>
> From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/26 Mon PM 10:22:51 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT: The simple internet, was Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > as is built in, once or not at all.
&
mike wilson wrote:
>
> as is built in, once or not at all.
> > > >
> > >
> > Mike - earlier I wrote that the button wasn't in my Netscape
> > 6.0
> > I don't have Netscape 6.0 I have netscape 4.6 -
> >
> > You may have been scratching your head over that one
> > muttering
> > "yesit is yes it is
>
> From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/26 Mon PM 07:34:29 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT: The simple internet, was Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> >
> &
mike wilson wrote:
>
> >
>
>
>
> In NS, go to: edit>preferences>privacy and security>images
>
> There, you will find two boxes. One is image acceptance, the other is for
> animations. You can choose to let them loop as many times as is built in,
> once or not at all.
> >
>
Mike - earlier I
On 23/06/06, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately nothing seems to stop 100% of the crap. Pop-ups,
> animation, music, ads, etc. no matter what you do some of them get by
> however there are a couple of easy things to do.
>
> Just disabling MacroMedia (now Adobe) Flash will stop abou
mike wilson wrote:
>
> >
> > From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2006/06/22 Thu PM 05:42:11 GMT
> > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > Subject: Re: OT: The simple internet, was Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
> >
>
>
> In N
On Jun 23, 2006, at 8:12 AM, graywolf wrote:
> Or the designer can just know what he is doing, and it works on most
> anything.
That's true. But, for instance, at Batter's Box we jettisoned most of
the navigation and polls and sidebar stuff so that you get right to the
content on a small scre
Kiwi's have a fun accent.
I quite like it, makes me smile. So do the Scottish & Irish accents.
Dave S
On 6/23/06, Norman Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kiwi, I am not...
> Norm
>
> From: "David Mann"
>
> > On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Norman Baugher wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not familiar with t
On 6/23/06, Norman Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kiwi, I am not...
> Norm
>
Dunno about that, Norm. You are rather fruity.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Kiwi, I am not...
Norm
From: "David Mann"
> On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Norman Baugher wrote:
>
>> I'm not familiar with this FluckR...
>
> Didn't know you were an NZer...
>
> (if you don't know what I'm talking about, ask an Australian)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
Unfortunately nothing seems to stop 100% of the crap. Pop-ups,
animation, music, ads, etc. no matter what you do some of them get by
however there are a couple of easy things to do.
Just disabling MacroMedia (now Adobe) Flash will stop about 90% of the
animated web crap. As for sound I just nor
Or the designer can just know what he is doing, and it works on most
anything. Check out my site on your TX it is mobile friendly without
being regular browser unfriendly. Although the images are probably a bit
big for cellular wireless connections, but fine for Wi-Fi connections.
To make it wo
On Jun 23, 2006, at 12:47 AM, Norman Baugher wrote:
> I'm not familiar with this FluckR...
Didn't know you were an NZer...
(if you don't know what I'm talking about, ask an Australian)
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
> From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2006/06/22 Thu PM 05:42:11 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT: The simple internet, was Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>
> Paul Sorenson wrote:
> >
> > Ann -
> >
> > In Firef
Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:45:12 -0700
Mark Roberts wrote:
> IE has a simple option whereby you can add a "toggle image loading"
> button into the tool bar. Enable or disable image loading with a
> single click. I use it frequently. I don't think Firefox has anything
> similar yet.
Opera browser has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In a message dated 6/22/2006 10:53:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> What i want is a permanent stop animation button - know
> where i can find one of those? :) :)
>
> ann
> ===
> There are too many different types of animation for one bu
Wow that really rocks, Mark, thanks!
As to sound - I do have a couple of waves I need - alerts -
but
I also keep the amps down verry low
such smart guys we have here!
ann
Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> >I use firefox for my browser - I don't want it set to jsut
> >text
Aaron
That is great
I just did it with Google on Firefox
and it worked -- it is text only, although not plain text in
the strictest sense
I love it!
ann
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> > hmmm are you saying that from the comfort of my dial
In a message dated 6/22/2006 10:53:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What i want is a permanent stop animation button - know
where i can find one of those? :) :)
ann
===
There are too many different types of animation for one button to cover them
all.
Marnie aka Doe
Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> Ann -
>
> In Firefox, you can block images and get text only this way...
>
> Go to the Tools menu, click on Options, then click on the Content icon.
> In the window that opens un-check the box that says Load Images. To
> the right of the Load Images choice is a box la
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>I use firefox for my browser - I don't want it set to jsut
>text even if I could, though,
>because I sometimes need to look at things by images - but
>I would be very happy if
>I could block ALL animation and ALL sound when I'm surfing.
>I had a stop animation button in Net
On Jun 22, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> hmmm are you saying that from the comfort of my dial up
> connection I can make a browser that reads in text format
> only when I'm , say, I'm researching stuff on Google or
> Yahoo? that would be great.
Yes -- basically, there are other for
Ann -
In Firefox, you can block images and get text only this way...
Go to the Tools menu, click on Options, then click on the Content icon.
In the window that opens un-check the box that says Load Images. To
the right of the Load Images choice is a box labeled Exceptions. Click
on that an
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>
> Ann, I've been pleasantly surprised by the number of wonderfully simple
> mobile-optimized web sites out there ever since I began to do the majority of
> my online reading and e-mailing on a Palm TX. (It's a long story, but my
> iBook needs a minor-but-expensive repai
Bob W wrote:
>
> >
> > But an ad on top of the large view?? Oh no! that didnt
> > use to be and I'm paying them
> > for the space - that's annoying - although the ad for
> > Aperture isnt moving at least.
> > (I just went and looked)
>
> I also see an ad on the large view. Those are beautifu
Ann, I've been pleasantly surprised by the number of wonderfully simple
mobile-optimized web sites out there ever since I began to do the majority of
my online reading and e-mailing on a Palm TX. (It's a long story, but my iBook
needs a minor-but-expensive repair and the TX was a prop I got to
On 6/22/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems to me they shouldn't be doing ads on top of anyones
> stuff if we are paying them for
> the space ($25 a year for 100 mgs of which I've only used
> about 5)
>
I did wonder if maybe "members" with a login don't have to see the
ads, b
>
> But an ad on top of the large view?? Oh no! that didnt
> use to be and I'm paying them
> for the space - that's annoying - although the ad for
> Aperture isnt moving at least.
> (I just went and looked)
I also see an ad on the large view. Those are beautiful pictures, and
I didn't actu
skye wrote:
>
> On 6/22/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> No ad on your folder, plus one ad on top of each of the four photos I
> looked at. However, much less wait on your photos (thanks for that,
> although you probably did it because of your modem limits more than
> for li'l
On 6/22/06, Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> skye wrote:
> >
> > I haven't done an indepth study of photo display sites. All I know is,
> > every time I go to photo.net (which happens a lot with all the PESOs),
> > I get slapped with an ad, first thing, at the top of the page. Then
> > af
r again... photo sharing vs.
> > a gallery.
> >
> >
> > Tom C.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > >Subje
I'm not familiar with this FluckR...
Norm
From: "Michael Christian Gaudet"
> With a tip of my hat to Tom and John's recent comments, I'm not sure what
> the next incarnation of PUG's gallery should be, but I did try something
> recently that might be set an example of a plausible way to proceed
You need to log in to see all available sizes, even for public photo's.
This limitation was smething we ran into a while back on a thread about
one of my PESO's (I use flickr).
-Adam
Michael C. Gaudet wrote:
>By mentioning Flickr, I certainly didn't want anyone to consider that I was
>advoca
On 21/6/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What's the deal Cotty? This is not a debate or referendum on Adelheid's
>management of the PUG. She's done an excellent job.
>
>This is a debate as to the nature of the PUG itself, and whether it should
>be a high quality gallery showcasing the b
suitable for a photo sharing site, but not a gallery in my
> opinion.
>
> I'm trying to make that distinction over and over again... photo sharing vs.
> a gallery.
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
> >From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Pentax-
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
> >Hi Dave,
>>Don't take it to seriously. Some of the most insulting e-mails, like
>>those between Bill and Tom, were a spoof. They're pals. And it wouldn't
>>be the
again... photo sharing vs.
a gallery.
Tom C.
>From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:06:38 +0800
>
>Flickr , of all photo hosting sites
>Hi Dave,
>Don't take it to seriously. Some of the most insulting e-mails, like
>those between Bill and Tom, were a spoof. They're pals. And it wouldn't
>be the PDML if someone didn't wallop someone else every now and then.
>Paul
Correctamundo!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
again... photo sharing vs.
a gallery.
Tom C.
>From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:06:38 +0800
>
>Flickr , of all photo hosting sites
>
>
>Having come back from such a layed baack place like GFM to this new PDML, a
>pile of snarky insulting emails, i'll add that i agree wirth Cotty, Please
>keep the Pug.
>
>For those that cannt read between the lines, see you.
>
>I want to learn about photography,not the crap that seems to be t
Flickr , of all photo hosting sites I find it to be the most
annoying to view images on.
IMO If you want to kill the PUG & everything it stands for, host it on
Flickr ;-)
Dave
At 08:51 AM 22/06/2006, Michael wrote:
>By mentioning Flickr, I certainly didn't want anyone to consider that I was
>
Hi Dave,
Don't take it to seriously. Some of the most insulting e-mails, like
those between Bill and Tom, were a spoof. They're pals. And it wouldn't
be the PDML if someone didn't wallop someone else every now and then.
Paul
> l
> Adelheid, if you're reading this thread, please don't despair. Th
By mentioning Flickr, I certainly didn't want anyone to consider that I was
advocating strict competition for PUG. It's just a tool that I use and that
I think could be helpful for Adelheid, if she so chooses. I mean, Flickr is
pretty fun the way everyone can link to one another everywhere.
As for
John Forbes wrote:
> And my comment about it slowly dying was as much to do with the lack of
> comment on the PUG submissions here in the forum as it was about the
> quality and quantity of those submissions. A PUG which attracts more and
> better pictures, and more discussion, will make Ade
Adelheid, if you're reading this thread, please don't despair. There's
only one PUG, and I for one would appreciate it even if there was only
one contribution a month. It would still be alive with that single
picture. Go PUG!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
Having come back from such a layed baack p
>
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To: "pentax list"
>> Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:18:16 +0100
>>
>>
AIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "pentax list"
>Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 23:18:16 +0100
>
>Adelheid, if you're reading this thread, please don't despair. There's
>only one PUG, and I for on
Tom C wrote:
>
> WIth photo.net one could just create a new presentation for the next theme.
> Photos would be totally separated and not seen together. I have no idea
> what other functionality it has or lacks compared to Flickr.
>
> Tom C.
>
I only have one quarrel with photo.net - it sticks
On 6/21/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adelheid, if you're reading this thread, please don't despair. There's
> only one PUG, and I for one would appreciate it even if there was only
> one contribution a month. It would still be alive with that single
> picture. Go PUG!
> --
Well said, Cot
Adelheid, if you're reading this thread, please don't despair. There's
only one PUG, and I for one would appreciate it even if there was only
one contribution a month. It would still be alive with that single
picture. Go PUG!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
ss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Subject: Re: PUG/PESO ...at Flickr?
>Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 13:17:03 -0700
>
>(As a flickr user), the only problem that I had with the flickr group
>gallery was that there was no way to separate the themes. It's just
>
(As a flickr user), the only problem that I had with the flickr group
gallery was that there was no way to separate the themes. It's just
all in one lump. I try not to complain without a solution so: My
suggestion is: It would be nice if, after the deadline of the theme
passes, someone (moderator)
With a tip of my hat to Tom and John's recent comments, I'm not sure what
the next incarnation of PUG's gallery should be, but I did try something
recently that might be set an example of a plausible way to proceed using
free photo tools on the net. Specifically Flickr, which doesn't cost
anything,
53 matches
Mail list logo
