...@redwoodhorses.com wrote:
It's the nuance!
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Rick Womer
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 6:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Film Day 3
Steady Stenquist lives! The subject's face is sharp
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that there are three controls: Focus, aperture, shutter speed.
Full automation is great but after a while it becomes tedious. Chimp,
see what the camera is doing, decide if I need exposure comp, make
sure the camera is focusing on
On Feb 24, 2013, at 6:06 AM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
One is constantly involved with the ~camera~ and less on the photograph.
Too true, and a philosophy that's applicable to many other areas of life.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
But digital has helped me up my keeper ratio - compared to slides - since I
can get I very good handle on the exposure - thank you histogram + RAW.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: Film
Steady Stenquist lives! The subject's face is sharp, but there is motion blur
in her hands. Nicely done, nicely rendered. There =is= something about film,
besides the nuisance...
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
It's the nuance!
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Rick Womer
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 6:41 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Film Day 3
Steady Stenquist lives! The subject's face is sharp, but there is motion
blur
I like all three. Good shots and a classic feel to them. :-)
Of the three, this one is the one I'd suggest a minor edit: just pull
down the toe end in the curves as the blacks are a little weak.
Otherwise I think you've caught the native rendering quality of that
era's Summicron.
Is this the
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Film Day 3
Thanks Frank. Had a good time shooting film. And I gave the old Leica a bit of
exercise. I have an equally old Agfa folder that is also in need of a workout.
On Feb 22, 2013, at 9:18 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
My
Thanks. I'll take a second look at the blacks.
The lens is the Summicron 50/2 Collapsible. It's in very nice shape, aside form
the aperture being a bit stiff. With frequent use it loosens up. Certainly one
of the best LTM lenses. I also have the Summaron 35/3.5, while not quite the
equal of the
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Old cameras are so much fun! Quite liberating, actually. Digital
becomes oppressive after a while. The simplicity of a mechanical film
camera is refreshing.
Could you expand on that? My perception is that digital is way simpler.
--
Hugs
I believe what Frank is saying is that an older film camera without meters,
autofocus or other electronic embellishments is in itself simple and
straightforward. The function of the machine is rewarding. Using it correctly
is not necessarily easy, but that's part of the fun as well. I take
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Old cameras are so much fun! Quite liberating, actually. Digital
becomes oppressive after a while. The simplicity of a mechanical
On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Old cameras are so much fun! Quite liberating, actually. Digital
-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Film Day 3
On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:09 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 23, 2013, at 10:15 AM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Old cameras
Nice collection of shots, Paul. This one is my favorite. There's
something fun about going out with a film camera, taking 24 or 36
exposures, and not knowing for sure what you have till they get developed...
Mark
On 2/22/2013 1:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A coffee shop pic. Again, the Leica
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Thanks. I'll take a second look at the blacks.
The lens is the Summicron 50/2 Collapsible. It's in very nice shape, aside
form the aperture being a bit stiff. With frequent use it loosens up.
Certainly one of the
On Feb 23, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
wrote:
Thanks. I'll take a second look at the blacks.
The lens is the Summicron 50/2 Collapsible. It's in very nice shape, aside
form the
My favourite of the three. The Leica was made for this!
;-)
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Sent: February 22, 2013 2/22/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Film Day 3
A coffee shop pic. Again, the Leica iiif RD and
Thanks Frank. Had a good time shooting film. And I gave the old Leica a bit of
exercise. I have an equally old Agfa folder that is also in need of a workout.
On Feb 22, 2013, at 9:18 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
My favourite of the three. The Leica was made for this!
;-)
Cheers,
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A coffee shop pic. Again, the Leica iiif RD and Summicron 2.0. This
one at f4, and converted to BW from the Portra 400 original.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16959392size=lg
After the shooting I've been doing this week with a K-5, I'm
20 matches
Mail list logo
