On Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:22:53 -0400, you wrote:
>You must work and live around a bunch of crooks or something.
>And your full of s**t on most of the rest by the way.
I'm simply describing facts as I know them, shitty as they are. Those
facts may or may not generalize to the entire population of U
r, William [OCDUS] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 11:37 AM
Subject: RE: More UPS Crap
> Kent Gittings wrote:
> > You must work and live around a bunch of crooks or something.
> > And your full of s**t on most of the rest by the
Kent Gittings wrote:
> You must work and live around a bunch of crooks or something.
> And your full of s**t on most of the rest by the way. [Snip...]
Gee, Kent -- and I thought Mick's shorts were on a little tight! Actually,
John Mustarde's experiences are similar to some of the rest of us who
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 15:46:05 -0400, "Mick Maguire"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Harris wrote:
>
> >Don't over generalize
>
> I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over
> generalization as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment
> very offensive >8-|
You me
Well, I have always insisted the the proper pronounciation of UPS (to mix
in another thread) is Oops!
But at least Oops can deliver to my house which Airborne Express insists
doesn't exist and returns all packages to the sender.
--graywolf
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
|
\/ |
\ /---+
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Harris
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More UPS Crap
Mick Maguire wrote
] |
(_/) ICQ: 48609010 |
\/ |
\ /---+
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Harris
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More UPS Crap
Mick
Mick Maguire wrote:
> I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over generalization
> as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment very offensive >8-|
Huh? The Harriet reference is, perhaps, not PC. And maybe it can be
construed as insulting, condescending or many other
ng something to
a police station.
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:38 PM
Subject: Re: More UPS Crap
> > Rodger Whitlock wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Actual
In a message dated 10/18/01 5:18:15 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< >One solution might be to have UPS packages delivered to a business
address.
<< Sssshit, that's the worst method of all. >>
LOL! Maybe we're just "lucky" here. City of 100,000 in an economically
de
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:14:46 EDT, you wrote:
>One solution might be to have UPS packages delivered to a business address.
Sssshit, that's the worst method of all. The UPS driver most assuredly
know the names of several people at your business address who can sign
for packages, and has probably
Last week my 400mm f5.6 SMC-A arrived from the USA with USPS EMS, insured up
to $500 for $38.75 from the USA to the UK. We were not at home, so they left
a card in the mail box, with a phone number. I called them I wanted to pick
the item up, but they couldn't stop it for another delivery attempt.
Robert Harris wrote:
>Don't over generalize
I don't think that Rodger Whitlock's comment was so much over generalization
as misogyny! I for one found the "Harriet" comment very offensive >8-|
Regards,
/\/\ick...
++
||
__/) Mick
> Rodger Whitlock wrote:
>
>
> > Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in
common: they
> > deliver to residential addresses during the day when no
one's at
> > home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went
to work
> > and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet w
Rodger Whitlock wrote:
> Actually, all the delivery services have one problem in common: they
> deliver to residential addresses during the day when no one's at
> home. Doing so was fine back in the fifties when Ozzie went to work
> and Harriet screwed the delivery man, but Harriet went to w
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 11:03:57 +0200, Norman Baugher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ranted:
> William Robb wrote:
> > I got a reply from UPS regarding that shipment that they left
> > with my neighbor.
> > The gist of it is that they leave the decision about whether to
> > deliver to the addressee or ju
> Here is my bitch list:
(list of problems deleted)
The main reason I don't use UPS stems from one (long) incident.
My wife was returning to the East Coast to attend the wedding of
one of the girls from her Girl Scout troop. She had been asked
to make the wedding cake. This involved some amou
And after a UPS inside job relieved my repaired LX from a box sent by Pentax
CO, UPS has now marked my house a security risk, and won't leave anything
anywhere unless they actually have someone from inside the house sign for it
in person. That is really annoying, as I'm never home when they choos
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One solution might be to have UPS packages delivered to a
business address.
> It need not be your own business, but one with which you make
arrangements to
> accept deliveries for you. You'll need to use their address
rather than your
> own
They made that decision because it was cheaper to pay the insurance on
lost or stolen stuff than to have the driver try and return to do their
job, which is supposed to be delivering packages to the intended
recipient...
Norm
William Robb wrote:
> I got a reply from UPS regarding that shipment t
20 matches
Mail list logo