[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you see yourself saying 'I'd the Largest Mocha Frap, please' and still
say yes when they ask 'With cream?' :-)
Cheers,
Ryan
As I don't hang around Starbucks often enough to remember their oddball names,
I generally tell them "your smallest size" and they say "Tall!"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Alling posted:
Starbucks uses that for marketing,
Starbucks The rest of the World
TALL== Small
GRANDE == Medium
VENTE(SP?) == Large
or else Starbucks only sells one size since they all more or less
-
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 7:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Use of the word 'classic'.
>
>
>
> > What, I wonder, is wrong with a simple:
> > Large
> > Larger
> > Largest
> >
> > ?
> >
> > ERN
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Peter Alling posted:
> >
> >>Starbucks uses that for marketing,
> >>
> >>Starbucks The rest of the World
> >> TALL== Small
> >> GRANDE == Medium
> >> VENTE(SP?) == Large
> >>
> >>or else Sta
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 08:19:03 +1000, Ryan Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you see yourself saying 'I'd the Largest Mocha Frap, please' and still
> say yes when they ask 'With cream?' :-)
>
Well, that's why I like my favourite espresso bar, Toronto's Jet Fuel.
Lattes, mochas and the like, com
Can you see yourself saying 'I'd the Largest Mocha Frap, please' and still
say yes when they ask 'With cream?' :-)
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 7:38 AM
Subject: Re:
On 21/10/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>What, I wonder, is wrong with a simple:
>Large
>Larger
>Largest
>
>?
>
>ERN
and also:
'Just a tad larger than the largest Medium but not quite as large as the
smallest Large'
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Plac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Alling posted:
Starbucks uses that for marketing,
Starbucks The rest of the World
TALL== Small
GRANDE == Medium
VENTE(SP?) == Large
or else Starbucks only sells one size since they all more or less
Peter Alling posted:
> Starbucks uses that for marketing,
>
> Starbucks The rest of the World
>TALL== Small
> GRANDE == Medium
> VENTE(SP?) == Large
>
> or else Starbucks only sells one size since they all more or less
> tra
Keith Whaley wrote:
Words don't have much meaning any more, do they? It falls in line with
an increasing lack of respect by those in the first 1/3 of their
allotted life span.
Superlatives have long since attained mediocrity status. Little or no
need for the word anymore, in fact!
When one has a
Starbucks uses that for marketing,
Starbucks The rest of the World
TALL== Small
GRANDE == Medium
VENTE(SP?) == Large
or else Starbucks only sells one size since they all more or less
translate into large.
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
When
Hi,
> When one has a group of 4 increasing larger, let's say coffee,
> containers and the smallest of the group is called "Giant," well, all
> comparison is lost, isn't it.
A good way to market condoms, perhaps. As for coffee, the smallest (or
perhaps I should say 'least large') servings are gia
so let's see Pentax Spotmatic, K2, KX, MX, LX, Nikon
FM*etc.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:26:33 -0700
Subject: Re: Use of the word 'classic'.
> Words don'
Keith Whaley wrote:
> Words don't have much meaning any more, do they? It falls in
> line with an increasing lack of respect by those in the first
> 1/3 of their allotted life span.
> Superlatives have long since attained mediocrity status.
> Little or no need for the word anymore, in fact!
> W
Words don't have much meaning any more, do they? It falls in line with
an increasing lack of respect by those in the first 1/3 of their
allotted life span.
Superlatives have long since attained mediocrity status. Little or no
need for the word anymore, in fact!
When one has a group of 4 increasi
Welcome to the wonderful world of digital electronics.
Malcolm Smith wrote:
When I think of the word 'classic' in connection with cameras, I immediately
think of anything M42 or perhaps K2s & other early bayonette fitting
equipment. I was quite surprised in the 16.10.04 edition of Amateur
Photograp
Well, in the car world there are:
Special Interest Cars --fairly new but are interesting,
Classic Cars --20+ years old,
Veteran Cars --30+, &
Vintage Cars --40+
Or at least those were the ages specified back in the 50's when that meant
classics were from the 30's, Veterans the 20's, and Vintage th
It is a much debased term today -- an in "the first annual
Bulwer-Lytton/William Robb photographic cliché classic."
I didn't run the contest for this year's cliché PUG, so perhaps that
makes it an emeritus classic.
Joe
To me "classic" has always implied the presence of
either a significant or enduring innovation or the
initial component introduction.
A word blasphemed as a selling tool.
--- Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Things used to last, to be a sense of joy and pride
> for many years as our
> po
Things used to last, to be a sense of joy and pride for many years as our
possessions became "classics". Digital equipment has changed all the rules.
Once upon a time, we might have said, "This is 70's era equipment!" or
"Those Speed Graphics were used by the great photo journalists of the
'40's."
Don't know about the formal definition, but some advertising lines
certainly are instant classics ;-). I'm still recovering from the
"Official digital camera of the Internet" slogan in that other thread
(and, in fact, wonder whether Al Gore approved of that statement -
given he's the Inventor
Don't know about the formal definition, but some advertising lines
certainly are instant classics ;-). I'm still recovering from the
"Official digital camera of the Internet" slogan in that other thread (and,
in fact, wonder whether Al Gore approved of that statement - given he's the
Inventor
I thought it generally assumed (no rule) that a 'Classic' was 25 yrs+, as an
example the MX would be a classic. Or am I thinking of 'Vintage'?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: "Malcolm Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:33:25 +0100
Su
23 matches
Mail list logo
