[PEN-L:3836] Re: rationality

1995-01-18 Thread Jim Devine
On Wed, 18 Jan 1995 08:02:13 -0800 kevin quinn said: >This is in response to Robin's comments on rationality. > >I agree with Robin that institutions shape the selves whose lives >they structure, and in this context that the instrumentally rational agents >that people rational choice models tend

[PEN-L:3835] Re: child care & the market

1995-01-18 Thread Justin Schwartz
On Wed, 18 Jan 1995, Doug Henwood wrote: > On another list, an irrepressible born-again market enthusiast we'll call > only H.G., after dismissing public jobs programs as "a joke" and "a waste > of money," declared that government should do no more than finance child > care, not provide it - prov

[PEN-L:3834] Re: Statement by Women Academics on Welfare

1995-01-18 Thread Elaine Bernard
As one of the women academic signers of the letter on welfare, I don't think it's purpose was to segregate women (least of all women economists). It was a statement by academic women (better yet, Doug, you might ask the class question of why academic women) who have either studied welfare or are

[PEN-L:3833] Starbucks and Guatemala

1995-01-18 Thread Matt Zeidenberg
I'm posting this for Erich Hahn, U.S./GLEP Wake Up, Starbucks! As part of its national campaign to persuade Starbucks Coffee Company to adopt a code of conduct, the U.S./Guatemala Labor Education Project (U.S./GLEP) is trying to locate college and university campuses where Starbucks coffee is

[PEN-L:3832] PWT5.6 now available

1995-01-18 Thread Doug Henwood
>Date: Wed, 18 Jan 95 17:56:49 EST >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Precedence: bulk >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Feenberg) >Subject: PWT5.6 now available >X-Comment: Penn-World Tables Discussion List > >Version 5.6 of the Penn World Table

[PEN-L:3831] Re: child care & the market

1995-01-18 Thread BILL MITCHELL
>On another list, an irrepressible born-again market enthusiast we'll call >only H.G., after dismissing public jobs programs as "a joke" and "a waste >of money," declared that government should do no more than finance child >care, not provide it - provision being best left to private providers. In

[PEN-L:3830] Re: child care & the market

1995-01-18 Thread Teresa Amott
As we know, the state does a pretty decent job providing health care -- socialized medicine -- to the military. The Military Child Care Program is also quite good. After some widely publicized scandals, the military got their act together in training, certifying, and paying child care workers, s

[PEN-L:3829] Re: rationality

1995-01-18 Thread Robin Hahnel
I have no disagreements with Kevin Quinn's recent posting at all. The reason I want to see what kind of behavior different institutions promote is that I want to "choose" what kind of person I would rather become. But the way to know what kind of agent is going to "go with" a particular institutio

[PEN-L:3828] Re: rationality

1995-01-18 Thread Robin Hahnel
The essential issue, I believe, is whether or not particular social institutions promote socially productive or socially unproductive behavior. [I'm sure we could argue for a while about how to define what is socially productive and unproductive, but let's assume we could agree on that for the mom

[PEN-L:3827] Re: child care & the market

1995-01-18 Thread Robert Naiman
I'd like to point out that here in Champaign County, the Champaign County Nursing Home which as its name implies operates under government authority has a day care program which has been quite successful, in terms of 1) having more demand for participation than they have physical space 2) reducing

[PEN-L:3826] Re: New Party piece

1995-01-18 Thread Edward Ian Robinson
Bravo, Elaine. My thoughts exactly. Ian Robinson On Wed, 18 Jan 1995, Elaine Bernard wrote: > Come'on Doug, play nice. In the same spirit that I took up > J. Case, I'm sure you don't mean CP as a term of endearment. > Play nice boys! There's some real politics here, so cut out > the red ba

[PEN-L:3825] Re: New Party piece

1995-01-18 Thread Doug Henwood
At 4:44 AM 1/18/95, Elaine Bernard wrote: >Come'on Doug, play nice. In the same spirit that I took up >J. Case, I'm sure you don't mean CP as a term of endearment. >Play nice boys! There's some real politics here, so cut out >the red baiting bullshit. I'm not redbaiting at all, I'm describing a

[PEN-L:3824] child care & the market

1995-01-18 Thread Doug Henwood
On another list, an irrepressible born-again market enthusiast we'll call only H.G., after dismissing public jobs programs as "a joke" and "a waste of money," declared that government should do no more than finance child care, not provide it - provision being best left to private providers. In an

[PEN-L:3823] Re: Statement by Women Academics on Welfare

1995-01-18 Thread Doug Henwood
I am mystified why a message on welfare signed by women economists is particularly useful. It doesn't go against gender stereotyping; welfare is typically thought of as a "women's" issue, squishy and bleedingheartish, unlike big macro thinking or rigorously tiny microthinking. It would be news if

[PEN-L:3822] Exports

1995-01-18 Thread David Ranney
One point about exports that has not been discussed much is the idea that the proceeds from exports do not necessarily end up at the point of origin or even the country of origin. If a transnational corporation uses a developing country as an export platform, that benefits the firm but not the

[PEN-L:3821] Re: Cohen and Historical Materialism

1995-01-18 Thread Justin Schwartz
On Wed, 18 Jan 1995, Jim Devine wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jan 1995 10:40:32 -0800 Justin Schwartz said: > >On Mon, 16 Jan 1995, Jim Devine wrote: > >> Justin, on your reference to G.A. Cohen's reconstruction of historical > >> materialism, I would add the adjective "failed." He produced a > >> tech

[PEN-L:3820] Re: rationality

1995-01-18 Thread kevin quinn
This is in response to Robin's comments on rationality. I agree with Robin that institutions shape the selves whose lives they structure, and in this context that the instrumentally rational agents that people rational choice models tend to be produced by the universal reign of markets. I thi

[PEN-L:3819] Re: New Party piece

1995-01-18 Thread JDCASE
I would happily plead guilty to Stalinism if I weren't sure that Stalin was more of a Trotskyist than and Leninist...but Elaine is right that the debate in THESE terms is moot until the next revolutionary upheaval. In fact it obscures the truth which my story of the strike was meant to tell --

[PEN-L:3818] Re: New Party

1995-01-18 Thread Trond Andresen
A question from far away: Is _any_ radical party project in the U.S. at all feasible in the sense of aspiring to a majority vote, when mass media are so perverted as they are in the U.S.? I confess that I really am a pessimist on this issue. You have a hen-an-egg-problem: To achieve the fairly

[PEN-L:3817] Re: New Party piece

1995-01-18 Thread Elaine Bernard
Come'on Doug, play nice. In the same spirit that I took up J. Case, I'm sure you don't mean CP as a term of endearment. Play nice boys! There's some real politics here, so cut out the red baiting bullshit. I think the real CP, Trotskyist, New Left, American Left legacy is ignoring political dif

[PEN-L:3816] Re: Cohen and Historical Materialism

1995-01-18 Thread Jim Devine
On Mon, 16 Jan 1995 10:40:32 -0800 Justin Schwartz said: >On Mon, 16 Jan 1995, Jim Devine wrote: >> Justin, on your reference to G.A. Cohen's reconstruction of historical >> materialism, I would add the adjective "failed." He produced a >> technological-determinist theory of history that differs