John,
Did you just make that up...
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> Well, 60% of statistical information on the internet is made up on the spot.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On 12/2/2011 12:22 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: "P. J. Alling"
On 12/1/2011 9:16 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 30/11/2011 8:19 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bill you are a sadist, I wouldn't recommend Pentax Forums to my worst
enemy.
Masochist actually. I post there regularly.
They are a better sour
From: "P. J. Alling"
On 12/1/2011 9:16 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 30/11/2011 8:19 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bill you are a sadist, I wouldn't recommend Pentax Forums to my worst
enemy.
Masochist actually. I post there regularly.
They are a better source of obscure technical information than the
On 02/12/2011 9:58 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
They are a better source of obscure technical information than the
PDML though.
They do talk gear a lot. But I wonder how much of that obscure technical
information is correct and how much is simply made up. Sometimes it's
hard to tell the difference.
On 12/1/2011 9:16 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 30/11/2011 8:19 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bill you are a sadist, I wouldn't recommend Pentax Forums to my worst
enemy.
Masochist actually. I post there regularly.
They are a better source of obscure technical information than the
PDML though.
On 30/11/2011 8:19 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bill you are a sadist, I wouldn't recommend Pentax Forums to my worst
enemy.
Masochist actually. I post there regularly.
They are a better source of obscure technical information than the PDML
though.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Dear Friends,
Thank you all for your comments and suggestions.
It is, unfortunately, a little late to suggest asbstinence from
Pentaxforums; I am already a long time member ;)
Seriously though, thank you all (especially John) for insisting on the
fact even poor triggers should work; as this is no
On 11/30/2011 10:54 AM, William Robb wrote:
On 30/11/2011 8:56 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Mine (Aputure brand) synchs only at (and below) 1/60th of a second.
The Company web site was saying that they support Pentax (as well as
Canon on the same unit) up to a synch speed of 1/250th.
Pocket Wizar
I use Paul C. Buff CyberSync and they work fine with the K20D up to
1/180th sec. My old cheap Chinese (eBay special) radio triggers worked
fine with it too. They're just not very durable.
You should be able to get up to 1/180 sec with the K20D and *any* brand
of radio slave. I know Pentax does
On Nov 30, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
> Mine (Aputure brand) synchs only at (and below) 1/60th of a second.
>
> The Company web site was saying that they support Pentax (as well as
> Canon on the same unit) up to a synch speed of 1/250th.
>
> Pocket Wizards is rather too expensive
On 30/11/2011 15:51, mike wilson wrote:
On 30/11/2011 15:39, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Update:
A company representative has just sent me an email saying that they
do not support Pentax cameras.
Also, the (plain wrong) statements of support on their web site will
soon be removed.
He says they only s
On 30/11/2011 8:56 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Mine (Aputure brand) synchs only at (and below) 1/60th of a second.
The Company web site was saying that they support Pentax (as well as
Canon on the same unit) up to a synch speed of 1/250th.
Pocket Wizards is rather too expensive here.
Any others?
On 30/11/2011 15:39, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Update:
A company representative has just sent me an email saying that they
do not support Pentax cameras.
Also, the (plain wrong) statements of support on their web site will
soon be removed.
He says they only support C* and N* cameras.
Could you ple
On 30/11/2011 15:39, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Update:
A company representative has just sent me an email saying that they
do not support Pentax cameras.
Also, the (plain wrong) statements of support on their web site will
soon be removed.
He says they only support C* and N* cameras.
Could you ple
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Bulent Celasun
wrote:
> Update:
>
> A company representative has just sent me an email saying that they
> do not support Pentax cameras.
> Also, the (plain wrong) statements of support on their web site will
> soon be removed.
> He says they only support C* and N*
Mine (Aputure brand) synchs only at (and below) 1/60th of a second.
The Company web site was saying that they support Pentax (as well as
Canon on the same unit) up to a synch speed of 1/250th.
Pocket Wizards is rather too expensive here.
Any others?
Bulent
---
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Bulent Celasun
wrote:
> Update:
> He says they only support C* and N* cameras.
What are these, new cameras.:-)
Dave
>
> Could you please name a radio trigger who "does" support K20D and K5?
>
> Bulent
>
> -
On 30/11/2011 8:39 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Update:
A company representative has just sent me an email saying that they
do not support Pentax cameras.
Also, the (plain wrong) statements of support on their web site will
soon be removed.
He says they only support C* and N* cameras.
Could you p
Update:
A company representative has just sent me an email saying that they
do not support Pentax cameras.
Also, the (plain wrong) statements of support on their web site will
soon be removed.
He says they only support C* and N* cameras.
Could you please name a radio trigger who "does" support K
Thanks John,
>But it should trip the flash up to whatever the sync speed of the camera.
That is why I am surprised.
When I mount the mentioned flash units on the hot shoe, I can use the
1/180 second synch.
Strange!
Someone suggested that I might need fresh batteries; replacing the 12V
on the tra
From: Bulent Celasun
I have recently had a pair of radio triggers (Aputure brand) said to
be compatible with Pentax cameras.
Their declared that the synch speed is (up to) 1/250 second.
They seem to synch properly at only 1/60 second on both K20D and K5.
The units are also compatible with Canon
William, Larry, Stephen,
Thank you all for the responses.
I have tried a Sigma EF500 DG-ST and a Pentax AF280T; they both synch
at 1/60 and below.
Why is it that difficult to synch at a higher speed like, say, 1/125?
In this age of high tech for low price, I mean!
Thanks again :)
Bulent
---
I have seen similiar effects with chinese triggers a few years ago. But I found
that it also depends on the flash. If you have an ancient flash without TTL,
maybe even non-Pentax, try that also.
Steffen Zahn
Am 19.11.2011 um 22:50 schrieb Bulent Celasun :
> I have recently had a pair of radio
I find that the cheap flash triggers work up to about 1/100, over that and I
start losing a bit at the bottom of the frame.
I think it depends on the trigger, and the flash.
On Nov 19, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
> I have recently had a pair of radio triggers (Aputure brand) said to
On 19/11/2011 3:50 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I have recently had a pair of radio triggers (Aputure brand) said to
be compatible with Pentax cameras.
Their declared that the synch speed is (up to) 1/250 second.
They seem to synch properly at only 1/60 second on both K20D and K5.
The units are also
I have recently had a pair of radio triggers (Aputure brand) said to
be compatible with Pentax cameras.
Their declared that the synch speed is (up to) 1/250 second.
They seem to synch properly at only 1/60 second on both K20D and K5.
The units are also compatible with Canon cameras so I expect thei
26 matches
Mail list logo
