I guess government mules have a strong union.
On 8/15/2015 11:52 AM, John wrote:
Don't know anything about cycle frames, but at Grand Canyon National
Park in Arizona, they won't let you take the mule trip if you weigh over
200 lb.
On 8/14/2015 11:31 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Bob W wrote:
If i
essage - From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: OT; Cycles and frame weight limits, was : Geso, jays in flight
>
>
>>> On 15 August 2015 at 19:54, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Knarf wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I don't
And where would you put the 600, tripod and gimbal head?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: OT; Cycles and frame weight limits, was : Geso, jays in flight
On 15 August 2015 at 19:54, L
I got the joke part, too.
:-)
Cheers,
Frank
On 15 August, 2015 3:32:37 PM EDT, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>Knarf wrote:
>> Ah, now I get it.
>>
>> Good point.
>
>And in case it wasn't obvious, the suggestion was a joke. Well, mostly
>anyways.
>
>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> frank
>>
>> On 15 August, 2015
So I guess a 225lb person will break his ass.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John"
Subject: Re: OT; Cycles and frame weight limits, was : Geso, jays in flight
Don't know anything about cycle frames, but
Knarf wrote:
Ah, now I get it.
Good point.
And in case it wasn't obvious, the suggestion was a joke. Well, mostly
anyways.
Cheers,
frank
On 15 August, 2015 2:54:54 PM EDT, Larry Colen wrote:
Knarf wrote:
I don't follow you.
Cheers,
frank
On 14 August, 2015 11:50:26 PM EDT, La
Ah, now I get it.
Good point.
Cheers,
frank
On 15 August, 2015 2:54:54 PM EDT, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>Knarf wrote:
>> I don't follow you.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>> On 14 August, 2015 11:50:26 PM EDT, Larry Colen
>wrote:
>>> Schwinn varsity.
>
>Schwinn varsities were so incredibly h
On 15 August 2015 at 19:54, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> Knarf wrote:
>>
>> I don't follow you.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> frank
>>
>>
>> On 14 August, 2015 11:50:26 PM EDT, Larry Colen wrote:
>>>
>>> Schwinn varsity.
>
>
> Schwinn varsities were so incredibly heavy and overbuilt they would probably
> carry
Knarf wrote:
I don't follow you.
Cheers,
frank
On 14 August, 2015 11:50:26 PM EDT, Larry Colen wrote:
Schwinn varsity.
Schwinn varsities were so incredibly heavy and overbuilt they would
probably carry a modern American family of four without complaint.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.c
Don't know anything about cycle frames, but at Grand Canyon National
Park in Arizona, they won't let you take the mule trip if you weigh over
200 lb.
On 8/14/2015 11:31 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Bob W wrote:
If it's anything like tyre pressures then it's probably good for 440lb
[1].
As I under
t; Sent: 14 August 2015 13:56
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
>>
>> I think that 220lb is for optimum handling or something. Its not like
> it'll snap in
>> two if 221lb sits on it. It's like a "best befo
I don't follow you.
Cheers,
frank
On 14 August, 2015 11:50:26 PM EDT, Larry Colen wrote:
>Schwinn varsity.
>
>On August 14, 2015 10:21:05 AM PDT, Bob W-PDML
>wrote:
>>On 14 Aug 2015, at 16:32, Malcolm Smith
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Some time ago I was asked how to find out what weight a c
Schwinn varsity.
On August 14, 2015 10:21:05 AM PDT, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>On 14 Aug 2015, at 16:32, Malcolm Smith
>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Some time ago I was asked how to find out what weight a cycle would
>take by
>> two of my friends, who were overweight. They were both tall and
>suspected
>> the
Bob W wrote:
> That's very impressive. I've found that cycling 6-7 hours a day across
> France has a similar effect and you still get to eat snacks :0)
That's the benefit of cycling, which has allowed me to retain a small
chocolate ration in life!
> I'd have thought a decent mountain bike would
On 14 Aug 2015, at 16:32, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
>
>
> Some time ago I was asked how to find out what weight a cycle would take by
> two of my friends, who were overweight. They were both tall and suspected
> they may have to lose weight first. As cycling is low impact exercise on
> joints, I t
Bob W wrote:
> If it's anything like tyre pressures then it's probably good for 440lb
> [1].
>
> As I understand things, to decide the maximum tyre pressure they
> inflate them until they burst. They then declare the maximum pressure
> to be half the bursting pressure.
>
> [1] Caveat: I am not
stated
> maximum is at your own risk. Don't sue me - I haven't any money.
>
> B
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Knarf
>> Sent: 14 August 2015 13:56
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Su
But what about the 20# lens ?
-Original Message-
>From: Knarf Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
>
>I think that 220lb is for optimum handling or something. Its not like it'll
>snap in two if 221lb sits on it. It's like a "best before" date: They're
ny attempt to exceed the stated
maximum is at your own risk. Don't sue me - I haven't any money.
B
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Knarf
> Sent: 14 August 2015 13:56
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Ges
allery.com/kennethwaller
>>
>> - Original Message - From: "Knarf"
>> Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
>>
>>
>>> False dichotomy.
>>>
>>> For $6000 you've got the 560mm:
>>>
>>> http://m.henrys.
I'm not exactly sure how whether or not a fish needs a bicycle relates
to the cost of an imaginary 600mm f/2.8 lens?
On 8/13/2015 12:30 AM, Knarf wrote:
False dichotomy.
For $6000 you've got the 560mm:
http://m.henrys.com/74968-PENTAX-DA-560MM-F5-6-ED-AW-LENS.aspx
For $14,000 you've got the M
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Yeah, but the bikes weight limit is only 220 lbs !
That could be a problem
Dave
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Knarf"
> Su
Yeah, but the bikes weight limit is only 220 lbs !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Knarf"
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
False dichotomy.
For $6000 you've got the 560mm:
http://m.henrys.com/74968-PENTA
False dichotomy.
For $6000 you've got the 560mm:
http://m.henrys.com/74968-PENTAX-DA-560MM-F5-6-ED-AW-LENS.aspx
For $14,000 you've got the Marinoni Genius with Campy Super Record EPS and Bora
wheelset.
http://www.marinoni.qc.ca/html/Genius.html
That's like 1/2 the price of one truck.
Think o
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 12/8/15, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Just in case there was something I was missing, I searched. The fastest
>>600 prime I found was F/4.
>
> I told him this was gonna be expensive
Truck, lens, truck lens Oy
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers
On 12/8/15, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Just in case there was something I was missing, I searched. The fastest
>600 prime I found was F/4.
I told him this was gonna be expensive
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
___
ry.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: "Steve Cottrell"
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
On 12/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes i am.:-)
At 2.8 or even 3.2 i'll have to play around with a pre focus point, as
they come in from a bit of an an
thing like that.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Cottrell"
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
On 12/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Yes i am.:-)
At 2.8 or even 3.2 i'll have to play around w
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 12/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Yes i am.:-)
>>At 2.8 or even 3.2 i'll have to play around with a pre focus point, as
>>they come in from a bit of an angle to my right, thus the higher ap
>>values like 5.6 and 6.
On 12/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Yes i am.:-)
>At 2.8 or even 3.2 i'll have to play around with a pre focus point, as
>they come in from a bit of an angle to my right, thus the higher ap
>values like 5.6 and 6.3 to give my more in focus area but a poor back
>drop. Practice,
On 8/12/2015 8:27 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 11/8/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
A 600mm should solve the lens issue !
Yup
f/2.8 should do it. At a pinch an f/4. You getting this Dave
Yes i am.:-)
At 2.8 or even 3.2
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 11/8/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>A 600mm should solve the lens issue !
Yup
>
> f/2.8 should do it. At a pinch an f/4. You getting this Dave
Yes i am.:-)
At 2.8 or even 3.2 i'll have to play around with a pre focus
On 11/8/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
>A 600mm should solve the lens issue !
f/2.8 should do it. At a pinch an f/4. You getting this Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
On 11/8/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
>And WD = ?
War Department.
The Mrs !!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/
I think i'll need to rethink my location, lens picks a little more
seriously now.
A 600mm should solve the lens issue !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Cottrell"
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
On
The WD doesn't like being that high apparently ;-)
And WD = ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Cottrell"
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
On 11/8/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
Maybe
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:12 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 11/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I think i'll need to rethink my location, lens picks a little more
>>seriously now.
>
> The challenge is on
Seems a lot are shot at 105mm, my fa 100 f 2.8 may just do the trick th
On 11/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I think i'll need to rethink my location, lens picks a little more
>seriously now.
The challenge is on
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
Mark, these are in my back yard, but actually yes i could pull my car
up close.:-)
I think i'll need to rethink my location, lens picks a little more
seriously now.
Dave
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Mark C wrote:
> Nice action shots though I agree about the fence - maybe setup a blind to
>
Nice action shots though I agree about the fence - maybe setup a blind
to get closer and better blur the background. Can you pull a car up
closer to the jays? Cars make great blinds, just sit in the comfy seat
with the window down and wait...
On 8/10/2015 12:05 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
I mad
On 11/8/15, Ken Waller, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Maybe drape something over the fence ?
The WD doesn't like being that high apparently ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pent
On 11/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I sit in a shady spot.:-)
Shade is good, yer excused
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
t;
> J
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Cottrell"
> To: "pentax list"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 10:56:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
>
> On 10/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I made
I agree with Cotty. You've got some nice crisp action shots but the
background ruins them. Maybe drape something over the fence ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in fligh
What Cotty said!!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Cottrell"
To: "pentax list"
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 10:56:05 AM
Subject: Re: Geso, jays in flight
On 10/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I made a small, yes Cotty a small galle
On 10/8/15, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I made a small, yes Cotty a small gallery of my recent jays in flight shots.
>
>http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2015-jays1/album/index.html
>
>I know a few should be cropped but these are for your viewing pleasure
>as is.:-)
You call that sma
Thanks Darren
Dave
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> David, That is an impressive set with several images reaching the
> level of simply stunning! All of them technically excellent.
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>> I made a small, yes Cotty a s
David, That is an impressive set with several images reaching the
level of simply stunning! All of them technically excellent.
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:05 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
> I made a small, yes Cotty a small gallery of my recent jays in flight shots.
>
> http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2
I made a small, yes Cotty a small gallery of my recent jays in flight shots.
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/2015-jays1/album/index.html
I know a few should be cropped but these are for your viewing pleasure as is.:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brook
49 matches
Mail list logo
