cheers,
frank
On October 18, 2015 8:53:56 AM EDT, Bulent Celasun
wrote:
>Just as said!
>
>https://celasun.wordpress.com/2015/10/18/sweet-nothing/
>
>Ricoh GXR A12.
>
>Comments (lighthearted or otherwise) appreciated.
>
>Bulent
>
Here's a couple of old ones, so someone of you may have this vague feeling of
deja vu:
Absorbed http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2015/10/absorbed.html
The young lady on the steps was taken with the *is D and kit 18-55. The boy and
dad with the late, lamented Leica CL with Summicron C f2.0 40m
What Frank said.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 4:24 PM, knarf wrote:
>
> Clark is a cutie - well captured!
>
> Very nice colours on the Jay.
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
>
>> On October 18, 2015 8:35:47 AM EDT, David J Brooks
>> wrote:
>> Clark with Granny at the horse farm
>>
>>
Thanks for your comment, Bulent.
How about a B&W?
If I get a round tu it.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bulent Celasun"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Bunchberry'
That's beautiful!
How about a B&W?
Bulent
---
Thanks Jack, Iappreciate the comment.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Bunchberry'
Like the 5 spot dice arrangement.
Beautifully exposed, Ken!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Wal
Clark is a cutie - well captured!
Very nice colours on the Jay.
Cheers,
frank
On October 18, 2015 8:35:47 AM EDT, David J Brooks wrote:
>Clark with Granny at the horse farm
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22273102795/
>
>First blue jay shot using X30
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/
I like the top one best but both are beautiful. The reflection is lovely.
Cheers,
frank
On October 17, 2015 9:05:13 AM EDT, David J Brooks wrote:
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22232909602/
>
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22058842989/
>
>Some colour in the swamps. Taken duri
They don't do that sort of stuff in Bancroft.
They bray like a donkey...
Cheers,
frank
On October 17, 2015 1:18:23 PM EDT, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>Makes me want to play the banjo and squeal like a pig
>
>B
>
>> On 17 Oct 2015, at 14:55, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> Makes me want to throw a Hula
>> P
Beautiful texture, exposure and composition.
Love it!
Cheers,
frank
On October 16, 2015 1:46:47 PM EDT, Ken Waller wrote:
>Taken in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, early summer.
>K3, 200mm f4.0 Ed Macro, 1/640, f11, 800 ISO
>
>Comments/critiques appreciated.
>
>http://photo.net/photodb/phot
On 2015-10-18 14:25 , Darren Addy wrote:
So how many computers can I install a single [CC] license on? Would it be
possible to have it on my work computer (currently running CS5) AND my
home computer?
yes, you may install CC on two computers, but you may use only one at a
time; you may also de
On 2015-10-17 19:49 , Darren Addy wrote:
Well, obviously this interested no one other than me.
i read the Speed Graphic one but didn't have anything to say; then i was out
of time to look at the other on …
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
Thanks for the input, everyone.
John S. said: "If you're installing PhotoshopCC on the same computer
you used for PhotoshopCSx, you might not even have to reinstall them."
So how many computers can I install a single license on? Would it be
possible to have it on my work computer (currently runni
Yes.
The Graflex Speed Graphic 4x5 I used at the Photo Staff when I was in high
school had a typical Wollensak Raptor 135mm f/4.7 lens, about the EFoV
equivalent of a 35 or 40 mm lens on a 35mm FF camera. One of the challenges was
getting the focus and focus zone right because you had so litt
Most articles behind paywalls can be accessed by searching for the
article on Google, and clicking on the link. Even the semi Mighty New
York Times, and Wall Street Journal, show the full article if it's
accessed from Google. The London Review of Books apparently could give
two figs about Goo
Trouble here Mark. Bob S.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> An article in the London Review of Books by someone who employed her
> as a nanny for three years in the early 80's.
> http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n20/linda-matthews/diary
>
> It's behind a paywall but I believe you c
Depends on the focal length of the lens and aperture and film format.
But yes even with relatively slow lenses you can have very shallow DOF
even on large format.
A not uncommon lens for portraits with medium format would be something
like 210mm with a maximum aperture of f6.7. At a distance
Darren,
I did watch both enjoyed them.
In fact, I started following the site (roadsandkingdoms).
The Pentax vs Nikon video was very interesting and informative.
Still, if and when time is as important as money (equipment price),
the argument becomes weak...
Thanks for bringing these to our atten
An article in the London Review of Books by someone who employed her
as a nanny for three years in the early 80's.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v37/n20/linda-matthews/diary
It's behind a paywall but I believe you can get free access for a
limited number of articles. If anyone has trouble please let me kno
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Larger formats bring other things to the table beyond resolution. You'll never
get the imaging characteristics of a banquet camera by stuffing more bazillion
pixels into a 35mm format sensor.
Does the speed graphic really have that shallow of a depth of field wide
It was ~most~ interesting to me. I read the articles yesterday but had to leave
a response until today.
I have to admit that as wonderful as digital is, some of my best photos were
taken on film loaded in my Spotmatics, LXen, MX and Leica CL. Is that because
I had to go slower, check (and be
John Sessoms wrote:
Your existing Photoshop plug-ins should work with the PhotoshopCC
component. If you're installing PhotoshopCC on the same computer you
used for PhotoshopCSx, you might not even have to reinstall them.
I don't remember having to reinstall them going from 32bit PhotoshopCS5
t
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Larger formats bring other things to the table beyond resolution. You'll never
get the imaging characteristics of a banquet camera by stuffing more bazillion
pixels into a 35mm format sensor.
Higher resolution can bring other things than just more pixels. A lot of
c
For the same reason "no one will ever need more than 640k RAM."
On 10/17/2015 8:23 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Hmmm? Well, i wonder why y'all might need more than 36 megglepixies.
I don't really find myself needing 24...
Godfrey
On Oct 17, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Darren Addy
wrote:
Disappointed t
That "3 layers composition" thing bothered me too. The image is too
small to read the fine print. I recognized the image was a Foveon.
Wondered if it was saying the "super resolution created by SR" created a
virtual Foveon sensor?
Guess not.
On 10/17/2015 7:26 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Darre
Your existing Photoshop plug-ins should work with the PhotoshopCC
component. If you're installing PhotoshopCC on the same computer you
used for PhotoshopCSx, you might not even have to reinstall them.
I don't remember having to reinstall them going from 32bit PhotoshopCS5
to 64bit PhotoshopCS6
thanks bob
Its a fun little camera
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Good stuff Dave. Bob S.
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:35 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>> Clark with Granny at the horse farm
>>
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22273102795/
>>
>> First blue jay sh
Good stuff Dave. Bob S.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 7:35 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> Clark with Granny at the horse farm
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22273102795/
>
> First blue jay shot using X30
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/21650369724/
>
> the B&W straight from camera,
Just as said!
https://celasun.wordpress.com/2015/10/18/sweet-nothing/
Ricoh GXR A12.
Comments (lighthearted or otherwise) appreciated.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/b
Larger formats bring other things to the table beyond resolution. You'll never
get the imaging characteristics of a banquet camera by stuffing more bazillion
pixels into a 35mm format sensor.
Godfrey
> On Oct 18, 2015, at 5:18 AM, Collin Brendemuehl
> wrote:
>
> There's a reason 645, 6x6/7
Clark with Granny at the horse farm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22273102795/
First blue jay shot using X30
https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/21650369724/
the B&W straight from camera, the colour shot converted in silky pix
raw converter and cropped a bit
Dave
--
Documenting L
>Hmmm? Well, i wonder why y'all might need more than 36 megglepixies. I
don't really find myself needing 24...
>
>Godfrey
There's a reason 645, 6x6/7/9/17, 4x5, 8x10 existed. We always want
more-better.
I wonder how long until the digital banquet camera comes into being ...
--
PDML Pentax-D
Didn't see it on first post, but I looked at it today.
1- David Burnett's 4x5 work is delightful.
2- This was an interesting view of the fact that focus stacking and stitching
can be very effective tools. Of course, using them with the Pentax comparing to
a single exposure with the Nikon begs
It turns out that my camera isn't broken.
A friend posted a question about cleaning dust off her sensor. I turned
on my K-x to see what Dust Alert was called in the menu, and it was
exhibiting a very weird problem, not unlike I was having with the K-5.
I then realized that my 16-50 was on the
49 matches
Mail list logo
