go to the back of the classroom and behave
yourselves...
...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!?
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Too Much PAW
From: "Cotty" <
onsor" me things aren't looking to great
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 8:55 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: RE: Too Much PAW
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Fra
ursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Too Much PAW
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged:
hehe, the challenge is on!
tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
ps no wise arse comments about "fondling&
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I think I'll be
>pretty safe. Unless that is, Cotty squashes me in the back of tv's car on
>the drive to GFM!
>
>hehe...
>
>tan.
Stone the crows. I thought she was riding on the roof with a suppl
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there!
>I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ...
>
>ERN
Don't forget, one of my specialties is picturing people who don't want to
be pictured...
No worries, you'll never even know it's happen
On 25/2/04, FRANK disgorged:
>Tanya,
>
>Call hubby over to the computer right now.
>
>Show him this:
>
>http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
Oh no! - too late. Well, it was nice while she lasted...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastich
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:45 PM
Tanja said:
> OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody
photography
> list". I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you
lot
> is "saf
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Tanja said:
> >
> >
> >>OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody photography
> >>list". I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot
> >>is "safe"! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and
> >>meet
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:02:54 +0200, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
> Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss)
You're a _bad_, _bad, boy Lasse. But it's the comment I would have
made, had I been so bold, so I guess that makes me one, too. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
And a shotgun?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tanja said:
OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody photography
list". I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot
is "safe"! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and
meeting with a bun
ebruary 2004 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Too Much PAW
Tanja said:
> OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody
photography
> list". I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you
lot
> is "safe"! He is petrifi
Tanya,
Call hubby over to the computer right now.
Show him this:
http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm
It will calm any concerns he might have about the quality of people you'll
meet at GFM.
cheers,
frank
PS: I couldn't help thinking, when I read your husband's commen
On 25/2/04, TANJA THE SWEET disgorged:
>OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody photography
>list". I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot
>is "safe"! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and
>meeting with a bunch of "interne
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged:
>>
>> >hehe, the challenge is on!
>> >
>> >tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
>> >
>> >ps no wise arse comments about "fondling", ok Cotty? hehe.
>>
>> I'll let someone else have a go :-)
>>
>> Cue Lasse...
uot;, lol, his words, not mine!
You are very naughty boys, now go to the back of the classroom and behave
yourselves...
...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!?
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged:
>
> >hehe, the challenge is on!
> >
> >tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
> >
> >ps no wise arse comments about "fondling", ok Cotty? hehe.
>
> I'll let someone else have a go :-)
>
> Cue Lasse...
Yes, yes, Cotty.
On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged:
>hehe, the challenge is on!
>
>tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
>
>ps no wise arse comments about "fondling", ok Cotty? hehe.
I'll let someone else have a go :-)
Cue Lasse...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
! lol...
Cotty... HELP!!
Paul, you aren't going to be at GFM are you?!? *eek*!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Too Much PAW
I sometimes fondle as I photograph. Tha
OMG, I SO did NOT need to know that!! lol...
Cotty... HELP!!
Paul, you aren't going to be at GFM are you?!? *eek*!
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Too Much PA
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW
> Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming
> too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on
> Friday.
>
> Phtooey! I say.
Phooey agreed.
At least the PAW is on topic.
William Robb
hehe, the challenge is on!
tan. (who "fondles" AS she photographs)
ps no wise arse comments about "fondling", ok Cotty? hehe.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people
> haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk
> about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear
> and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen
> any of
On 24/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Why not make the URL to your site more noticeable by making
>it, what do you call it, a dynamic link ... y'know, with the
>"http" in front of it.
Will this make a difference? In my plain text email application
(Powermail 4.2), anything beginning with 'www
On 23/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Too Much PAW!?!?!?!?!
>
>Wow, this list is nuttier than I thought. There are threads on whisky,
>sports cars and, in the past, an incredible number of goofy
>off-topics. Now people are threatening to unsubscribe because there are
&g
Hi,
Why not make the URL to your site more noticeable by making
it, what do you call it, a dynamic link ... y'know, with the
"http" in front of it.
I agree about the community feel to this list.
shel
Cotty wrote:
> I haven't participated because I have a web site with galleries on it,
> and th
On 23/2/04, SHEL disgorged:
>I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people
>haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk
>about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear
>and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen
>any of those good, high-t
Hi!
Shel, I agree with you - "The Spice Must Flow!"
Boris
eeing the work of others who I don't see much
from! I say, keep PAW alive!!
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROT
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
hehehe, from fairygirl who is feeling a trifle hippyesque today (well, I WAS
born in the 70s!)...
That means you should be a hard-bitten, cynical member of Generation-X,
surely? ;-)
S
On 23 Feb 2004 at 17:59, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment
> that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going
> to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said
> anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his
> decision .
born in the 70s!)...
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 11:59 AM
To: PDML
Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW
Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming
too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on
Frid
Shel, I think we're finding the answer to the question you posed when you
started this...
"Are you photographers or equipment fondlers? Let's find out ;-))
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PAW
Party Poopers:-)
I think this is great. A new rush so to speak has happened.I can finally show some of
my
Nikon and
Yashica Mat camera pic's that i like, that cannot go on the PUG.Others have shown pic's
from film and
digi cameras that are non Pentax too.
I find this very refreshing.
The
Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming
too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on
Friday.
Phtooey! I say. The pics should come as the mood strikes
you, when you have a good one you want to share, or when you
have one you're looking for comments about. And why just
on
34 matches
Mail list logo
