Well, that amazes me. I don't hold out much hope for the US Navy.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 November 2005 12:32
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img
http://www.gcn.com/16_29/news/32083-1.html
http://www.gcn.com/17_17/news/33727-1.html
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 5:42 AM
Subject: RE: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
o its own location. The resulting
strike killed the user and three comrades."
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 November 2005 01:23
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re:
Agreed.
But then, Mozilla Firefox is going up for months now.
I don't think 10% marketshare should be ignore now.
In some countries, 5% in others 25%.
Do what you want but personnaly, if a company shop website doesn't
work with firefox, I do NOT switch browser. I switch company.
Was my 2 cents ;
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
Well what would you say of the security
of the free world depending upon Bill Gates software was?
We can blame the loss of freedoms on Bill Gates and his software?
William Robb
tems crashed, taking a few
other Window systems with it.
Herb
- Original Message - From: "Joseph Tainter"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
Once when I flew out
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
I believe it.
Blue screen error... hehehehehe.
Maybe you can blame all the collateral damage on Bill Gates.
William Robb
In a message dated 11/19/2005 2:52:21 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
some of the navigation systems on US warships run on Windows. there was a US
guided missile cruiser that was disabled for a few hours because one of its
important Windows systems crashed, taking a few other
inter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
Once when I flew out of Heathrow I looked up at the usual bank of screens
showing the status of arriving and departing flights. At the very
>
> I've seen that at many places. It's just the passenger
> information system; not stuff that is really important.
> OTOH, I know someone who has been working on the new UK air
> traffic control system. Apart from having the total UK
> system in one building, which is scary enough, his st
On Nov 19, 2005, at 9:55, Joseph Tainter wrote:
So when you land at congested Heathrow, the world's busiest
airport, remember that the place runs on Windows.
"... and I'm so worried about the baggage retrieval system they've
got at Heathrow"
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson
[EMAIL PR
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:55:16AM -0700, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>
> My experience with IE is equally poor. Seems that all virus type
> attacks/spyware/adware/etc all trigger off IE. I rarely use it for
> anything, unless there are no alternatives and I must visit that site
> (a ra
http://daimyo.org/bsod/
more BSODs
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: IE bashing --> was Re: full size img taken w/12-24
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005,
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 19, 2005, at 7:55 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Once when I flew out of Heathrow I looked up at the usual bank of
screens showing the status of arriving and departing flights. At the
very end of this row of monitors one showed a blue screen that read:
"This pro
On Nov 19, 2005, at 7:55 AM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Once when I flew out of Heathrow I looked up at the usual bank of
screens showing the status of arriving and departing flights. At
the very end of this row of monitors one showed a blue screen that
read: "This program has performed an ille
Bruce wrote:
My experience with IE is equally poor. Seems that all virus type
attacks/spyware/adware/etc all trigger off IE. I rarely use it for
anything, unless there are no alternatives and I must visit that site
(a rare occurrence).
--
Once when I flew out of Heathrow I looked up a
:51
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> When I saw you had left your last name out of your sig, ILMAO.
>
> (Just in case? I made up the zero thing on the spur of the moment just
> to get back at Tim for bringing my name into this threa
less (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17. november 2005 00:09
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: full size
after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17. november 2005 00:09
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> No, no, Frank is the list scapegoat. We b
ge crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16. november 2005 16:58
To: PDML
Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
LOL ... On the basis of that rationale, why did you buy a Pentax
Because he had to, or else use Canon "Coke" Bottles.
Cotty wrote:
On 16/11/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
why would Cotty go
through all the trouble to convert his favorite Pentax lenses to
Canon mount? ;-)
Erp, because *I can* ??
=-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/
On 16/11/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>why would Cotty go
>through all the trouble to convert his favorite Pentax lenses to
>Canon mount? ;-)
Erp, because *I can* ??
=-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottys
On Nov 16, 2005, at 10:13 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
I think you are playing dirty here. The result is the same from a
Pentax as
from a Canon, after conversion.
Um, no. I have both. Canon lenses are not Pentax lenses and have
different rendering characteristics. Otherwise, why would Cotty go
My experience with IE is equally poor. Seems that all virus type
attacks/spyware/adware/etc all trigger off IE. I rarely use it for
anything, unless there are no alternatives and I must visit that site
(a rare occurrence).
It will be interesting to see if Microsoft chooses to ignore this
problem
sage-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16. november 2005 16:58
> To: PDML
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> LOL ... On the basis of that rationale, why did you buy a Pentax? ;-)
>
> Yes, IE is here. So is doggie poo. Doesn't m
At 10:15 AM 11/16/2005, you wrote:
On Nov 16, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Netscape did the trick. Wish I knew what's going on.
Thanks for giving the obvious tip Godfrey.
Glad that worked. Internet Explorer is junk.
Godfre
At one point, the US government actually issued a statemen
LOL ... On the basis of that rationale, why did you buy a Pentax? ;-)
Yes, IE is here. So is doggie poo. Doesn't mean I want either of them
in front of me on my desk. Both stink.
Godfrey
On Nov 16, 2005, at 7:50 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Rant warning:
IE may be junk, but it is what most people
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16. november 2005 16:16
>
On Nov 16, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Netscape did the trick. Wish I knew what's going on.
Thanks for giving the obvious tip Godfrey.
Glad that worked. Internet Explorer is junk.
Godfre
Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15. november 2005 19:39
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> Try using a different browser. Netscape, Firefox, Opera ...
>
> Godfrey
>
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:3
It's a electrical extension cord from a retractable reel. I suspect
they plug the truck in to keep various pieces of equipment & batteries
charged.
Dave
On 11/16/05, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very nice shot.
> BTW: Why is there a string from th car atatched to a beam in the roof?
>
i have actual rez images shot with other 12-24 lenses you can compare with.
these are low compression images and are 2-3MB in size.
Sigma 12-24/4.5-5.6 - sharpened and levels, but no CA removed
http://www.herbchong.com/Temp/IMGP5150.jpg
Nikkor 12-24/4 DX - sharpened, levels, and CA removed
h
It was on a tripod, mirror lock-up. But I have upsized the image to 6k
x 4k, so you can see the details better, that may be why the smaller
details may be a little soft. I am going to post a RAW (DNG) image
tonight for all to download.
rg
Andre Langevin wrote:
> > http://www.g0nz.com/imag
Thanks Jos.
rg
Jostein wrote:
There's one in the mail coming your way now.
Jostein
- Original Message - From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: full size img taken w/12-24
I'm using IE6.0.2
This
There's one in the mail coming your way now.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Øsleby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 6:53 PM
Subject: RE: full size img taken w/12-24
I'm using IE6.0.2
This looks like a dead end. If you hav
-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
The page with the jpg. It loads, but I can't see the picture.
The URL is http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
There's no HTML page associated. It's simply a JPEG file. C
freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15. november 2005 19:26
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 10
On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
The page with the jpg. It loads, but I can't see the picture.
The URL is http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
There's no HTML page associated. It's simply a JPEG file. Clicking on
that link should open a new browser window and then, dependi
rgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15. november 2005 18:51
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> What page? It's just a JPEG file.
>
> Godfrey
>
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 9:25 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
>
> > Let me add
On Nov 15, 2005, at 9:34 AM, Andre Langevin wrote:
> > http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> > Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
> > It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
> levels + WB fixing, so its not totally raw
> > its 1.4Mb so it might take its time to load
Low-righ
Original Message-
> From: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15. november 2005 18:33
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> I dont know what to tell you Tim, I just tried it from my work machine
> and it loaded. Maybe your ISP is n
e power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15. november 2005 16:07
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: full size img taken w/12-24
The URL is found, but I'm not
> > http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> > Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
> > It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
> levels + WB fixing, so its not totally raw
> > its 1.4Mb so it might take its time to load
Low-right corner: shouln't "Texas" be sharper? Was the camera
scuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: full size img taken w/12-24
The URL is found, but I'm not able to see the picture. And the expand to
full size button is visible.
I don't understand.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very free
r guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 15. november 2005 16:07
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: full size img taken w/12-24
>
> The URL is found, but I'm not able to see the picture. And the expand to
> full size butto
I upres-ed it so it would be a little magnified to allow for closer
examination. I will post a RAW image when I can determine if my
server/ISP has the bandwidth to support the downloads.
rg
Bob Sullivan wrote:
How come this shows as a 6100x4100 pixel jpeg on my screen here?
Did you up-size
On Nov 14, 2005, at 10:29 PM, Gonz wrote:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
Caveats:
It was too big so I had to compress to a somewhat lower quality jpg
than I wanted.
It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
levels + WB fixing, so its not totally r
The URL is found, but I'm not able to see the picture. And the expand to
full size button is visible.
I don't understand.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> ---
Boris Liberman wrote on 15.11.05 15:16:
> PS Raw Processing engine (whatever its name which I forgotten) allows
> you to up-size the image up to 25 MP. Rumour has it that this kind of
> up-sizing is the best.
This is not just a rumour Boris ;-) We are just preparing '07 calendar for
one of our key
Bob,
PS Raw Processing engine (whatever its name which I forgotten) allows
you to up-size the image up to 25 MP. Rumour has it that this kind of
up-sizing is the best.
HTH.
--
Boris
How come this shows as a 6100x4100 pixel jpeg on my screen here?
Did you up-size it somewhere in the process?
Have you got the new 24 megapixel sensor?
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/15/05, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WARNING WARNING WARNING!!
> __
>
>
> Not for the bandwidth
Thanks Gonz. Sharpness looks good in the corners. I think that lens is
a keeper .
Paul
On Nov 15, 2005, at 1:29 AM, Gonz wrote:
WARNING WARNING WARNING!!
__
Not for the bandwidth impaired
http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
On 15 Nov 2005 at 9:39, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> Rob Studdert wrote on 15.11.05 9:28:
>
> > That's very impressive, it's pretty darned good right into the corners, how
> > prevalent was the CA prior to the correction?
> No matter how low CA was, you won't ever buy limited circle DA lens Rob,
>
Rob Studdert wrote on 15.11.05 9:28:
> That's very impressive, it's pretty darned good right into the corners, how
> prevalent was the CA prior to the correction?
No matter how low CA was, you won't ever buy limited circle DA lens Rob,
will you? ;-P
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regar
Gonz wrote on 15.11.05 7:29:
> http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
>
> Caveats:
>
> It was too big so I had to compress to a somewhat lower quality jpg than
> I wanted.
> It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
> levels + WB fixing, so its not totally
On 15 Nov 2005 at 0:29, Gonz wrote:
> WARNING WARNING WARNING!!
> __
>
>
> Not for the bandwidth impaired
>
> http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
>
> Caveats:
>
> It was too big so I had to compress to a somewhat lower q
56 matches
Mail list logo
