On Jul 18, 2005, at 2:28 AM, Cotty wrote:
The only reason I can think of is that there may be children
lurking on
the list, strange as that may seem
When I was a kid I swore like a sailor.
But not in front of my parents ;)
B*t t* b* h*n*st, I d*n't g*v* a damn.
Is that the next range of
On 7/17/05, E.R.N. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shows a sense of shame?
I'm rarely accused to doing that...
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 7/17/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only reason I can think of is that there may be children lurking on
> the list, strange as that may seem
>
> B*t t* b* h*n*st, I d*n't g*v* a damn.
Actually, Cotty, that's a pretty sensible answer, and one I'd not thought of.
thanks,
frank
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/17/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
f**k
I'm going to veer even more wildly off-topic:
Why, to be polite, to we put asterisks in the middle of swear-words,
to make them more palatable to sensitive readers?
Shows a sense of shame?
Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Personally, I think you should stop shaking *ists at each other. :-)
...or engaging in *istrionics.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
frank theriault wrote:
On 7/17/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin, whadya' need a gun for? You have other options, sharp pointed
stick, a heavy club.
Point-ed stick, eh? Getting all 'igh and mighty, are we?
I always found a banana was pretty handy. Or a handful of cherries
Personally, I think you should stop shaking *ists at each other. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Fred" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cotty"
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Definitions
So, are you suggesting that the "ability"
On 17/7/05, Fred, discombobulated, unleashed:
>OK, then, may I assume that you would like to have the PDML be as inclusive
>as possible (in the sense that as many people with serious interest in
>things Pentaxian would be welcome)? (This may not be a valid assumption.)
>
>If that assumption is co
ee and prohibit them from further
use of this wonderful list.
Why would we want to risk such a thing unnecessarily?
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 11:26 AM
> To: Cotty
> Subject: Re: Definitions
>
>
> &
>> So, are you suggesting that the "ability" to use foul language is what
>> makes one an "adult"?
> Not at all. If my child of 11 was lurking on an email list that had
> contributors who regularly used foul language, I would not allow him to
> continue.
> The Pentax list is hardly that.
OK, the
I think it would be within the bounds...
Anthony Farr wrote:
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 18 July 2005 1:24 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Definitions
wouldn't that be suede-o...
My thought exactly. But i
> -Original Message-
> From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 18 July 2005 1:24 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Definitions
>
> wouldn't that be suede-o...
>
My thought exactly. But if I'd corrected Kevin's s
wouldn't that be suede-o...
Anthony Farr wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 17 July 2005 2:27 PM
Thats why I am a vegetarian. Or suedo Vege..
ei. I won't eat anything I have not killed myself.
(snip)
Kind regards
Kevin
Actually he can say F**K on the air, he just gets punished for it. Same
as if he kill 100 people
but I would hope the punishment would be a bit heavier for the latter.
(Though with the modern
court system that's hard to predict).
David Savage wrote:
Kevin, whadya' need a gun for? You have o
On 17/7/05, Fred, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So, are you suggesting that the "ability" to use foul language is what
>makes one an "adult"?
Not at all. If my child of 11 was lurking on an email list that had
contributors who regularly used foul language, I would not allow him to
continue.
The P
> The only reason I can think of is that there may be children lurking on
> the list, strange as that may seem
So, are you suggesting that the "ability" to use foul language is what
makes one an "adult"?
Fred
"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Definitions
On 7/17/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
f**k
I'm going to veer even more wildly off-topic:
Why, to be polite, to we put asterisks in the middle of swear-words,
to make them mor
On 17/7/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm going to veer even more wildly off-topic:
>
>Why, to be polite, to we put asterisks in the middle of swear-words,
>to make them more palatable to sensitive readers?
The only reason I can think of is that there may be children lurking o
Not in the least, I have no problems at all with hunting. I may be a
city slicker, but my father grew up on a farm & a lot of my family
live in rural areas where hunting is very common, so I was exposed to
it at a young age.
I was more poking fun at Kevin's comment about the government taking
away
Shit I don't know F***k . I do it because others do it.
Some people are just a bit more sensitive to colourful language than
others I guess.
Dave
On 7/17/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/17/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> f**k
>
> I'm going to veer even more
Moreover, following the same logic, the names of the Pentax' digital
SLRs are actually unsuited for the sensitive photographer. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 1:12 PM
Sub
On 7/17/05, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The answer to the 2nd question is No, because murder is a legal concept, and
> (other) animals aren't capable of understanding it. For similar reasons
> infants can't commit murder, and neither infants nor animals are allowed to
> vote.
To expand on
On 7/17/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
f**k
I'm going to veer even more wildly off-topic:
Why, to be polite, to we put asterisks in the middle of swear-words,
to make them more palatable to sensitive readers?
Everyone knows the person quoted meant "fuck". That's the word that
wen
On 7/17/05, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin, whadya' need a gun for? You have other options, sharp pointed
> stick, a heavy club.
Point-ed stick, eh? Getting all 'igh and mighty, are we?
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
The answer to the 2nd question is No, because murder is a legal concept, and
(other) animals aren't capable of understanding it. For similar reasons
infants can't commit murder, and neither infants nor animals are allowed to
vote.
The answer to the 1st question is a qualified Yes, because murder i
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 17, 2005 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: Definitions
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 17 July 2005 2:27 PM
Thats why I am a vegetaria
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 17 July 2005 2:27 PM
>
> Thats why I am a vegetarian. Or suedo Vege..
> ei. I won't eat anything I have not killed myself.
(snip)
>
> Kind regards
> Kevin
I always thought a "suedo vegetarian" was a p
Bob W wrote:
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
Are they available online?
Googlus amicus tuus est.
Sample recipes:
http://www.britishmuseum.co.uk/text.asp?page=recipe+1#R4
Bob W wrote:
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
Are they available online?
Googlus amicus tuus est.
For anyone else interested:
http://www.britishmuseum.co.uk/shops.asp?cat=101
r Nikes on, and get out there!
If you live in a city, of course, you can just take a cab.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 July 2005 05:27
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Definitions
>
> T
Bob W wrote:
It's a classic "dip into" book. I must try to get an
original copy; mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I
suspect will not last much longer.
Déjà vu. I bought a copy of 'Steve McCurry' by Anthony Bannon yesterday. The
bookseller went into a hymn of praise about the qu
>
> It's a classic "dip into" book. I must try to get an
> original copy; mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I
> suspect will not last much longer.
>
Déjà vu. I bought a copy of 'Steve McCurry' by Anthony Bannon yesterday. The
bookseller went into a hymn of praise about the quality o
Bob W wrote:
I shall have a look through that tomorrow - it looks fascinating.
It's a classic "dip into" book. I must try to get an original copy;
mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I suspect will not last much
longer.
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
Kevin, whadya' need a gun for? You have other options, sharp pointed
stick, a heavy club.
Hunting was done this way for centuries.
Now wildly veering off topic.
I was watching a doco last night about the Christian Coalition's
campaign to rid US airwaves of "morally indecent" TV & Radio. Anyway
On Jul 17, 2005, at 1:50 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
The English Mc Ds are particularly gruesome, they are much better
here not that
I indulge unless under duress.
I gave up on all that stuff about 4 years ago after deciding that I
was eating it too often, and it really wasn't that satisfying
This one time, at band camp, Bob Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was never keen on takeaway food before but that's me finished, for ever.
Thats why I am a vegetarian. Or suedo Vege..
ei. I won't eat anything I have not killed myself. And I rarely get the
opportunity or inclination to ou
From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
those who are "pissed eagles" are safe either in armored cars, or in the
middle of nowhere. pretty convenient.
This is an error in logic commonly called a "Hasty generalization" (Secundum
quid).
Land Rovers are not (commonly) armored and mine is factory st
A number of upscale eateries, including one somewhat toney place in NY, the
name of which I've forgotten, serve upscale versions of White Castle Burgers,
or "sliders" as their commonly called. The combination of the sauted onions,
thin burger, and pickle slice can be quite goood when prepared ju
I shall have a look through that tomorrow - it looks fascinating.
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You might like thi
not very
good.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in Englan
J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in England
wasn't even close, and I'm not a big fan of McDonnalds.
That's why you go to Mickey D's. Known Quality Assurance programs. Bob S.
On 7/16/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry in Houston wrote:
>
> > < > Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
> > Regards, Bob S.>>
> >
> > Last time I was in London I bought a coupla hambu
White Tower hamburgers were better. Same size on a round bun (actually they
were bigger (3 bites). 12 for a buck. But those were walk in fast food places
for pedestrians (You stopped off after getting off the trolly and carried them
the rest of the way home) When the last pedestrian died they w
One of the things about the fast food chains like McD is they are supposed to
get all their food from the franchiser. But having worked in one for a week
once I can tell you that that box of meat goes in and out of the freezer for
many a day. Be glad they over cook everything.
graywolf
http://
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
White Castle burgers were often called "belly bombs" . But what can
you expect for an 8-cent burger (yes, that's what they cost at one time!)
Shel
Yeah, 8¢, but remember they were not much bigger than a 50¢ piece!
More than once I got their 6 for a quarter, or whatev
Jerry in Houston wrote:
<>
Last time I was in London I bought a coupla hamburgers
at a roach coach outside the British Museum gad,
they made Mcdonalds seem great .
Same for hamburgesas in Guatamala
Interesting story on British TV this week. A guy goes to ten fast food
outlets
White Castle burgers were often called "belly bombs" . But what can
you expect for an 8-cent burger (yes, that's what they cost at one time!)
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
> Anyone who considers McDonalds to be the nadir of bad hamburgers
> has never sampled the culinary d
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 06:12:42AM +0100, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
> >Are you sure about that?
>
> Yes.
Anyone who considers McDonalds to be the nadir of bad hamburgers
has nev
On 16 Jul 2005 at 8:55, Bob W wrote:
> As far as burgers themselves are concerned, probably not, but I've only had 2
> or
> 3 McDonalds' burgers in my life. It's not an experience I subject myself to
> willingly.
>
> We have a chain called Wimpy which preceded McD by many years, and they were
>
On 16/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
>or the one out by the round-a-bout?
Oh, there's a small one near the TV studio in Abingdon. The class of
student they have in there beggars belief. I think one of the
So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
or the one out by the round-a-bout?
(Just remember, if there's time to lean, there's time to clean.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/16/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
ut they have a certain crappy Englishified charm. But all
> the crap that McD brought to bear around the burgers was a whole new level
> of grue entirely.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
> > -Original Message-
> > Wrom: TFJMVRESKPNKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBGD
re or less identical to
Roman liquamen.
What you had in England before McDonalds was probably a Wimpy - not very
good.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject
mentaries shown
about them, and their food hygiene standards are simply disgusting.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerry in Houston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2005 05:31
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Definitions
>
> < B
ROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2005 01:32
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> I think he's saying maybe McD's didn't make it worse.
>
On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Just off to my job interview at the local McD's :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
>Are you sure about that?
Yes.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
<>
Last time I was in London I bought a coupla hamburgers
at a roach coach outside the British Museum gad,
they made Mcdonalds seem great .
Same for hamburgesas in Guatamala
Jerry in Houston
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Cotty,
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Wasn't that one of the slogans early on?
WW
Cotty,
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/15/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
>
> I concede.
>
> McDonalds.
>
>
>
>
> C
On 7/15/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >that you better shut up, talking about "collateral damage".
>
> Or what
or you miay find it difficult to cope if (god forbid) someone close to you
becomes one. i think this is a really lame euphemism for "kids we killed
and don't gi
entax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
that you better shut up, talking about "collateral damage".
mishka
On 7/15/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ever been one?
>
> There's alot I ha
unfortunately, it's people who are very unhappy with the current situation
who are paying the consequences. like in nyc, london and madrid.
those who are "pissed eagles" are safe either in armored cars, or in the
middle of nowhere. pretty convenient.
mishka
On 7/15/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTEC
nal Message-
> From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> ever been one?
>
> mishka
>
> On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ever hear of colateral damage?
> >
> > Kenneth Waller
I think he's saying maybe McD's didn't make it worse.
Regards,
Bob...
-
"The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:10
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/
He didn't say hamburgers, he said McDonalds. Hamburgers have been around
since the Roman Empire.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 July 2005 00:10
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT OT OT --
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
I wish I'd thought of that!
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
>
> I concede.
>
> McDonalds.
Freedom is not free and it's not a capital asset. Each generation must pay
its price for liberty. We took the hit with Pearl Harbor and our merchant
marine took the hit supplying Briton during WWII. We were aware that the
consequences of stopping Hiro Hito and Hitler would be the taking of
hund
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
No one here is whining. We're mad as hell AND doing something about it -
and we're not asking your permission - and we're never going to. Get use
inister of finance to French King Louis XIV
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
- Original Message ---
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Exactly what is it about what any other country allied with the USA which
is really not their own responsibility and choice?
Uhh Bob, you guys tie a lo
Ah... right...
From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What I fear as an Australian is not so much the Taliban, Al Queada etc
it is America. Look at countries that have been allies of the USA in
the past. They look rather bleak now when they were so well before
being allied to the USofA[sic]
Believe what you want to believe.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These effe
>ever been one?
There's alot I haven't been.
What's your pount?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller &
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These effects (killing of noncombatants in Baghdad) were secondary to the
> intended action (ridding the country of Saddam government).
All for a few drops of oil, unless you really believe the WMD story.
> I don't believe
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Damn, Willie! I'd only hate ya for 90 seconds. My attention span isn't any
longer...
What were we arguing about?
Were we arguing?
William Robb
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ever hear of colateral damage?
>
> Kenneth Waller
one who wants to kill others and doesn't mind killing
himself in the process.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> - Original Message -
&
h the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: L
sible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT --
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
You're being obtuse, Willie. Try just saying what you think.
I have too many friends of the American persuasion on list (you included, oh
Bombastic
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Thats when a suicide bomber kills 18 children to get the 3 servicemen he was
after, right?
William Robb
tion of killing
innocents.
Sorry, but in war things get broken and people are killed (sometimes innocent
people).
Sorry if my message wasn't clearly stated.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS
unt of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The word
Hmm...
So you are saying that the Americans chose to instill terror in the
noncombatant Iraqi populous by targeting and destroying innocents such as
children, students, and the general Iraqi population irrespective of their
politics concerning Sadam's regime, and it was America's intention to
of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
The word "terrorist" is used to
This one time, at band camp, "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The word
> "terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to instill terror in a
> noncombatant populous by destroying innocents such as children, students,
> and or a general population regardless of their populous. I
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
The word "terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to instill
terror in a noncombatant populous by destroying innocents such as
children
"The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
- Original
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:06:46 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
> The word "terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to
> instill terror in a noncombatant populous by destroying innocents
> such as children, students, and or a general population regardless
> of their populous. It's a function of
possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
- Original Message -
From: "D. Glenn Arthur Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bomb
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't want to get involved in this argument can you guys please take
it off list.
Hopefully, it's run it's course.
William Robb
Hi!
> that's *exactly* what i meant.
>
> best,
> mishka
Natural'no. V konce koncov u nas odin i tot zhe assembler :-).
Translation: Naturally. After all we share the same assembly :-)
Guys, Bill, Paul, et al, please take your very discussion off-list. Thanks.
--
Boris
> Paul
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:59 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Message - Wrom: GVCJVTLBXF
> > Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
> >
> >
> >> I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:32, William Robb wrote:
> We've seen what you do to countries that you consider a threat.
or not
On 7/13/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Wrom: NKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBG
> > Date: 2005/07/13 Wed AM 03:25:23 GMT
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
> >
> > I wa
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
