In a message dated 4/13/2007 10:08:31 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> Typical Yosemite color anyway, this time unartified, unmucked with. If
you
> think I should bring up the shadows more, just say so.
>
> http://members.aol.com/eac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ...
> Typical Yosemite color anyway, this time unartified, unmucked with. If you
> think I should bring up the shadows more, just say so.
>
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/leaves.htm
>
> Comments welcome.
Marnie, I think this looks just fine. In fact
In a message dated 4/11/2007 2:15:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just about to sign off the list but thought I'd dash off a note first --
Marine, I like your original crop best - not that the verticals Ken and
Tom propose are bad,
but if someone had posted the two p
Okay, noted.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
=
Since I agreed with Tom regarding cutting off trees in photos I have to say
that I prefer this one by far Marnie.
Greetings
Markus
But maybe you'll like this better:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/yellowtree.htm
Very quick edi
Bah, humbug! :-)
Tom C.
>From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PESO - Yosemite Color (Redux - Real Photo)
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:12:52 -0400
>
>Just about to sign off the list
Just about to sign off the list but thought I'd dash off a note first --
Marine, I like your original crop best - not that the verticals Ken and
Tom propose are bad,
but if someone had posted the two pictures next to each other and asked
me to say who I thought took each
of them (perhaps from a
Since I agreed with Tom regarding cutting off trees in photos I have to say
that I prefer this one by far Marnie.
Greetings
Markus
But maybe you'll like this better:
http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/yellowtree.htm
Very quick edit in response to your post, I might play with a bit m
l@pdml.net
>Subject: Re: PESO - Yosemite Color (Redux - Real Photo)
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:57:05 EDT
>
>In a message dated 4/11/2007 1:22:36 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>That's fine. I took your 'original' to show you what I would hav
In a message dated 4/11/2007 1:22:36 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's fine. I took your 'original' to show you what I would have done.
I'm not saying mine is better (obviously I think so or I would not have done
it), but it's a different take. :-)
I rotated 1
: Re: PESO - Yosemite Color (Redux - Real Photo)
I definitely like the colors and of course the subject. Having taken many
tree shots I'll give you a dose of my own self-criticism. Don't take it
personally as a severe critique. OK. :-)
I always have a problem with trees that are cuto
p://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5836377
I'll remove it in 24 hours.
Tom C.
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: pdml@pdml.net
>Subject: Re: PESO - Yosemite Color (Redux - Real Photo)
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:23:26 EDT
>
>I don&#x
In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:22:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very nice.
Might I suggest a slight vertical crop along the RH edge (about a third of
the distance from the edge to the rightmost tree) to eliminate most of the
blank blue sky which I find draws my ey
I don't agree. Sometimes, for me, it is about the light on the leaves, the
curve of a branch, etc., not about the whole tree. Just like I might take
someone's hands and not shoot them full body. This one was about the light on
the
leaves and the contrast between them and the dark of the pin
In a message dated 4/11/2007 12:06:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey, this no disclaimer thing is tough. :-)
LOL ... still need to work at it, eh? ;-)
> ... I have used significant highlight/shadow on this because the trees
> were pr
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 2:05 PM
Subject: PESO - Yosemite Color (Redux - Real Photo)
> I've been looking over my photos from Yosemite, taken last October, and
> some
> are a bit better than I thought. Nothing super great, nothing Ansel
> Adamish,
> nothing near a
In a message dated 4/11/2007 11:42:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Very well seen and I think you hit the shadows exactly right. Good
contrast, yet adequate detail. I'd probably not, however, be able to
resist pumping the yellow slightly...but then, I'm weak. ;)
Jack
.
Tom C.
>From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PESO - Yosemite Color (Redux - Real Photo)
>Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Very well seen and I think you hit the shadows exa
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey, this no disclaimer thing is tough. :-)
LOL ... still need to work at it, eh? ;-)
> ... I have used significant highlight/shadow on this because the trees
> were pretty dark. ...
>
> http://members.aol.com/eactivist/PAWS/pages/leaves.htm
Excellent. A very nice
Very well seen and I think you hit the shadows exactly right. Good
contrast, yet adequate detail. I'd probably not, however, be able to
resist pumping the yellow slightly...but then, I'm weak. ;)
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've been looking over my photos from Yosemite, taken last Octob
I've been looking over my photos from Yosemite, taken last October, and some
are a bit better than I thought. Nothing super great, nothing Ansel Adamish,
nothing near as good as I really wanted...
Hey, this no disclaimer thing is tough. :-) Anyway, at the time I was
suffering a bit from hig
20 matches
Mail list logo
