Hello Jack,
I think I like it. I would like to see it a bit bigger. As it stands
now, it seems a bit over sharpened to me
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, July 17, 2006, 4:29:06 PM, you wrote:
JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=133
The colors and lighting do a lot for this little plug. It is kind of
a cool shot.
--
Bruce
Monday, July 17, 2006, 3:38:01 PM, you wrote:
MR> http://www.robertstech.com/peso.htm
MR> Shot a couple of years ago and recently re-discovered whilst backing
MR> up my archives.
MR>
I've looked at this one a couple of times. Funny, but I like it the
way it was presented, but I also like it with the upper portion
cropped off, just leaving the boats. It makes for a totally different
picture and very cool one at that.
Nice job!
--
Bruce
Monday, July 17, 2006, 6:01:
A rather interesting shot. On the far right, it seems that there is
some kind of window frame or something, yet to the left seems like a
reflection on a window. Care to tell us a little more about this one?
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, July 17, 2006, 5:09:09 PM, you wrote:
s> took t
quite done with it.
The pose is real cute, but I wish you had a slightly higher vantage
point so I could see his nose. I love the right arm hanging down -
very cool!
--
Bruce
Monday, July 17, 2006, 5:22:18 PM, you wrote:
KW> Check out
KW> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallpho
reflection.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, handheld
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/6.7
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3192a.htm
Comments welcome.
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks, Jay. This was shot handheld. Yeah, that Tokina is a fine
lens. A few years ago, I had a Pentax A 400/5.6 lens. I have found
the Tokina to be a pretty similar performer (closer focusing, by far)
in a much more compact and usable package. It is a keeper for sure.
--
Bruce
Monday
Very cool sky. In this case, I like the first one - the shot is
really about the sky and I think a little breathing room on the horse
tail works better.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 7:55:21 AM, you wrote:
JD> Came upon this scene some time back and quickly pulled over (I usually
JD>
think this photo will continue to get
even better, the bigger it can be viewed.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 5:58:08 AM, you wrote:
JD> @ 72 dpi: (It's too early)
JD> http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=136
JD> Jack
JD> ___
oto -
as a standalone it just doesn't have enough going for it.
As always, the technical quality is excellent.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 8:48:33 AM, you wrote:
RRR> http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/6177055
RRR> and
RRR> http://www.photosight.ru/p
amount of compression you can live with. Lastly, upload the
image to your site.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:52:07 AM, you wrote:
JD> Bruce,
JD> I'll just go ahead and embarrass myself (my life long challenge) by
JD> saying that I don't have any idea.
JD>
is a
Blue Heron...if not, could you please identify?
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 9:42:04 AM, you wrote:
C> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> At least I think it is. This was taken on the same walk yesterday as
>> the egrets. The odd looking patterns you see in the background are, I
>
Didn't get to comment earlier - couldn't post to the list.
Anyway, this is one cool shot! Having been there and tried to make my
own good shots, you were there at a great time. This one begs to be
blown up big and put on a wall!
--
Bruce
Friday, July 14, 2006, 7:03:09 PM, you
This is the last image from the walk.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3194a.htm
Comments welcome.
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
t need to worry about compression. Then do a series of
convert/compressions to jpg to see how small you can make it without
causing problems. For the most part, you should be able to size to
about 800 pixels on the long edge and be less than 300K and still have
a very good image.
--
Bruce
T
Like 'em both! The second one is just a bit better for me. Neat
stuff, that fungus.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 12:26:50 PM, you wrote:
MR> David J Brooks wrote:
>>Well done.
>>
>>I like the first one, fungus and twig.
MR> Thanks! Just added two more:
M
Hey, that is one very cool shot! I love how the buildings behind are
kind of high key - almost ghost-like. Nice work!
--
Bruce
Tuesday, July 18, 2006, 6:14:26 PM, you wrote:
AM> http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/191286989/
AM> Nikon F3HP, Silvertone 400 in Rodinal 1:25. The Goo
Very nice, indeed! I'd love to get an owl shot like this - or even to
see an owl. I must be out at the wrong times.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 5:44:07 AM, you wrote:
WH> istDL, 200mm f/4 SMC, iso 800. The image is cropped about 50%.
WH> http://img.phot
o.com/PAW/bkd_3204a.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
This shot just brings to mind a voodoo doll just made and ready to be
used. The other strange thought that came to me was Marvin the
Martian.
Pentax *istD, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/750 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3177a.htm
Comments welcome.
--
Bruce
Hello Toralf,
I can see what you mean about the expression. It does seem to kind of
hang on to you and make you keep looking. Almost like you are trying
to see what she is seeing/thinking. I like this one in B&W. Thanks
for sharing.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006,
Love the image in general. I pulled it down and played with
saturation just a bit - if you bring up the saturation a little, some
really warm orange hues come up nicely - I rather like it, gives it a
warmer morning feeling.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 9:16:18 AM, you
So I would crop some off the top. I tried it here and feel
the picture is much stronger that way.
I like the angle and colors that you have portrayed here - a little
more work on the image and it could be quite good.
--
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 9:42:19 AM, you wrote:
SL&
foreground.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 10:06:54 AM, you wrote:
JD> Driving from Astoria, OR to the Olympic Peninsula, WA, we passed
JD> through Aberdeen, WA. Thought later I should have gone back to the car
JD> and gotten a flash just to say I'd tried it.
JD&g
ur product arrangement.
Obviously I don't know really what they will do, but they do show some
history with high priced, full featured products and low/no cost
products for the entry level.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 2:04:52 PM, you wrote:
RRR> Godfrey DiGiorgi
e was anything in the right half of the image that was
worth looking at. IOW, it worked just fine for me as about half the
image area, all on the right side. Hope this makes sense.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 2:59:46 PM, you wrote:
JB> I colleaque of mine lives very near the s
Yes, we are always trying to send them back to Frank, but he doesn't
want them. I don't think anyone in Canada really wants to claim them,
but then they do have Canada in their name, so...
--
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 3:26:05 PM, you wrote:
BW> Ah I was about to ask w
oops - I meant the left half of the image...brain fart - sorry.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 3:09:49 PM, you wrote:
BD> Interesting...It is a sunset, but has a coolness to it, like it is
BD> rather cold outside. That aspect interests me. I looked at several
BD>
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 2:33:04 PM, Bob W. wrote:
BW> I've used PS on and off for years (since v3), but never really
BW> invested a lot of time in learning it - it has always seemed to me
BW> like a hydra multiplied by an octopus times several squids crossed
BW> with a multi-limbed dinosaur.
No apology needed - a precious memory has been captured beautifully!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 7:37:54 PM, you wrote:
PS> Some of you know that both my 90 year old mother and my almost two year
PS> old granddaughter, Grace, live with me. Tonight, my granddaughter
PS> clim
of surroundings.
--
Bruce
Thursday, July 20, 2006, 1:24:17 AM, you wrote:
C> It's a really sharp image, but like the other shot a while back (not
C> sure from whom), I dislike disembodied head shots of herons, egrets and
C> cranes. They just look all wrong. :-)
bark reflection I am seeing, makes it feel a
little better. In any event, when the subject is surrounded by water,
you get whatever reflects in the water for the background.
Sorry to make you ill .
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, July 20, 2006, 2:28:26 AM, you wrote:
Eac> In a message da
Thanks - lighting does play a pretty critical role in this shot -
different lighting and there would be nothing but an ugly piece of
vegetation.
--
Bruce
Thursday, July 20, 2006, 9:17:26 AM, you wrote:
DJM> Wonderful lighting. It really makes this shot special.
DJM> On 7/19/06, Bruce
zooms are not light!
--
Bruce
Friday, July 21, 2006, 9:32:28 AM, you wrote:
JT> I have the Sigma EX 70-200 F2.8. Everyone who has it regards it as a
JT> very sharp lens, for much less than Pentax's offering in this category.
JT> Check Photodo.
JT> There is a new, digital version,
you are entirely right about the title. It should have been
dedicated to Frank!
--
Bruce
Friday, July 21, 2006, 9:31:14 AM, you wrote:
KW> Very well done but I think its mis-titled.
KW> Should be "A pair for Knarf".
KW> Kenneth Waller
KW> - Original Message --
That is only for the Canadian version...
Friday, July 21, 2006, 11:09:45 AM, you wrote:
KW> What no Canada Goose icon?
KW> Kenneth Waller
KW> - Original Message -
KW> From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KW> Subject: The camera for cat (or dog) haters?
>>in addition the icon f
I generally like it, however, I do wish the time of day was different.
Seems to be very bright and contrasty. The image would be nicer with
a bit softer, diffused light.
--
Bruce
Friday, July 21, 2006, 8:51:39 PM, you wrote:
PJA> Lush green foliage, an old wooden bridge, a stop sign s
Excellent shot! Makes me very curious to see what you did post to the
PUG.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, July 22, 2006, 1:14:27 PM, you wrote:
MR> Although I first wondered where I was going to get an architecture
MR> shot for this month's PUG, I ended up finding several that
Same thoughts on my part.
--
Bruce
Saturday, July 22, 2006, 3:40:04 PM, you wrote:
BW> That's a nice composition, and looks like a good photo. I always think
BW> the sepia filter effect looks heavy-handed though. I would prefer a
BW> much lighter touch with the sepia.
BW>
Most interesting. Are the dolls mostly the same size from car to car?
It almost seems like they are trying to seed a crowd to form around
their car, adoring it.
Nice shot, BTW.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, July 22, 2006, 2:43:36 PM, you wrote:
PS> I shot a car show today. Among
70-210/4, handheld
ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3220a.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello Gabriel,
Nice work - a striking image. I like it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, July 28, 2006, 3:05:46 PM, you wrote:
GC>
http://gabrielcain.com/gallery2/v/nature/montecristo2006/monte-cristo-mountain-with-a-stream-01-revised.jpg.html
GC> http://tinyurl.com/hc5ya
GC> Wilm
Hard to take a bad picture of her. Very cute, indeed!
--
Bruce
Saturday, July 29, 2006, 12:27:24 PM, you wrote:
PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4741532
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Excellent work! The geese really help give some scale and presence to
the shot. I really like it.
--
Bruce
Saturday, July 29, 2006, 3:07:44 PM, you wrote:
JD> Hope I've not put this up in the past.
JD> Taken at a city park lake in Dec. several years back.
JD> I first no
,
Bruce
Saturday, July 29, 2006, 2:48:37 PM, you wrote:
DJB> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/paw/gfmfalls.jpg
DJB> Taken just North? of GFM off the BR Parkway.
DJB> istD, 16-45, around f5.6 and TV of 1.2 i think.
DJB> Tripod Slik 700 Pro
DJB> Comments welcome, but i'm fragile
Great shot! I sat and chuckled at this one. Well seen.
--
Bruce
Saturday, July 29, 2006, 6:47:54 PM, you wrote:
DS> Caught my eye at the park today:
DS> http://www.dsanderson.com/modern.htm
DS> How times have changed! ;-)
DS> Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
This would go well in the series of shots that Shel was showing about
things in the area. Many were unusual to me, even though they were
more commonplace for him. This shot is unusual, but being in San
Francisco, you do see some odd things.
--
Bruce
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 11:01:25 AM, you
Nice shot - good framing and the position of the man works very well.
I like it. Your shots have been improving lately. I remember when
you first joined the list - it is nice to see your growth.
--
Bruce
Sunday, July 30, 2006, 8:02:12 PM, you wrote:
Eac> Returning from the SF Farme
Pentax *IstD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/1000 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3236.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Jack,
Thanks for the comments and suggestions. I like what you had to say.
Here is close to what you suggested:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3236a.htm
Here is the original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3236.htm
--
Bruce
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:11:17 PM, you wrote:
JD> L
A little work on the highlights would be good. The overall effect is
good and the picture is a nice one. I don't think the title helps - I
really don't associate the lower strands to the flowers, especially as
legs. Nice shot, just call it Water Lilies.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
One of several beaver ponds in the park near my home.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/5, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/125 sec @ f/6.7
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3263.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
hours with him. It was well worth the
trip. Everyone in our group was more than thrilled with the
experience and the hospitality. If I were to go again, I would book
this one for sure.
HTH,
Bruce
Wednesday, August 2, 2006, 7:24:13 AM, you wrote:
TR> I'm putting a tour together and Mo
, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3217.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 3, 2006, 7:20:28 AM, you wrote:
PJ> I've put up about 20 images as a portfolio at Photo.net.
PJ> Almost all of them are taken a few km from home, which is in Northern
PJ> Norway. Most are taken at night!
PJ> the link:
PJ> http://www.photo.
Sorry to break up the wild speculation on the K10D, but for those who
care to look:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3243a.htm
Comments welcome.
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
the K10D can be basically an *IstD with my few improvements,
then I'm sure I will buy one fairly quickly after it is for sale.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 8:51:46 AM, you wrote:
PJA> I don't remember where I read it, but it was supposed to be ~3fps 10
PJA
- you lost me on that comment and picture - are you saying you
love mine and yours, love mine-hate yours, love yours-hate mine, or
hate all these kind of shots?
--
Bruce
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 10:11:15 AM, you wrote:
WR> - Original Message -
WR> From: "Bruce Dayton&qu
Thanks for all the comments on this shot. I do agree that the
backlighting is what really caught my eye. The thorns are so visible
in this kind of light. I probably framed it just a bit too tight.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 7:49:21 PM, you wrote:
g> the backlight
some more work
or not. Thanks for looking and commenting on it.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 12:43:07 PM, you wrote:
KW> Too much contrast to pull this off.
KW> Makes me want to see the darkened areas.
KW> Also why the inclusion of the blank sky reflection?
KW&g
I'm liking the third shot the best. It comes catches my interest
where most cat shots don't. I can't count myself among those
who understand the reference.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 1:19:20 PM, you wrote:
AS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?ph
This is the last of the pond shots for awhile. This was an attempt to
isolate and simplify and hopefully give a feeling of peacefulness that
is present.
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, handheld
ISO 200, 1/250 sec @ f/5.6
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3244.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
This one really doesn't do anything for me. I think it is the closed
eyes of both of them that really make me lose any kind of interest or
connection.
--
Bruce
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 7:17:48 PM, you wrote:
PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4774310
--
PDML Pentax
My intention with the DOF was to keep it somewhat shallow - I wanted
the reeds to be sharply focused and the reflection to be slightly OOF
to emphasize the separation between the two.
I'll have to look more at the cropping that you suggest. Thanks for
looking and commenting.
--
Bruce
S
ple I show the image to here rather like
it.
Anyway, thank you for sharing your feelings - it always helps to
improve my work.
--
Bruce
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 7:24:15 PM, you wrote:
PS> Interesting, but it makes me dizzy. Is there a better pic here after
PS> cropping. Perhaps you need to
A very classic - perhaps even cliche picture doesn't excellently. A
pleasure to view. Nicely done.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 7:19:59 PM, you wrote:
PS> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4774311&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@p
Not quite sure what I how I typed that - meant to say 'perhaps even
cliche picture DONE excellently'
--
Bruce
Sunday, August 6, 2006, 8:45:30 PM, you wrote:
BD> A very classic - perhaps even cliche picture doesn't excellently. A
BD> pleasure to view. Nicely done.
BD&
Thanks for the suggestions. Perhaps my next walk I'll see how low I
can get and see what that does to the results.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, August 7, 2006, 8:44:22 AM, you wrote:
g> being closer to the water level might also help...
g> the crop suggested by WR defiitely ma
Good to hear varying opinions - I may go back and work at it a little
more to see if it can be improved. Thanks for the comments.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, August 7, 2006, 1:17:01 PM, you wrote:
RK> On 8/6/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is the last of
Sweet shot, Roman!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 10, 2006, 12:22:35 AM, you wrote:
R> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060810101241
R> Father and child instead of mother and child icon.
R> --
R> home <http://roman.blakout.net/>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
So where is the saw?
--
Bruce
Thursday, August 10, 2006, 6:34:31 AM, you wrote:
AS> http://users.rcn.com/annsan/longlittlekittybw.jpg
AS> I'm having such fun
AS> ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 12, 2006, 2:45:48 AM, you wrote:
BW> Hi,
BW> my older brother, his younger son and I cycled across England the
BW> length of Hadrian's Wall this week. We did a total of about 140 miles
BW> (225 km) in 3 days. Here are 3 landscapes from th
Nice! Again, would love to see this one just a bit bigger, if
possible.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, August 12, 2006, 6:58:02 AM, you wrote:
JD> Am pleased to say that a Panalure print of this scene won first place
JD> in the "B&W Nature" category in an '04 pho
Hello Roman,
I like the first two most. The second is my favorite. You captured a
great expression on her face like she was really communicating with
the audience.
--
Bruce
Saturday, August 12, 2006, 6:54:50 AM, you wrote:
R> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060812152304
--
P
This is a shot that I would like to see bigger. I'm suspecting that
it is quite striking when viewed like that. It also seems to be a bit
blown out in the flower - don't know if this is the result of the scan
or as shot. Anyways, I like it with those two caveats.
--
Bruce
Friday,
For some reason, these shots did not really come across for me. Maybe
I don't appreciate B&W enough or maybe something is missing in the
rendering here vs. the original.
--
Bruce
Friday, August 11, 2006, 1:13:45 PM, you wrote:
JD> This is by way of reminiscing about Kodak Tech
Nice, indeed. An unusual case where the direct, bright light works
very well. The colors are great, the composition is nice, just
overall great!
--
Bruce
Monday, August 14, 2006, 1:31:18 PM, you wrote:
KW> Check out
KW> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.ht
I like this shot. I love the row of men all sitting on stools. There
is enough context with the waitress and cook to fully understand what
is going on. Nice work!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, August 15, 2006, 12:29:27 AM, you wrote:
SB> Bette's is an old fashioned diner located
ratio in
current DSLR's. Not so much crop for 8X10, 11X14, etc. However, this
already exists in the Olympus 4/3rds system.
So I would lean towards a real high ISO mode that produces usable
results.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, August 16, 2006, 6:26:57 AM, you wrote:
AR> On Aug
Hello Dario,
It is pretty cool. The explanation does help to know why they are
there. I especially like the inclusion of the person with the cell
phone. Adds something to the mix. Nice shot!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 17, 2006, 1:50:22 PM, you wrote:
DB> For some reason
.
HTH
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 8:01:35 AM, you wrote:
JD> Thanks, Marnie,
JD> I look at this image and honestly try to find evidence of over
JD> sharpening. Maybe I just don't know what I'm looking for.
JD> The "horns" are lined with hair like fuzz and tin
I use both a Samsung flatscreen CRT and a high end Fujitsu Crystal
View LCD. It looks pretty much the same on both.
--
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 10:36:41 AM, you wrote:
JD> Thanks, Bruce. I'm curious, what type of monitor are you using?
JD> Jack
JD> --- Bruce Dayton <
Hey now, wait a minute! It took a while to get the Nikonian Bruce R.
off the list so I could be the only one. Now you're trying to pawn a
Doug off on to my name - sorry, I got first dibs.
--
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 10:12:16 AM, you wrote:
MR> Douglas Newman wrote:
&g
I like this one. The location really works. Not the usual looking
Bridge shot. The location warrants some more exploration concerning
lighting and time. Nice work!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 9:12:20 AM, you wrote:
Eac> That's right, not a faux bridge, or a su
image that has been
heavily saturated, you immediately react in your mind.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 12:35:05 PM, you wrote:
JD> H'lo, Bruce.
JD> I can't get my mind around "unnaturally sharp".
JD> My glasses see the world as even sharper.
You apparently have more arms than I do . I can only manage two
cameras at once. You do realize that you can take a lens off and put
a different lens on - you don't need a body for each lens :)
--
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:25:33 PM, you wrote:
DJB> Easy lads.
DJB> I have
That is correct. In my usage, a 40X WA Lexar card is as fast as it
can go. Not even sure it is that fast. I can say that my 4gb
microdrives are the same speed as the 40x Lexar card.
The D is just a bit pokey by today's standards.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:55:
That is why they have so many different models to choose from :)
--
Bruce
Friday, August 18, 2006, 4:59:25 PM, you wrote:
DJB> What.
DJB> When did this happen.?
DJB> The Nikon group was very specific about this,.
DJB> :-)
DJB> Dave
DJB> Quoting Bruce Dayton
Very cool indeed. Your proofs are quite good. I'm anxious to see
more of this stuff from you.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, August 20, 2006, 4:56:20 AM, you wrote:
JØ> Okay, I'll be the first to admit that this is probably the worst pic
JØ> I've posted for a PESO so
Hello Shel,
That describes the experience I had. Great on film, not so hot on
digital. I've owned two different samples over time. The first I
only tried on film. If it were me, I'd stick with your K 24.
--
Bruce
Monday, August 21, 2006, 8:31:01 AM, you wrote:
SB> Ahhh .
So you're saying if you both shut up, then the list will be naturally
balanced?
--
Bruce
Wednesday, August 23, 2006, 10:54:52 AM, you wrote:
TC> Funny... I attack Pentax to maintain list equilibrium. :-)
TC> Tom C.
TC> "I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, br
Nice shot. The strong contrast and saturation work very well with the
subject. I love the hat. A more unusual angle makes this very
enjoyable.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August 24, 2006, 11:46:23 PM, you wrote:
PJA> I couldn't fall asleep so I decided to post a PESO.
PJA
Yes, I see what you mean. I switched to RAW a long time ago and
pretty much stick to it. Unless there is a very specific reason to
shoot jpg, which, for me, is fairly rare.
--
Bruce
Thursday, August 24, 2006, 6:22:11 PM, you wrote:
RW> Saturday night at GFM (the June edition) there was a
Much better. I like this one. What really makes it interesting is
the narrow street lined with cars, the cyclist and the oncoming car.
Makes you wonder just how well everything is going to fit and who is
going to give in (game of chicken).
Nice shot!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, August
Somehow, this comes across as too busy without anything to really pull
my attention. I just find my eyes wandering around in the frame with
no place to land.
--
Bruce
Friday, August 25, 2006, 6:13:22 AM, you wrote:
MD> A summer memory: Deciduous forest (backlit)
MD> http://folk.uio.no
ou have in that one. I would have loved to see a few more shots
of this one - slightly different perspectives and focal lengths.
The second has such a strong sky - it is very good.
I appreciate your sharing with us.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 25, 2006, 6:52:01 AM, you wrote:
C&
Somehow this photo is amusing to me. I think because of the cap keeper with
the lens cap hanging down just so.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, August 25, 2006, 4:35:56 AM, you wrote:
R> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060825142318
R> First I'd noticed him photographing me,
Nice portrait of the Cockatoo. Love the background color - it really
works well with the bird.
As to the first, I think I've seen that same picture somewhere before
.
Welcome back. Not only the same threads, but the same participants.
--
Bruce
Friday, August 25, 2006, 8:54:16 AM, you
1201 - 1300 of 2160 matches
Mail list logo
