I really like this one. It is pleasant to look at. The composition turns
something rather ugly into something pretty. (The dominating mills have the
rotor blades in sync!)
But I have one problem. My browser adapts the size of image. I'm using 1024
x 768. That's convenient, but it creates some
Hi!
Come to think of it, it will even open Pentax RAW images, in the PEF
format. I found a plugin for Windows somewhere on the internet which
extends Windows and adds support for the PEF format. I would recommend
it to any Windows XP user with a Pentax digital camera. I can even look
at a
At 11:38 PM 10/30/2005, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
double-click on that new icon on my desktop and it opens the pic in a
simple picture-viewing utility
On 10/30/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was in manual
exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were at least a stop
and a half too hot. What this tends to do apart from the obvious is turn the
sky a
Great picture. Loved it. I would like to see the picture in color also just to
understand what you discuss here, if possible. It looks just great in
BW though.
No problems with size since I use a 1600x1200 monitor.
Where were you standing when you took this picture? Obviously not on the
ground
On 31 Oct 2005 at 13:47, Gaurav Aggarwal wrote:
Great picture. Loved it. I would like to see the picture in color also just to
understand what you discuss here, if possible. It looks just great in BW
though. No problems with size since I use a 1600x1200 monitor. Where were you
standing when
After seeing what you had to work with I'm impressed.
Nice shot.
Dave
On 11/1/05, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Oct 2005 at 13:47, Gaurav Aggarwal wrote:
Great picture. Loved it. I would like to see the picture in color also just
to
understand what you discuss here, if
Cotty wrote:
On 30/10/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it
Excellent composition. The tonal values are nice here to my eye.
Paul
On Oct 30, 2005, at 7:25 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was in
manual exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were at
least a stop and a half too hot.
Hi Rob ...
BW seems like a good way to present this photo. Good choice. The subject
and location looks like it would offer a lot of possibilities, although I'm
not sure that you caught the best possibility with this shot. However,
the problem here is that the image is way too big to fit on my
On Oct 30, 2005, at 4:25 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was
in manual exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which
were at least a stop and a half too hot. What this tends to do
apart from the obvious is turn the sky a very
I really like it, nice tones and composition.
Regards
Albano
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that
the camera was in manual exposure mode and in a rush
shot off five frames which were at least a stop and
a half too hot. What this
Hi!
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was
in manual exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were
at least a stop and a half too hot. What this tends to do apart from
the obvious is turn the sky a very icky turquoise colour, so rather
than completely
Rob Studdert wrote:
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I forgot that the camera was in manual
exposure mode and in a rush shot off five frames which were at least a stop
and a half too hot. What this tends to do apart from the obvious is turn the
sky a very icky turquoise colour, so
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Rob ...
BW seems like a good way to present this photo. Good choice. The subject
and location looks like it would offer a lot of possibilities, although I'm
not sure that you caught the best possibility with this shot. However,
the problem here is that the
On 30/10/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
On Oct 30, 2005, at 17:05, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that for
a number of reasons having to do with my
eyesight. I used to have it at 800 x 640,
but I was missing tons of stuff that way.
Both Internet
You'd have to right click on the pic. and save it to the desktop but it
would work about the same way.
Cotty wrote:
On 30/10/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
I have this problem, too --
my monitor is set at 1024 x 768 - I can't make it
any finer than that
My monitors
Hi!
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
double-click on that new icon on my desktop and it opens the pic in a
simple picture-viewing utility application as large as the screen will
allow,
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: PESO Silk purse or sows ear?
Hi!
My monitors are 1024X768 as well. What I do on a Mac is drag the pic
straight from the web browser window and drop it onto the desktop. Then I
double-click on that new icon on my desktop
G'day Rob.
Mate, I like it...2 thumbs up.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Grafton
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 30 October 2005 11:25 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO Silk purse or sows ear?
Another pic from my trip. Bad bad Rob, I
21 matches
Mail list logo
