It was a tough shoot, Rob. The poor fellow'd been standing around all day
...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Rob Studdert
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/b-2-kool-face.html
>
> LOL, he doesn't look too happy about being in the frame :-)
Et tu Frank...
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/11/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's just silly...
...Or is it Art?
Maybe you just don't "get it".
-frank
--
A man's only as old as the woman he feels.
--Groucho Marx
On 5/11/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's just silly...
...Or is it Art?
Maybe you just don't "get it".
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 5/11/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few people suggested that more detail in the man's face in this pic would
> be helpful, or that a more blurry image might work.and perhaps give the
> photo a central reference point. It took a while to decide upon a
> solution, as there wer
On 11 May 2005 at 17:05, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> A few people suggested that more detail in the man's face in this pic would be
> helpful, or that a more blurry image might work.and perhaps give the photo a
> central reference point. It took a while to decide upon a solution, as there
> were a fe
That's just silly...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A few people suggested that more detail in the man's face in this pic would
be helpful, or that a more blurry image might work.and perhaps give the
photo a central reference point. It took a while to decide upon a
solution, as there were a few ways this c
On 5/11/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
His face was purposely obscured, as were some details
> on his clothing and body. Most people feel, as do you, that the rendering
> doesn't work the way it is. I tend to agree, but don't know which way I
> want to go with it just yet. Oooh!
A few people suggested that more detail in the man's face in this pic would
be helpful, or that a more blurry image might work.and perhaps give the
photo a central reference point. It took a while to decide upon a
solution, as there were a few ways this could be done as well as several
suggestions
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 5/11/2005 4:21:25 PM
> Subject: Re: PAW PESO - B 2 Kool
>
> On 5/10/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This started out as a screwed up scan of an image that, it turned out, I
> > didn'
I'd rather be hated by you guys than just disliked by many others.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: frank theriault
> On 5/10/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Even your, screwed up stuff comes out, well, if not great, at least
> > interesting. I hate you, (Frank make a note).
On 5/10/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This started out as a screwed up scan of an image that, it turned out, I
> didn't care for, but I decided to run with it and see what could evolve.
> Comments and crits invited and welcome. As Boris would say, be ruthless
>
>
> http://home.
On 5/10/05, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even your, screwed up stuff comes out, well, if not great, at least
> interesting. I hate you, (Frank make a note).
I've hated Shel for a long time now.
However, now it's "official". We hate him.
Check...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness
Hi John ...
I have another shot without the person. There's quite a lot to like in the
shot, but a few elements didn't come together well. It may be worth
another visit ... Thanks so much for your input.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Forbes
> I think this is a tremendous shot. T
Shel,
I think this is a tremendous shot. The patterns are so strong, and so
effective, that I think they render the human figure superfluous. If you
can go back, when the light is right, it would be nice to try the shot
with nobody there. For me, it would work, and work better.
John
On We
Shel,
I look forward to the "more blurry fellow".
May convey a state of confusion as though finding
himself in a 'too' advanced geometry class. In which
case, it would only make sense if so titled.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if I should make the fellow even m
ROTFL
Thanks Rick, I needed that.
Dave S
On 5/11/05, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with Bruce.
>
> There's no Ruth here, and what would she have to do
> with it anyway?
>
> Rick
>
> --- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This started out as a screwed up scan of an
I agree with Bruce.
There's no Ruth here, and what would she have to do
with it anyway?
Rick
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This started out as a screwed up scan of an image
> that, it turned out, I
> didn't care for, but I decided to run with it and
> see what could evolve.
> C
An interesting composition, but the figure is neither silhouette nor
clearly seen. He's sort of lot in a deep shadow that makes me wish you
had gone one way or the other.
Paul
On May 11, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
This started out as a screwed up scan of an image that, it turne
G'day Shel,
I like the geometry & lighting, but I don't think having the person
there adds anything.
I'll reserve further comment until I can have a look and play around at home.
Dave S
On 5/11/05, Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This started out as a screwed up scan of an image th
I wonder if I should make the fellow even more blurry. I was thinking of
doing just that. What say ye? (Well, I'm gonna try it anyway)
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Cesar
> >It works for a bit - all the converging lines and white leading
> >directly to a FACELESS person. The center of
A pic is worth a few words any day ... ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Cesar
> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> >It works for a bit - all the converging lines and white leading
> >directly to a FACELESS person. The center of it all just falls apart
> >for me. Almost like a nice crescendo and
Hi Bruce ...
The facelessness was intended. Whether or not it works is another matter.
I go back and forth on it. Thanks for taking a look and commenting ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> It works for a bit - all the converging lines and white leading
> directly to a FACELESS person. The
Hi Boris ...
That's the strangest thing, for, you see, the scan came out a bit bluish,
which is odd since I was scanning a C41 B&W. So I decided to with that and
see where it would lead. I decided to see what would happen if I made the
person featureless. I won't comment further at this point.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
It works for a bit - all the converging lines and white leading
directly to a FACELESS person. The center of it all just falls apart
for me. Almost like a nice crescendo and then...nothing.
Thanks Bruce, I could not have put it better myself.
As an engineer, English is not
It works for a bit - all the converging lines and white leading
directly to a FACELESS person. The center of it all just falls apart
for me. Almost like a nice crescendo and then...nothing.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, May 10, 2005, 4:33:56 PM, you wrote:
SB> This started out as a screwed up scan of an
Hi!
This started out as a screwed up scan of an image that, it turned out, I
didn't care for, but I decided to run with it and see what could evolve.
Comments and crits invited and welcome. As Boris would say, be ruthless
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/b2kool.html
Shel, you mis-cite me :)
Even your, screwed up stuff comes out, well, if not great, at least
interesting. I hate you, (Frank make a note).
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This started out as a screwed up scan of an image that, it turned out, I
didn't care for, but I decided to run with it and see what could evolve.
Comments and cr
This started out as a screwed up scan of an image that, it turned out, I
didn't care for, but I decided to run with it and see what could evolve.
Comments and crits invited and welcome. As Boris would say, be ruthless
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/b2kool.html
Shel
28 matches
Mail list logo
