these sort of changes were made? Is this a case of a
mark 1 and mark 2 version of the non MLU 6x7, or were there a number of
variations in its life?
Just wondering...
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Paul Ewins
Subject: Non MLU 6x7
A question for the Brotherhood:
I received a couple of fixer-upper come parts 6x7's in
the mail
today, and while they are both definietly non MLU, there are a
number of
detail differences between them. One is serial
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Not really -- the Honeywell/Pentax/Asahi logo is on the prism, which is
removable. You could have a new body with an old prism.
Its the little, obvious things, that make me feel the stupidest when I
miss them. :)
That they're a newer version of a
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, at 12:24 PM, gfen wrote:
Since I primarily see this with the 105 f2.4, which seems to almost be
the
default lens with this, which is preferable the newer one or the older?
I don't think they changed anything other than cosmetics and maybe
coatings. I have a new
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
The metering prism has a bar out the side, making the camera taller on
one side than the other. The non-metering prism lacks this bar.
Thanks to the PDML'ers, I've learned this.. but my next questions are:
How to tell a MLU from non-MLU unit? Is it
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 09:52 AM, gfen wrote:
How to tell a MLU from non-MLU unit? Is it possible by the name? IE, if
it
says Honeywell, can I assume its a non-MLU, if it says Asahi Pentax it
could go either way, but if it says Pentax its definalty a MLU?
Not really -- the
. Casselberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: good deal on a non MLU 6x7?
Aaron wrote:
The way to check for MLU is to look for the MLU switch. It is on the
same side as the shutter release, on the side of the mirror box
: Bill D. Casselberry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: good deal on a non MLU 6x7?
Len wrote:
You must be using a long lens. If not, then unweildy_behemoth = 1
Just judging by the necessity of the seated position, ricebag
I found an ad for a non-MLU 6x7 with TTL prism (new batteries, as well),
90mm 2.8 ls lens, and caps for $650. Is this reasonable? Is this, better
yet, a good deal? While its a non MLU, it also gets me started down the
path with a leaf shutter lens, as well. He does say there is a ding in the
apex
gfen wrote:
I found an ad for a non-MLU 6x7 with TTL prism (new batteries, as
well), 90mm 2.8 ls lens, and caps for $650. Is this reasonable? Is
this, better yet, a good deal?
Three words: Jump on it! Assuming it's not totally beat to hell, and that
it functions properly. From what I've
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Three words: Jump on it! Assuming it's not totally beat to hell, and that
Well, I emailed him, we'll just have to see what his (why is it I always
assume everyone on the internet is mail? but, anyways..) response is,
then.
I figured it was a
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, gfen wrote:
assume everyone on the internet is mail? but, anyways..) response is,
...is MAIL?
I've been at this job too long.
--
http://www.infotainment.org
The destructive character is cheerful. - Walter Benjamin
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
gfen,
Bruce
Tuesday, April 30, 2002, 11:54:32 AM, you wrote:
snip
g I realize now I forgot to ensure something I wanted to check on: the 6x7's
g prism is mountable on a newer 67, right?
The prisms for the non 67II are all interchangeable. The TTL prism
won't work on the 67II and the AE
- Original Message -
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: RE: good deal on a non MLU 6x7?
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Three words: Jump on it! Assuming it's not totally beat
to hell, and that
Well
gfen asked:
Why is it I always assume everyone on the internet is mail?
and Len replied:
Perhaps because you are using e-mail. Then again, you probably
meant male. VBG
Hi Len,
In the event that he has to pay a WHOLE lot of money on postage and
handling, would that be fee-mail?
VB Groan
Thanks Bill. I needed that. :)
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: Peifer, William [OCDUS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 3:32 PM
Subject: RE: good deal on a non MLU 6x7?
gfen asked:
Why is it I always assume everyone on the internet is mail
16 matches
Mail list logo
