have you compared this A28/2.8 with any other 28mm from
Pentax?
Hi Alek,
No i have not but i found some informations at
http://home.att.net/~alnem/html/pentax_primes.html
It confirms the poor quality of the A28/2.8 and suggests
that the best 28mm is the old K28/3.5 despite the size and
weight.
Post rearranged
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, U+B Scheffler wrote:
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:01:22 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E5l_Jensen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
There appear to be 2 versions of this lens, and they are different
optically, the earlier being noticeably better.
http://home.att.net/~alnem/html/pentax_zooms.html#80-200
Is there a way to tell them apart?
Thanks to Boz's site, I found a
William,
Sorry I tweaked you, but I stand by my assertion that making good
photographs with a Pentax camera does not depend on the exclusive use of
Pentax OEM lenses. Maybe I'm crazy, but I sure I've made good photos
with a Spotmatic with a Zeiss lens mounted. Or with an MX with a lowly
Vivitar
=E5l_Jensen?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Raimo wrote:
A 4.5/80-200 SMC-M Pentax would fit your needs very well - if you can find
one. Very
sharp
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Lillja
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
It was a Newbie Question William, mind the context. And I think that
newbies need third party lenses (or a substantial income) to build up a
good kit of quality primes quickly - to save themselves from
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Lillja
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Your statement sounded to me just like that Canon ad in Pop Photo. The
Canon ad is marketing drivel.
Perhaps you need to learn how to read more intelligently than to relate
everything to marketing pap
/27/03 10:02:15 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
I hate to say it, but buy Pentax lenses.
I don't mind saying it at all.
BUY PENTAX LENSES.
William Robb
No matter how (un)fortunate it sounds, I totally second Lon's and
Bill's opinion
: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
I really don't agree that you should buy only Pentax lenses. Yes, You
can't
go WRONG with most of the Pentax lenses out there but some of my favourite
lenses are not Pentax Lenses at all. And, I would add, that in many cases
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
I really don't agree that you should buy only Pentax lenses.
Yes, You can't
go WRONG with most of the Pentax lenses out there but some of
my favourite
lenses are not Pentax
I have found the Sigma 24 2.8 (not the 1.8, as good or bad as it might
be) to be outstandingly sharp. I have both the MF K mount and Nikon AF
versions, both are great, with sturdy metal constroction. I don't think
I paid more than $65 for either one.
Chris L.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/03 09:18AM
Uh, cave man, that would be construction ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/28/03 09:38AM
I have found the Sigma 24 2.8 (not the 1.8, as good or bad as it might
be) to be outstandingly sharp. I have both the MF K mount and Nikon AF
versions, both are great, with sturdy metal constroction. I don't
think
I hate to say it, but buy Pentax lenses.
I don't mind saying it at all.
BUY PENTAX LENSES.
No matter how (un)fortunate it sounds, I totally second Lon's and
Bill's opinion. One of the things that were caused in my life by PDML
was to decide rather decidedly grin to buy only Pentax
I really don't agree that you should buy only Pentax lenses. Yes,
You can't go WRONG with most of the Pentax lenses out there but
some of my favourite lenses are not Pentax Lenses at all.
And, of course, you ~can~ go wrong with a ~few~ of the Pentax
lenses...
And, I would add, that in many
on 28.07.03 15:51, Fred at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pentax didn't make a lens like this. I fact, almost nobody has made
a 100-300 that doesn't go soft at the long end. The AT-X, though,
is fast and sharp throughout its range.
You may be wrong. Sigma EX 100/300/4 is regarded as very sharp
The Tokina has been around for 20+ years, the Sigma just came out recently.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
I like Nikon's top line cameras, throughly hate everything else they make.
While most Pentax lens are very good pictorially, I really like the older
Pentax bodies the best of any I have used (quite a few). I still think the
MX is the epiphany of 35mm SLRs.
Ciao,
Graywolf
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 2:48 PM
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Speaking of Pentax lenses, isn't the infamous 40mm pancake lens part
of that mystique? Or is it a 43mm?
I just saw a 40mm Olympus 'pancake' lens offered on eBay for something
like $750 or more
Raimo wrote:
A 4.5/80-200 SMC-M Pentax would fit your needs very well - if you can find one. Very
sharp and contrasty (mine was sharper than 4/200 SMC-M Pentax that I had before it).
Not expensive.
REPLY:
You're the second, if not the third, who claims the M 80-200/4.5 is better than the M
I have found this website helpful.
http://www.concentric.net/~smhalpin/
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Robert
- Original Message -
From: Patrick Wunsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 2:56 PM
Subject: Newbie Questions
Hello,
Let me first introduce
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Lillja
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Sure, William - If you're willing and able to pay for them. But for a
new photographer who may be on a limited budget, a third party lens
(especially a prime in an extreme focal length) can be an excellent
Hi Patrick and welcome.
Prior to buying a used SMC A 7-210 f 4, i owned(still do)the 80-200 f4.5/5.6 zoom.
Both are good lenses and sell on ebay,bigger stores like KEH etc or through the list.
I found i was getting good pictures from the later lens although its slower than the f4
which helps in my
Hi!
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
I hate to say it, but buy Pentax lenses.
I don't mind saying it at all.
BUY PENTAX LENSES.
William Robb
No matter how (un)fortunate it sounds, I totally second Lon's and
Bill's opinion. One of the things that were caused in my life
My question relates to what other quality, yet
affordable, lenses would you
recommend that I add to my arsenal? I would love to
hear your
recommendations for both a nice wide angle lens
along with a 80-200 zoom and
possibly a 400 to 500mm range zoom or telephoto. Any
thoughts are really
I wrote:
When you are on a tight budget try the M35mm/3.5 and
the M80-200mm/4.5. They are very good and go for
fairly low prices on ebay.
Oops I ment the M28mm/3.5 ...
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
don't buy many new lenses, and I have no sense of value in present day
new lenses...
keith whaley
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
I hate to say it, but buy Pentax lenses.
I don't mind saying it at all.
BUY PENTAX LENSES.
William
Hello,
Let me first introduce myself. I have been a Pentax owner for about 10
years and am brand new to this list and still consider myself fairly new to
photography. For the last 10 years I have done a considerable amount of
nighttime lightning photography but I would like to broaden my
My question relates to what other quality, yet affordable, lenses would you
recommend that I add to my arsenal? I would love to hear your
recommendations for both a nice wide angle lens along with a 80-200 zoom
and
possibly a 400 to 500mm range zoom or telephoto. Any thoughts are really
Alan Chan wrote:
My question relates to what other quality, yet affordable, lenses would you
recommend that I add to my arsenal? I would love to hear your
recommendations for both a nice wide angle lens along with a 80-200 zoom
and
possibly a 400 to 500mm range zoom or telephoto. Any
Hi Patrick,
Welcome to the list.
Depending on your future plans for bodies there are some good deals out
there. If you plan to get a newer autofocus body or the (hopefully) soon to
be released digital SLR you should look for either A series (non-autofocus)
or F and FA series (autofocus) Pentax
I hate to say it, but buy Pentax lenses. Most are very good.
Before you actually buy one of them, post on this list just which
one you have your eye on. You'll hear a) it's great b) Not so good,
and almost uniformly, c) Hell, it's better than the XYZ lens.
No kidding, though, Pentax comes
- Original Message -
From: TM
Subject: More newbie questions- contrast, lens obstruction,
shutter?
Stupid question- can shooting through a chain-link fence
make it appear as though there are differing exposure times
throughout the frame? I ask because I had no choice and had
Hmmm,
Possibly an artifact of the light rays being blocked and not making
it to the lens?
Il Bill
TM wrote:
Stupid question- can shooting through a chain-link fence
make it appear as though there are differing exposure times
throughout the frame? I ask because I had no choice and had
TM wrote:
I'm trying to figure out if it is the shutter or the fence that
caused this. The lighter and darker portions moved around in
different frames and different rolls of film, is this still
indicative of a shutter problem?
Could you see the fence in the viewfinder, all out of
On Thu, 30 May 2002 18:28:06 -0700, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
TM wrote:
[...] the shutter or the fence that caused this. [...]
Could you see the fence in the viewfinder, all out of focus?
If so - it makes some sense that its shadow lessened exposure
[...]
If
35 matches
Mail list logo
