I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for interesting
light I saw this field.
Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm @ 70mm. Handheld.
Comments are welcome.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/32377264/
Jens Bladt
Arkitekt MAA
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/lis
.
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: PESO: Field
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:23:15 +0200
I was doing a panorama photograph today. While I was waiting for
interesting
light I saw this field.
Pentax *ist D, SMC Pentax-F 4-5.6/70-210mm
funnily enough, I rather like that extra ripple at the top (quickly checks
for typos...).
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2005 21:51
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: PESO: Field
>
> Hi Je
Easy to armchair quarterback... If that last ripple were twice as thick I
would likely agree. A delightful shot though.
Tom C.
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: RE: PESO: Field
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:10:43 +0100
funnily
I tend to agree with Tom on this one.
G
On Aug 8, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Bob W wrote:
funnily enough, I rather like that extra ripple at the top (quickly
checks
for typos...).
Much to like about this shot and the geometry/texture! I
might suggest cropping the relatively narrow layer at the
to
It's trite, cliched and works very, very well.
Excellent job on shooting a subject most never pull off.
-Adam
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
> your opinions on it.
>
> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
> ISO 280, 1/250
I like the soft blur in the foreground that takes your view to the sharp
center, and then falls off to a blur in the background.
Jim A.
> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
> your opinions on it.
>
> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
> ISO 280,
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bruce Dayton
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 6:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Field
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4
I like the concept. Not sure about the composition and the lack of DOF.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
> your opinions on it.
>
> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
> ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/
Hi Bruce,
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:43:37 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
>I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
>your opinions on it.
>
>Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
>ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
>
>http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm
Hmm, doe not
: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bruce
Dayton
Sendt: 1. april 2007 06:44
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: PESO - Field
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax
I think it needs an anchor of some sort. Just too homogeneous with no
direction for the eye.
As composed, I feel the foreground should be in focus.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
> your opinions on it.
>
> P
Exactly what i was thinking.
I like the single out of place flower.
Dave
On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the soft blur in the foreground that takes your view to the sharp
> center, and then falls off to a blur in the background.
>
> Jim A.
>
>
>
> > I'm trying t
On Mar 31, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
> your opinions on it.
>
> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
> ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
>
> http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm
Doesn't do much for me, Br
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:46:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_46
I like it.
I would probably crop out the less populated portions in the URH & LRH
corners
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Field
> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appr
Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
KW> Subject: PESO - Field
>> I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
>> your opinions on it.
>>
>> Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
>> ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
>>
>>
; Best regards,
> Bruce
>
>
> Saturday, March 31, 2007, 5:26:09 PM, you wrote:
>
> KW> I like it.
>
> KW> I would probably crop out the less populated portions in the URH & LRH
> KW> corners
>
> KW> Kenneth Waller
>
> KW> - Original Message
In a message dated 4/1/2007 9:22:14 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot
evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion and tried a
crop:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616a.htm
Original:
ht
Hi Bruce,
I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it seems a step or two removed from
the more typical bird closeup - putting the little winged creature into a
larger context than just a closeup on a branch seems to get me more
"involved" with the scene, somewhat akin to having been there as oppos
Much better, IMO.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Field
> Many thanks to those of you who took the time to comment. This shot
> evoked some mixed feelings. I have taken Ken's suggestion
This was supposed to be about your bird pic, not the field pic,
which I've net yet looked at. I think the posting error is all Marnie's
fault. Bad Girl! Marnie
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it s
Bruce,
I agree with Jens and Jack.
Rick
--- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it needs an anchor of some sort. Just too
> homogeneous with no
> direction for the eye.
> As composed, I feel the foreground should be in
> focus.
>
> Jack
> --- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Thanks for your comments. I tend to agree with you. I think that is
why it works for me too.
--
Bruce
Monday, April 2, 2007, 10:06:31 AM, you wrote:
SB> Hi Bruce,
SB> I like this photo quite a bit. Somehow it seems a step or two removed from
SB> the more typical bird closeup - putting the
I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible that
I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around in the
brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem interested in
my bird seed, but he may do cleanup duty on the ground on
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
Comment appreciated
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Couple of sharp cuties, Paul!
Well done!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 4:56 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible
> that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around
> in the brush an
Nice clear shot and great depth of field control -- the bird really stand
out well from the background.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possib
Thanks Dan. Great Pentax glass.
Paul via phone
> On Oct 15, 2016, at 11:17 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Nice clear shot and great depth of field control -- the bird really stand
> out well from the background.
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>> On S
Very nice. You make getting good photographs of birds seem easy, or at least
possible.
On October 15, 2016 4:56:34 PM MST, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely
>possible that I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they
>thrash aro
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely possible that
I’ve just been missing them.Based on what I’ve read, they thrash around in the
brush an aren’t likely to perch in a visible spot. He didn’t seem interested in
my bird seed, but he may do cleanu
Thanks Malcolm. One key to getting bird pics is that the photographer stay
still long enough that the birds become accustomed to seeing you.
Paul via phone
> On Oct 16, 2016, at 3:28 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it
and he nailed the species too!
ann
On 10/16/2016 12:11 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
Very nice. You make getting good photographs of birds seem easy, or at least
possible.
On October 15, 2016 4:56:34 PM MST, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don’t recall seeing one of these guys before, but it’s entirely
p
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Malcolm. One key to getting bird pics is that the photographer stay
still long enough that the birds become accustomed to seeing you.
I 'll have to be more patient. We also have a very high cat population
wandering about; I've got better pictures of them stalking p
On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
> I 'll have to be more patient. We also have a very high cat population
> wandering about; I've got better pictures of them stalking pigeons in the
> garden than I have of the birds themselves!
And what's wrong with cat photos? :)
Cheers,
Dav
On 10/17/2016 12:42 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Oct 17, 2016, at 2:43 AM, Malcolm Smith
wrote:
I 'll have to be more patient. We also have a very high cat
population wandering about; I've got better pictures of them
stalking pigeons in the garden than I have of the birds
themselves!
And what's
John wrote:
> And what's wrong with cat photos? :)
>
> Cheers, Dave
>
Nothing really. Unless you want to photograph birds - cats ain't birds.
For John & Dave; a regular bird stalker here: http://flic.kr/p/MRdvah
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 5:36 PM
Subject: PESO - Field of trees
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
>
> Comment appreciated
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Kenneth Wa
Good eye! Beautifully exposed. It is, however, very blue.(?)
A little additional symmetry might have helped it for me, but I "get
it" and like it.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Pen
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
Very very nice! Love it.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Excellent, Ken. I love the monotone effect. It works wonderfully here.
Paul
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
> > Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/m
Hi Ken!
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
all I can say is - wow! Very nice, the tree on the right looks almost
translucent to me.
Bedo.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
Jack, thanks for the comments.
I actually dialed out some blue for the posted version.
Originally captured with out the help of filters.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees
> Good eye! Beau
Paul, thanks for commenting.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees
> Excellent, Ken. I love the monotone effect. It works wonderfully here.
> Paul
>> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> >
Dario, thanks for commenting.
The original image is slightly bluer - I dialed some out in PS CS2.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Dario Bonazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees
> Very, very nice! Was the image so blue even o
I'm generally a sucker for this type of photo. The fog and layers
always intrigue me. So for that reason, I like this photo.
The scan seems to be showing quite a bit of grain - kind of surprised
me being Velvia. I know it has been mentioned, but it is really blue.
I'm curious if the original is
Great shot Ken
Dave
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Check out
> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
>
> Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
>
> Comment appreciated
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdm
ffect there. Probable an effect of under exposure.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO - Field of trees
> I'm generally a sucker for this type of photo. The fog and layers
> always intrigue me. So for
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25. oktober 2006 17:36
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Field of trees
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in the fall, in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.
Comment appreciated
Thanks in ad
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW
On Apr 8, 2007, at 11:43 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
> think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
>
> Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handhe
Better. But still needs more DOF. This is one of those shots where
you have to bite the bullet and pull out the tripod.
Paul
On Apr 8, 2007, at 2:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm cur
Bruce Dayton wrote:
> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
> think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
>
> Pentax K10D, Tokina AT-X SD 400/5.6, Handheld
> ISO 400, 1/250 sec @ f/11
In a message dated 4/8/2007 11:44:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
think this one works better or worse than the previous one.
Pentax
Good feedback, thanks.
--
Bruce
Monday, April 9, 2007, 7:28:21 AM, you wrote:
C> Bruce Dayton wrote:
>> Another attempt at the field of flowers type of thing. Different
>> location, different lens, same photographer. I'm curios whether you
>> think this one works better or worse than the pre
56 matches
Mail list logo
