Hi,
Sorry, so you use K adaptall with new bodies without problems. I think about KA ones.
Alek
Użytkownik Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:38:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:38:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about
>metering, like A lenses?
I have the K Adaptall, not the KA. It works fine on my two newer
bodies. No jamming. Meters as if it were a K or an M lens
So you use safely KA adaptall with new bodies? Is it this one for sure?What about
metering, like A lenses?
Alek
Użytkownik Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote:
>
>> Maybe other members can shed some light into the Adaptall compatibility with
>>
Hi,
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 15:30:20 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So you use your without any problems on ZX5 and MZS but you
> wrote that there can be jamming problems [...]
I didn't write anything about jamming problems, since I haven't had any
with the Adaptall lenses on K-1000, LX, ZX-5, an
Hi,
I just asked about K adaptall, I am going to buy KA one!! for my Tamron 90/2.8.
So you use your without any problems on ZX5 and MZS but you wrote that there can be
jamming problems (when you mentions Pz-1p). So I hope I can safely use it on my Pz-1
and maybe in future on MZS or ZX-L for inst
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 22:04:52 -0500, Jeff wrote:
> Doug, is yours [Tamron SP 90/2.5] the K or KA version?
It's the K version, now that you mention it.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Doug, is yours the K or KA version?
Jeff.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
> On Sat, 9 Nov 2002 10:19:34 -0500, Jeff wrote:
Hi,
Thanks! I just wanted to know if I can use these adaptalls with new bodies (AF ones)
Alek
PS If you happen to get more inf. about it please drop me a line.
?ISO-8859-1?Q?Michel_Carr=E8re-G=E9e?=@UNKNOWN napisał:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
>> Hi,
>> Can I use Tamron adaptall KA on MZS or ZX-5n
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
>
> And you use KA adaptall with your manual bodies?I prefer tamron 2.8 since
it gives 1:1.What about quality o
]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM
>Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
>
>
>> I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc
>and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy
>
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Tamron adaptall KA
> I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc
and I bought Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also
I also have some manual lesnes:105/2.8, K135/2.5-not Takumar, K28/3.5 etc and I bought
Tamron SP macro 90/2.8 also manual version and plan to buy adaptall for my cameras and
wonder if it fixes for newer ones.But if it is good for PZ-1 it also should work with
newer bodies I hope.
Manual lenses a
> Hi Jeff,
> Thanks. I own Super A and PZ-1 and for these cameras according to Tamron I
can use the adaptall. But when I asked them what about newer bodies they did
not know. Where is there a problem with adaptall? PZ1 has different mount
than Z-1p?
> Why did you sell Z1p?Bought MZS or changed sy
Użytkownik Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>Hi Alek,
>I have the Tamron adaptall in the K, KA & KR versions.
>I never used either one with my now gone Z-1p. A photo sales rep mentioned
>that they were prone to jamming into the autofocus gear slot, requiring
>total disassembly of the adaptor for r
14 matches
Mail list logo
