Re:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0318.htm
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0321.htm
The juniper trees in the foregrounds are probably 300 to 400 years old.
It's hard to find a sizeable one in Navajo country that doesn't have axe
marks in it.
Heading to the same
Hi!
Ok, so it is not really a matched pair, but the same mitten twice.
These were both taken near the same time. I'm trying to decide which
I like better. It would be nice to get opinions on what you like, if
any.
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/monumentvalley_0318.htm
http://www.daytonphoto.c
, 2005 7:43 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - Pair of Mittens
I do appreciate the feedback. The polarizer was set to show as much
separation of cloud and sky as possible. I don't know if that would
have an opposite effect on the plants, but I would guess that they
would gain the same benefit. Pe
The first has too much going on, distracting, a snap to record you being
there.
The second is more interesting, but I believe a lower perspective, with the
foreground stump 'competing' with the mittens would be a stronger image.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[E
Well, so far, it is certainly unanimous that the second is better than
the first. Shooting info on the second one:
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4, handheld, polarizer
ISO 200, 1/90 sec @ f/13, 26mm focal length
date/time: 6/16/2005 @ 2:16:09 pm
I do appreciate the feedback. The polarizer was set to sh
On 7/18/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so it is not really a matched pair, but the same mitten twice.
> These were both taken near the same time. I'm trying to decide which
> I like better. It would be nice to get opinions on what you like, if
> any.
>
> http://www.daytonphoto
i don't like the shadow and the tree branch above on the first one. did you
use a polarizer on either of these shots? the vegetation looks like it is
reflecting the sky.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2005 1:35 PM
Sub
I like the second one it has a more dynamic composition.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Ok, so it is not really a matched pair, but the same mitten twice.
These were both taken near the same time. I'm trying to decide which
I like better. It would be nice to get opinions on what you like, if
any.
http
I'm for No 2, too. I like the way that there appears to be a succession
of simialr outcrops, standing guard over something to the left.
John
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:22:25 +0100, Rick Womer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
#2 gets my vote. The framing with the overhanging
branch in #1 doesn't w
0321, by far. A bit too bad the tree stump shows
having been cut. You, however, did all it was possible
to do with the scene. Excellent composition and DOF.
Don't like the peek-a-boo limb in upper right of 0318.
Needs to be connected.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so it
They are both wonderful photographs. I have been there, and know that
shooting monumnt valley if much more difficult that it might at first
appear.
Of the two, I prefer the second, #321. The foreground in both the upper
right and lower left adds interest and texture, and the sky is
wonderfu
#2 gets my vote. The framing with the overhanging
branch in #1 doesn't work for me--it somehow clashes
with the spacious feel of the rest of the image.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so it is not really a matched pair, but the same
> mitten twice.
> These were both taken
Bruce ... the second is more interesting and I think a better photo from a
compositional standpoint. The shadow on the lower right of the first photo
is not only a distraction, I think it upsets the balance of the photo.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Bruce Dayton
> These were both taken
13 matches
Mail list logo
