List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
I'm talking about the DA 12-24, which is a very fine optic and
probably better than both the K and A 15 primes.The DA 14/2.8 is
almost certainly even better. I'm also talking about the upcoming
DA* lenses, which may well be better than any
se kind of trades.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 12:50 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor
Annie probably clubbed her upside the head a few times too many:-).
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Supposedly the rumour comes from one of Annie Leibovitz's assistants.
>
> -Adam
>
> Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> It's probably a rumor initiated by hand wringers and chicken littles
Supposedly the rumour comes from one of Annie Leibovitz's assistants.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> It's probably a rumor initiated by hand wringers and chicken littles.
> I'm sure there as many or more of both on the Canon side as there are
> on the Pentax side.
> Paul
> On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:2
On 3/2/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's probably a rumor initiated by hand wringers and chicken littles.
>I'm sure there as many or more of both on the Canon side as there are
>on the Pentax side.
Truly.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Past
It's probably a rumor initiated by hand wringers and chicken littles.
I'm sure there as many or more of both on the Canon side as there are
on the Pentax side.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:24 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>> On 3/2/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>> BTW: Can
Cotty wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> BTW: Canon is rumored to be considering a new lens mount for the
>> (supposedly 22-megapixel) 1Ds-III.
>
> ROTFL
>
That is the rumour. I put as much stock in that as you do though.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
On 3/2/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>BTW: Canon is rumored to be considering a new lens mount for the
>(supposedly 22-megapixel) 1Ds-III.
ROTFL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 04/02/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This debate goes nowhere ... it has gone around and around too many
> times already.
It's called a discussion, part of the reason most of us are here I've
venture to suggest.
> Take pictures instead.
Surely I can converse with my PDML b
I'm talking about the DA 12-24, which is a very fine optic and
probably better than both the K and A 15 primes.The DA 14/2.8 is
almost certainly even better. I'm also talking about the upcoming
DA* lenses, which may well be better than any of the FA lenses ever
produced. They will certain
On Feb 3, 2007, at 2:29 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> If Pentax had delivered a 6-8MP body with the functionality of the
> K10D but significantly improved noise, DR and sensitivity over the
> existing 6MP bodies do you think it would have been the short term hit
> that the K10D has?
>
> Do you
On 04/02/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would have to auto crop to 10 t0 12 megapixels to make me and
> other DA lens owners happy.
If Pentax had delivered a 6-8MP body with the functionality of the
K10D but significantly improved noise, DR and sensitivity over the
existing 6MP
It would have to auto crop to 10 t0 12 megapixels to make me and
other DA lens owners happy. Which means it would have to be a full
frame sensor on the order of the top of the line camera, which means
it would be a $6000 camera. All of that is reason to believe it won't
happen. But I'll be
On 04/02/07, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really hope your wrong Bill.
So do I, a FF sensor under a K-mount with DA lens detection and the
potential to auto-crop to 6-8 MP APS would be near ideal.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
pport full frame. Perhaps they will
>> support 1.3 crop, which would be find. But full frame ain't gonna
>> happen. The cards have already been dealt.
>> Paul
>> On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:08 AM, William Robb wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message --
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor tomorrow, I'd weigh whether I
>needed it and what lenses I'd need to support it. Then buy them if I
>felt there was an advantage.
>
>The K10D and *ist DS would still be working so I wouldn't be 'stranded'.
Of course. All this ta
William Robb wrote:
>I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have
> a 645 mount.
I think just the opposite: 645 mount is dead.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 10:34 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage" Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> Your probably
dont believe this will be the case at all.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 9:57 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
No.
If Pentax were to go to a larger se
Not rational at all, see my last post.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 10:46 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Whoa, wait a minute Godders. That way too
hey don't support full frame. Perhaps they will
> support 1.3 crop, which would be find. But full frame ain't gonna
> happen. The cards have already been dealt.
> Paul
> On Feb 3, 2007, at 11:08 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
> >
> > - Original Message -
&g
They probably know where they think they are headed. The question is,
who will do the thinking in the future.
--
Bruce
Friday, February 2, 2007, 9:16:32 PM, you wrote:
DIS> On 03/02/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If Pentax was going to go full frame, they wouldn't be discont
My dick is big enough already. ]'-)
G
On Feb 3, 2007, at 7:46 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Whoa, wait a minute Godders. That way too rational for the PDML. When
> are you going to learn? We want to see some hand wringing and sensor
> envy. :-))
> Paul
> On Feb 3, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi
obb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Savage"
> Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
>>>
>>> I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will
>>> have a 645
>>> mount.
>>>
>>> Willia
On 2/4/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Savage"
> Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
> >>
> >> I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have a 645
> >> m
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage"
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>>
>> I expect any larger than APS-C sensor cameras from Pentax will have a 645
>> mount.
>>
>> William Robb
>
> I really hope your wrong Bill.
>
Think of t
On 2/4/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Savage" Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
> > Your probably right.
> >
> > If Pentax ever go the 35mm FF route they'll probably do what Ni
Whoa, wait a minute Godders. That way too rational for the PDML. When
are you going to learn? We want to see some hand wringing and sensor
envy. :-))
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> No.
>
> If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor tomorrow, I'd weigh whether I
> neede
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage" Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
> Your probably right.
>
> If Pentax ever go the 35mm FF route they'll probably do what Nikon has
> done, WRT supporting APS lenses.
>
I expect any larger than APS-C sensor camer
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
>, I might buy some DA type
> lenses I cant get otherwise like an extreme wide or extreme wide zoom,
> but thats about
> it for me.
Thats pretty much what I am doing.
With one
No.
If Pentax were to go to a larger sensor tomorrow, I'd weigh whether I
needed it and what lenses I'd need to support it. Then buy them if I
felt there was an advantage.
The K10D and *ist DS would still be working so I wouldn't be 'stranded'.
All the DA lenses I've purchased have performed
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 04:16:32PM +1100, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 03/02/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If Pentax was going to go full frame, they wouldn't be discontinuing
> > all their full-frame lenses. All the new lenses on the horizon are
> > DA. That's a clue as to
Paul Stenquist
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:57 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
If Pentax was going to go full frame, they wouldn't be discontinuing
all their full-frame lenses. All the new lenses on the horizon are
DA. That's a clue as to where
Your probably right.
If Pentax ever go the 35mm FF route they'll probably do what Nikon has
done, WRT supporting APS lenses.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/3/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't abandon a new product line. Takeover or no. I've been there.
> Paul
> On Feb 3, 2007, at 12
What are you after?
I have a couple of lenses that I'd be willing to part with.
Cheers,
Dave
On 2/3/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total at KEH,
> Ebay looks to have been picked over like last week's kill, and nothing at
>
gt; David Savage
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:46 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
>
>
> On 2/3/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Aren't any of you guys even the least bit concerned
> > that if/whe
You don't abandon a new product line. Takeover or no. I've been there.
Paul
On Feb 3, 2007, at 12:16 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 03/02/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If Pentax was going to go full frame, they wouldn't be discontinuing
>> all their full-frame lenses. All
On 03/02/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Pentax was going to go full frame, they wouldn't be discontinuing
> all their full-frame lenses. All the new lenses on the horizon are
> DA. That's a clue as to where Pentax is headed.
I seriously doubt Pentax really knows where it's head
wise like an extreme wide or extreme wide zoom,
> but thats about
> it for me.
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> David Savage
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:46 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss
otherwise like an extreme wide or extreme wide zoom,
but thats about
it for me.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:46 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
On 2/3/07, J
A lens, you are taking somewhat of a risk
> that you might seriously regret it later arent you?
>
> JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:17 PM
> To: P
I'm thinking about selling my K85/1.8. It might bring enough to fund
a 77 limited or a DA 70.
Paul
On Feb 2, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> Yup, Pentax's success with the K10D and K100D has lenses flying off
> the shelves.
>
> I'm selling my Zenitar 16/2.8 FE, Pentax-A Rear Converte
On 2/3/07, J. C. O'Connell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aren't any of you guys even the least bit concerned
> that if/when Pentax goes to an affordable FF digital slr you will be
> stranded with a bunch of DA lenses that cant do FF?
Slightly, but I don't let that stop me if the DA has a feature th
Hey Cory! How much do you have?
I am real real close to a final decision to sell the following classics:
FA* 80-200/2.8 (may already be spoken for)
A 100/2.8 macro
A 20/2.8
Would these satisfy your lens lust for a week or two?
Stan
On Feb 2, 2007, at 5:28 PM, cbwaters wrote:
> Man, the lens p
No.
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'"
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:01 PM
Subject: RE: NO FS this Friday?
> Aren't any of you guys even the least bit concerned
>
arent you?
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 9:17 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: NO FS this Friday?
Yup, Pentax's success with the K10D and K100D has lenses flying
- Original Message -
From: "cbwaters"
Subject: NO FS this Friday?
> How's a guy supposed to enable himself these days?
>
>
I buy new ones
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Yup, Pentax's success with the K10D and K100D has lenses flying off
the shelves.
I'm selling my Zenitar 16/2.8 FE, Pentax-A Rear Converter 2x-S, and
might sell the FA135/2.8 if I convince myself that the DA50-200/4-5.6
handles my need for a long lens well enough.
I'm in the "purge" part of
Some times, plastic is NOT our friend.
DaveWe're number 3, we're number 3 etc
On 2/2/07, John Whittingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total
> > at KEH, Ebay looks to have been picked over like last week's kill,
> > and nothing at a
> Man, the lens pickens are SLIM... There's like three lenses total
> at KEH, Ebay looks to have been picked over like last week's kill,
> and nothing at all offered on the PDML... How's a guy supposed to
> enable himself these days
Blame the K10D, selling like hot cakes in the UK, Canon might
You could treat yourself with a new FA* 600/4
Already have one? Ok, buy another for backup.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
cbwaters
Sent: 3. februar 2007 00:28
To: Pdml@pdml.net
Subject: NO FS
201 - 251 of 251 matches
Mail list logo
