On Oct 31, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Don Sanderson wrote:
(R)e(T)ractable (F)lash.
The pop-up thingy on top. ;-)
I found an official designation buried in the Specifications section
of the Z-1p manual: "Retractable TTL Auto Flash". I don't know where
the "A" went... I guess they wanted a TLA.
Retractable Thu-the-lens-metered Flash.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
What's RTF?
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert
As f
for the record, if anyone is keeping track, my first D was replaced because
the power-switch wouldn't stop the lens down when pushed to the DOF preview
location.
Christian
ff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:07 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
What's RTF?
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert
As for the RTF it's a waste o
(R)e(T)ractable (F)lash.
The pop-up thingy on top. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 4:07 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
>
>
> What'
What's RTF?
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
> [Original Message]
> From: Rob Studdert
> As for the RTF it's a waste of space on my camera,
> it seems to work but I'm never the one
On 30 Oct 2005 at 11:44, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> If we're doing a survey, my first istDS was returned for replacement. The
> "OK" and directional button on the back didn't work. Other problems were
> operator error.
The little directional button on my *ist D is very very poor but I've never
re
Neither of mine have given any problems. When I got the first one, it
sometimes seemed to behave erraticaly. Good battery practice dealt with
that.
John
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:37:54 -, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm talking ab
If we're doing a survey, my first istDS was returned for replacement. The
"OK" and directional button on the back didn't work. Other problems were
operator error.
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
> [Original Message]
> From: Mark Roberts
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm talking about 60 people who use and post. My impression is that
>quite a high proportion of those have had enough trouble to need
>intervention by either return or repair. It is entirely possible that
>my impression may be skewed by people posting a
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 30, 2005, at 8:01 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be associated
with power supply. But the _failures_, necessitating camera
return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I w
On Oct 30, 2005, at 8:01 AM, mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be associated
with power supply. But the _failures_, necessitating camera
return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I was really
anal about it
Malcolm Smith wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be
associated with power supply. But the _failures_,
necessitating camera return/repair, seem to be quite high.
My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I was
really anal about it I would
would be cheaper to do a final testing and inspection
before shipping.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
mike wilson wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wi
; <==> "Expert Proof"
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message ----- From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
I have to say that I am suprised by the number of people on here who
have had a similar experience to you. Maybe list members are mo
mike wilson wrote:
> I would agree that many of the _problems_ seem to be
> associated with power supply. But the _failures_,
> necessitating camera return/repair, seem to be quite high.
>
> My _impression_ (which is what most of us have - if I was
> really anal about it I would have logged t
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
I have to say that I am suprised by the number of people on here who
have had a similar experience to you. Maybe list members are more
exploratory of thei
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Another firm believe shattered
I have to say that I am suprised by the number of people on here who have
had a similar experience to you. Maybe list members are more exploratory
of their camera's capabilities t
Don Williams wrote:
For a long time I have held that with the instruction book and a little
patience anyone with an ounce of intelligence can find out how to work a
machine or instrument. Too bad -- I now have to abandon this premise.
After getting the card for the *ist D I programmed custom
Sendt: 30. oktober 2005 11:56
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Another firm believe shattered
I should add here that the camera works
perfectly with an external flash -- a
Vivitar 730AFPK. But with the internal
flash up the camera will not expose
although the flash symbol appears and
all
I should add here that the camera works
perfectly with an external flash -- a
Vivitar 730AFPK. But with the internal
flash up the camera will not expose
although the flash symbol appears and
all seems well.
Don Williams wrote:
For a long time I have held that with the instruction book and a
21 matches
Mail list logo
