From: Cotty
On 5/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a little concerned about his focus accuracy with that rig. His HD
screen was very good, and since we were dealing with room interiors, he
shot mostly with wides, including some with a 17mm fisheye (which is
almost
On 4/3/11, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I sort of think the whole DSLR video is going to be a passing fad.
Agree, but now that video is part of the design, it won't disappear.
It'll still be there, and in some ways that's not bad as it represents a
cost-effective way to get into
On Mar 5, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 4/3/11, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I sort of think the whole DSLR video is going to be a passing fad.
Agree, but now that video is part of the design, it won't disappear.
It'll still be there, and in some ways that's not bad as
On Mar 5, 2011, at 5:32 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 4/3/11, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
I sort of think the whole DSLR video is going to be a passing fad.
Agree, but now that video is part of the design, it won't disappear.
It'll still be there, and in some ways that's not bad as
Oh, I wouldn't be giving up on cell phone cameras just yet.
I think they already took market share from the PS cameras,
and everybody carries one! Why carry 2?
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Mar 5, 2011, at 2:32 AM, Cotty wrote:
On
On 5/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wish you were here!
Rates on request !
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On 5/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a little concerned about his focus accuracy with that rig. His HD
screen was very good, and since we were dealing with room interiors, he
shot mostly with wides, including some with a 17mm fisheye (which is
almost rectilinear on an APS
On Mar 5, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 5/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm a little concerned about his focus accuracy with that rig. His HD
screen was very good, and since we were dealing with room interiors, he
shot mostly with wides, including some with a 17mm
It's not you're rates it's your shipping costs...
On 3/5/2011 10:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 5/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wish you were here!
Rates on request !
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!
--Marvin the Martian.
That should be ...your rates... Spell checkers make illiterates of us all.
On 3/5/2011 12:37 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
It's not you're rates it's your shipping costs...
On 3/5/2011 10:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 5/3/11, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Wish you were here!
Rates on
Just like marriage -
Its not the cost of acquisition, its the upkeep.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: DSLR video
It's not you're rates it's your shipping costs
If you want to hear some interesting perspectives on DSLR video
capture, Gale Tattersall (the person behind the shooting of that
episode of House made with the Canon 5D II) was interviewed by
Ibarionex Perello on The Candid Frame podcast very recently. You can
get the MP3 from here:
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
I've bought a
highly recommended book on the subject of DSLR video capture ...
haven't had much time to read it yet, but it looks good skimming
through it: From Still To
On Mar 4, 2011, at 11:37 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Paul Stenquist
Airborne and on my way home from producing a one-day video shoot in
Atlanta. The shooter I worked with used a Canon T2i DSLR with a
7-inch HD monitor mounted atop. (This was another job where I didn't
get to hire the
AFAIK Sony has an APS-C video camera just as Panasonic has a 4/3 one.
FF is a possibility (mount allows for it) nut nothing more than rumors AFAIK.
2010/9/23 Cotty cotty...@mac.com:
I know some of you are interested in the video functions of your DSLRs,
Pentax or otherwise. The video camera
The Sony is much less capable than the Panasonic, but you can actually
buy the Sony. It's essentially a NEX-5 in a camcorder body with more
control over video and no RAW option for stills.
The Panasonic is essentially going to be a GH2 in a camcorder body,
likely with more video control and
On 27/4/10, Walter Hamler, discombobulated, unleashed:
Saw a post somewhere the other day that the final episode of House
for this season has been filmed using a Canon DSLR. The reason was
stated as wanting to explore the limited depth of field that was
available with some of the Canon lenses. ??
Informed sources have told me that many of the recordings for the
upcoming Eurovision Song Contest (finals in Oslo in May) will be done
with DSLRs. The stated reason is a certain fashion for shallow depth
of field in videos. The rumor also told about complications from
codec- and file format
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Just sayin.
CW
On 4/27/2010 11:31 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Today during my nonlinear dynamics lab, the Development Office sent
two people over to get video for a capital campaign DVD.
Interestingly, they used a Canon 5D. They
On 27 April 2010 11:42, Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Just sayin.
CW
Maybe they were filming for Mime TV.
Just sayin...
--M.
--
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A
I might have a bias...This is my office:
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/Other/Single-Shots/2793835_9yqag#333453567_nmtG6
CW
On 4/27/2010 11:44 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 27 April 2010 11:42, Cory Waterscbwat...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Just
DSLRs like the Canon 5D Mk II create seriously good video for the
money that can take advantage of interchangeable lenses. The two main
downsides are ergonomics and (as noted) sound. A second system is
required for good sound. The camera's rudimentary sound is left on to
provide a reference track
Remember the application. They only want footage, over which they
will dub a voice over and/or music.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Just sayin.
CW
On 4/27/2010 11:31 AM, Steven
Tell that to Douglas Fairbanks, (never mind, he's dead).
On 4/27/2010 11:42 AM, Cory Waters wrote:
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Just sayin.
CW
On 4/27/2010 11:31 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Today during my nonlinear dynamics lab, the Development Office
On 27/4/10, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Couldn't put it better :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
DSLR's have their place now in filmmaking (yes I know it's not film, but
programme-makers still affectionately refer to the process as
filmmaking, including this one) it is true - but there are limitations.
If you're reading this thread then you will also find this article
interesting:
I joke about this only being a development DVD but they are trying to
raise a quarter billion USD.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 27/4/10, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sound without video is radio. Video without sound is broken.
Couldn't put it
From: Steven Desjardins
Today during my nonlinear dynamics lab, the Development Office sent
two people over to get video for a capital campaign DVD.
Interestingly, they used a Canon 5D. They said that, as long as they
didn't need sound, the DSLRs were more than adequate. I'm just
reporting not
On 27/4/10, John Sessoms, discombobulated, unleashed:
K-7 manual says it will record monophonic sound in camera and you can
plug any commercially available stereo microphone that has a 1/8 inch
stereo connector into the camera for stereo recording.
Don't the Canon's record sound?
Recording
On 28/04/2010, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
Recording unbalanced audio through 3.5mm jacks is not proper audio
recording. You might as well shoot the video and then show it underwater.
Oh it's fine over a short distance and absolutely no problem with
these pre-amplified hot shoe mounted mics.
On 28/4/10, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Oh it's fine over a short distance and absolutely no problem with
these pre-amplified hot shoe mounted mics. Balancing only reduces
cable induced noise, a bad balanced mic pre-amp can sound worse than a
good unbalanced system.
Well, you kn ow
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 28/4/10, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Oh it's fine over a short distance and absolutely no problem with
these pre-amplified hot shoe mounted mics. Balancing only reduces
cable induced noise, a bad balanced mic pre-amp
On 27/4/10, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
One advantage to only shooting video of drunken engineers is that
nobody actually wants to hear them.
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
Saw a post somewhere the other day that the final episode of House
for this season has been filmed using a Canon DSLR. The reason was
stated as wanting to explore the limited depth of field that was
available with some of the Canon lenses. ??
I have been watching the TV guide so as to record it
34 matches
Mail list logo