I know there is a technique for shooting stationary subjects with huge
dynamic range, by taking a few bracketed exposures and combining those
bracketed exposures into a single image. Can anyone point me to an on-line
tutorial that explains the best way to do this? I want to try this on some
On 23 Nov 2005 at 23:02, Glen wrote:
I know there is a technique for shooting stationary subjects with huge
dynamic range, by taking a few bracketed exposures and combining those
bracketed exposures into a single image. Can anyone point me to an on-line
tutorial that explains the best way
with multiple exposures?
I know there is a technique for shooting stationary subjects with huge
dynamic range, by taking a few bracketed exposures and combining those
bracketed exposures into a single image. Can anyone point me to an on-line
tutorial that explains the best way to do this? I want
Message -
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:20 PM
Subject: Multiple exposures with * ist D
Any listers have experience using this function?
I'd like to hear of your experience/comments on using this function.
Was
exposure
Subject: Multiple exposures with * ist D
Any listers have experience using this function?
I'd like to hear of your experience/comments on using this function.
J Was
exposure acceptable etc?
Kenneth Waller
Any listers have experience using this function?
I'd like to hear of your experience/comments on using this function. Was
exposure acceptable etc?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Multiple exposures with * ist D
Any listers have experience using this function?
I'd like to hear of your experience/comments on using this
function. Was
exposure acceptable etc?
I tried it for fun, just to see if it worked.
It works
on 25.05.04 0:40, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The sorts of suggestions you made are just the type of things that I'd shoot
multiple images for and then post process in PS. I'm still not sure if I can
ever find a use for it. I do wish that they'd concentrated their efforts on
On 25 May 2004 at 13:48, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Rob, actually you have aperture bracketing in *istD. Just switch it to Tv or HyM
mode (green button must be set to shift Tv value only in second case) and
bracketing will change only aperture value in 0.3 or 0.5 steps depending on your
CFs
on 25.05.04 15:27, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that info, I had no idea, I had read the manual but I missed it
obviously.
Well, you didn't. It is not mentioned in manual. Pentax is well known for
hiding some features and not mentioning about it in manuals... I haven seen
Rob,
pg 84 step 3, in the manual, makes no mention of exposure compensation for multiple
exposures. In the MZ-S and the PZ1P, which also have multiple exposure capabilities,
there is no mention about exposure compensation for multiple exposures either and if
you simply shoot multiples
I believe that the way the *ist D handles multiple exposures is
entirely different from film. We're all discussing how it should be
calculating 1/2 the exposure for the first shot and the other 1/2 the
exposure for the second shot . . .
. . . what if the *ist D is a far more simple beast
On 24 May 2004 at 11:30, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Rob,
pg 84 step 3, in the manual, makes no mention of exposure compensation for
multiple exposures. In the MZ-S and the PZ1P, which also have multiple exposure
capabilities, there is no mention about exposure compensation for multiple
exposures
Apparently, when you dial in the number of multiple exposures, the software
compensates the actual exposure depending on the number dialed in.
Ken Waller
-Original Message-
From: William Kane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple exposures with the *istD
I believe that the way
fartsey stuff.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple exposures with the *istD
On 24 May 2004 at 11:30, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Rob,
pg 84 step 3, in the manual, makes no mention of exposure compensation for
multiple exposures. In the MZ-S
, 8:46:20 AM, you wrote:
RS On 24 May 2004 at 11:30, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Rob,
pg 84 step 3, in the manual, makes no mention of exposure compensation for
multiple exposures. In the MZ-S and the PZ1P, which also have multiple exposure
capabilities, there is no mention about exposure
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: Multiple exposures with the *istD
Rob,
in response to ...In what circumstances would you be likely to use the
multiple exposure function
on the *ist D? I've been shooting multiples on film where I do a sharp
focus and then a soft
On 24 May 2004 at 19:17, Jostein wrote:
In reply to Rob:
I'd use multiexposure for astro and other low light conditions where slow
movement might cause a blur. Eg. forest plants that would move even in
slight breeze. And the occational time-lapse...
The sorts of suggestions you made are
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Multiple exposures with the *istD
If you've tried multiple exposures with the *ist D, what method of
exposure
compensation are you using?
With a film camera I multiply the film ISO by the number of
multiple
exposures taken - ie
i got both :-)
is around 250us$ ok for the dmd and 120us$ for the k2 a good deal
i also got a 135mm 1.8 with the k2 its a porst
well now for the question how do you take multiple exposures with a k2 and a
k2dmd
i did not get a manual
wayne
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question: How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My guess is that,
on that particular photo, one second exposures wouldn't be short enough to
do the trick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
- Original Message -
From: Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior
Subject: Re: Multiple exposures
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question:
How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My
guess is that,
on that particular photo, one second exposures
Yes, that is what exactly I want to know. Any suggestion/comment??
Regards,
Ayash K.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question: How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My guess is that,
on
Cameron hood wrote, when describing his, by the way, gorgeous, submission
for this month's PUG:
Equipment: Pentax PZ-1p: 300mm F4.5 at F32; SMC 'Cloudy' filter;
multi-exposure exposure of about 8 - 10 seconds total exposure
I wonder what's the benefit of using multiple exposures for an image
wonder what's the benefit of using multiple exposures for an image like
his, and, more important, how do you decide when the situation calls for a
multiple exposure technique?
Can someone that's used to doing this kind of thing, or ,perhaps,s the
Author himself, clarify this?
Thanks
I am trying to figure out the best way to take multiple exposures quickly.
When I use the multiple exposure option it basically disables the
consecutive photograph option. If I have to press the shutter release for
each exposure it will take longer than I have. Anyone have any ideas?
Nick
26 matches
Mail list logo
