Hey Marnie! Long time no see. Saw your house report. Your life is surely
interesting...
But then again, I should be looking for your pictures.
Merry New Year :-).
Boris
On 12/24/2010 9:27 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Gee, finally someone noticed.
Well, it was Cotty...
Marnie aka Doe
@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way/She's baccckk!
See if I can reply in 150 words or less. :-)
Sold Condo after 5 months. Revisited ABQ, NM and Medford, OR to redecide
if I wanted to live there. Decided Oregon was a watered-down CA, and ABQ was
way too dry after all. Didn't think I could
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:57 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
See if I can reply in 150 words or less. :-)
Sold Condo after 5 months. Revisited ABQ, NM and Medford, OR to redecide
if I wanted to live there. Decided Oregon was a watered-down CA, and ABQ was
way too dry after all. Didn't think
I got a Ratbusters song in my head. I'll work out the details.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 3:10 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Debated that. ;-) Called the rat people instead. Now all the roof rats
seem to be gone (house was abandoned, after all).
But then it was the thermal windows, making
Thanks, frank. :-)
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 12/25/2010 5:24:58 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
It's a Christmas miracle. Marnie's back!
Nice to hear from you, Marnie. Nicer still to hear that things are
working out.
cheers,
frank
--
PDML
Thanks, ann.
Marnie aka Doe;-)
(Well, I could go on and on about house selling/buying/fixing up, but that
would be so OT. And you know PDML, stay on topic -- Photography, Pentax.
Now if I could turn into a pun, that would be different.)
In a message dated 12/24/2010 9:55:43 P.M.
From: Cotty
On 19/12/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Pentax were to produce a dSLR that has a digital sensor that measured
24mm x 36mm, what would we call that (without offending anyone's
sensibilities)?
A meal.
An invitation to dinner.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Gee, finally someone noticed.
Well, it was Cotty...
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
This is a resend, originally sent a few days ago and it didn't show up.
She's baccckkk
In a message dated 12/21/2010 9:39:23 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
webstertwenty...@gmail.com writes:
Marnie, you're back!
I missed this Marnie. How did the house selling go?
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 2:27 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Gee, finally someone noticed.
Well, it was Cotty...
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
This is a resend, originally sent a few days ago and it didn't show up.
She's baccckkk
In a
See if I can reply in 150 words or less. :-)
Sold Condo after 5 months. Revisited ABQ, NM and Medford, OR to redecide
if I wanted to live there. Decided Oregon was a watered-down CA, and ABQ was
way too dry after all. Didn't think I could afford to remain in CA or the
Bay Area (near
Sounds fun (not ;-). Weird noises? Call Ghostbusters.
-Original Message-
From: eactiv...@aol.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:57:48
To: pdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way/She's baccckk!
See
Debated that. ;-) Called the rat people instead. Now all the roof rats
seem to be gone (house was abandoned, after all).
But then it was the thermal windows, making these popping sounds. Or
thumping sounds, somewhere in between the two. Very loud. Would literally wake
me up, especially as
So Marnie, where are you now? Same place or did you move? Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:27 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Gee, finally someone noticed.
Well, it was Cotty...
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
This is a resend, originally sent a few days ago and it didn't show up.
She's
Debated that. ;-) Called the rat people instead. Now all the roof rats
seem to be gone (house was abandoned, after all).
But then it was the thermal windows, making these popping sounds. Or
thumping sounds, somewhere in between the two. Very loud. Would literally wake
me up, especially as
Well so glad to ahve you back, Marnie!
We have to keep our woman power up here...
But I also missed your original post -- and I haven't been doing much
but lurking
great you got a house... and glad to get your report, if ever so
abrreviated
Merry Christmas
ann
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Jezus mon, you're huge...
And I carry a big lens
On 12/19/2010 7:01 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
I've been
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On 12/20/2010 2:01 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
I've been told I have a Full frame at 6'4 260 lbs!
Kenneth Waller
http
those englishmen... absolutely no decorum...
Ecke
2010/12/20 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
On 19/12/10, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Is there a time limit on that event, Cotty?
Well, obviously it would be useful within my lifetime but should the
need arise, I'd be quite happy to
Marnie, you're back! ... and you're right.
On 12/20/2010 6:56 PM, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
That is thoroughly disgusting.
But, hey, what else is new?
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
In a message dated 12/20/2010 3:00:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cotty...@mac.com writes:
On 19/12/10, Steven
On 12/20/2010 2:01 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
I've been told I have a Full frame at 6'4 260 lbs!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
I am cropped then... Very cropped.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
2010/12/20 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
I am cropped then... Very cropped.
don't feel bad. after all you get a free extension factor ]=)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Is there another more socially or technically acceptable way of referring to
a digital sensor that is the same size as a frame of film? The use of the
term full frame seems to offend some people, but I don't know of an
alternative that
On 19/12/10, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Is there a time limit on that event, Cotty?
Well, obviously it would be useful within my lifetime but should the
need arise, I'd be quite happy to be exhumed and placed at table, as
long as there was suitable interest, with my hat
That is thoroughly disgusting.
But, hey, what else is new?
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
In a message dated 12/20/2010 3:00:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
cotty...@mac.com writes:
On 19/12/10, Steven Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
Is there a time limit on that event, Cotty?
Well, obviously
It certainly is. Oh, well, it certain does that is (look interesting).
Since it is cropped and slow, it holds no particular interest to me though.
Boris
On 12/18/2010 6:04 AM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
Looks interesting.
--
Mmm for such range it is no slow at all IMO, it is even nearly
constant aperture.
It is WRed and of a much nicer range than 12-24.
If it is good, it is a must have for me (that kind of lens I mean).
I'm not a wide lens guy so the range makes it very versatile.
Of course it is APS-C but who still
On 12/19/2010 12:43 PM, Thibouille wrote:
Of course it is APS-C but who still thinks Pentax will bring FF?
(I know you hopes so, Boris).
I hopest not...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
On Dec 19, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 12/19/2010 12:43 PM, Thibouille wrote:
Of course it is APS-C but who still thinks Pentax will bring FF?
(I know you hopes so, Boris).
I hopest not...
Then why worry about the lens frame? A lens designed for APS-C will outperform
one
On 12/19/2010 2:11 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Then why worry about the lens frame? A lens designed for APS-C will
outperform one designed for 24 x 36. (They're both full frame. Just
different frames.) Paul
I opine (may be wrong, but that's my right) that some 24x36 designed
lenses outperform
Of courses some are (imagine if not...).
Yep as for vignetting, maybe distortion as well, FF lenses used on
APS-C suffer less, proportionally than an APS lens on APS body.
But those lens will sometimes (often?) offer CA for free as well and
often less sharp as well, simply because they didn't need
On Dec 19, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Thibouille wrote:
Of courses some are (imagine if not...).
Yep as for vignetting, maybe distortion as well, FF lenses used on
APS-C suffer less, proportionally than an APS lens on APS body.
But those lens will sometimes (often?) offer CA for free as well and
...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:00 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On 12/19/2010 2:11 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Then why worry about the lens frame? A lens designed for APS-C will
outperform one designed for 24 x 36
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On 12/19/2010 2:11 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Then why worry about the lens frame? A lens designed for APS-C will
outperform one designed for 24 x 36. (They're both full frame. Just
different frames.) Paul
I opine (may be wrong
...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 8:00 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On 12/19/2010 2:11 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Then why worry about the lens frame? A lens designed for APS-C will
outperform one designed for 24 x
, December 19, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full. Paul On Dec 19,
2010, at 4:24 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In my opinion
, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full. Paul On Dec 19,
2010, at 4:24 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In my opinion
2010/12/19 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
I know how it's used. I haven't been dead for the last seven years. That
doesn't make it any less ridiculous.
Amen to that.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full. Paul
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full.
The thing about language is that usage determines meaning, not the
other way around. Full-frame is virtually universally used to mean
24 x 36
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:16 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full.
The thing about language is that usage determines meaning, not the
other way
Well, Paul, there were those nasty internet rumors based on a careful
analysis of your PDML submissions. I always assumed that you had
entered a new artistic phase with the onset of middle age. ;-)
I know how it's used. I haven't been dead for the last seven years.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full.
Sure, all sensors are full-frame for themselves. You've passed
Tautology 101, and
, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full. Paul On Dec 19,
2010, at 4:24 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In my opinion
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:22 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Well, Paul, there were those nasty internet rumors based on a careful
analysis of your PDML submissions. I always assumed that you had
entered a new artistic phase with the onset of middle age. ;-)
HAR! Unfortunately, I'm well past the
/cdsound/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 4:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645
, December 19, 2010 5:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
We are just seeing the overlap of film stuff and digital sensors. So many
lenses were designed for the 35 mm format. We still use medium format
even though the sensor isn't that size. Look at the 645D
: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera
double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full. Paul On Dec 19,
2010, at 4:24 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In my opinion, the modern DSLR usage of the term full frame means
...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Steven Desjardins
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 5:16 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
We are just seeing the overlap of film stuff and digital sensors. So many
lenses were designed for the 35 mm format. We still use medium format
: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of paul
stenquist
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 5:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:40 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
why do I want a Pentax FF DSLR? One of the reasons
On 19/12/10, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full.
MARK.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 19/12/10, eckinator, discombobulated, unleashed:
the whole discussion is moot
MARK!!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:40 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
why do I want a Pentax FF DSLR? One of the reasons
would be those big wide viewfinders like on the
MX. wow those look great compared to the tunnel
vision
Come back Wheatfield, all is forgiven
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
] On Behalf Of paul
stenquist
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 5:59 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On Dec 19, 2010, at 5:40 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
why do I want a Pentax FF DSLR? One of the reasons
would be those big wide viewfinders like on the
MX. wow
I've been told I have a Full frame at 6'4 260 lbs!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Well, Paul, there were those nasty internet rumors based on a careful
analysis of your PDML submissions. I always
Is there another more socially or technically acceptable way of referring to a
digital sensor that is the same size as a frame of film? The use of the term
full frame seems to offend some people, but I don't know of an alternative
that requires fewer words. I don't know of anyone who ever
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Come back Wheatfield, all is forgiven
Well, almost all
2010/12/20 Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net:
Is there another more socially or technically acceptable way of referring to
a digital sensor that is the same size as a frame of film?
they're all 23.9 by 35.8 or something anyway so why even look for a term? ]=)
The use of the term full
On 19/12/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Pentax were to produce a dSLR that has a digital sensor that measured
24mm x 36mm, what would we call that (without offending anyone's
sensibilities)?
A meal.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Is there a time limit on that event, Cotty?
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 19/12/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Pentax were to produce a dSLR that has a digital sensor that measured
24mm x 36mm, what would we call that (without offending
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 19/12/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Pentax were to produce a dSLR that has a digital sensor that measured
24mm x 36mm, what would we call that (without offending anyone's
sensibilities)?
A meal.
My hat's off
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
On 19/12/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Pentax were to produce a dSLR that has a digital sensor
That works for me.
On Dec 19, 2010, at 6:24 PM, eckinator wrote:
a sensor size fairly accurately resembling TriX's size? would make
for a nice acronym...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Well, Paul, there were those nasty internet rumors based
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Is there another more socially or technically acceptable way of referring to
a digital sensor that is the same size as a frame of film? The use of the
term full frame seems to offend some people,
It doesn't offend me. It just doesn't make
The format formerly known as 35 mm.
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:48 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:17 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Is there another more socially or technically acceptable way of referring to
a digital sensor that is the same size as a frame
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:30 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 19/12/10, Jeffery Smith, discombobulated, unleashed:
If Pentax were to produce a dSLR that has a digital sensor that measured
24mm x 36mm, what would we call that (without offending anyone's
sensibilities)?
A meal.
A meal rich in fiber!
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The format formerly known as 35 mm.
35 mm full-frame, or 35 mm half-frame?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
No one likes a wise ass, Matthew. Oh wait, I do like wise ass
comments. Good one!
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The format formerly known as 35 mm.
35 mm full-frame, or 35 mm
I agree with you there. They are putting too much into RD of lenses that are
not compatible of...wellyou know.
That's fine with me. They are making some great strides in their current line
of dSLRs.
Jeffery
On Dec 19, 2010, at 6:48 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
We would call it 24 x 36,
this make my K5
full-frame when I switch it to movie mode? :)
- Peter
-Original Message-
From: Steven Desjardins
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 8:46 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
We are just seeing the overlap of film stuff and digital sensors
d135
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Is there another more socially or technically acceptable way of referring to
a digital sensor that is the same size as a frame of film? The use of the
term full frame seems to offend some people, but I don't
Not intuitive enough. I'm going to stick to full-frame. Or just avoid the
subject altogether.
Jeffery
On Dec 19, 2010, at 7:51 PM, David Parsons wrote:
d135
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
Is there another more socially or technically
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:54:23PM -0500, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The format formerly known as 35 mm.
35 mm full-frame, or 35 mm half-frame?
Quite. Especially since half frame was the original frame size.
When
Jezus mon, you're huge...
On 12/19/2010 7:01 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
I've been told I have a Full frame at 6'4 260 lbs!
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens
: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera double
frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full. Paul On Dec 19,
2010, at 4:24 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
In my opinion, the modern DSLR usage of the term full frame means
cameras
On 12/19/2010 11:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Full frame is a bit of silliness. It's irrelevant. Is a 645 camera
double frame? There are many sensor sizes. All of them are full.
Paul
I am with Paul on this one. In the middle ages back then /wink wink/,
no one called 6x4.5 cropped w.r.t. 6x6
? http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
The article appears to have been taken down. Did anyone copy any of the
info?
John
--
http://www.jacelio.com
http://www.cafepress.com/jacelio
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I'm still seeing it. Try a shorter URL:
http://tinyurl.com/25ljuj7
Jeffery
On Dec 18, 2010, at 9:46 AM, John Celio wrote:
? http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
The article appears to have been taken down. Did anyone copy any of the info?
John
--
Try this:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/126118-pentax-files-da12-35-f3-5-4-5-weather-resistant-supersonic-drive-motor-patent.html
It's a link to a thread. The first link didn't have any discussion.
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
On 2010-12-18 08:46 , John Celio wrote:
? http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
The article appears to have been taken down. Did anyone copy any of the
info?
your email client, like mine, probably dropped the trailing hyphen when
it recognized the URL
--
PDML
? http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
The article appears to have been taken down. Did anyone copy any of the
info?
your email client, like mine, probably dropped the trailing hyphen when it
recognized the URL
Yep, looks like that was it. Thanks!
Sounds like
At 11:46 AM -0800 12/18/10, John Celio wrote:
? http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
The article appears to have been taken down. Did anyone copy any of the
info?
your email client, like mine, probably dropped the trailing hyphen
when it recognized the URL
Yep,
/
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of John
Celio
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 2:47 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: New 12-35 lens on the way
? http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming
http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
Looks interesting.
--
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Count me in.
Jeffery
On Dec 17, 2010, at 10:04 PM, David Parsons wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
Looks interesting.
--
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com
Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/
The WR is a nice feature, but I don't think it will replace my 12-24
and I can't justify having both.
Leon
On 18 December 2010 15:04, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/Pentax-DA-12-35mm-DC-WR-lens-coming-
Looks interesting.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
88 matches
Mail list logo
