Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-22 Thread Mark Roberts
Have a look at the lens test I did a few months ago: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/lenstest.htm The four lenses tested at 24mm were: FA*24/2.0 F24-50/4 FA24-90/3.5-4.5 Tamron 17-35/2.8-4 All tripod-mounted, manual exposure and white balance. Aperture at f/11 The test conditions were chosen, by

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-22 Thread Digital Image Studio
On 22/08/06, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Shel, > > That describes the experience I had. Great on film, not so hot on > digital. I've owned two different samples over time. The first I > only tried on film. If it were me, I'd stick with your K 24. I agree, though I never did

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Bruce Dayton
Hello Shel, That describes the experience I had. Great on film, not so hot on digital. I've owned two different samples over time. The first I only tried on film. If it were me, I'd stick with your K 24. -- Bruce Monday, August 21, 2006, 8:31:01 AM, you wrote: SB> Ahhh thanks for jogg

RE: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Jens Bladt
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Jens Bladt Sendt: 21. august 2006 19:31 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: RE: FA* 24/2 AL [IF] Mine is silver - or more like grey, really. Not good? It's absolutely excellent! The clotch: You can push the focusrig back and forth to switch between AF a

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Matjaz Osojnik
It is one of my favourite lenses, the other being 77 Limited. I use it only on film bodies, so don't know how it works on a DSLR. I love it for for it's many qualities, being able to produce very pleasing images overall, very good flare resistance and for its speed. I can see it as a great co

RE: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Jens Bladt
elig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel Belinkoff Sendt: 21. august 2006 16:58 Til: PDML Emne: FA* 24/2 AL [IF] Recently I've been using the K24/2.8 quite a bit, and have found the focal length to be very useful. While I'm not ready to buy the FA* 24

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Bob Sullivan
Shel, Godfrey is right. Rob was the one to note chromatic aberration as a digital problem. I've used the lens and absolutely love it on film and have found no problems on digital. (maybe I'm not critical enough?) It is really terrific to have a fast, wide prime on the DS. It will remind you of

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Carlos Royo
It is an excellent lens, both with film and digital. Only made in silver, but the lens body is metal, not plastic. Someone has just explained how the AF/MF clutch works, so I will not comment on it again. In some high contrast situations, such as the typical dark branches against a bright sky, i

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote: > The FA* 24 F2 is one of those controversial lenses. ... I had > bought it for use in > low light. ... The FA35/2 and FA50/1.4 are my low-light lenses at present. Would be nice to have a 24-28 f/2 lens, but I'm too leery of the FA*24 to be

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Joseph Tainter
> [Original Message] > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > My reservations about the 24/2 stem from the wide disparity of > comments I've heard about its optical performance. It seems most > people who have used it with film love it, but most people who've > used it with the DSLR bodies find too much c

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Ahhh thanks for jogging my memory. Shel > [Original Message] > From: Godfrey DiGiorgi > My reservations about the 24/2 stem from the wide disparity of > comments I've heard about its optical performance. It seems most > people who have used it with film love it, but most people who've

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Far as I'm aware, the FA*24/2.0 is/was only available in silver. It does not have QuickShift, it has a clutch on the focusing ring. Slip the ring on the lens and the AF coupling is disengaged regardless of what the setting on the body is. This nets the ability to focus manually while the cam

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread P. J. Alling
Boz's site only shows a silver version so I'd go with that. I've heard it's a very fine lens. Well beyond my price range right now. Shel Belinkoff wrote: >Recently I've been using the K24/2.8 quite a bit, and have found the focal >length to be very useful. While I'm not ready to buy the FA* 2

Re: FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Aug 21, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > More important, how is it optically? I seem to recall some people > saying > that it wasn't very good - although I don't recall any specifics. I've only used it on film, and it was spectacular. Made my Sigma Super Wide II 24mm f2.8 look l

FA* 24/2 AL [IF]

2006-08-21 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Recently I've been using the K24/2.8 quite a bit, and have found the focal length to be very useful. While I'm not ready to buy the FA* 24/2.0 right now, it may be worthwhile to consider adding to my personal road map, so I've some questions: Is the lens only available in silver, or can it be had