On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:06 PM, frank theriault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Guess I'm going to have to go with the redhead... :-)
>>
>> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_09/08_09_chalk/16.jpg
>
> Dear me, how
Actually, recent price reductions in OZ have now made the K200D very
competitive. It can be had for $A700 from a reputable dealer which is
considerably better than the $A1200 (approx) that it was listed for
originally.
I'm still aiming for the K20D but I haven't totally excluded the 200D
from con
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Joseph McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guess I'm going to have to go with the redhead... :-)
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_09/08_09_chalk/16.jpg
Dear me, how shocking!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bre
On Sep 8, 2008, at 04:39 , Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I've been grabbing all the Pentax MZ-era camera straps that I
> can find. Love those pockets, and those little nipples on the strap
> buckles are great for motor drive film cams (I need another one for
> the HexarRF). I
>I like nipples
MARK !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Derby Chang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Coming camera(s) : for thow who know, would you buy it?
> Lenses too? There's some nice ones on the roadmap I'
> I read a couple times already that in Eastern Europe, the K200D is
> selling like hot cakes.
True :) Here the K200D is the best price / value machine most of us can
get. Even if the price of the K200D is still high for most people... I
think the ultra-low budget compacts (which have IQ like a ph
Was no accident. 8-P
Jack
--- On Mon, 9/8/08, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Coming camera(s) : for thow who know, would you buy it?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date:
The price is indeed a bit steep although there seems to be quite
differences in different markets: the distibutors may be partly at
fault here.
I read a couple times already that in Eastern Europe, the K200D is
selling like hot cakes. In the US (and other places as well) it is
expensive regarding
Interesting choice of words.
>>> Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/8/2008 8:36 AM >>>
Nice grab!
Jack
--- On Mon, 9/8/08, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Coming camera(s) : for thow
The K200D is not enough camera for too much money. Apart from the
weather sealing the Sony A200 matches or exceeds it in every regard
(especially AF and buffer/fps) for around $200 less and the Nikon D80
is roughly the same price while far more camera. It's not a bad
camera, just a bad value (the o
Everything I've heard indicates something below the K200D. A K2000D per se.
-Adam
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adam, who said the new camera wasn't replacing K200D? :p
> According to current informations it would (supposedly) replace or
> compliment it b
Sure they would but I expect Hoya-Pentax to go that route more than before...
A least they do not market upgrade versions as full new versions
(read...Canon-like).
Personnaly, I do not think the K20D needs anything more than what it
has already. But the K200D or an intermediate model would be we
> Well the K200D could indeed receive an upgrade for a very good reason:
> the base camera is damn good (just a K10D with a couple features
> missing) but the buffer/fps really is a joke, espcieally the
> ridicullous buffer.
>
> Other than that the K200D is a very fine camera.
>
But wouldn't users
Well the K200D could indeed receive an upgrade for a very good reason:
the base camera is damn good (just a K10D with a couple features
missing) but the buffer/fps really is a joke, espcieally the
ridicullous buffer.
Other than that the K200D is a very fine camera.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:46 PM,
Why do K200D or K20D need a replacement? What Pentax _may_ need is
something lower than K200D or higher than K20D.
K200D Minus could be something like the Micro Four Thirds from Olympus.
Ergo a K bayonetted, interchangeable compact camera :P Like a Micro K.
K20D Plus could be FF camera
There are
I love how all the women are glaring at her... funny stuff.
CW
P. J. Alling wrote:
> We can tell
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_09/08_09_chalk/16.jpg
>
>
>
> Derby Chang wrote:
>
>> Lenses too? There's some nice ones on the roadmap I'd like to get.
>>
>> And I've been grabbing all t
Adam, who said the new camera wasn't replacing K200D? :p
According to current informations it would (supposedly) replace or
compliment it between K200D and K20D.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
P
Nice grab!
Jack
--- On Mon, 9/8/08, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Coming camera(s) : for thow who know, would you buy it?
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Monday, September 8, 200
We can tell
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/08_09/08_09_chalk/16.jpg
Derby Chang wrote:
> Lenses too? There's some nice ones on the roadmap I'd like to get.
>
> And I've been grabbing all the Pentax MZ-era camera straps that I can
> find. Love those pockets, and those little nipples on the
Frankly, the K200D is already low-end enough. The only way they could
go lower on a saleable body without completely crippling the camera is
to simply reintroduce the K100D Super updated with the new processing
software used in the K2 series bodies. Otherwise we'll end up with
something as uncompet
Well for what I know (which is nowhere near official, Pentax-Hoya
seems a lot more NDA guys than before and I'm not under NDA) it seems
this time some might want to upgrade their istDS (although doubt we
will see TTL or anything else than pentamirror).
Other than those two issues, it seems a nice
Yep, lenses too.
I have all my shooting needs covered already lens wise. Now I await a
body that will have a decent low light capable sensor in it.
But I'm not holding my breath while I wait for it.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/9/8 Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Lenses too? There's some nice ones on
Lenses too? There's some nice ones on the roadmap I'd like to get.
And I've been grabbing all the Pentax MZ-era camera straps that I can
find. Love those pockets, and those little nipples on the strap buckles
are great for motor drive film cams (I need another one for the
HexarRF). I like nippl
Until Pentax come out with a camera with specs & performance similar
to the Nikon D700, I'm not buying any more of their equipment.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/9/8 Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> For those who know about the new camera (I mean the small low-end one
> ;) ), do you feel like buying it?
>
> For those who know about the new camera (I mean the small low-end one
> ;) ), do you feel like buying it?
>
For those who don't know about the new camera... would you share some
information? :D
.t
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:11:37 +0200, "Thibouille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> For those who know about the new camera (I mean the small low-end one
> ;) ), do you feel like buying it?
>
> --
I'd need to know more but almost certainly not. I can't imaging
anything of lower spec than the K200D bei
26 matches
Mail list logo
