> Well, it's your choice.
>
> I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we don't
> see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike) or some similar thing rise out of
> this bullshit to the peril of my son or others due to such idiocy. I watched
> fools like you help to cause the dea
Mike Johnston wrote:
So they're about to blow the crap out of Baghdad. How the hell should I know
why they're doing it? Oil? Politics? Warmongering? Too much saber-rattling
to back down now? Can't find bin Laden and got to take it out on somebody?
Christ, I have no idea. But whatever the reason
Robert Harris wrote:
>
>
> This list has gone to hell again, with the usual ranting and raving and
> anti-American nonsense from non-thinking know-nothings.
And that's exactly what you posted. More anti-american nonsense from a
non-thinking know-nothing. Mike couldn't BEAR the gun discussion. P
> And that's exactly what you posted. More anti-american nonsense from a
> non-thinking know-nothing. Mike couldn't BEAR the gun discussion. Poor
> baby. But all this mindless crap is okay, as long as it reflects one's
> own opinions.
Oh, I can bear the gun discussions, Paul. What I can't bear is
> Mike Johnston wrote a lengthy political opinion piece.
I did NOT write a "lengthy political opinion piece." I defended myself
against a bile-spewing, stupidly reasoned, invective-strewn post that
referred to me as "Baghdad Mike," called me a twit, and implied that I was
somehow (?) endangering
> > Mike Johnston wrote a lengthy political opinion piece.
>
>
> I did NOT write a "lengthy political opinion piece." I defended myself
> against a bile-spewing, stupidly reasoned, invective-strewn post that
> referred to me as "Baghdad Mike," called me a twit, and implied that I was
> somehow (?
From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[skip]
> I think he's an idiot,
It's one thing to preach this nonsense to your party zealots for which you
no doubt receive much acclaim, but believing their own propaganda is what
cost your party power, especially in the last congressional elections. I
g
Well reasoned and fairly said, Bob.
keith whaley
Bob Blakely wrote:
>
> From: "Mike Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [skip]
> > I think he's an idiot,
>
> It's one thing to preach this nonsense to your party zealots for which you
> no doubt receive much acclaim, but believing their own propag
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography
arguments someplace else... Thanks.
Fred
Mike I have at this time only one thing to say, Shut Up.
At 11:42 PM 2/1/2003 -0600, you wrote:
> It was long. It was about your political opinions. You wrote it.
>
> That you felt that you were viciously attacked and had the right to defend
> yourself doesn't change those facts above.
>
> What y
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the communists
and I did not speak out because I was not a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the C
The last two years have been nice (most of it anyway) but I have had
enough. Cya.
On Saturday 01 February 2003 10:17 pm, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > Well, it's your choice.
> >
> > I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we
> > don't see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike)
12 matches
Mail list logo