On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Andre Langevin wrote:
> Among some amazonian groups, there is a single word for both green or
> blue, But if you show people both green and blue colors and ask if these
> are different, they will say they are. They just don't find it usefull
> for their purposes to distinguish
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> chris posted:
> > On the subject of weird eyes, a friend of mine can tell which eye she is
> > looking out of. I'm not sure if they're spaced further apart than normal,
> > or if she just has trouble focusing them properly, but she says that she
> > s
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: Colour fidelity & low-light AF of *ist-D
> It might be a function of depth perception, like 3D glasses. My right eye
seems
> to be color dominant. If I look at something and cover my left eye the
color
Hi,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 9:42:35 PM, you wrote:
>>I don't think it's empirically testable. If two people attach the same
>>label to the same experience then that is all we can know, or need to
>>know. (...)
>>Bob
> Among some amazonian groups, there is a single word for both green or
> b
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might
actually [be] what you perceive to be green. (...) And how would one
actually prove any of this?
Ryan
I don't think it's empirically testable. If two people attach the same
label to the same experience then that is all we can know
I remember noticing this maybe 15 years ago. I just thought that I was
getting old, or that one eye was irritated. Apparently everyone has a
dominant eye, mine is my left eye, and it appears cooler than my right
eye, which does seem to have a noticeable warmer tint to it.
rg
graywolf wrote:
On 6/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I've never noticed any color difference between my eyes, and in a simple
test
>now, also don't.
>
>One has a lot of floaters, though. If that helps.
ROTFL. Marnie, you kill me.
Sorry folks.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places,
On 6/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Hell, my left eye sees colors differently (more blue) than my right eye, how
>could anyone think that two different people would see them the same?
Hey Tom, if you went to one of those retro 3-D movies of the Blob or
whatever, you wouldn't need the cardb
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might actually
what you perceive to be green. Imagine people around you who go thru life
seeing 'blue' vegetables (though it seems perfectly normal to them *because*
that's what they always known the label 'green' to refer to). And how wou
chris posted:
> On the subject of weird eyes, a friend of mine can tell which eye she is
> looking out of. I'm not sure if they're spaced further apart than normal,
> or if she just has trouble focusing them properly, but she says that she
> sees things from two slightly different perspectives...
No perceptible color changes, but a faint (thin) cataract on the left
cornea acts much like one of my old Takumars... Slightly yellow.
Normally, it's not noticeable. Not with both eyes open.
With just the left eye open, I can't _see_ the color bias, but my vision
is much less sharp. Hardly unusual.
I've never noticed any color difference between my eyes, and in a simple test
now, also don't.
One has a lot of floaters, though. If that helps.
Hehehe.
Marnie aka Doe
Hell, my left eye sees colors differently (more blue) than my right eye, how
could anyone think that two different people would see them the same?
--
Dr E D F Williams wrote:
I think its more likely that different eye/brain sets might see the same
colour very slightly shifted, one way or the ot
This brings up a question I have always wanted to ask -- related to
the fact that my own two eyes see colors slightly differently! It's
easiest to see in skin tones, but if I close one eye and then the
other, it's obvious to me that my right eye sees a slightly "warmer"
or redder rendition than
from HELL!"
Updated: August 15, 2003
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Walkden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ryan Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:31 PM
Subject: Re: Colour fidelity & low-light AF of *ist-D
> Hi,
>
> T
Hi,
Thursday, November 6, 2003, 2:24:49 PM, you wrote:
> It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might actually
> what you perceive to be green. Imagine people around you who go thru life
> seeing 'blue' vegetables (though it seems perfectly normal to them *because*
> that's w
It's an interesting thought, but what I perceive to be blue might actually
what you perceive to be green. Imagine people around you who go thru life
seeing 'blue' vegetables (though it seems perfectly normal to them *because*
that's what they always known the label 'green' to refer to). And how wou
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:22:01 +0200, Dr E D F Williams wrote:
> More than a year ago (two?) we had a discussion about this very thing -
> colour perception. Do we all see the same colours? Two people look at a
> coloured object; both agree that it's yellow-green. But do they actually
> perceive iden
See New Pages "The Cement Company from HELL!"
Updated: August 15, 2003
- Original Message -
From: "Pat White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: Colour fidelity & low-light AF of *ist-
D. Glenn Arthur wrote:
First, Google for "anomalous reflectance". I've read about
the effect on film before, and apparently there are certain
fabric/dye combinations that are a real PITA for catalog
photography because of it. (Or maybe you don't have to, since
you already have a handle on the ca
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Rob Studdert wrote:
> On 3 Nov 2003 at 22:35, John Francis wrote:
> > Oops. Make that IR and near-IR, not UV.
> >
> > There is increased sensitivity into the UV, too, but that causes
> > things to look more blue, not more red. Proof-read more carefully!
>
> If the *ist D is li
On 3 Nov 2003 at 22:35, John Francis wrote:
> Oops. Make that IR and near-IR, not UV.
>
> There is increased sensitivity into the UV, too, but that causes
> things to look more blue, not more red. Proof-read more carefully!
If the *ist D is like most other cameras it will have a hot mirror (I
>
>
> I've seen this sort of thing once before - slide shots of some
> flowers in New Zealand exhibited a very similar alteration.
> The cause is that film (and, I assume, the CCD sensor) is more
> senstive to the low-UV than the human eye. Objects with a high
> component of UV in their appearanc
John Francis wrote:
> 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12345678
(I used to use that trick a lot.)
> One one costume, though, I noticed an extreme colour shift. It
> was made of blue velvet material (about the colour of Sexy Kitty
> for those who watched th
24 matches
Mail list logo