Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-04 Thread Walt
On 1/4/2013 6:35 AM, John Sessoms wrote: From: Larry Colen On Jan 3, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Are we going to have another ridiculous this vs that feud now? Digital vs Film, aperture coupler vs none, Windows vs Mac KY vs Bengay? Products for two entirely different proble

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-04 Thread John Sessoms
From: Larry Colen On Jan 3, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Are we going to have another ridiculous this vs that feud now? Digital vs Film, aperture coupler vs none, Windows vs Mac KY vs Bengay? Products for two entirely different problems. You do *NOT* want to get them mixed u

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-04 Thread Boris Liberman
We don't need to funny brackets... First version just works on my Thunderbird 17.0 Portable under Win7. On 1/2/2013 11:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote: As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a plain URL in the email: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8339725404/

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Larry Colen wrote: >> The browser you're using is broken shit, Larry. > > Not browser, email client. And it's not a piece of shit, but it does have a > bug. ... Yes, I realized that after I hit the send button. Slip o the fingers... No big deal to me. I get broke

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-03 Thread steve harley
on 2013-01-03 15:23 Larry Colen wrote It seems that no matter how you format the URL, it'll break something. one solution is to always use a shortener (e.g. bitly); these URLs are too short for most clients to mess them up, they do obfuscate … -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net h

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-03 Thread Larry Colen
On Jan 3, 2013, at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > Are we going to have another ridiculous this vs that feud now? Digital > vs Film, aperture coupler vs none, Windows vs Mac KY vs Bengay? > ... Now Android vs > iOS? Huh? I think you're the only one seeing that as a debate in this. It was

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-03 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:05 PM, steve harley wrote: > on 2013-01-02 14:22 Larry Colen wrote > >> As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a >> plain URL in the email: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8339725404/ > > > it depends on the URL, and the sender

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-03 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
Are we going to have another ridiculous this vs that feud now? Digital vs Film, aperture coupler vs none, Windows vs Mac ... Now Android vs iOS? The browser you're using is broken shit, Larry. Get a new browser, or live with it. Life is imperfect. G -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com --

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread knarftheria...@gmail.com
I chose Android because that's what they gave me at work. Cheers, frank --- Original Message --- From: William Robb Sent: January 2, 2013 1/2/13 To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Subject: Re: URL format in posts - Original Message - From: "Larry Colen" S

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Larry Colen" Subject: Re: URL format in posts Nope. I chose Android over iOS because I find the iOS UI unusable. I chose Android because it's what Tom C uses... William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread Larry Colen
On Jan 2, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Bruce Walker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:19 PM, John Francis wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:22:01PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote: >>> As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a >>> plain URL in the email: >>> >>> http://www.fl

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread steve harley
on 2013-01-02 15:19 John Francis wrote This should also work as a way to get to that same URL: < http://www.w3.org/Addressing/ URL/5.1_Wrappers.html > that fails as received Thunderbird, probably because you are not using format=flowed; it might have worked if the brackets weren't spaced fro

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread steve harley
on 2013-01-02 14:22 Larry Colen wrote As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a plain URL in the email: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8339725404/ it depends on the URL, and the sender, as well as the recipient; your example is too easy — long URLs or

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread Bruce Walker
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:19 PM, John Francis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:22:01PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote: >> As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a >> plain URL in the email: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8339725404/ >> >> So, people have

Re: URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread John Francis
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:22:01PM -0800, Larry Colen wrote: > As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a > plain URL in the email: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8339725404/ > > So, people have taken to enclosing them in angle brackets: >

URL format in posts

2013-01-02 Thread Larry Colen
As I understand it, I guess that some people have a problem with posting a plain URL in the email: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8339725404/ So, people have taken to enclosing them in angle brackets: which show up in the browser on my