William Robb escribió:
Well cripes almighty Carlos!
How can you get on your high horse and make a statment like that without
making formal, scientific, error free tests.
Don't you realize that visual impressions gotten by long experience in
the field don't mean shit around here?
Haven't you figur
Jens Bladt escribió:
I did some quick tests - and now it seems to have improved to the same
performance as the Tokina 2.8-4.3 28-70mm at 28mm and still much better at
70mm. It's still not as impressive as it used to be. Not as sharp as the
(very expensive) SMC FA 2.8/28-70mm.
Yes, I agree. If I cou
Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. november 2004 00:05
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time (Lens
test results) !!
Dropped it the sea f
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
He's not the dumb one, (take a guess who is),
You really want me to put that guess out there Mr. test it to
death.?
William Robb
.
JCO
==
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
> Yes, he said the lens was more flare prone than a SMC len
Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
I managed to fix one problem:
For some time I couldn't shift the focus clutch to
On 14 Nov 2004 at 16:47, William Robb wrote:
> Well cripes almighty Carlos!
> How can you get on your high horse and make a statment like that
> without making formal, scientific, error free tests.
> Don't you realize that visual impressions gotten by long experience
> in the field don't mean sh
ont of the
> lens barrel. I guess there's not much flare protection at 28mm.
>
> Jens Bladt
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
>
>
> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sendt: 14. november 2004 17:43
> Til
---Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. november 2004 17:43
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time (Lens
test results) !!
>I have this lens, and I also had the F 35-80 4-5.6, until I sold the
>latter la
- Original Message -
From: "Carlos Royo"
Subject: Re: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
Yes, I said the lens is more flare prone than SMC lenses. I have
not run comparison tests, as I don't waste my time in that kind of
thin
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
well it would be pretty dumb for the original
poster to make a general statement that the tokina
lens was more flare prone than the SMC
J. C. O'Connell escribió:
Yes, he said the lens was more flare prone than a SMC lens.
One would have to assume under same conditions. Either
both using hoods or both not using hoods. If his
comparison was with hoods, then adding one didn't help
did it? If the comparison was without hoods my point
i
My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
> Yes, he said the lens was more flare prone than a SMC lens.
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
Yes, he said the lens was more flare prone than a SMC lens.
One would have to assume under same conditions.
I wouldn't count on that.
William Robb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
> Zooms do
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
Zooms do not inherently have to have noticeable distortion,
sure a lot of cheap ones do, but that does not make it
acceptable or min
ECTED]
Subject: Re: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
> It's "only" d
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
It's "only" disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at
28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
The distortion
Jens Bladt escribió:
I have found it no more prone to flare than other wide angle lenses. I good
lens hood is usually crutial for a wide angel, isn't it?
I always use it with the original hood, but in the bright sunny days so
common here in Southern Europe, it is evident that this lens flares much
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> It's "only" disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at 28mm
> and that is flare prone? HAR!
>
> Thats like buying a car with its "only" disadvantages being a wimpy
> engine and a bad suspension...
Actuall, no, it's like buying a car with
J. C. O'Connell escribió:
It's "only" disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at 28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
That’s like buying a car with its "only" disadvantages being a wimpy
engine and a bad suspension...
Every 24-to-something or 28-to-something I've had or used showed more
I have this lens, and I also had the F 35-80 4-5.6, until I sold the
latter last January, and the Tokina is sharper. In fact, it is very
sharp for a zoom lens, its only disadvantages being noticeable
barrel distortion at 28 mm. and that it is a flare prone lens,
compared to SMC Pentax lenses.
T
Sendt: 14. november 2004 17:24
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Arghhh My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time (Lens
test results) !!
It's "only" disadvantages is that it has noticeable distortion at 28mm
and that is flare prone? HAR!
Thats like buying a car with its "onl
PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 11:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Arghhh.... My Tokina AT-X ProII 28-70mm sucks big time
(Lens test results) !!
Jens Bladt escribió:
> So, I tested my lenses. It's really, really bad. My Tokina is
> absolutely worthless. It may b
Jens Bladt escribió:
So, I tested my lenses. It's really, really bad. My Tokina is absolutely
worthless.
It may be due to wrong focusing on a digital, but I doubt it.
I always have considered this an excellent lens. Befor I bought it I tested
it agains
my Pentax FA 28-80mm Powerzomm, and found that
25 matches
Mail list logo
