I particularly like the old mill - I think I might have said that when I
saw them on facebook :-)
ann
On 10/24/2017 11:32 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
After more fumbling around i loaded up some shots from this weekend
and it still takes me a while to remember how to find the file number
to share.
Nicely done, David
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:32 AM, David J Brooks
wrote:
> After more fumbling around i loaded up some shots from this weekend
> and it still takes me a while to remember how to find the file number
> to share.Arg.
>
Nice set. I agree with Larry.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: David J Brooks
Sent: 24 October, 2017 5:32 PM
To: Pentax Discuss
Subject: Peso;s late fall
After more fumbling around i loaded up some shots from this weekend
and it still takes me a while to remember how to find the file n
David J Brooks wrote:
After more fumbling around i loaded up some shots from this weekend
and it still takes me a while to remember how to find the file number
to share.Arg.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18431836/
Old church in Salerm Ontario
https://www.photo.net/photo/18431835/
Old church i
Very nice, Dave!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 24, 2017, at 8:32 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
>
> After more fumbling around i loaded up some shots from this weekend
> and it still takes me a while to remember how to find the file number
> to share.Arg.
>
>
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/184
That "Boattail" design was popular in the 1930s. Auburn and Duesenberg
were big in that design.
-p
On 10/9/2016 4:17 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Kinda fun ... the odd thinga bout that car is the back looks like a front
ann
On 10/9/2016 1:52 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Well, It's a rainy day, and
Kinda fun ... the odd thinga bout that car is the back looks like a front
ann
On 10/9/2016 1:52 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
Well, It's a rainy day, and I started screwing around with the updog
app interface to dropbox, just to see what I could get away with,
without doing too much work. I've got
> On 29 July 2016 at 01:27 Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On July 28, 2016 4:34:20 PM PDT, Ken Waller wrote:
> >>> > I just try to enjoy the heron now.
> >>>
> >>> That's just ducky.
> >>
> >> Except that the final bill can be eye-watering.
> >
> >I hope this is your swan song on this matter.
>
> Are
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- Tree of Egrets
Are you trying to bring us down?
eider that or I'm trying to feather the flames
On July 28, 2016 4:34:20 PM PDT, Ke
ng on this matter.
Are you
>
>
>Kenneth Waller
>http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "mike wilson"
>Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- Tree of Egrets
>
>
>>> On 28 July 2016 at 00:27 Ken Waller wrote:
>>>
> I just try to enjoy the heron now.
That's just ducky.
Except that the final bill can be eye-watering.
I hope this is your swan song on this matter.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
S
> On 28 July 2016 at 00:27 Ken Waller wrote:
>
>
> > I just try to enjoy the heron now.
>
> That's just ducky.
Except that the final bill can be eye-watering.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Larry Colen"
> Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- Tree
I just try to enjoy the heron now.
That's just ducky.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- Tree of Egrets
P.J. Alling wrote:
Would one prefer a sea of regrets, or, a tree
P.J. Alling wrote:
Would one prefer a sea of regrets, or, a tree of egrets?
I just try to enjoy the heron now.
I couldn't decide which I liked better so I'll inflict both on the group.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20treeofegrets.html
https://dl.dropboxuser
The first photo for me, but not by
much.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 27, 2016, at 3:04 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> on
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
The interior for me... and that is one I'm very familiar withgoing way
way back
ann
On 9/14/2015 12:54 PM, Donald Guthrie wrote:
Like both those photos and caught the Tri-X look right away. The
interior one is may favorite. love the you are there feel.
On 9/14/15 8:30 AM, pdml-requ...@pdml.n
Both are excellent - great graphics in the first and excellent mod in
the second. Apparently not a crowded train
On 9/13/2015 2:40 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I had to take the last train out of New Haven CT a couple of nights
ago, and decided to make a photographic virtue out of necessity.
It
Both very cool shots! I especially like the interior.
>From another era. Good choice to go monochrome. And very well rendered, too!
Cheers,
frank
On 13 September, 2015 2:40:40 PM EDT, "P.J. Alling"
wrote:
>I had to take the last train out of New Haven CT a couple of nights
>ago,
>and decid
Saves on the Electric Bill...
JJ McA
On Sep 14, 2015, at 12:29 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> I like the pics--both are very evocative.
>
> Since Conrail snuffed it years ago, you must be referring to
> Connecticut Shore Line East as the operator. I've seen (and heard, and
> smelled) a few of their tr
I like the pics--both are very evocative.
Since Conrail snuffed it years ago, you must be referring to
Connecticut Shore Line East as the operator. I've seen (and heard, and
smelled) a few of their trains go by, and all three senses indicated
that they were diesels. Why they should be running dies
Dropbox is doing the XSS scripting thing that pisses off NoScript again.
NoScript users will have to do an "unsafe reload" to see the images.
The third one is just not found - Error (404)
Nice doggie.
On 12/17/2014 8:15 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I was digging through some old files and came acros
On 12/18/2014 10:32, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
sad photo of the diner! another one bites the dust :-(
No! As I understand it, the diner is being renovated.
good! I couldn't read the signs in the photo. That should change
tomorrow w
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> sad photo of the diner! another one bites the dust :-(
No! As I understand it, the diner is being renovated.
https://www.facebook.com/themilforddiner
http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Fundraisers-cooked-up-to-restore-Milford-Diner-300957
sad photo of the diner! another one bites the dust :-(
Vinny looks like a Vinny, alright :-)
and doggie is sweet.
ann
On 12/17/2014 21:53, P.J. Alling wrote:
Alright that was the wrong URL this should do it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20milforddiner.html
It is Milford CT. There are a number of old diners in a number of towns
that I haven't visited lately that might or might not be neglected or
being restored. There was one in Middletown CT where I ate a central
Connecticut "delicacy", (steamed hamburgers), for the first time 12
years ago that
Alright that was the wrong URL this should do it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20milforddiner.html
On 12/17/2014 9:44 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20dogportrait.html
On 12/17/2014 9:41 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20dogportrait.html
On 12/17/2014 9:41 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Firefox returned a 404 error on the first two that I was able to get around,
but the 404 on the third one seems insurmountable.
Rick
On Dec 17, 2014, at 8:15 PM, P.J. Alli
Firefox returned a 404 error on the first two that I was able to get around,
but the 404 on the third one seems insurmountable.
Rick
On Dec 17, 2014, at 8:15 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> I was digging through some old files and came across this one. It was fairly
> underexposed, people are amazed
For some reason the formatting codes disappeared this should fix it.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20---%20milforddiner.html
On 12/17/2014 8:45 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
All are very fine images. Black dogs are very difficult to
photograph, but you make it look easy,
All are very fine images. Black dogs are very difficult to
photograph, but you make it look easy, and of course I am please to
see the dines and to hear it is being restored. I assume this is the
one in Milford, CT, rather than the one in PA, DE or NJ.
(BTW, the link in your post is brokent; I
Love the 1st one, PJ. Cheers, Christine
On Oct 3, 2014, at 6:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> But three views. I always blow out the highlights, even dialed in -2 stops
> of exposure.
>
> The first two are about 1/2 to 2/3 frame crops.
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%2
;
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> To: "PDML"
> Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:05:55 AM
> Subject: Re: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
>
> Spot metering on the body would yield a bird that's 18 percent gray. Of
> course it
rom: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 11:05:55 AM
Subject: Re: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
Spot metering on the body would yield a bird that's 18 percent gray. Of course
it's easy to bring out the white in conversion. But spot metering is not a
> - Original Message -
> From: "P.J. Alling"
> To: "PDML"
> Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 9:37:27 AM
> Subject: Re: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
>
> Matrix Metering was what I used.
>
>> On 10/3/2014 11:14 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
Alling"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 9:37:27 AM
Subject: Re: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
Matrix Metering was what I used.
On 10/3/2014 11:14 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> I've noticed, Paul, that in recent years you've had better luck reducing
> c
k reducing
>>>> clipped whites.
>>>> I agree that matrix metering would help.
>>>>
>>>> Jack
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>> From: "Paul Stenquist"
>>>> To: "PDML"
>&
#x27;ve had better luck reducing
clipped whites.
I agree that matrix metering would help.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 4:44:02 PM
Subject: Re: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
Odd. I use the full matrix
I've noticed, Paul, that in recent years you've had better luck reducing
>> clipped whites.
>> I agree that matrix metering would help.
>>
>> Jack
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Paul Stenquist"
>> To: &quo
"PDML"
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 4:44:02 PM
Subject: Re: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
Odd. I use the full matrix metering on both the k-5 and k-3 when shooting
egrets, and I haven’t blown one out in recent years. Generally, white objects
will slightly underexpose because a dumb mete
Both are good photos but the first one really stands out for me - the
way the bird is positioned against the darker band cutting diagonally
through the grass works really well.
Mark
On 10/3/2014 7:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
But three views. I always blow out the highlights, even dialed in -2
I've noticed, Paul, that in recent years you've had better luck reducing
clipped whites.
I agree that matrix metering would help.
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 4:44:02 PM
Subject: Re: PESO(s) I
Excellent image, all of them. The background really makes the birds stand out.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:05 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> But three views. I always blow out the highlights, even dialed in -2 stops
> of exposure.
>
> The fi
The highlights look acceptable to me - you've not lost much in the feather
detail that would be interesting.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
But three views. I always b
Odd. I use the full matrix metering on both the k-5 and k-3 when shooting
egrets, and I haven’t blown one out in recent years. Generally, white objects
will slightly underexpose because a dumb meter considers them neutral. I’ve
shot them both against a bright sky and against dark water and shrub
P.J. You don't indicate the focus metering. Could it have been other than spot?
Jack
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2014 4:05:11 PM
Subject: PESO(s) I have but one Egret...
But three views. I always blow out the highlights, even dialed in
Dan,
You could pull back the highlights a bit in Lightroom.
Some parts of the flower are a bit blown out.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16969678
>
> Comments and criticisms invited.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16969678
> Comments and criticisms invited.
That's a nice shot, but because I'm slightly red/green colorblind, it's
harder for me to separate the flower/leaves. You seem to not be into
photoshopping, but th
Interesting viewpoint, Frank. It's a step in the right direction,
that's for sure.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 5:18 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> Haven't shown a subway shot for a while:
>
> http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2013/02/s.html
Thanks, Don!
Glad you enjoyed.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Don Guthrie
Sent: February 21, 2013 2/21/13
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO - S
I saw it on your blog and it made me wonder..just wonder. I am waiting
for the other shoe to drop. Tension. Now I wonder why I
I saw it on your blog and it made me wonder..just wonder. I am waiting
for the other shoe to drop. Tension. Now I wonder why I like it but I do.
pdml-requ...@pdml.net wrote:
Message: 13
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:18:27 -0500
From: frank theriault
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - S
M
Thanks kindly, Derby.
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
>
> I'm late, and lots of comments already, but...so lovely, especially the
> transition of the tones to white.
>
>
>
> On 5/12/2012 1:00 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last Mar
I'm late, and lots of comments already, but...so lovely, especially the
transition of the tones to white.
On 5/12/2012 1:00 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/8243508238/lightbox/
K20D, DA* 50-135mm/2.8 @
-Original Message-
From: Gerrit Visser [mailto:gerrit...@gmail.com]
Sent: December 4, 2012 7:15 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: PESO - "S"
I did see the subtle difference but for some reason I was drawn there which
was probably not your intention.
Well, I
t; Jack
> From: Bruce Walker
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 3:33 PM
> Subject: Re: PESO - "S"
>
> Jack, I've been studying a lot of B&W studio work lately. Here I was
> going for an almost abstract look -- outlines, areas of (a
Subject: Re: PESO - "S"
Jack, I've been studying a lot of B&W studio work lately. Here I was
going for an almost abstract look -- outlines, areas of (almost) solid
tones, skin pale, hair dark, etc. So I cranked the whites way up and
the darks way down, leaving the midtones almost
Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent: December 4, 2012 6:38 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - "S"
Basically, yeah, the faint tonal differences are intentional. But my first
cut had more separation; the version you saw had been tweaked to push the
whites right up close to 100% which
I prefer the B&W version, it seems more absolute or binary.
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent: December 4, 2012 6:33 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - "S"
Jack, I've been studying a lot
Thank you, Frank!
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:31 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Beautiful, aptly titled and perfectly rendered.
>
> Like a great deal!
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: Bruce Walker
> Sent: December 4, 2012 12/4/12
> To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Krisjanis Linkevics
wrote:
>> Great pose. Looks great on my new monitor :-) Did you decide not to add
>> bit more distinction between left arm and the background?
>>
>> Gerrit
>>
>> I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
>>
>> http://www.flickr.c
Workin' on it! :-)
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/8243508238/lightbox/
>>
>> K20D, DA* 50-135mm/2.8 @ 95mm/f:7.1, 1/1
Thanks, Walt!
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> Might check your monitor calibration? On my calibrated IMac there is
> plenty of separation and it looks really great.
>
> Walt
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Gerrit Visser wrote:
>> Great pose. Looks great on my new moni
Basically, yeah, the faint tonal differences are intentional. But my
first cut had more separation; the version you saw had been tweaked to
push the whites right up close to 100% which flattened the tone curve
near the top. I backed that off and restored the original version once
again, so have a l
Jack, I've been studying a lot of B&W studio work lately. Here I was
going for an almost abstract look -- outlines, areas of (almost) solid
tones, skin pale, hair dark, etc. So I cranked the whites way up and
the darks way down, leaving the midtones almost empty.
There _is_ definition in the light
Beautiful, aptly titled and perfectly rendered.
Like a great deal!
cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Bruce Walker
Sent: December 4, 2012 12/4/12
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Subject: PESO - "S"
I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
http://www.flickr.com/br
On Dec 4, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/8243508238/lightbox/
>
> K20D, DA* 50-135mm/2.8 @ 95mm/f:7.1, 1/125th, ISO 100.
> Lr 4.2, Ps CS5, Imagenomics Portraiture, Nik Silver Efex Pro 2.
I too lose definition in the area of her left shoulder. Also troubling is
the featureless dress.
Like the pose.
Jack
From: Bruce Walker
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:00 AM
Subject: PESO - "S"
I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
htt
> Might check your monitor calibration? On my calibrated IMac there is
> plenty of separation and it looks really great.
>
> Walt
Hmm, true, this will teach me not to comment on pictures based on what I see on
the work monitor.
kris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
, 2012 9:44 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - "S"
Might check your monitor calibration? On my calibrated IMac there is plenty
of separation and it looks really great.
Walt
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Gerrit Visser wrote:
> Great pose. Looks great on my new monito
Might check your monitor calibration? On my calibrated IMac there is
plenty of separation and it looks really great.
Walt
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Gerrit Visser wrote:
> Great pose. Looks great on my new monitor :-)
> Did you decide not to add bit more distinction between left arm and the
> Great pose. Looks great on my new monitor :-) Did you decide not to add
> bit more distinction between left arm and the background?
>
> Gerrit
>
> I'm visiting my neglected to-do list. One from last March.
>
> http://www.flickr.com/bruce_m_walker/8243508238/lightbox/
>
> K20D, DA* 50-135mm/2.
Great pose. Looks great on my new monitor :-)
Did you decide not to add bit more distinction between left arm and the
background?
Gerrit
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
Sent: December 4, 2012 9:00 AM
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List
Su
I love the wheels shot especially, but they're both very good. The
detail in the mechanism is wonderful. I'm just a gear-head I guess.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:29 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> No the PUG isn't rejecting submissions, at least not that I know of, no
> these are images I rejected, but
012 2/6/12
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: re: PESO[s] Railroad related PUG rejects
P.J. I like the wheel just fine and can make no complaint about
composition or crop. Thanks for posting this one.
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:29:23 -0500
> From: "P. J. Alling"
&
P.J. I like the wheel just fine and can make no complaint about
composition or crop. Thanks for posting this one.
Message: 8
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:29:23 -0500
From: "P. J. Alling"
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO[s] Railroad related PUG rejects
Message-ID: <4f2eca83.7070...@gma
A little irony, perhaps, but a bit rusty as well.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:29 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> *More than a little irony in that, Whot?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm
PJ,
I especially like how the steam locomotive's wheel show. This is
always hard to show being black on black. Being old and faded
probably helps, but you still did a fine job.
The 1890's swing bridge looks good. We have one of similar vintage in
Rock Island, Illinois. I'd suggest including som
I like the image of the wheels very much.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 1:29 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> No the PUG isn't rejecting submissions, at least not that I know of, no
> these are images I rejected, but still thought I'd show just bec
I prefer the first one, but I like machinery shots.
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Well I have a slight preference for the close-up but they are both PUG
> worthy I think
>
> ann
>
>
> On 2/5/2012 13:29, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>
>> No the PUG isn't rejecting submissions, at
Well I have a slight preference for the close-up but they are both PUG
worthy I think
ann
On 2/5/2012 13:29, P. J. Alling wrote:
No the PUG isn't rejecting submissions, at least not that I know of, no
these are images I rejected, but still thought I'd show just because...
I haven't been all t
On 11/20/2011 8:52 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I think 1719 is an #outstanding# photo, with just the right amount of motion
blur in all the right places.
Generally a terrific gallery.
Thank you very much.
And for those wondering:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/6365377055/in
I think 1719 is an #outstanding# photo, with just the right amount of motion
blur in all the right places.
Generally a terrific gallery.
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen
Sent: November 20, 2011 11/20/11
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: PESO s
On Nov 20, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> The timing in the first one is fantastic, Larry. Very nicely done there.
> Not sure about the 2nd one; I'm not against the motion blur, but not sure the
> action of the 3 people in the frame is compelling enough.Cheers, Christine
Tha
One thing I might add is maybe crop out the flowers on the right. Just a
thought. Ignore if doesn't suit you. Cheers, Christine
On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> As I mentioned in last night's Aaarrgghh post, our dojo is in the middle of
> belt tests. I look at my photogr
The timing in the first one is fantastic, Larry. Very nicely done there. Not
sure about the 2nd one; I'm not against the motion blur, but not sure the
action of the 3 people in the frame is compelling enough.Cheers, Christine
On Nov 19, 2011, at 11:35 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> As I menti
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:57 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Saw this globular lamp at dusk when it's inner glow was just barely overcame
> the light of slightly overcast sky, so I did a couple of studies. I kind of
> like it. Converted to B&W mainly due to the mixed lighting with color
> balance all o
Like Ann, I prefer the staircase, which is an effective image with a
strong mood.
Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Both are effective, but the street light really works.
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:57 P
hmmm - I really prefer the staircase myself. and I missed it the first
time I saw Pete's post..
ann
On 8/8/2011 09:38, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Both are effective, but the street light really works.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:57 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Saw this globular lamp at dusk when it's
Both are effective, but the street light really works.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 2:57 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Saw this globular lamp at dusk when it's inner glow was just barely overcame
> the light of slightly overcast sky, so I did a couple of studies. I kind of
> like it. Converted to B&W mai
I like the lamp. Cheers, Christine
On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:57 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Saw this globular lamp at dusk when it's inner glow was just barely overcame
> the light of slightly overcast sky, so I did a couple of studies. I kind of
> like it. Converted to B&W mainly due to the mixed
From: Toralf Lund
'Evening all,
There is a certain way of rendering (if that's the right word) water that
seems to have been fashionable for a while. Not sure if I'm a great fan
myself, but I still had to try something similar myself. The results are in:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=20
Not bad if you like purple rocks and brown water.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Toralf Lund wrote:
> From: Toralf Lund
> Subject: PESO(s): Granfoss
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, June 10, 2011, 5:43 PM
> 'Evening all,
>
> There is a certain way o
Those are fine Images, Toralf. Where is Granfoss?
Dan
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> 'Evening all,
>
> There is a certain way of rendering (if that's the right word) water that
> seems to have been fashionable for a while. Not sure if I'm a great fan
> myself, but I still
On 6/11/11 0:18, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Very nice, if you like your water that way...
Well, like I said, I'm not sure - but thanks!
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
'Evening all,
There is a certain way of rendering (if that's the right word) water that
On 6/11/11 0:20, Jack Davis wrote:
I think there will always be a place for the "silk ribbon" waterfall effect,
but it had become such a cliche'.
Precisely!
Well done however, Toralf.
Thanks.
- Toralf
Jack
--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Toralf Lund wrote:
From: Toralf Lund
Subject: PESO(s): Granf
I think there will always be a place for the "silk ribbon" waterfall effect,
but it had become such a cliche'.
Well done however, Toralf.
Jack
--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Toralf Lund wrote:
> From: Toralf Lund
> Subject: PESO(s): Granfoss
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Friday, June 10, 20
Very nice, if you like your water that way...Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> 'Evening all,
>
> There is a certain way of rendering (if that's the right word) water that
> seems to have been fashionable for a while. Not sure if I'm a great fan
> myself, b
Christine Aguila wrote:
HI Bulent: Village would be my favorite--a nice job of showing the
isolated village, and canyon 7 is nice, but of those, canyon 4 would
be my favorite because of the angle. You seem to be low to the water
surface there and it makes for an interesting shot. Cheers, Ch
HI Bulent: Village would be my favorite--a nice job of showing the isolated
village, and canyon 7 is nice, but of those, canyon 4 would be my favorite
because of the angle. You seem to be low to the water surface there and it
makes for an interesting shot. Cheers, Christine
- Original
Steve,
Thank you for your comments and I am pleased for your interest in our flora.
In fact, the biologically strategic position of Anatolia through ages
has made it a rather uniqe place.
You may want to have a look to the below Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flora_and_vegetation
On 2011-05-31 15:39 , Bulent Celasun wrote:
Hello All,
I have recently visited a rather secluded part of Eastern Anatolia:
we have an interesting synchronicity, Bulent -- yesterday morning i
photographed the flowers of tanacetum albipannosum in my garden, and
looked up info on the species i
1 - 100 of 425 matches
Mail list logo
