Just stopped by to say hi. I’ll drop you a line again when I get back to the UK.
Take care.
Thanks,
Cameron
Sent from my iPad
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Just wondering if Cotty is still around? I’ve been to England twice now and
forgot to look him up. Known him online since the 90’s.
Thanks,
Cameron
Sent from my iPad
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
From the New York Times:
http://tinyurl.com/yn3cef
Unbelievable. Vista my ass - more like a little glimpse of what a real
computer looks like. Billy Gates' 'crew' has really lost it this time -
he should go to jail for this amount of blatant piracy and theft.
The only thing he won't steal is
He's mentioned and interviewed in the feature on Artifacts in Bulgaria.
Cheers,
Cameron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Thanks, Cameron. I may or may not get by a bookstore to look at the
article. What role does Boz have in the project. Photographer?
BTW, do you remember that FA* 300 F4.5 that you and Alan Chan located
for me at Kerrisdale Cameras? I was a little frustrated at first that
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg
Yay!
Cheers,
Cameron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Dynamic range!
Or is it smooth gradations?
At any rate, congrats to Pentax for releasing what looks to be a simply
splendid camera with the K10D - at an amazing price - let's hope it
lives up to the specs. And that the new 2.8 hyper-super-sonic zooms are
equally reasonable.
And is it just
Quote
On Aug 30, 2005, at 1:51 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
... I haven't used PS much, but when people here and other places
talk about how you need gigabytes of memory to work with images as
*small* as the ones a digital camera generates...
I've had no problem working with large files (up to a
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 04:28:44 -0700
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Why full frame?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Hello Kevin ...
We must have very different standards or you must be performing some
On 23-Aug-05, at 9:58 AM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:12:50 -0400
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Sunning at 24x36 inches?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
On 23-Aug-05, at 9:58 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 12:25 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Large Print Quality From 6mp Cameras (was: )
When I see such a print that meets my
Did I mention that we're off to see Alison Krauss in London in a couple
of weeks? g
Cheers,
Cotty
That'll be a great show.
Since 'Brother, where art thou?', there certainly has been a resurgence
in bluegrass. And there are some amazing virtuoso musicians amongst
them, and Allison Krause
I find it hard to believe that people have such mixed feelings about
this lens - either there are some batch to batch discrepancies (highly
unlikely), or (more likely) some of the posters really don't know what
they are talking about, and just find they aren't getting the results
they are
Yo Cam!
Don't let the bastards grind you down VBG
Actually you made 2 mistakes, cos as well as not getting a DSLR for 2
years while you were hiding under a barrel, you then went and got a
Pentax!
grinning, ruinning, diving
Having played with my mother-in-law's Rebel XT, with her $85.00
I think you need to be cautious about putting down others for their
findings. I do know how to use wide angles, as well as that lens,
having owned two of them. My film experience was very good. My
digital experience was not.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Present company excepted, Bruce. I always
William Robb, the cranky old bugger, spontaneously expunged venomously:
The three Mac users in the world wouldn't touch it anyway. Bt
nature, they don't like to use MS products.
I think there's a few more than three, Willy:
http://www.forbes.com/free_forbes/2005/0620/115tab.html
for the
A forwarded message of importance to the PDML and Pentax users:
Hello,
Thank you for your interest in the DxO Technology. At present we do
not have Pentax bodies on our list of next releases, however that
could always change. For next DxO Module development, please check
this web page:
Pre-Ebay Post-PMA disappointment sale: accepting offers on the
following Pentax items:
1 Pentax PZ1-P camera with grip strap, neck strap, electronic cable
release, manual, and custom function card - excellent condition
FA* 28-70 2.8
Excellent condition
A few minor cosmetic marks on lens hood/body
Please don't pepper me with questions like 'how much do you want?' Of
course, I want as much as I can possibly get, so make me an offer. Top
offers will get replies.
Cameron
For photography, graphics, video, and music production, all pros use a
Mac. For Mac's proprietary ColourSync, stability, reliablility, and
speed. Get the best one you can afford; you will never look back. There
are lots of 'friends' around with lots of software, and you will never
have to put
On Nov 29, 2003, at 3:03 PM, Frank wrote:
Well, no one has said it so far, but I gotta tell you, Cam (is it okay
if I
call you Cam?): YOU DA MAN!!
That is ~way~ cule! You got to be a Pap this summer, and you didn't
tell us
until now? Just waiting for the right time, eh? Sounds like a real
On Nov 28, 2003, at 11:30 AM, William Robb sympathetically disgorged
disparagingly:
From: Bob Walkden
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3246718.stm
Bob
Let's hope that the laws which allow this verdict remain unchanged,
and
that any appeal won't change the verdict..
Actually, lets not.
Does anybody have a source for these still? A link would be appreciated.
Also looking for the lowest prices seen on a new MZ-S. Just curious.
Also, not to alarm anybody, but the 31 Limited is not on the Pentax
Canada website.
C.
To the gentleman who just joined the list with the *ist-D, tilt shift
lenses are not really necessary with the advent of photoshop. Although
you can achieve some extremes of depth of field with these lenses that
cannot be replicated in PS, if it is just distortion correction you are
after, you
Bob wrote:
First, this is not a flame. It's simply an observation of the losses
involved in using Photoshop, Paint Shop Pro or other software tool to
accomplish the functions provided by a shift lens. It should be
obvious that
after the fact correction of distortion necessarily involves
R. G. wrote:
D'Hood, like I'm from D'Hood
Did someone call me?
C.
Some of my posts are not making it to my copy of the digest, and yet
other people are responding to them, so they are obviously getting
them, perhaps only in individual emails. I sent out 3 tests yesterday,
and none of them went through. I am sending them to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Should I only
On Saturday, October 11, 2003, at 07:50 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Saturday, October 11, 2003, 11:30:49 AM, you wrote:
[...]
I bought a 2 year old Apple PowerBook for nearly £900. It was
top-of-the-
line for its vintage. It had extended three year warranty on it. Since
I've had it, the
So where's the new flash? Replacements for the powerzoom FA* series?
The full frame Pro DSLR? How about the 'flagship'?
C.
Why on earth would they make a 14-54, a 14, a 14-48, and an 11-22
available so early in their production? The 14-54 and 14-48 seem
especially strange; mind you, Pentax and other companies do make about
600 variations of the 28-70/80/90, but these are not released together,
but over a very
But seriously, folks, any chance of turning the eights off?
Thanks,
Cameron
On Monday, October 6, 2003, at 12:54 PM, J.C.O. wrote:
There may well be valid technical reasons for the loss of K mount
compatability with the new generation of cameras, or there may not be.
I'm not a camera technician, so I don't know.
I don't trust the opinions of people who are not camera
Reposted because no one seemed to answer it:
I have another question for those who have the D and a 24mm or similar
wide prime; it would appear you can focus closer with the D than with a
standard film camera with the same lens. Has anyone figured out whether
or not their hyperfocal scale
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/1002/pana204.jpg
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/1002/pana202.jpg
I knew it could be done.
C.
Finally got to try one out in the shop yesterday.
It IS small; very small. The conservative design was necessary to keep
things as small as they are. I desperately felt the need for a battery
grip, but having compared it to the D10 and the D100, I can't really
see the need for a camera that
.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Cameron Hood
Subject: Re: *ist D
And no lens hood of any kind comes with it, even though there
are bayonette mounts molded into the cheap plastic lens body that
make
it look incomplete without one. Another Pentax design gaffe.
Cameron
We've all been worried about you, man! What, you think nobody loves you?
We do, man!
Where's those pics of you 3000mm f=45 contraption someone was asking
about a few weeks back?
Glad you're still with us!
Cameron Hood
On Tuesday, September 23, 2003, at 01:34 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Yes, I think the attachments are viruses or something, at least I hope
so; I've been saving them for my collection.
Another joy of Macs: virus collections!
C
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:50 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else been inundated by e-mail purportedly from
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:50 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another triumph for MS software
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32925.html
Oh, goody! A worm collection!
C
I usually tell them I'm sending them a cheque for $80,000,000.00, and
include a smattering of viruses disguised as pictures of my vacation.
C.
On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 05:51 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am happy to report that after getting a few about a month ago I
haven't
had
Doug Franklin wrote
Uhhh. There weren't no .386 stuff when PCs or DOS was invented. The
iAPX386 chip didn't come out until several years later. PCs used the
8088 chip which was an 8-bit external bus version of the 8086, which
had a 16-bit external bus. Both had 16-bit internal busses.
I rest
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 12:17 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Jeez, Cameron, get off it will you? Just cause your experience with
Windows is much like Alan Chan's Pentax experience doesn't mean the
rest of us have the same problems and experience. TAKE IT TO ANOTHER
FORUM ABOUT COMPUTERS
Dear Boz, I love your site! Are you going to be posting those updated
*ist D pics? The first ones were fairly terrifying to those of us who
were planning to buy the camera.
C.
but no sign of the *ist D with faulty focus and lousy colours.
Nice that the two top cameras by Pentax have totally screwed up and
incompatible interfaces: on the MZ-S, you have to stop your lenses down
manually, but on the *ist-D, you can't. Good going, Pentax.
What the are they doing
American
hero. Time will prove that he has perpetrated the largest scam in
corporate history. And we have all been his victims.
Get a Mac, you'll never look back; just ask Cotty.
Never again,
Cameron Hood
That's because they crash and go down so bloody often, it has spawned
an entire industry! How many tech head are making their living doing
Mac support?
C.
JCO posted:
It's not which technology is better it's
the application of the technology that
makes the difference.
I just thought we
BTW, I'm in Canada, and on the West Coast. Perhaps it is a local or
regional problem. Kerrisdale is one of the biggest stores in Vancouver.
C.
On Saturday, September 13, 2003, at 12:57 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: *ist D delayed again
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
My salesman at Kerrisdale cameras has told me the release date has
been delayed yet again until the end of September. He didn't say,
however, what year that will be. We've been waiting for a damn digital
camera since, what, Spring 2001? I wonder how many P people will bail
in the meantime.
Money weight no object:
FA* 24
FA* 28-70
FA* 80-200
FA* 250 -600
Less range, all primes, and FAR less money weight
L 31
L 43
L 77
FA 100 Macro
Less Range and Money:
FA 24-90
FA 100 Macro
F 70-210
F* 300
And to the venerable Bill C. from the beautiful Oregon Coast, we all
hope you are out
Har, har, har! Excellent work, old bean. Now if you could just get a
Pentium 4 to run OSX, you'd be really happenin'!
C.
Oops, did I mention a M.., a maaa.., a mmm again?
On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 12:03 PM, that crazy Olde English
bastard wrote:
Well, it was just a matter of
According to Kerrisdale cameras, their first shipment is to arrive Sept
11-12th, at the aforementioned $2699.00 with the 18-35.
I'm on the list (and can hardly wait!).
C.
Was that Vancam? Oh, man, they are butchers. My F*300 4.5 was focussing
strangely, with scratchy noises, and when I took it there, and the guy
put it in a vise WITH NO PROTECTION AT ALL! A METAL VISE! I asked him
to take it out, and it was only then that I noticed that the body of
the lens had
I have. $2699 CDN with the 18-35.
C.
On Saturday, August 30, 2003, at 07:43 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 10:42:40 +0100
From: zoomshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: UK pricing for *istD!
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Leo's Cameras here in Vancouver have about 4 brand new 200mm f=4's in
the box with the original price from the 70's. These are new old stock,
and as I recall they are less than $200.00 each. If you want me to
phone and get more info (or if any one else wants one) let me know. I
believe they
http://lolslideshow.com/index.cfm?page_id=5action=prev
C.
A friend of mine just bought an *ist film camera; what a nice
little machine! It has 95% of the functions of my PZ-1P, just missing
the faster flash sync and 1/3 stop bracketing (it will do 1/2 stops).
The auto focussing is fabulous, it is small, light, great metering (3
types), focus
Judging from this picture:
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2003/0808/pentax04.jpg
I would say that Pentax is definitely planning and/or building a full
frame DSLR and/or FSLR based on the same *ist-D chassis. Look at the
gaping hole that the current mirror is in; it is hard to tell, but I
Nice collection Sid! I would love to see that polished brass one again.
Could you post it somewhere, or send me a jpeg if you have time. Thanks.
Oneday I'll start a collection.
C
On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 04:18 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 00:04:08 -0500
From:
Could you send me a copy of it for my collection? Don't worry; I'm on a
M...a MM...oh, I better not say it.
(Cheers to Cotty) ;)
C
(I'm serious, though; I do collect them)
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 12:47 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:08:17 -0400
From:
The macro is just friggin' amazing! And the other shots are equally
wonderful. I may just be glad I waited. Can't wait to see how the 85
f1.4 does.
Nice work, Mr. Roberts.
Cameron
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 12:51 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:24:57 -0400
From:
Good slide film and the world's most perfect scanning job.
C
On Monday, August 18, 2003, at 12:51 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 22:37:09 +0300
From: Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *ist-D photos
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type:
Threds about beer and the blackout can carry on unchecked, but if I
mention a Mac I get screamed at? Which is more applicable to
photography? I use my computer constanly for editing, printing and
selling.
Just an observation.
BTW, if you want a really good Canadian beer, try Sleemans
: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 23:27:55 CDT
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re: OT Virus warning (no hoax believe me)
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron Hood posted, among other things:
Macs are fabulous, and as a former Windoze user who has
switched, I
personally will never
Its been discontinued. I tried it once, and found it very contrasty.
Don't know about your cross processing question, though.
C.
On Friday, August 15, 2003, at 11:51 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:49:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Albano Garcia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL
A bit of both. OSX has superb onboard encription which is about to
get even better, and Macs are notoriously difficult to write viruses
for, anyway, EXCEPT for the Microsoft software which we can now,
thankfully, avoid. There are a few Mac viruses out there set to go
against Outlook
And don't forget, you probably will continue shooting at a higher
rate for the life of the camera, so a net profit/smaller loss will
eventually be realized. Also, you are probably shooting a lot more
experimental shots that you would not dream of doing if you had to pay
for the film. And
Looks and sounds pretty good, and what I like about the new lens is the
coverage from 24 - 70, and it takes the same filter size as my FA*
series glass (67mm). No new polarizers required. And my 28 - 70 2.8
will kick in nicely above this. And I can't wait to see images from the
85mm f=1.4!
You, obviously, haven't tried a Mac lately.
The current virus attracks are ALWAYS against Microsoft software,
because people are mad as hell and fed up with their crap.
Get a Mac, and you will have a TOTALLY different computing experience.
C.
I suffered through Windoze from 1995 - 2000. NEVER
I have been printing all the test pics published by the major
camera companies as they have introduced their DSLR's. The Pentax ones
are a bit disappointing in the sharpness factor, esp since 2 of them
are shot with the macros! NONE of the other test shots I have printed
have been with
With all you guys coming to Vancouver BC in August, I would like to
propose the first Vancouver PDML meet. Send me a private email, and we
will try to come up with some times and places.
Cameron Hood
PS: Vancouver members should get in touch, too.
Anyone heard of Jermann Dieter?
C.
Get a Mac.
C.
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 08:12 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 21:18:49 -0400
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
I must confess, I have been guilty of just what the mighty
Dougster is saying. I am so pissed off at Pentax for all of the reasons
I have been bitching about over the last several years (no DSLR, no
'Limited' camera, no IS, no USM, no aperture wheel or grip-strap on the
otherwise gorgeous
Any pics of a CHROME MZ-S with Chrome Limiteds out there?
C.
Vancouver is a city of 1.5 million people. And this is the only
Pentax repair station west of Toronto, over 3,000 miles away. They plan
on operating in Canada out of Toronto only. This can not be a good
thing, and cannot be a sign of a healthy company.
BTW, Pentax has been here since
That's cause you're such a jerk most of the time nobody can stand you.
c.
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 10:57 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:29:07 -0500
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Good-bye Pentax (2)
Message-ID:
be. Best wishes to him from a long time (since '96) PDML
member.
Cameron Hood
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 06:30 AM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:51:33 +0100
From: Bojidar Dimitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Good-bye Pentax (was: Pentax needs USM
I got to try the D10 at Kerrisdale Cameras in Vancouver today. Nice
machine; great build quality, excellent control layout, intuitive, good
screen, magnesium body, pop-up flash with lots of clearance for big
lenses, and better image quality than we will get with the *ist D. We
put a
What do the black Limiteds look like on the MZ-S? Any pics?
C.
On Sunday, March 9, 2003, at 02:36 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 16:22:27 -0500
From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help needed (longish)- Silver
Soft focus maybe, although you get quite a different quality of
softness from soft lenses or from the magnificent Zeiss Softtar filters
than you do from a Gaussian blur in Photoshop (I have a Zeiss Softar 1
and a Vivitar soft focus filter that fit all my lenses). It does not
hit and spread the
You are the bokeh master, Mike.
So the shape of the specular highlights is determined by the shape of
the aperture; the amount and quality of the bokeh ('bouquet') is
determined by the optic itself.
Thanks, Mike; you're never too old to learn. BTW, I love your column
C.
On Saturday, March 1,
to his works.
Pity; everyone should definitely check this out.
Cameron Hood
PS: Sorry if I digress...
on 01/18/03 8:44 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
for a history exam at school I once had to write an essay about the
first Prime Minister of Britain, a certain Sir
.
By the way, welcome back, and happy new year.
Cameron Hood
the perspective once they
are scanned in.
Cameron Hood
a poet, your darn system¹s gonna hang.
When the copy of your floppy's getting sloppy on the disk,
And the microcode instructions cause unnecessary risk,
When you have to flash your memory and try to RAM your ROM,
Quickly turn off your computer, and be sure to call your Mom!
Cameron Hood
Given that 35mm lenses are the best there are, and that Pentax may
eventually have a real high end full frame 35mm DSLR, with the resolution at
or greater than the current offerings from other manufacturers, I can only
dream about the kind of quality we will get when shooting with some of the
Don't you wish they made something that useful now, instead of the huge jump
in price from the f=5.6 70-210 to the 80-200 f=2.8?
Cameron
on 12/20/02 5:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:46:24 -0500
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I had this bag for about a week; it was the only Lowepro product to ever let
me down.
The clip holding the shoulder strap on at the bottom back of the bag is
plastic and extremely flimsy; any kind of lateral motion on this (like
picking the bag up off the ground) causes the clip to release
Paul wrote:
--=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2A548.80C1D450
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;
name=winmail.dat
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=winmail.dat
eJ8+Ig0CAQaQCAAEAAABAAEAAQeQBgAI5AQAAADoAAEIgAcAGElQTS5NaWNy
that the digest is down. Mighty quiet out there. Maybe all the Americans
shots each other.
Cameron
PS: Keep the guns; ban bullets!
PPS: Just bought my mother in law a battery/vertical grip and strap for the
Season of Greetings for her Eos 7E: nice camera: silent, fast, no shutter
slap, silent
Photoshop 6 and beyond does an excellent job of dividing the difference
('tween Mac and PC gamma) with their 'save for web' Jpeg function. I have
viewed my posts to the PUG on both platforms, and they seem quite good.
C.
Paal states:
I can't imagine anyone claiming to be remotely professional who don't use DOF
preview.
The Z-1p don't have DOF preview when using the AV wheel. I have no problems
setting
the aperture on any lens and grossly prefer it to pokig my eye with my right
thumb
every time I tried
Actually, I didn't say I needed a robocamera for weddings, what I need is a
wrist strap to protect my equipment from getting knocked out of my hands
from all the drunks bumping into me, another feature neglected on the MZ-S.
Cameron
That was basically my point. One wonders if it isn't easier
I was defending myself from a Paal attack. I love the guy.
I have yet to find a salesman who can tell me how to switch from aperture to
shutter priority on an MZ-S. Paal mentioned briefly that it was easier than
I had at first thought. Could anyone explain it carefully for me, as I do
not own an
Douggy...?
Cameron
Not only the chief test subject, but also a volunteer.
Cameron
From: tom
*Subject: RE: Brad the CEO's Assistant (Re: New Pentax SLR platform)
*Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 14:31:30 -0800
I pretty sure he's just
, and
relentlessness is totally wasted on a small list like this; you should go
somewhere else and go for the bigtime.
Go be with the pros; buy a Nikon.
Stop sending so many goddamn idiotic posts, you imbecile. In fact, don't
send any.
Cameron Hood
B.Mus., B.Ed., A.A., B.C.R.M.T.
No blame or barb intended, Doug. The mailings just seem to be getting really
sparse. I used to get two, three, or more digests a day, and it has been
trickling in at 1 very sparse one a day. I thought maybe there was a prblem
you didn't know about. Also, the archive contained postings that I never
Question 1:
1) FA* 28-70 2.8. A lens that I own that never ceases to amaze me (sorry
Paal)
2) FA 24-90. Have heard good things, and would be an excellent travelling
lens.
3) FA 28-105 original powerzoom. My first lens with the PZ1-P, and when I
look back on the shots I got with that thing, it
She's a no go again. Archive OK, mailings no
Time to get a Mac, Doug.
Cameron
PS: Let's all kick in and buy him a computer that works.
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
