On 5/25/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought you were the anti-focus league leader, Frank :)... Kidding,
sorry...
Well, I wouldn't say I'm the leader, but focus isn't as important to
me as it seems to be for others. To put it another way, a strong
enough image that missed
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A scosh is a term that means just a little, but by no definite amount.
How does it relate to a smidgen? More, less or about the same?
ERNR
genuinely interested
From: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/05/25 Wed PM 12:31:44 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PAW: Etude in Soft
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A scosh is a term that means just a little, but by no definite amount.
How does it relate to a smidgen? More, less
Scosh (or skosh) was picked up by American servicemen around the time of
the Korean War. It's derived from the Japanese word sukoshi. The first
recorded use of the word was in 1951. It remained a chiefly military term
through the 1950s and '60s, and spread into more mainstream usage in the
'60s
Both terms mean about the same, although smidgeon (sometimes spelled
smidgen) means a tiny, almost undetectable amount, is usually a scosh.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: E.R.N. Reed
A scosh is a term that means just a little, but by no definite
amount.
How does it relate to a
.. is usually considered to be a scosh smaller than a scosh.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 5/25/2005 8:47:16 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: Etude in Soft
Both terms mean about the same, although smidgeon (sometimes spelled
I have this hunch that the word came about during WWII - the Japanese
word sukoshi (pronounced just about like scosh), means little or
small amount - my thinking is that the GI's picked it up from there
and it wormed it's way into American english.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, May 25,
Thanks Bruce and Shel. I have never heard of the Japanese origin of
scosh, but I recognize that many US servicemen were stationed in Japan
after WWII and certainly during the Korean War. (My father and uncle
were among them.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/25/05, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Whooo, boy! I can't even read the headlines on that paper, it's so
soft! ;-)
keith whaley
In a message dated 5/24/2005 11:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Boris
Whooo, boy! I can't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/24/2005 11:20:27 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
On 5/24/05, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest :).
Today I took a soft lens for my project shooting...
Doesn't really work for me, Boris.
It's not so much the softness of focus, but what the
Hi Frank,
It's just that glow that I find so enticing. Perhaps a scosh less might
be an improvement, but as it is, it lends an ethereal and diaphanous
quality to the photo, moving it away from the more typical photo and giving
the image a sense, or feel, beyond the subject matter and
: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PAW: Etude in Soft
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=191069
Please be brutal. But honest
Hi!
Whooo, boy! I can't even read the headlines on that paper, it's so
soft! ;-)
Neither can I! ;-)
Boris
Hi!
It's just that glow that I find so enticing. Perhaps a scosh less might
be an improvement, but as it is, it lends an ethereal and diaphanous
quality to the photo, moving it away from the more typical photo and giving
the image a sense, or feel, beyond the subject matter and composition.
Hi!
Doesn't really work for me, Boris.
It's not so much the softness of focus, but what the light seems to be
doing that I find bothersome. Hard to explain, but it seems that
there's light coming around the edges of some of the objects in the
frame, like the arm and shirt of the subject.
I'm
A scosh is a term that means just a little, but by no definite amount.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
Shel, what is it scosh less???
19 matches
Mail list logo