Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-16 Thread pnstenquist
Uneven mats don't bother me. Sometimes I prefer them. Precut mats are now widely available in sizes that fit the digital frame. I mount most of my full -frame digital pics with 11 x 17 mats, which are now widely available. In a 16 x 24 frame, the mat area is uneven but the results are attractiv

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-16 Thread John Coyle
TED]> To: "'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'" Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 4:38 AM Subject: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody > I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What > makes people think they have to cr

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-16 Thread David Mann
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Uneven mats don't bother me. Sometimes I prefer them. Picture framers almost always make the mat a little bigger at the bottom. Apparently even matting makes the pic look a little too low in the frame for some reason. It also gives spa

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-17 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Bob W wrote: > > I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What > makes people think they have to crop the image to fit the paper? > > To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard > and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-17 Thread graywolf
That does have the benefit, Ann, that all the prints are the same size which simplifies filing a bunch. It happens to be my way of doing things too. All finished prints smaller than 8.5x11 are printed on 8.5x11 centered on the paper. In the old old old days I printed on roll-paper. Cut off enou

RE: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-17 Thread Bob W
That's almost what I intend to do. Although I haven't mounted any of my prints yet I plan to get pre-cut mattes in 3:2 and 4:3 ratios as appropriate, in standard paper and frame sizes, and print to fit the matte-hole. This depends on me always shooting to the aspect ratio of course, which is what

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-17 Thread Doug Franklin
Ann Sanfedele wrote: > Actually, just leave a substantial border around it and cut > the MAT to fit the image :) I'll cut the inner hole in the mat to fit the image, but I'll also cut the outer edge of the mat to fit a standard frame size because the non-standard frames are either terribly expens

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-17 Thread David Mann
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:03 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote: > When I showed, I always had someone else cut the mats - > anyone who has witnessed what a klutz I am would agree I should do > that. I'm not too fond of cutting mats as there's very little room for error. It'd be a lot easier with the right

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-18 Thread David Mann
On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > I'll cut the inner hole in the mat to fit the image, but I'll also cut > the outer edge of the mat to fit a standard frame size because the > non-standard frames are either terribly expensive or I have to make > them > myself, including cuttin

Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MPbody

2006-08-18 Thread Doug Franklin
David Mann wrote: > On Aug 18, 2006, at 12:01 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > >> [...] mat to fit a standard frame size because the non- >> standard frames are either terribly expensive or I have >> to make them myself, including cutting the glass. > > Cutting the glass is the best part :) Just make