Bruce Dayton wrote:
So, my question is - are the limited lenses truly worth it? Beyond
the cachet of owning one - will there be a marked improvement in my
images?
I used the 31mm once when I borrowed Cesar's for a few hours. I almost
forgot to return it. Honestly, (except the Canon
On Jun 24, 2006, at 2:18 PM, Christian wrote:
I used the 31mm once when I borrowed Cesar's for a few hours. I
almost
forgot to return it. Honestly, (except the Canon 600/4 IS :-) ),
the
31 Limited was the best freakin' lens I ever touched. It is a
mechanical jewel with optical
At one time, I owned the 43mm Limited. While it was mechanically very
nice, I can't say that it was obviously an optically better lens than
the FA 50/1.4. But it costs twice as much.
The 31 limited costs about 2-3 times as much as the FA 35/2. Again,
how much - if any - better is it optically?
P.S. Complicating things, it is just possible that there is a DA 30 F??
in the wings.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Here's some thoughts per Boris' post (on making images
communicate clearly) a couple of weeks ago:
Composition can be used to convey ideas about a person. Per the
re-braodcast on PBS (US Public Broadcasting) yesterday:
When Billy Graham first
On 11/4/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
If you havn't noticed
On 10/4/06, Gabriel Cain, discombobulated, unleashed:
is a regular joke (I believe) from Cotty.
No joke!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11. april 2006 09:25
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Thoughts on cameras, and a PESO (was Re: OT Nother test)
On 11/4/06, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed
I've always found the comment to be somewhat insulting and not at all
funny. I've mentioned it to Cotty, but hey, he likes it and no one else
has complained, so WTF. Now there's two of us ... not that that will
change anything.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Tim Øsleby
Seriously, Cotty.
It's a real but anachronistic and/or vernacular word. It means disorientated.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/04/11 Tue PM 01:25:52 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Thoughts on cameras, and a PESO (was Re: OT Nother test)
Sorry. Forgot, Cotty never makes jokes
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Thoughts on cameras, and a PESO (was Re: OT Nother test)
Sorry. Forgot, Cotty never makes jokes, that’s part of his act ;-)
Seriously, Cotty. Are you serious? As I read your heading it is a friendly
insult. Have I got it completely wrong?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
On Apr 11, 2006, at 7:42 AM, mike wilson spake thus:
It's a real but anachronistic and/or vernacular word. It means
disorientated.
Discomfitted and disconcerted are other elements of being
discombobulated. I've always just ignored it as it means as much as
spake thus in the context of
It seemed pretty apt for my 20D comment. ;^) I didn't take it as an insult.
Or not more than a friendly one, anyway.
Gabriel
graywolf wrote:
Means confused
discombobulate
discombobulate (dîs´kem-bòb´ye-lât´) verb, transitive
discombobulated, discombobulating, discombobulates
To
: Gabriel Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11. april 2006 18:28
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Thoughts on cameras, and a PESO (was Re: OT Nother test)
It seemed pretty apt for my 20D comment. ;^) I didn't take it as an
insult.
Or not more than a friendly one, anyway
Cotty wrote:
Yo Gabriel.
Cotty in England.
Leave that home page just like it is - minimalist works!
Thanks. I decided on a minimalistic approach due to wanting it to be
simple and straight-forward. :-) I'm glad it works.
mike wilson wrote:
Indeed. Best one I've seen for ages. But
On 10/4/06, Gabriel Cain, discombobulated, unleashed:
notably the 20D
with a full 36mm x 24mm sensor
That's the 5D or the 1Ds Gabe.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Cotty wrote:
On 10/4/06, Gabriel Cain, discombobulated, unleashed:
That's the 5D or the 1Ds Gabe.
*face palm* That's true. Very discombobulated.
Gabriel
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Cain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10. april 2006 18:56
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Thoughts on cameras, and a PESO (was Re: OT Nother test)
Cotty wrote:
On 10/4/06
with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenitar_k_fisheye_lens.htm
Nothing against the Zenitar 16/2.6 fisheye, but there ~are~ other Russian
K-mount lenses. So, in the spirit of the thread's title, are there any
thoughts on [other] Russian K-mounts?
Fred
I have one and enjoy its curvilinear distortion. I also have the
DA14, which I prefer for most of my ultrawide work, but the Zeni is a
very very good lens for something that costs $140 or less, new. Two
of my favorites so far:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/25p.htm
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenitar_k_fisheye_lens.htm
Peace,
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
Roman wrote:
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenitar_k_fisheye_lens.htm
Peace,
Dave Brooks and Frank both have it, I've seen some excellent stuff from
both of them.
-Adam
Yes I have one. On the D the FOV of a defished zenitar and rectilinear
16 mm on the 16-45 are almost identical. The 16-45 is much much
better.
The zenitar fisheye effect is only of interest on analog bodies.
Toine
On 3/25/06, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar
- Original Message -
From: Roman
Subject: Thoughts on Russian K-mounts, any?
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
I had one for a while. It's actually quite a good lens. I think Frank has it
now.
William Robb
Here's a sample:
http://360.leende.net/zenitar/test.jpg
I don't have a similar shot from the 16-45. Contrast of the 16-45 is
better and the zenitar is non SMC. The zenitar price is :)
On 3/25/06, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes I have one. On the D the FOV of a defished zenitar and
Some thoughts and links here – http://mac.tidings.nu/PinkyPentax/
Z16mmFE.shtml
Regards,
Bertil
Toine wrote:
Here's a sample:
http://360.leende.net/zenitar/test.jpg
I don't have a similar shot from the 16-45. Contrast of the 16-45 is
better and the zenitar is non SMC. The zenitar price is :)
I've played with Frank's Zenitar 16mm fisheye and I'll confirm this
general assessment. Flares
Yes.
I bought mine from this company. Good to deal with. Sent my 16mm by
airmail. Three weeks to my house.
I recommend this outfit, They didi a good deal with me.
Dave
Quoting Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
Exactly why i bought it Mark.
$180 Canadian for my P mount. Keep it out of the sun and its great,
Dave
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Toine wrote:
Here's a sample:
http://360.leende.net/zenitar/test.jpg
I don't have a similar shot from the 16-45. Contrast of the 16-45 is
better
i used to have one. it's great on film, and pretty much useless on D.
best,
mishka
On 3/25/06, Roman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenitar_k_fisheye_lens.htm
Peace,
--
home
http://photonotes.org/reviews/zenitar-fisheye/
Anyone has any experience with Zenitar 16mm/f2.8 K-Mount fisheye lense?
http://www.rugift.com/photocameras/zenitar_k_fisheye_lens.htm
Nothing against the Zenitar 16/2.6 fisheye, but there ~are~ other Russian
K-mount lenses. So, in the spirit of the thread's title, are there any
thoughts
Since I've got some time on my hands,
(recently
retired yet called back to
consult) I thought I'd give my thoughts on a few of the images in the March
Pug that caught my eye.
Sun on Canoes - Dave Brooks - I would like this more if there were sun
Ken, thanks for commenting on the PUG.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March, 2006 7:42 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: March PUG is open - my thoughts
Since I've got some time on my hands, (recently retired yet
called
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I've got some time on my hands, (recently retired yet
called back to
consult) I thought I'd give my thoughts on a few of the images
in the March
Pug that caught my eye.
Metal Landscape - Gianfranco Irlando - imaginative
original
Hi Ken
Since I've got some time on my hands, (recently retired yet called back to
consult) I thought I'd give my thoughts on a few of the images in the March
Pug that caught my eye.
Ripples - Henk Terhell - good eye execution
Field - Jens Bladt - My kind of image - good eye execution
Dew - Dag
Thanks for commenting on the Pug, Ken. I have to agree about Ann's pic
from Scottsdale. Excellent shot.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2006, at 1:41 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Since I've got some time on my hands, (recently retired yet called
back to consult) I thought I'd give my thoughts on a few
Hi!
Anti Pattern - Boris Liberman - I especially like the dichotomy of the
green cactus the orange citrus
Thanks, Ken. It is was rather desperate submission, since I did not find
any particularly patterned photographs of mine ;-).
The citrus is probably orange...
Boris
Hi,
I'm a newcomer to the DSLR world having recently
bought a used *istDS body along with a SMC-A 50/1.7.
Luckily, thanks to this mailing list and its archives
as well as the Pentax DSLR forum on DPReview, many
helpful comments have guided my equipment selection.
Right now, I'm looking for a
Yuan-Juhn Chiao wrote on 03.01.06 11:42:
Right now, I'm looking for a decent budget wide-angle
zoom to cover. I would spring for the 16-45, but at
430 Euros, it's simply too much. I could obtain the
original *istD kit lens (FAJ 18-35) new for around 100
Euros, around the cost of the current
No, it's not really that bad. For the price it's pretty good, and might
even exceed your expectations. However, at that price, your expectations
should not be sky high!
John
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 10:42:57 -, Yuan-Juhn Chiao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm a newcomer to the
However, for the same money, the 18-55 is a better lens. Unless you also
want a ultra-wide zoom with no aperture ring for a film body (the 18-55
on covers 24-55 on a film body).
-Adam
John Forbes wrote:
No, it's not really that bad. For the price it's pretty good, and
might even exceed
I suppose that, about the 40 DA, it's not that it doesn't cover the
full frame, but maybe it's quality is too poor on the edge to qualify
it as a full frame lens.
but then, I'm just guessing
danilo.
On Sep 29, 2005, at 9:37 AM, danilo wrote:
I suppose that, about the 40 DA, it's not that it doesn't cover the
full frame, but maybe it's quality is too poor on the edge to qualify
it as a full frame lens.
but then, I'm just guessing
From the examples I've seen with the DA40, it is at least
Subject: Re: my after-wishlist thoughts
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:08:10 -0700
On Sep 29, 2005, at 9:37 AM, danilo wrote:
I suppose that, about the 40 DA, it's not that it doesn't cover the
full frame, but maybe it's quality is too poor on the edge to qualify
it as a full frame lens.
but then, I'm
On Sep 29, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Tom C wrote:
The DA 40 is the one Pentax lens I'm remotely curious about,
largely because of its form factor.
Does anyone have anecdotal, or otherwise, evidence about it's
performance?
A friend on the PAW list has one and has shown several photos which
I remember having seen sample images posted on the list, a side by side
comparison to the M 40/2.8, if I remember well.
Pancho
Tom C schrieb:
The DA 40 is the one Pentax lens I'm remotely curious about, largely
because of its form factor.
Does anyone have anecdotal, or otherwise, evidence
Thursday, September 29, 2005, 7:57:49 PM, Pancho wrote:
PH I remember having seen sample images posted on the list, a side by side
PH comparison to the M 40/2.8, if I remember well.
PH Pancho
Yes, I recall seeing them too. I think they were from IstD, and the DA
40 showed better contrast (more)
That was me. You can see them at:
http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardins/
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/29/05 1:57 PM
I remember having seen sample images
Thank Steve and Godfrey. Much appreciated. You may enablers.
Tom C.
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: my after-wishlist thoughts
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 14:19:26 -0400
That was me. You can see them
...about the full frame sensor issue, or at least one with lower crop
factor: Pentax has started the line of DA lenses designed for use on
DSLR only, with a smaller image circle. has any owner of these lenses
ever tried out on a film body how big the decrease in image circle
really is? I
David Volkert wrote on 13.03.05 9:49:
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range). Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot of action so
auto focus speed is really important to me
SP I tried both on Nikon D70. Tokina has worse sharpness than Sigma at open
SP apertures and has much higher chromatic aberrations (probably because Tokina
SP uses just 1 ED element while Sigma 4). And Sigma has much faster AF thanks
SP to true IF, is lighter despite having very good build quality
Frantisek wrote on 14.03.05 13:24:
I too found out a lot of purple fringes - I attributed it to flare
though. God knows what it was. But remember that the Sigma in Nikon
mount uses HSM - their equivalent of ultrasonic motors. These do make
the focusing a lot faster, especially on a body with
Monday, March 14, 2005, 1:39:46 PM, Sylwester wrote:
SP Frantisek wrote on 14.03.05 13:24:
I too found out a lot of purple fringes - I attributed it to flare
though. God knows what it was. But remember that the Sigma in Nikon
mount uses HSM - their equivalent of ultrasonic motors. These do
Frantisek wrote on 14.03.05 16:10:
Interesting :-) So much about the hype of ultrasonic motors. They can
do just as well with normal ones.
Yes, it seems so. Maybe the difference could be seen more clearly when we'd
compare bigger lenses with heavier mass to move? For me the only good side
of
- Original Message -
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk
Subject: Re: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
- I really don't know why
Canon has downgraded perfectly damped mirror from 10D :-( Costs
cutting???
Their customers want their manly cameras to sound like manly cameras.
Really.
William Robb
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range). Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot of action so
auto focus speed is really important to me. Thanks for your help,
-David
:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range).
Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot
At 07:55 2005.03.13 -0500, you wrote:
From: David Volkert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm looking into buying either
I have the manual focus version of the Tokina (ATX).
I like it a lot.
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Volkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 2:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
I'm looking into buying either
CRB You can't go wrong with the Tokina.
CRB Solid construction and fine optics.
I have had bad luck with several 20-35/2.8 ATX tokina I tried - really
soft up to 5.6 (due to spherical aberation and coma)
Which was a pity - I would like that fast while compact lens.
It might be that all were bad
it a lot.
Don
-Original Message-
From: David Volkert [mailto:[EMAIL mailto:%5BEMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 2:49 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens
This one time, at band camp, David Volkert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range). Do
any of you have thoughts on either of them? I shoot alot of action so
auto focus
Both are reputed to be good. I have the Sigma and would say that it is
superb, even wide open.
The Sigma rates better on Photodo. You might query Photozone also.
According to Photodo, the Sigma is actually sharpest at the long end,
while the Tokina is sharper at 80 and 135 than at 200 -- but
]
To: pdml pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: Re: 80-200mm 2.8 Lenses Thoughts
Both are reputed to be good. I have the Sigma and would say that it is
superb, even wide open.
The Sigma rates better on Photodo. You might query Photozone also.
According to Photodo
. Overall it is better
at f/4 than f/2.8 at any f stop.
HTH,
Bruce
Sunday, March 13, 2005, 12:49:19 AM, you wrote:
DV I'm looking into buying either the Sigma 70-200mm 2.8 or the Tokina
DV 80-200mm 2.8 lens (the Pentax version is way out of my price range). Do
DV any of you have thoughts on either
I go out to a lot of rock shows and take pictures. (plug: the most recent
stuff is always at http://www.livejournal.com/users/ouij/). It's a lot of
fun, and people have been very positive about my work thus far.
Tonight, I went to a show and decided not to bring the camera.
It was nice to
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:16:02 -0500, Luigi de Guzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip ...I really do like just being able to go to a show and hang out
without having to worry about whether I'm underexposing by two-thirds of a
stop, or whether or not I'm focused correctly.snip
I don't worry about
Sometimes, you just have to relax and let go--even though
often it's the
hardest thing to do.
Good observation, Luigi. And nice blog, by the way!
Last summer, we went to a free waterfront concert of the Black Keys, a
two-piece blues band. It was early evening but it was a cloudless day and
Very nice photographs. It seem this is the camera for you!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 22. januar 2005 14:38
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: *istDS - first thoughts
Popped up some
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 21:28:18 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice pics and report Derby.
I concur with my friend from Oxford.
-frank
PS: that ~is~ where you live, right?
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 23/1/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
PS: that ~is~ where you live, right?
Close enough mate ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Hi Derby
Thanks for the thoughts and images.
Glad to see you obviously enjoy it so much, and are able to use it so
well.
Cheers,
Simon (*ist-DS owner of four weeks)
-Original Message-
From: Derby Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 22 January 2005 9:38 PM
To: Pentax
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
D
Really nice shots, Derby. I like the portrait. BTW did you ever consider
buying the *istD instead?
Peter, Sweden
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
D
Interesting read. Some nice shots too.
Paul
On Jan 22, 2005, at 8:38 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
D
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
What lenses did you use, Derby? (Presumably you didn't use the 43 for all
of them, or did you?) Thanks.
I did take notice of your MEF acquisition. So, you've
Nice selection of pictures, Derby. Thanks for sharing!
Tim
On 1/22/05 5:38, Derby Chang wrote:
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
D
Derby Chang posted
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
On your website you bemoan the lack of a gripstrap available for the DS like
the one for the PZ-1. You're half right.
Pentax doesn't have
On 23/1/05, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
Popped up some random thoughts about my first weekend with the *istDS.
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc/1st_DS/first_shots.htm
Nice pics and report Derby.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
Very nice pictures!
I use the Hakuba Grip-LH ($19 at BH) with my DS. Put it on as
soon as I bought the camera and have not yet taken it off. I
filed off its little registration stop and angle it a little
forward on the base, that gives me a perfect hand strap. The
grip's base blocks the battery
Peter wrote:
Really nice shots, Derby. I like the portrait. BTW did you ever consider
buying the *istD instead?
Peter, Sweden
Thanks Peter,
Yep I did consider it. But after looking around for a bit, it seems the
D is discontinued, in Australia at least. In fact the shop where I
bought the DS
ERNR wrote:
Sorry to hear you haven't been feeling well, and good to see you back (hope
it's not just a brief visit)
Too early to say.
Last night a flash jumped off the top of my Program
Plus.
I'm trying to picture this. And failing. Would you have time to elaborate?
It was dark and
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. december 2004 11:26
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Composition Thoughts and an Unfortunate Event
ERNR wrote:
Sorry to hear you
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 01:44:53 -0500 (EST), D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Last night a flash jumped off the top of my Program
Plus. It took the flash shoe with it. This is not
a danger I knew to expect -- a body shedding its
shoe and dumping the flash on the ground. I'm not
It's not hard to
I frequently print portraits as 11x17 or 8x12. That way you can compose
in the viewfinder.
Paul
On Dec 4, 2004, at 1:44 AM, D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Sorry I've been so quie^H^H^H^Habsent lately. I've not
been feeling well enough to keep all the usual balls in
the air, and PDML is one that got
On 4/12/04, D. Glenn Arthur Jr., discombobulated, unleashed:
I dunno, the idea of shooting 5x7 or 8x10 in the first
place sounds more and more tempting. But short of a
complete format change, I'm going to have to come up
with some tricks to help me remember to plan for
cropping when I shoot
Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So your summer is about three days long.?
LOL.
Three lng days...:-)
One of my dreams is to spend a week of holiday in December at Svalbard
(Spitsbergen)http://www.svalbard.com/infosvalbard.html to experience
Sorry I've been so quie^H^H^H^Habsent lately. I've not
been feeling well enough to keep all the usual balls in
the air, and PDML is one that got dropped for a while.
(Once or twice a day I eyeball the subject lines quickly...)
Last night a flash jumped off the top of my Program
Plus. It took
Quoting D. Glenn Arthur Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Sorry I've been so quie^H^H^H^Habsent lately. I've not
been feeling well enough to keep all the usual balls in
the air []
Sorry to hear you haven't been feeling well, and good to see you back (hope
it's not just a brief visit)
Last night
Henri Toivonen wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Fred Widall wrote:
Actually Frank and myself live at (approx) 43.5 N, 80.5 W
so we're actually closer to the Equator than the North Pole. A couple
of hours drive north of here on the way to a place called Tobermory,
there's a road sign marking the 45th
mike wilson wrote:
Henri Toivonen wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
Fred Widall wrote:
Actually Frank and myself live at (approx) 43.5 N, 80.5 W
so we're actually closer to the Equator than the North Pole. A couple
of hours drive north of here on the way to a place called Tobermory,
there's a road sign
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So your summer is about three days long.?
LOL.
Three lng days...:-)
One of my dreams is to spend a week of holiday in December at Svalbard
(Spitsbergen)http://www.svalbard.com/infosvalbard.html to experience
the dark
Your point?
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Peter J. Alling Subject: Re:
Random PUG Thoughts
It helps to live near the Arctic circle.
I live near North Dakota.
William Robb
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 23:09:27 -0600
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: Random PUG Thoughts
It helps to live near the Arctic circle.
I live near North Dakota.
William Robb
Close enough.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Actually Frank and myself live at (approx) 43.5 N, 80.5 W
so we're actually closer to the Equator than the North Pole. A couple
of hours drive north of here on the way to a place called Tobermory,
there's a road sign marking the 45th parallel.
We do get lots of snow though :)
- Original Message -
From: Fred Widall
Subject: Re: Random PUG Thoughts
Actually Frank and myself live at (approx) 43.5 N, 80.5 W
so we're actually closer to the Equator than the North Pole. A
couple
of hours drive north of here on the way to a place called
Tobermory,
there's a road
Ah, a name from my childhood.
We were on a family vacation, probably 40 years ago, and we took a
ferry crossing, I think from Tobermory, not sure of the name of the
other end now.
We were on our way to Seaforth to visit an aunt and uncle.
William
Fred Widall mused:
Actually Frank and myself live at (approx) 43.5 N, 80.5 W
so we're actually closer to the Equator than the North Pole. A couple
of hours drive north of here on the way to a place called Tobermory,
Is that anywhere near Barrington?
Yes, you may be closer to the Equator than to the Pole, at 43.5° N
you're a bit closer to the Arctic Circle 66.5° N
than to the Equator.
Fred Widall wrote:
Actually Frank and myself live at (approx) 43.5 N, 80.5 W
so we're actually closer to the Equator than the North Pole. A couple
of hours
901 - 1000 of 1375 matches
Mail list logo
