Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[About using LX focussing screens in MX bodies]
> About a 1/3rd of a stop. However it wouldn't be the same as using a ME Super.
That's easy to compensate for (should be easy to figure out for MX users).
I don't have hands-on experience with the ME Super
have if I had the choice.
>
>Ciao,
>Graywolf
>
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Johan Schoone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 3:18 PM
>Subject: Re:
About a 1/3rd of a stop. However it wouldn't be the same as using a ME Super.
At 08:18 PM 2/17/2002 +, you wrote:
>"T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Heck, I am having that problem with my ME Super. Wonder if I could get a
> > grid screen for it. Anybody know?
>
>That is not an e
That's one nice thing about the Yashica Mat. It has a grid on the screen to
aid in getting horizontals and verticals correct.
Bill
> > For 35mm I usually do what you just said. When I'm handholding I am
> > shocking at getting unstraight horizons.
>
> My problem with the 75mm is not so much h
On Monday, February 18, 2002, at 12:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For 35mm I usually do what you just said. When I'm handholding I am
> shocking at getting unstraight horizons.
My problem with the 75mm is not so much horizons but vertical lines --
being a tall person, I have to really ke
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I've also noticed that it's harder to judge the horizonals and
> verticals. A grid would be an excellent solution. Frequently, when
> using a tripod, I tilt down to get the horizon at the top of the frame
> just to check position before tilting back up to my frame and
> sh
"T Rittenhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heck, I am having that problem with my ME Super. Wonder if I could get a
> grid screen for it. Anybody know?
That is not an easy task. Try to find a decent MX body. You can put LX
screens in it, but the meter will be off. I don't know by how much, but
Since Friday I have a grid screen in my PZ-1, it looks as if it will be a
big help for my horizons. I have been thinking about this screen for quite a
while, and needed Peter to enable me. It is too early for a good opinion on
it yet, but sofar it looks positive.
Frits Wüthrich
Aaron Reynolds w
nquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: A little 6x7 enabling
> I've also noticed that it's harder to judge the horizonals and verticals.
A
> grid would be an excellent solution. Frequently, when usi
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: A little 6x7 enabling
> I've also noticed that it's harder to judge the horizonals and verticals.
A
> grid would be an excellent solution. Frequently, when using a tripod, I
> tilt down to get the horizon at the top of t
I've also noticed that it's harder to judge the horizonals and verticals. A
grid would be an excellent solution. Frequently, when using a tripod, I
tilt down to get the horizon at the top of the frame just to check position
before tilting back up to my frame and shooting.
Paul
Aaron Reynolds wrot
On Saturday, February 16, 2002, at 07:44 AM, Frits J. Wüthrich wrote:
> Apparently it is easier to keep the Horizon horizontal in 35mm then in
> 6x7cm.
I've noticed that my horizontals and verticals are a little off with the
75mm. I suspect it is the large viewfinder image that is messin' me
On Friday, February 15, 2002, at 07:23 PM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
> - what first, digital or medium format - ducks from
> Aaron's abuse!
Abuse? Please! I will merely rephrase your question to "what first,
crap or gorgeous negatives?" in the hopes that you will make the right
decision.
-Aaro
Looks like an irrigation thingy to me.
Bill KG4LOV, WPRS983
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the 6X7 detail pic there is
> something that looks like a fire at the bottom of the right tank, any
> idea what it is? The detail achieved with the big neg is amazing!
> Steve Larson
> Redondo Beach, California
Would you stop already! :) When I hit the $200 Million Lotto tonight
I`m going to get a few of those 67II`s. In the 6X7 detail pic there is
something that looks like a fire at the bottom of the right tank, any
idea what it is? The detail achieved with the big neg is amazing!
Steve Larson
Redondo
So ... there's nothing there that we didn't know. A big neg beats a
small neg in quality. Frankly, I'd have expected better quality from
the 6x7.
William Robb wrote:
>
> Warning, this is about a 500kb download.
> http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/6x7_Enable/
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Took just a few seconds.
Len
---
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 5:57 PM
Subject: A little 6x7 enabling
> Warning, this is about a 500kb download.
> http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/6x7_Enable/
> -
> This
Worth the wait to see the result - excellent. Love the sky - I suppose that
a new format is due a go - what first, digital or medium format - ducks from
Aaron's abuse!
Malcolm
Bill wrote:
> Warning, this is about a 500kb download.
> http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/6x7_Enable/
-
This message is fro
William,
Boy, if I hand't already taken the plunge, this is quite a difference.
Much smoother and no comparison in grain.
I just took delivery of a 165/2.8 and 55/4.0 from KEH. Just unwrapped
them, but haven't even put them on the camera yet. This enabling is
getting very contagious.
Thanks f
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:57:42 -0600, William Robb wrote:
>Warning, this is about a 500kb download.
>http://www.komkon.org/~wrobb/6x7_Enable/
One hell of a difference, eh? :-)
Later,
Gary
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and fol
20 matches
Mail list logo
