On 4/18/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank - you spend way too much time in Coffeehouses...
...And not enough time in bars?
;-)
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listi
In a message dated 4/18/2007 10:32:42 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I still don't really know how to do this stuff, but I was
experimenting a bit with the on-board flash of the *istD.
Work or not?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5865680
Comments are alwa
Frank - you spend way too much time in Coffeehouses...
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
> I still don't really know how to do this stuff, but I was
> experimenting a bit with the on-board flash of the *istD.
>
> Work or not?
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5865680
>
--
PDML Pentax
On 4/18/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks to artifical to me.:-)
>
> Maybe a tad to bright Frank. Not washed out but over bearing abit.
>
> Not sure how to say it.
It certainly does look artificial. That's kind of what intrigued me about it.
In any event, I'm glad that I took
Regardless of the rationale Frank, you've shot and posted a flower pic.
I've done it as well since I started shooting digital. I'm not making a
critical judgement, just an observation - and people are doing it because
it's so easy to do, and because flowers may be nice to pho
showing flower and macro pics.
It's not that I've started shooting flowers, but I was in a
coffeeshop, and where I wouldn't have wasted film on those flowers, it
cost me nothing to point and shoot at something that I could see from
my seat.
The "real" subject of that par
Looks to artifical to me.:-)
Maybe a tad to bright Frank. Not washed out but over bearing abit.
Not sure how to say it.
Dave
On 4/18/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still don't really know how to do this stuff, but I was
> experimenting a bit with the on-board flash of the *i
Hi Frank, no, it doesn't "work," but getting the hang of flash is sometimes
difficult with new gear. Why am I laughing? Well, it's not at you or the
pic, but for the longest time I've contended that since the advent of the
popularity of digital many photogs who were shooting documentary or stre
I still don't really know how to do this stuff, but I was
experimenting a bit with the on-board flash of the *istD.
Work or not?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5865680
Comments are always appreciated.
thanks,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
-
Good feedback, thanks.
--
Bruce
Monday, April 9, 2007, 7:28:21 AM, you wrote:
C> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
>> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
>> think this one work
In a message dated 4/8/2007 11:44:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
P
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
> think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
>
> Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
>
Better. But still needs more DOF. This is one of those shots where
you have to bite the bullet and pull out the tripod.
Paul
On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
> location, different lens, same photographer
On Apr 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
> think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
>
> Pentax K10D, To
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphot
entax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: PESO More flowers
Another photo from our local botanical garden
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5121066
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDM
Thanks Ken
It looks pretty much as I remember it
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 4:46 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO More flowers
Nice capture Bill. Good
Nice capture Bill. Good exposure & composition.
Colors appear a little muddy to me, but you were there so you would know.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO More flowers
> Another photo from our local botani
Like it, Bill. The missing peddle on the top blossom detracts some.
I'd, also, darken or clone the lighter background areas just to take a
look.
Jack
--- Bill Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another photo from our local botanical garden
>
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=512
Another photo from our local botanical garden
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5121066
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 9/2/2006 8:25:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Took this one this afternoon, in between the rain showers. Shot raw,
converted with Adobe Camera Raw, all of the color/contrast corrections
were done there.
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/testscans/IM
f the photos on both sites.
> > You seem to have lots of 'glow' in the flowers.
> > I'm not sure that I like it, but it is interesting.
>
> What do you mean by glow?
>
> As I mentioned, they were all taken with my cheapass Sigma macro zoom, which
> is very
I just got around to taking a peek at the flowers, etc. and found that
Ienjoy your work. Nice collection.
Not necessarily a criticism, but they don't appear to be lacking in
saturation. Some colors are almost iridescent, which might equate to a
"glow" to some. The slightest softness
> I looked at some of the photos on both sites.
> You seem to have lots of 'glow' in the flowers.
> I'm not sure that I like it, but it is interesting.
What do you mean by glow?
As I mentioned, they were all taken with my cheapass Sigma macro zoom, which
is very sh
John,
I looked at some of the photos on both sites.
You seem to have lots of 'glow' in the flowers.
I'm not sure that I like it, but it is interesting.
Regards, Bob S.
On 9/4/06, John Celio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Over the past spring and summer, I posted a coupl
Over the past spring and summer, I posted a couple photo-a-day sets on my
blog. Today I put both sets into their own galleries:
http://www.neovenator.com/photo/flowers1/index.html (16 photos)
http://www.neovenator.com/photo/flowers2/index.html (52 photos)
I've learned a lot from the comments I
I like the color rendition of the second, it's more, I think that the
background could be lightened a bit to good effect, maybe half as bright
as that on the first, while keeping the white flowers roughly the same
brightness level. I don't know if that's possible.
Mat Maessen
gt;
> This time, I white-balanced off of the flowers, and applied liberal
> amounts of curves to bring down the background. For some reason the
> JPEG always seems to have less contrast and be brighter in my web
> browser than it looks in the Photoshop window. Maybe the lack of real
> co
On 9/2/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks a little flat to me (considering the lighting thats not
> surprising) & seems to have a yellow colour cast
> A curves adjustment to darken the foliage helps to make the flowers stand out.
Take 2:
http://www.matoe.org
Increasing DOF will sharpen all of the background foliage. The soft
look certainly works here.
Jack
--- Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/2/06, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Very nice, Mat
>
> Thank you. :-)
>
> > Perhaps the
Mat,
A fresh pleasing shot. While there may not be recoverable detail in the
blossoms, they are so blown out as to glow. If that's your mood choice,
I get it.
I looked at it with the bottom cropped and it feels better to me as a
pano. I think the large leaves on the right work as an offset to the
b
On 9/2/06, Brian Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very nice, Mat
Thank you. :-)
> Perhaps the flowers could be a bit sharper but I like the composition with
> the water drops on the close foliage and the out of focus foliage in the
> background.
If it weren't the m
On 9/2/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks a little flat to me (considering the lighting thats not
> surprising) & seems to have a yellow colour cast
>
> A curves adjustment to darken the foliage helps to make the flowers stand out.
You know, I did a versi
Looks a little flat to me (considering the lighting thats not
surprising) & seems to have a yellow colour cast
A curves adjustment to darken the foliage helps to make the flowers stand out.
Cheers,
Dave
On 9/3/06, Mat Maessen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Took this one this
nice composition, but the petals do seem overexposed...
regards
Sridhar
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Very nice, Mat
Perhaps the flowers could be a bit sharper but I like the composition with the
water drops on the close foliage and the out of focus foliage in the background.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting Mat Maessen <[EM
Took this one this afternoon, in between the rain showers. Shot raw,
converted with Adobe Camera Raw, all of the color/contrast corrections
were done there.
http://www.matoe.org/gallery2/v/tomatoe/testscans/IMGP0046.jpg.html
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/ma
My S.O. asked me to take a photo of one of her orchids to send to her
mother. Since it's mother's day (here in the states) I thought I'd
post it for everyone's mother:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/flowers.jpg
Just an ordinary flower shot, but what the heck - mothers like that
stuff :)
)
> -Original Message-
> From: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 3. januar 2006 11:37
> To: Pentax Discuss
> Subject: GESOs: sculptures and flowers
>
>
> Happy new year, everyone,
>
> Here's to more enablement in 2006. Two GESOs from me for the new y
On 1/3/06, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Happy new year, everyone,
>
> Here's to more enablement in 2006. Two GESOs from me for the new year,
> all taken with the wonderful FA100 macro
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/06_01_sculpture/index.htm
>
> http://members.iinet.net
Happy new year, everyone,
Here's to more enablement in 2006. Two GESOs from me for the new year,
all taken with the wonderful FA100 macro
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/06_01_sculpture/index.htm
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index6/06_01_bloom/index.htm
Stay frosty,
D
--
On 9/22/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "John Graves"
> Subject: Peso or 2: Flowers
>
>
> >I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
> >
> > http://www.photo.net/pho
I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=529887
Nice work, John. So are you going to join us in the Pentax Pixel
Party on the 8th of October?
Godfrey
, I like #1. #2 has a little
too much shadow. If it were me and I was still interested, I'd go back and
shoot it agaub when it had more indirect light.
Nice butterfly shot on #1! But, also, if it were me, I'd crop it tighter. The
butterfly is of interest, some of the other flow
John,
Nice!
Butterfly shot is worthy of trying as a small pano
crop to include the blossom to its right. A loss of a
bit of the left side might, then, improve the balance.
Obviously, a greater DOF would have helped.
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=89
Would appreciate your reac
Pretty. I'm sure they're the first of many to come. I look forward to
seeing more.
Paul
On Sep 22, 2005, at 12:27 AM, John Graves wrote:
I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=529887
Comments please.
John G.
- Original Message -
From: "John Graves"
Subject: Peso or 2: Flowers
I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=529887
Comments please.
I like the one with the butterfly, but you should try to
I think I like my ist-DS. Here are the first of my new pictures
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=529887
Comments please.
John G.
hat frame over
others _because_ of the flower's intrusion. I think if you'll look back at my
comments on the ferns that I felt they could benefit from other colors or
shades in the bkgd.
When I first started the Friday flowers, I was careful to isolate the
blooms, either by bu
Touchy, touchy -
So I suppose you didn't want any comments?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 1, 2005 1:09 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Friday Flowers
In a message dated 7/1/2005 11:12:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROT
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 1, 2005 8:44 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Friday Flowers
http://www.sonc.com/jul1-05.htm
*Ist Ds28mm 2.8 smc f
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane
égalité, liberté
Nicely done, although the orange blur in the URH corner is distracting, why
include it?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 1, 2005 8:44 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Friday Flowers
http://www.sonc.com/jul1-05.htm
*Ist Ds 28mm 2.8 smc f
On 1/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://www.sonc.com/jul1-05.htm
>
>*Ist Ds 28mm 2.8 smc f
Superb shot Sonny.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
http://www.sonc.com/jul1-05.htm
*Ist Ds 28mm 2.8 smc f
Regards,
Sonny
http://www.sonc.com
Natchitoches, Louisiana
Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane
égalité, liberté, crawfish
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Flowers - don't look if offended
Bob, for me the numbers (as in $) were against continued usage of the
Photo CD. when I stopped, I had already spent the cost of a decent scanner
on the Photo CDs. I popped for a Ni
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: PESO: Flowers - don't look if offended
Ken & Shel,
I have 3 or 400 scanned slides on Kodak CD's.
This is the first batch to turn out so poorly.
I'm looking for somewhere else to take my business.
more selective in what
I'm scanning and while its scanning, I'm doing something else. Plus with bigger
files I can print bigger sizes.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO: Flowers - don't look if offended
Ken & Shel,
I h
(like anything else), you're just supporting
> poor quality.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: PESO: Flowers - don't look if offended
>
> A friend showed me several discs of Photo CD scans and I was not
;
Subject: RE: PESO: Flowers - don't look if offended
A friend showed me several discs of Photo CD scans and I was not impressed
at all. If you've got a lot of slides or film to scan, you'd be ahead of
the game economically to get a good film scanner, and with a little
practice and
A friend showed me several discs of Photo CD scans and I was not impressed
at all. If you've got a lot of slides or film to scan, you'd be ahead of
the game economically to get a good film scanner, and with a little
practice and reading of some on-line tutorials, you'll be getting better
results i
arkus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: PESO: Flowers - don't look if offended
Hi Bob
I did not know that you can still order Kodak CD's. That are the ones with
the different high resolution scans on it, right?
Here in Switzerland you can only order a low resolution JPG Picture
Hi Bob
I did not know that you can still order Kodak CD's. That are the ones with
the different high resolution scans on it, right?
Here in Switzerland you can only order a low resolution JPG Picture CD which
is unusable for my needs. I would love to have the
Kodak CD instead of scanning. It would
Markus,
The sad part of these scans being too dark is that I sent them out for
a professional scan to a Kodak CD. I paid about $1.75 each to have 50
slides put to a CD. I was underwhelmed by what Helix did for me here
in Chicago. Next time I'm going elsewhere. Perhaps somebody on the
pdml can
Frank and Boris,
Thanks for looking and the comments.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/31/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Well Frank inspired me.
> > I've had a number of slides scanned and thought to share a few.
> >
> > http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Ranuncula1.jpg
> > an
Hi Bob
I like the second one :-)
What scanner are you using for the slides and do you like it?
I just read some reviews and most of the cheaper film scanners seem to scan
too dark.
I'm just wondering because my scanner starts to add nasty yellow/brown lines
along the edges of the scans
and I won
On May 31, 2005, at 9:02 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thanks for the comments. You are on target with soft & etherial. My
wife tells me the flower is a ranuncula (ra-nun-cu-la?) and you've got
the colors right. Quite unusual colors on a 3-4 inch globe shaped
flower bud from the Illinois Botanic Ga
Hi!
Well Frank inspired me.
I've had a number of slides scanned and thought to share a few.
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Ranuncula1.jpg
and
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Tulip3.jpg
Both with the MZ-S, A200/4 Macro, and scanned from Kodachrome 64.
(Generally, the slides are coming ba
On 5/30/05, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well Frank inspired me.
> I've had a number of slides scanned and thought to share a few.
>
> http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Ranuncula1.jpg
> and
> http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Tulip3.jpg
Like 'em both, especially the second one. Th
Jack,
Thanks for the comments. You are on target with soft & etherial. My
wife tells me the flower is a ranuncula (ra-nun-cu-la?) and you've got
the colors right. Quite unusual colors on a 3-4 inch globe shaped
flower bud from the Illinois Botanic Gardens in Highland Park.
Regards, Bob S.
On
Bob,
My monitor renders the rose (?) a subtle but very
different and odd blend of red/orange/tan/rusty/etc...
Shallow DOF is OK with me.
Other flower seems to made up of the same general
color group with a bit of dark something added.
If you were going for soft artificial ethereal hews,
you succeed
Well Frank inspired me.
I've had a number of slides scanned and thought to share a few.
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Ranuncula1.jpg
and
http://members.aol.com/rfsindg/Tulip3.jpg
Both with the MZ-S, A200/4 Macro, and scanned from Kodachrome 64.
(Generally, the slides are coming back too
On 5/5/05, Marco Alpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With spring and all the gorgeous flower shots posted on the list, I
> thought I'd give it a try. I came upon these in a yard in downtown San
> Jose. I don't know what species they are, but I imagine someone on the
> list will know:
>
> http://ww
Somebodies son-flowers?
D
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Alpert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 5:11 PM
> To: Pentax List
> Subject: PESO - First Flowers
>
>
> With spring and all the gorgeous flower shots posted on the list, I
>
On 5/5/05, Marco Alpert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>With spring and all the gorgeous flower shots posted on the list, I
>thought I'd give it a try. I came upon these in a yard in downtown San
>Jose. I don't know what species they are, but I imagine someone on the
>list will know:
>
>http://ww
With spring and all the gorgeous flower shots posted on the list, I
thought I'd give it a try. I came upon these in a yard in downtown San
Jose. I don't know what species they are, but I imagine someone on the
list will know:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso14.html
- Marco
Yes, it's hand held. But the flash duration is 1/1000 or less, depending on the
TTL exposure, so it's sort of a gimme :-).
> Hi!
>
> > In the spirit of Marxist software, I offer a couple of far left flowers:
> > bleeding hearts . Seriously, these just bloomed tod
I can imagine shot #1 as making a nice greeting card for romantic gardeners
in the February time frame...
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Far Left Flowers
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 21:25:39 -0400
Hi!
In the spirit of Marxist software, I offer a couple of far left flowers:
bleeding hearts . Seriously, these just bloomed today (after the
weekend's foot of snow melted), so I used them to try out the ring light
flash I bought from Christian. I used the ring light with my Vivitar
Ser
Use a publicity still of John Wayne from the Conquerer, (so he was
really playing Genghis Khan, but who'll know??)
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:32:03 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think that for future
political discussions on the PDML, everyone should have to provide
metapho
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:32:03 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I think that for future
> political discussions on the PDML, everyone should have to provide
> metaphorical photographic evidence :-).
But there aren't any photos of Atilla the Hun! :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
lens to show Collin.
John
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:32:03 +0100, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Frank. Actually, I already had names for the flowers. The one
in focus that's a bit more toward the center is "Knarf." The one
that's more to the left is &qu
And presumably you'd need a panoramic lens to show Collin.
John
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:32:03 +0100, Paul Stenquist
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Frank. Actually, I already had names for the flowers. The one in
focus that's a bit more toward the center is "Knarf."
my Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro. I like the device. It might be
too harsh for some macro uses [...]
case, here are the pinko flowers shot at approximately 1:2:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3310077
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3310084
Thanks Frank. Actually, I already had names for the flowers. The one in
focus that's a bit more toward the center is "Knarf." The one that's
more to the left is "Frantisek." . I think that for future
political discussions on the PDML, everyone should have to prov
On Apr 26, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3310077
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3310084
I like the first one better.
To be honest I'm not that fond of ring flash but you've done well
despite that.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digista
ice?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist
> [...] I used the ring light
> with my Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 macro. I like the device. It might be
> too harsh for some macro uses [...]
> case, here are the pinko flowers shot at approximately 1:2:
> http://www.p
flat, as one would expect with a ringlight, but for this image it
seems to work pretty well.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 25, 2005, 6:25:39 PM, you wrote:
PS> In the spirit of Marxist software, I offer a couple of far left
PS> flowers: bleeding hearts . Seriously, these just b
On 4/25/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the spirit of Marxist software, I offer a couple of far left
> flowers: bleeding hearts . Seriously, these just bloomed today
> (after the weekend's foot of snow melted), so I used them to try out
> the ring li
In the spirit of Marxist software, I offer a couple of far left
flowers: bleeding hearts . Seriously, these just bloomed today
(after the weekend's foot of snow melted), so I used them to try out
the ring light flash I bought from Christian. I used the ring light
with my Vivitar Series
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:13:08 +0100, John Forbes wrote:
>
> > http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/IMGP1162.jpg
> >
> > Took this shot of the geraniums on my balcony, with the sun shining
> > through them (though out of the picture).
>
That's quite beautiful, John! Love the backligh
Thanks, Bedo!
John
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:50:00 +0200, Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
John,
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/IMGP1162.jpg
perhaps little bit busy (I like simple compositions) but the black
background calm things down. Very nice.
Bedo.
--
Using Opera's re
John,
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/IMGP1162.jpg
perhaps little bit busy (I like simple compositions) but the black
background calm things down. Very nice.
Bedo.
Thanks for commenting, Doug,
It's the full frame, uncropped, so there's no more space on the left. If
I get similar light, I'll try some more.
John
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:20:00 -0400, Doug Franklin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:13:08 +0100, John Forbes wrote:
http://www.j
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 09:13:08 +0100, John Forbes wrote:
> http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/IMGP1162.jpg
>
> Took this shot of the geraniums on my balcony, with the sun shining
> through them (though out of the picture).
I like it John. The only suggestion I'd make is maybe a lit
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/htm/IMGP1162.jpg
Took this shot of the geraniums on my balcony, with the sun shining
through them
(though out of the picture). I wasn't sure of exposure, so left it to the
camera, and this resulted. The strange thing is that it was broad
daylight,
a
Hi Kenneth
a truly beautiful and touching picture for me, maybe the eye of the bear
could be a bit more visible.
thanks for showing it
Markus
>
>
> Kenneth Waller wrote:
>
> >Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html for
> >another shot from my shoot in Denali Nation
Great shot Kenneth
I like how the soft colours of the flowers and bear seem to merge into one.The OOF ara
is
pleasing to.
Great on for the wall.
Dave (still catching up on paws and pesps) Brooks
> Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwal
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Alan Chan wrote:
Would be nice if the lower right corner could be avoid, and a little colour
adjustment in Photoshop. :-)
I tried cropping out the yellow in the middle top and the white in the
bottom corner, but i preferred this to the thinner image. I;ve had a bit
more of
Would be nice if the lower right corner could be avoid, and a little colour
adjustment in Photoshop. :-)
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
I don't take many pictures of flowers (mainly as they never seem to turn
out well, but am still playing with this whole nature photography
I don't take many pictures of flowers (mainly as they never seem to turn
out well, but am still playing with this whole nature photography thing),
but these aren't real, so they don't count :)
http://cowfish.org.uk/paw/flowers.html
comments always welcome
billy
--
The gr
801 - 900 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
