RE: Phonosnapographs

> -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of WILSON > MICHAEL [...] > > > > I'd be interested to hear what you think of the presentation if you > > don't > > mind: > > > > https://docs.com/BobWalkden/1478/phonosnapographs > > Once I got into it (Noscript

RE: Phonosnapographs

> -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Brian Walters > > A problem I found was that when I clicked to open one of the thumbnails, I > was then stuck with no way to get back to the thumbnail view - no navigation > arrows were visible. > > A bit of

RE: Phonosnapographs

> On 01 November 2015 at 08:02 Bob W wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of WILSON > > MICHAEL > [...] > > > > > > I'd be interested to hear what you think of the presentation if you > > > don't > > > mind: > >

RE: Phonosnapographs

> -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of David Mann > > All I see is blonde, brunette, redhead. > On the site? I don't understand that - are you looking at the right place? > Bob, the site seemed to work but it feels like they're trying too hard.

RE: Phonosnapographs

Thanks everybody - that's a fairly resounding 'No!' to Microsoft! B > -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML [...] > > I'd be interested to hear what you think of the presentation if you don't > mind: > >

RE: Phonosnapographs

> -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of WILSON > MICHAEL > > [...] > > > > > > > > I'd be interested to hear what you think of the presentation if > > > > you don't > > > > mind: > > > > > > > > https://docs.com/BobWalkden/1478/phonosnapographs > > > >

RE: Phonosnapographs

> -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of ann sanfedele > > Bob - > The first photo is so large in firefox at %100 that Ican't see the whole thing... > using the simple control+ or - it still resists my control. > So I tried it in chrome and same

Re: FS Friday - Up the Alcan calendar and a couple of other things

Please contact me off list with an address to mail a check as well, and I'll order a calendar too. On 11/1/2015 12:26 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: I'll write details off list - thanks, Jack your order is in:-) ann On 10/31/2015 11:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote: Ann, I do want a calendar. Please let

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

I prefer the colour. The other is a bit bland, but would would respond well to more contrast, I think B > On 1 Nov 2015, at 15:07, David J Brooks wrote: > > Taken last weekend on our camera club walkabout. > > B is in camera conversion using red filter bias, and the

Re: PESOs - Dark Angel

Those are nice shots, but how is that a costume, I know people who dress like that all year. On 10/31/2015 8:12 PM, paul stenquist wrote: Ready for trick or treating: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18119573=lg http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18119571=lg -- I don't want to

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

I'd have to vote for the b/w over the color, though I'd like to see a litle subtle vignetting to lead my eye more down the path. You might change my mind by adding a little more contrast to the color. It looks a little bland, to me. In either case, I'd like to be making my way down that

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

You're just being contrary... all the smart money is on the color version ;-) The softness of the light , lack of contrast in the color is a plus to me.. appropriate for his overcast day. ann On 11/1/2015 2:07 PM, Paul wrote: I'd have to vote for the b/w over the color, though I'd like to

Re: Phonosnapographs

appears?? ann, geezerette On 11/1/2015 9:15 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: A couple of questions: Has anyone tried viewing this on a smartphone, which is what it appears to be made for? Bob, would you care to get the impression of my students on this thing? I could have them check it out in class

Re: FS Friday - Up the Alcan calendar and a couple of other things

Be right there, John Thanks! ann On 11/1/2015 10:54 AM, John wrote: Please contact me off list with an address to mail a check as well, and I'll order a calendar too. On 11/1/2015 12:26 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: I'll write details off list - thanks, Jack your order is in:-) ann On

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

On 11/1/2015 10:50 AM, John wrote: On 10/31/2015 9:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: knarf wrote: Fun portrait: Nice detail, great colour, focus on front eye, technically very good but that cut off lip is a bother. Yeah, remember my mentioning having trouble with it locking focus. She kept walking

RE: Fighting enablement - lens choice question

Stanley Halpin wrote: > If you aren’t going to use it, maybe you should send it back? Where are > your priorities?!? Exactly where my wife left them! Malcolm -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

The color, by a mile for me ann On 11/1/2015 10:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote: Taken last weekend on our camera club walkabout. B is in camera conversion using red filter bias, and the colour shot, same scene is from the RAW file of the X30 https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22649815196/

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

On 10/31/2015 9:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: knarf wrote: Fun portrait: Nice detail, great colour, focus on front eye, technically very good but that cut off lip is a bother. Yeah, remember my mentioning having trouble with it locking focus. She kept walking towards me and by the time it

SEmi OT - smugmug (or other sites) and presentation on line

Smugmug caused me no small amount of grief when they "improved" the site - again, probably due to eagerness to make things work better on a phone or pad and screw those of us who only have "real" computers :-) But working on my new calendar I found a way to do it their wayand mine . Figuring

Re: Phonosnapographs

On 11/1/2015 9:15 AM, Mark Roberts wrote: A couple of questions: Has anyone tried viewing this on a smartphone, which is what it appears to be made for? Bob, would you care to get the impression of my students on this thing? I could have them check it out in class tomorrow. They may be closer

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

On 11/1/2015 10:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote: Taken last weekend on our camera club walkabout. B is in camera conversion using red filter bias, and the colour shot, same scene is from the RAW file of the X30 https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22649815196/

Re: Phonosnapographs

On 1 Nov 2015, at 14:16, Mark Roberts wrote: > > A couple of questions: > > Has anyone tried viewing this on a smartphone, which is what it > appears to be made for? I've checked it in my iphone, ipad and laptop (windows 10). It would be interesting to hear other

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote: > I prefer the colour. The other is a bit bland, but would would respond well > to more contrast, I think > > B I'll have to check my in camera settings, i think i have it at + 1 for contrast, may need to try +2 and see

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

I find that B renderings need a touch more contrast, compared to the color version. That's something I didn't really notice all that much in the good ol' days of film. On 11/1/2015 11:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote: On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote: I

Re: PESOs - Dark Angel

Nice Dave On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 8:12 PM, paul stenquist wrote: > Ready for trick or treating: > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18119573=lg > http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18119571=lg > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net >

OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

Taken last weekend on our camera club walkabout. B is in camera conversion using red filter bias, and the colour shot, same scene is from the RAW file of the X30 https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22649815196/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/22487873630/ Comments.?? Dave --

Re: PESO: Poke

On Sat, Oct 31, 2015, at 18:18, John wrote: > Is there any difference between "organic" bananas & the regular ones? I > mean other than the cost? organic bananas are often a bit smaller and sometimes they ripen differently (they can brown more before becoming overripe); i like them because of

Re: Copyright issues: What if you photograph someone with a copyrighted tattoo?

Then having read his recommendations, I became quiet peeved, as he runs roughshod over fair use in several cases. On 11/1/2015 11:32 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: I don't see how that's different than photographing a Copyrighted poster. No real interesting questions here at all, the law is pretty

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

> On 01 November 2015 at 20:10 "P.J. Alling" wrote: > > > On 11/1/2015 2:34 PM, WILSON MICHAEL wrote: > >> On 01 November 2015 at 16:45 "P.J. Alling" > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/1/2015 10:50 AM, John wrote: > >>> On 10/31/2015 9:08

Re: Powerstation

Thats very nice- easy on the eyes, spot-on geometry - etc. nit picking, I think you increasing contrast may be what is blowing out the sky in the background mainly the area above the people ann On 11/1/2015 3:45 PM, Bob W wrote: Another phone snap, but this time presented entirely unplugged.

RE: Phonosnapographs

Interesting - a bit late to send messages to the Maquis though! John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob W-PDML Sent: Sunday, 1 November 2015 04:54 To: Mail List Pentax-Discuss Subject: Phonosnapographs Microsoft

Re: The workspace

Interesting. I recalibrated my old iMac monitor again today to get it closer to the 5K Retina. I now have a tonality match, but the sharpness and richness difference is very obvious. Bought a new 72-inch long shell desk from Staples this week as well and tossed out the 72-inch folding table

Re: Phonosnapographs

On Nov 1, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Bob W wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of David Mann >> >> All I see is blonde, brunette, redhead. > > On the site? I don't understand that - are you looking at the right place? I was

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

There are apps specifically designed to produce similar results using image bursts and it's actually not overly tedious to stack images in LR, you can choose to have them auto-aligned too. Personally my preference would be to have access to the images stack as discrete images so that I could

Re: PESOs - Dark Angel

paul stenquist wrote: Ready for trick or treating: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18119573=lg http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18119571=lg I'll second Frank's comment on her growing up, I guess that someone around here has to do it and the usual suspects have proven

Re: Phonosnapographs

> On 01 November 2015 at 14:15 Mark Roberts wrote: > > > A couple of questions: > > Has anyone tried viewing this on a smartphone, which is what it > appears to be made for? > > Bob, would you care to get the impression of my students on this > thing? I could have

Re: Phonosnapographs

A couple of questions: Has anyone tried viewing this on a smartphone, which is what it appears to be made for? Bob, would you care to get the impression of my students on this thing? I could have them check it out in class tomorrow. They may be closer to the target demographic than the

Re: Copyright issues: What if you photograph someone with a copyrighted tattoo?

I don't see how that's different than photographing a Copyrighted poster. No real interesting questions here at all, the law is pretty much black letter. On 10/31/2015 2:21 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Some interesting questions arise!

Re: World's worst photo tutorial

On 10/31/2015 4:49 PM, John wrote: On 10/31/2015 4:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: John wrote: On 10/30/2015 9:41 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: On 10/30/2015 7:00 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: John wrote: On 10/30/2015 4:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Jack Davis wrote: From: "Mark Roberts"

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

I think the subject itself is a bit bland to benefit from B conversion. Is there anything there that can only be seen or can be seen better because of the B conversion? If there is, I don't see it. On 11/1/2015 11:11 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote: I prefer the colour. The other is a bit bland, but

RE: Phonosnapographs

> On 01 November 2015 at 20:22 Bob W wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John > [...] > > > > > > Anyway, the conclusion seems to be that it's a load of crap, and I'm > > > not about to argue with that. > >

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

> On 01 November 2015 at 16:45 "P.J. Alling" wrote: > > > On 11/1/2015 10:50 AM, John wrote: > > On 10/31/2015 9:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > >> > >> > >> knarf wrote: > >>> Fun portrait: Nice detail, great colour, focus on front eye, > >>> technically very good but

Re: Phonosnapographs

On 11/1/2015 4:46 AM, Bob W wrote: -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of WILSON MICHAEL [...] I'd be interested to hear what you think of the presentation if you don't mind: https://docs.com/BobWalkden/1478/phonosnapographs Once I got into it

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

On 11/1/2015 2:34 PM, WILSON MICHAEL wrote: On 01 November 2015 at 16:45 "P.J. Alling" wrote: On 11/1/2015 10:50 AM, John wrote: On 10/31/2015 9:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote: knarf wrote: Fun portrait: Nice detail, great colour, focus on front eye, technically very

RE: Phonosnapographs

> -Original Message- > From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John [...] > > > > Anyway, the conclusion seems to be that it's a load of crap, and I'm > > not about to argue with that. > > > > Ta, > > B > > > > > I had forgotten just how much I despise Powerpoint; the

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

On 11/1/2015 3:42 PM, WILSON MICHAEL wrote: On 01 November 2015 at 20:10 "P.J. Alling" wrote: On 11/1/2015 2:34 PM, WILSON MICHAEL wrote: On 01 November 2015 at 16:45 "P.J. Alling" wrote: On 11/1/2015 10:50 AM, John wrote: On

Re: Powerstation

'welks a On 11/1/2015 5:59 PM, Bob W wrote: Thanks ann. I hadn't paid any attention to the blown-out sky, but I've been into Lightroom and brought that down so it's not clipping any more, and it's a big improvement - thanks. B -Original

Re: World's worst photo tutorial

On 11/1/2015 12:02 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: On 10/31/2015 4:49 PM, John wrote: On 10/31/2015 4:01 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: John wrote: On 10/30/2015 9:41 PM, P.J. Alling wrote: On 10/30/2015 7:00 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: John wrote: On 10/30/2015 4:05 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Jack Davis

Powerstation

Another phone snap, but this time presented entirely unplugged. It's been the warmest November day on record over here, and Greenwich has been surrounded by a low fog which hung above the ground and allowed the sunshine through in a beautiful light which made everything seem unreal. This is a

Re: Poke

The Cranberries. Cheers, frank On October 31, 2015 11:56:40 PM EDT, Alan C wrote: >Now I know why you never sleep. > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: knarf >Sent: Sunday, November 01, 2015 5:49 AM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List >Subject: Re: Poke > >Yes. They're

RE: Powerstation

Thanks ann. I hadn't paid any attention to the blown-out sky, but I've been into Lightroom and brought that down so it's not clipping any more, and it's a big improvement - thanks. B > -Original Message- > From: PDML

Re: Powerstation

Yes! I agree with Ann! Difficult composition very adeptly handled. J - Original Message - From: "ann sanfedele" To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Sunday, November 1, 2015 1:51:07 PM Subject: Re: Powerstation Thats very nice- easy on the eyes,

Re: OT Peso's, SBSC (side by side comparison.)

John, probably not but i have the camera set to be a primary B camera butt with raw+jpg have the opportunity to see the colour shot as well, just an experiment, thanks for the input Dave On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 2:42 PM, John wrote: > I think the subject itself is a bit

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

Appreciate the comments Rob. I'd be curious to know what Paul Stenquist sees on his new 5K Mac display. (See original post in this thread, if you are wanting a diversion, Paul). Just a guess, but I think he may see more than "subtle" differences. Regarding your 2nd paragraph, it would be

Re: The workspace

Interestingly, the display may not be the only thing responsible for the quality difference that you are seeing: 10-bit color: http://petapixel.com/2015/10/30/os-x-el-capitan-quietly-unlocked-10-bit-color-in-imacs-and-mac-pros/ On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Jack Davis

Re: PESO Anita Cocktail (and K-3 mini review)

> On 01 November 2015 at 21:46 "P.J. Alling" wrote: > > > On 11/1/2015 3:42 PM, WILSON MICHAEL wrote: > >> On 01 November 2015 at 20:10 "P.J. Alling" > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/1/2015 2:34 PM, WILSON MICHAEL wrote: > On 01

Re: A side-by-side Pixel Shift Resolution comparison with 77mm Limited atf/11

It's subtle but it's there, whether it's going to make a discernible difference in a print for instance depends on crop size vs print size I guess but it's a tool with very limited scope from my perspective given the artifacts created when there is any movement in the frame. I have yet to test

PESO 2015 - 167 - GDG

Shooting around the house for a bit. This little scene caught my eye. https://flic.kr/p/AitJYs Enjoy! Godfrey -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the